T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2515.1 | | WOTVAX::DODD | | Wed May 08 1996 10:57 | 14 |
| With regard to Volvo - no.
Saab do a low pressure turbo, also termed EcoPower and a full turbo. It
depends how much boost the turbo gives. Whether it is pressure or
volume I don't know. What I do know is that one ends up with three
options on Saab 9000:-
2.0l non turbo. Absolutely useless.
2.0 LPT or Eco Much improved performance. Adequate for normal use.
Full turbo, maybe only on 2.3 but I think on 2.0. Whoosh.
My wife lets me drive hers at times, LPT that is.
Andrew
|
2515.2 | | AIMTEC::BURDEN_D | A bear in his natural habitat | Wed May 08 1996 19:06 | 11 |
| Typically a LPT would be used on an engine with a close to normal
compression ratio, and designed to be in use most of the time. A
'normal' turbo would mean the compression ratio of the engine is lowered,
which means less power before the turbo kicks in. It would also result
in a larger power surge once the turbo spins up.
The LPT is designed to add more power (but not gobs of power) over a
broader rev range. It would also not spin as fast, so should last longer
than a normal turbo.
Dave
|
2515.3 | | CGOOA::NAKAGAWA | | Wed May 08 1996 23:30 | 5 |
| If remember right, pressure goes up to only 0.4psi and works from
almost idle speed. This is SAAB's case, I didn't know Volvo had it.
mn
|
2515.4 | psi or bar? | AIMTEC::STDBKR::Burden_d | Keep Cool with Coolidge | Wed May 08 1996 23:45 | 4 |
| Would that be 0.4 bar instead of 0.4 psi? 0.4 bar would be about 6psi... What
does a typical turbo run at?
Dave
|
2515.5 | "bar" | CGOOA::NAKAGAWA | | Thu May 09 1996 07:32 | 9 |
| It's "BAR" not psi, my mistake.
I knew something didn't look right when I was typing.
Normal turbo(SAAB's case again) would be at 0.75 bar to 1.0 bar
depend on temperaure and octane.
mn
|
2515.6 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Thu May 09 1996 11:01 | 4 |
| Shoudln't that be 1.4 bar? Seems odd that a turbo would provide lower than
atmospheric pressure...
Chris.
|
2515.7 | | WOTVAX::DODD | | Thu May 09 1996 11:07 | 5 |
| The man did say "goes up by".
Just blowing in the wind.
Andrew
|
2515.8 | | KERNEL::IMBIERSKIT | Good frames, Bad frames... | Fri May 10 1996 10:58 | 3 |
| No, he said "goes up to only.."
TonyI$pedantic 8*)
|
2515.9 | | WOTVAX::DODD | | Fri May 10 1996 12:14 | 3 |
| Oh yes.
Andrew
|
2515.10 | | CGOOA::NAKAGAWA | | Fri May 10 1996 18:39 | 10 |
| >>Shoudln't that be 1.4 bar? Seems odd that a turbo would
>>provide lower than atmospheric pressure...
Well, end result boost pressure will be 1.4 bar, contribution from the
LPT is 0.4 bar that what I meant.
mn
|
2515.11 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Fri May 10 1996 19:09 | 11 |
| > Well, end result boost pressure will be 1.4 bar, contribution from the
> LPT is 0.4 bar that what I meant.
ah, right. Although I was being largely pedantic (as usual :), there was a
hint of curiosity.
Hmm, I wonder what sort of pressures the F1 cars used to run at when turbos
were in vogue (if anyone does know, could they make it clear if the pressure
they're referring to is boost or absolute!)
Chris.
|
2515.12 | pressure cooking... | VYGER::MCKAYRE | | Mon May 13 1996 15:16 | 17 |
| Don't know the answer to .11 but the pressures involved must have been
humungus because the engines were only about 1.3litres if I remember
correctly.
B.T.W. What does a dump valve do ?
I've heard various people recomending one as a good
aftermarket addition to turbo'd cars
Cheers
Rory...
|
2515.13 | | WOTVAX::STONEG | Temperature Drop in Downtime Winterland.... | Mon May 13 1996 15:41 | 10 |
|
Don't quote me on this (please !) but I think F1 cars were up higher
than 6 bar at one point - I seem to remember legislation to restrict power
by introducing a max boost of 6 bar, then down to 4 bar a year later.
