[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference terri::cars_uk

Title:Cars in the UK
Notice:Please read new conference charter 1.70
Moderator:COMICS::SHELLEYELD
Created:Sun Mar 06 1994
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2584
Total number of notes:63384

2458.0. "Peugeot 806 SRDT, a quick review" by PLAYER::BROWNL (Tyro-Delphi-hacker) Mon Oct 09 1995 14:37

    This weekend my local (UK) dealer lent me a Peugeot 806 SRDT. As time
    was tight, and I was travelling from and to Brussels, I only had it
    long enough to do about 120 miles, but I did my best to mix the driving
    as much as possible. I was able to do town work, country lanes, and
    motorway work (well, dual-carriageway, no motorways in Suffolk).
    
    For me, with three children at UK boarding schools, and doing a lot of
    cross-channel travelling with half of Sainsbury's in the car, it's a
    brilliant vehicle. It comes with either 5 or 7 seats as standard; we
    had the 5 seater version. The two front seats swivel and recline, and
    the back two rows can be placed in all sorts of configurations. They're
    easy to take out and put in, taking only a few seconds each; they also
    recline fully, and tip right forwards.
    
    The example I had had twin sunrooves, the front one is a tilt one, and
    the back one, a very large glass one, electric and automatic. It
    incorporates a tilting wind deflector. At motorway speeds and a little
    above, the wind noise was minimal. Full electric windows all round,
    including the rear vents, which had switches for the driver, and also
    for the rearmost row passengers. Full alarm, immobiliser and deadlocks,
    all remotely controlled. RDs radio cassette, and a
    key-in-a-4-digit-code engine immobiliser. Options include air-con, trip
    computer, CD-player, etc.etc. Comes with twin airbags as standard.
    
    It's extremely roomy. especially at the front, but once again (this
    is a fault on the 405), the lack of storage space is more than
    apparent. The glove box is tiny, and given the acres of dash, I'm
    bemused at to why there're not more places to put things like coins,
    pens etc. The front is walk-through like a van, no central console, but
    it does have arm-rests for each front seat. It has door-open
    indicators, and a full range of lights, satellite radio controls built
    into the steering wheel etc. Fully carpetted, and with comfy and shaped
    seats etc. This example was metallic Royal Blue, which was a rather
    nice colour, with a nice tasteful interior, no day-glo patterns on the
    seats or whatever (thankfully).
    
    The rear door is a tip-up type, like an estate car, and there are
    sliding doors on each side, a nice feature. Getting in and out of the
    thing is no problem, it's not that high up. In terms of size, it's
    the same length as a 405 estate, and only a little wider.
    
    A couple of faults on this one, the heated rear-window didn't work, and
    the satellite mode command-button for the radio didn't work. Two other
    water-related events which may or may not be a "feature". When I
    collected the car, it was raining slightly, and I had the tilt roof and
    the driver's window open. On deceleration after having driven a few
    hundred yards, the former dumped water on my head, and the later all
    over my arm and the electric windows/door-mirror switches. Fortunately
    with no ill effects!
    
    It drives very well, although I found it rolled a little more than the
    405 estate I normally drive; no surprises there really. I found the
    clutch very light indeed, so light in fact, that I stalled it a couple
    of times when parking: it didn't have the feel I'm used to.
    Additionally, the engine is so quiet that it's hard to hear the revs;
    well, that's my excuse anyway. At speed, this quietness was still
    evident, it's a nice motorway cruiser. In town, the engine, which is
    the 1.9 turbo version fitted from the old 205 to the 605, is strong
    with good low-down torque. The turbo cuts in at just over 2000 RPM, as
    in my 405, and similarly, gives a good belt of power.
    
    In fact, despite the above, the engine is the only negative thing I can
    really say about the vehicle. It is just a little under-powered. Not a
    lot, and it's fair to say that at less than 200 miles old, the whole
    thing is somewhat tight, but I was aware of a need to use more revs
    than I'm used to, and to knock it down into 4th much more often that I
    have to in the 405. I drove at 85-90 with no problems, it was doing
    around 3500RPM in 5th, and not in the least straining. However, and
    this is the part that bothers me, there was little acceleration left at
    that speed. In my 405, if I clog it at that speed, it surges forwards,
    and I can pass safely, or clear any potential problems. I got the
    feeling in the 806 that 95 would be more-or-less it as far as speed is
    concerned (I have no idea what the advertised top speed or 0-60 type
    times are). This is reflected in the fact that 5th gear hills now
    became 4th gear hills, and its ability to pull in 5th at low speeds was
    much reduced compared to the 405.
    
    All things considered, I may be being unfair, and I must say that aside
    from that, I was very impressed by the car. Perhaps another drive, in a
    looser one, might sway me, but I can't help feeling that with 5 people,
    and a pile of luggage, the 1.9TD 806 will be struggling to maintain its
    momentum, with a consequent reduction in fuel consumption, and extra
    wear on the engine. I can't imagine what the non-turbo version must be
    like... Given that I'm 95% convinced that I should buy it, and that the
    missing 5% is the engine, I'm vacillating between ordering one, or
    waiting for the promised 2.1TD next autumn. The thing is, if I'm going
    to spend nearly 20K on a car I want to be 20Ks worth of happy with it,
    and I want to keep it for a fair while; right now, I'm still
    unconvinced that its good enough in the engine department. Sure, the
    petrol version will be ok, but given the mileage I do, and the price
    difference in Europe between diesel and petrol, that's not really an
    option. Fuel consumption as advertised comes in as about 10% higher
    than my 405, which seems about right. Mind you, what it's like under
    load etc., I don't know.
    