Then again, it could have been 1.6 and 1,4 ?
Graham
BTW, I'll ask in F1 - that should get a definitive answer (or three)
|
2515.14 | | WOTVAX::HATTOS | It's simple - but it's not easy | Tue May 14 1996 19:08 | 1 |
| And the Turbo F1 cars were 1500cc not 1300cc. 6 bar sounds right.
|
2515.15 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Tue May 14 1996 19:29 | 6 |
| > And the Turbo F1 cars were 1500cc not 1300cc. 6 bar sounds right.
that's right. Didn't someone manage to (very briefly) get almost 1bhp per CC
out of one of these things?
Chris.
|
2515.16 | BMW | AIMTEC::STDBKR::Burden_d | Keep Cool with Coolidge | Tue May 14 1996 22:59 | 8 |
| The Brabham BMW 4 cylinders used in qualifying were producing between 1200 and
1300 bhp, or so someone claimed... I believe the race engines of that era
were producing 'only' 700-800 bhp.
Let's see, in qualifying trim, that means my Isetta should be able to put out
about 250bhp. Not bad!
Dave
|
2515.17 | TOWCAR OF THE YEAR in '92 | CGOOA::NAKAGAWA | | Wed May 15 1996 01:50 | 15 |
| In mid 80s when Porche, BMW, Honda engines were still in F1 race,
engine size was 1.5L for turbos.(most of them were V6, BMW was IL4)
Honda's qualify engine boost was up to 5.0 bar and produced over
1100hp+
Later FIA ruled to have popoff valve installed and limited turbo
pressure down to 4.0 bar, then again down to 2.5 bar.
At very end of turbo era, Honda managed to squeeze 1500hp+ out of
1500cc engine with help of Shell's special petrol.
Back to Volvo 940,
Volvo 940 SE(normal turbo?): The TOWCAR OF THE YEAR in '92 by British
Camper Assosiation.
mn
|
2515.18 | | WOTVAX::STONEG | Temperature Drop in Downtime Winterland.... | Wed May 15 1996 10:15 | 6 |
|
Yes, I've checked in the F1 conf. and it was definitely 6 bar or there
abouts, later restricted to 4 bar and then 2.5 before banning Turbo's
altogether.
G.
|
2515.19 | Wow! 8-) | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Wed May 15 1996 10:57 | 5 |
| Re .16
An Issetta with 250BHP? That would be lethal!!!!!!
Malcolm.
|
2515.20 | Dump Valve | CHEFS::slagra.reo.dec.com::Slade_G | | Fri May 17 1996 18:20 | 25 |
|
> B.T.W. What does a dump valve do ?
>
> I've heard various people recomending one as a good
> aftermarket addition to turbo'd cars
A dump valve keeps the turbo spinning when you let off the throttle.
The turbo forces air into the chamber when the throttle is open.
When you close the throttle (IE during gear changes) the turbo has
nowhere to blow the air so it slows down dramatically. When the throttle
is re-opened, the turbo has to spin up to speed again to start forcing
the air into the chamber. The dump valve is a release valve on the side
of the impeller housing which is designed to let the air out and so keep the
turbo spinning at full operational speed. This reduces the amount of lag
once on the move.
If you ever listen to the Grp A rally cars at full speed, between gear
changes they emit a high pitch squeek or chirp, this is the dump valve
working.
Hope it makes sense
Graham_S
|
2515.21 | | WOTVAX::STONEG | Temperature Drop in Downtime Winterland.... | Mon May 20 1996 10:47 | 5 |
|
is that the same thing as a WasteGate then ? or is the Wastegate their
to limit the pressure ?
G.
|
2515.22 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Mon May 20 1996 11:15 | 6 |
| > is that the same thing as a WasteGate then ? or is the Wastegate their
> to limit the pressure ?
the wastegate is a boost limiter, if I understand correctly...
Chris.
|
2515.23 | hot air | VYGER::MCKAYRE | | Mon May 20 1996 12:21 | 10 |
| Okay I get the bit about the dump valve but I always thought the
wastgate opened when reving up to the boost point to let the turbo spin
up to working revs not to stop it going to fast...
...but then I'm not sure.
Rory...
|
2515.24 | Low blow ? | WOTVAX::BARRETTR | | Mon May 20 1996 13:50 | 18 |
| re 2515.23
The wastegate simply has a spring of a set strength governing when it
opens. When the boost pressure hits a certain point it opens enough to
let out excess boost thus ensuring that your engine does not self
destruct. It doesn't stop the turbo from spinning as fast as it wants
it just dumps the excess pressure it produces from doing this. People
who modify turbo charged cars on the cheap - usually make the wastegate
open at a higher pressure.
Dump valves are necessary on very highly boosted cars since the back
pressure caused by lifting off the accelerator can actually destroy the
rotors on the turbo. It was also discovered that it helped reduce turbo
lag whilst changing gears.
Rick
|
2515.25 | out of puff | VYGER::MCKAYRE | | Mon May 20 1996 16:45 | 22 |
|
What you say makes sense but if the wastegate is simply governed by a
spring then what is the air operated actuater (the piston goes onto a
lever on top of my turbo) for ? I notice that my fathers turbo diesel
does not have the auctuator.
Of couse this actuater may be leading us up
another lengthy garden path but I did have a few problems with mine
sticking causing the engine to shut down.The was when normally you'd just
start feeling the boost as you go up though the rev range (aprox.
5000rpm).
Confused of Ayrshire
^^
and its geting worse.
|
2515.26 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Mon May 20 1996 18:12 | 7 |
| I think that the wastegate is operated by a valve in the inlet manifold (or
the corresponding bit of the turbo), so if the boost pressure gets too high,
some of the exhaust gases are released, reducing the compression. Or
something like that (it's been too long since I knew about this sort of
stuff!)
Chris.
|
2515.27 | Chips and cheats... | KERNEL::BELLAL | Alastair Bell | Thu May 23 1996 13:56 | 35 |
| On older (simpler)turbo systems there is a little (usually rubber) hose
connected at one end to a Diaphagm unit (On top of the turbocharger)
and at the other end connnected directly to the inlet manifold. Inside
the diaphragm unit there is a spring. When the air pressure in the
inlet manifold rises to the point that it overcomes the spring
pressure, the diaphragm moves and via a connecting rod and lever, opens
a valve within the exhaust side of the turbo enabling some of the
exhaust gasses to be vented past the exhaust turbine, thus limiting the
inlet manifold pressure. More modern (complex) systems do this by using
a weaker spring within the diaphragm but having an electronic control
unit (APC in Saab terminology) to detect the boost state and then
operate an electric control valve to open the airline from the manifold
to the diaphragm and hence open the wastegate more quickly. This gives
more accurate and quicker control over boost pressure. It can also be
used (as on the current Saab 900 Turbo) to reduce boost pressure in the
lower gears to reduce the possibility of wheelspin. (In the Saab 900
this occurs in first and second and reduces the boost from .95 bar down
to approx .70 bar (or as near as I can tell from my boost gauge!))
On the early (NOT GTTi) charades it was possible to fit an external
spring to the wastegate to improve the boost from (a very sad) 4psi to
approx 7psi. This gave a terrific boost to performance (25%) for no real
cost. There is always however a cost in reliability for any increase in
power. More modern systems such as Saabs Trionic or APC and Daihatsu in
the GTTi require a remapping of the 'black box'. This can give
significant improvements also, as you can have the boost pressure
progressively increase as revs increase. This is acceptable because to
get the same internal CYLINDER pressures as revs increase requires more
boost because the valve opening times are reduced, therefore there is
less time available to get the same volume of gas into the combustion
chamber. An example of a dramatic improvement possible: BBR do a kit
which transforms a standard Volvo 440 Turbo from 120 bhp to 210 bhp.
The kit comprises no more than a new actuator (diaphragm unit) and a
new 'blac box'. The GTTi rally car I was involved with 8 years ago (in
NZ) was 'chipped' from 99 bhp to 170 bhp.... and we still claimed it
was standard group 'N' (showroom class!).
|