    For most people though, who drive differently to me, and whose car
    usage pattern will be different, I suspect this'll be a brilliant buy,
    and if you're considering buying such a vehicle, I strongly recommend
    you try one. It's due for UK release at the UK Motor Show later this
    month.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2458.1COMICS::CORNEJMon Oct 09 1995 15:1211
    I've also been awaiting a test in one of these.  I'll have to chase the
    dealers again now that I know they are actually available.
    
    re the high speed performance - does anyone know what the Cd is?  It
    could be worse than the 405 and drag becomes much more significant at
    high speed.
    
    Is the 806 all metal,  or does it have plastic panels like the Espase?
    
    Jc
    
2458.2PLAYER::BROWNLTyro-Delphi-hackerMon Oct 09 1995 16:2316
    They yet aren't freely available, AFAIK; my dealer has been after one
    for a long time. I suspect the one he has is now his as a demonstrator
    as it had an Ipswich registration. If you want to try it, you'll need
    to go to Ipswich. His name is Stuart Patience, 01473-720101
    
    I have no technical data at all, but I may well have some stuff in
    French at home; possibly the Cd will be in there. I'll look tonight.
    What I do have is prices, standard equipment and extras etc.
    
    As for plastic panels, I don't know, but I'd suspect so. Even the 405
    has some smaller panels in plastic. Given the construction, I'd be
    surprised if any other than valences and grills etc. are plastic.
    Certainly, no parts of the doors, bonnet, sills etc seemed to be in
    plastic, and the vehicle felt very solid.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
2458.3Confused? Ask roger!COMICS::CORNEJMon Oct 09 1995 17:3411
    Ta Laurie,
    
    I only asked about the plastic cause I have this little extra wire
    sticking out the top,  held on with a bloody big magnet.  Wouldn't want
    to get a car and find its plastic :-)  Apart from that,  its properties
    as a ground plane would be useless.
    
    Cheers,
    
    Jc
    
2458.4The test drive, phase 2PLAYER::BROWNLTyro-Delphi-hackerMon Nov 13 1995 15:2448
    I borrowed the same 805 this weekend, at the insistence of the dealer,
    Stuart Patience. He said that now that it'd done over 2000 miles, it
    was a different car, and had loosened up considerably. Aside from the
    fact that I'm predisposed to be convinced, and the fact that I really
    like this car, and wasn't at all averse to driving one again, I readily
    agreed.
    
    This time, we did only a little town work, and mostly main-road
    driving. We drove up from Ipswich to Oundle to see my son George who's
    at school there, thence to Stamford for an early dinner, then Ipswich
    via Oundle again; a round trip of some 280 miles. What a difference!
    
    It took me a little time to get used to the different feel of it, to
    remember the handbrake is on the "wrong" side, and to remember that the
    gear lever is in a different place. It's taller than the 405, and
    handles differently. It's not van-like by any means, but it isn't a
    well run-in brilliantly-handling car like the 405. It doesn't even roll
    and pitch that much, although of course it does a little more than the
    405, but it does handle, well, just differently.
    
    Anyway, it was soon apparent that Stuart was correct, it *is* a
    different car. This time, there was real surge at motorway speeds in
    5th, and no sense of struggling on long hills. It reached 85 easily,
    with no fuss, and just for one quick burst I took it up to 100, where
    it was still pulling happily. It cruised at 80-odd at just over
    3000RPM, and that left bags of oomph to pull out of trouble. All my
    earlier reservations about performance have gone. It's true that it
    isn't as quick as my 405, but it's easy to accept that it's just a
    different sort of car, and therefore, as long as performance is
    adequate and reasonable, that's enough. It is both of those.
    
    I found the clutch was still a little light, but there was more feel to
    it, and the engine, being looser I suppose, never stalled once.
    Five-up, from Oundle to Stamford, with coats, some luggage and a
    computer on-board, it still pulled well; I doubt a full load will phase
    it. I didn't measure the fuel consumption accurately, but judging by
    the gauge, and the miles done, it was very reasonable, easily within
    10% of my 405. I'd expect that to improve with time and as the engine
    beds in.
    
    Later this week I should have an idea from the Peugeot export
    department of when they can provide my car, and I look forward to
    driving my own 806. Again I have to say, anyone who is thinking of
    getting one of these MPV things, dash down and organise a test drive.
    If you have a problem with the thought of a Peugeot, then try the
    Citroen or the Fiat. Really, it's a gem.
    
    Laurie.
2458.5PLAYER::BROWNLTyro-Delphi-hackerTue Jan 09 1996 13:154
    Just a quick update: I've ordered one of these, a 7-seater, Royal Blue
    one, due for delivery in March.
    
    Laurie.
2458.6Another quick update!PLAYER::BROWNLCyclops no more!Thu Jun 06 1996 15:2035
    Well, March has been and gone, as have April and May. June's well on
    its way, and still no car. I've just spoken to the dealer, and
    apparently, my car has now been made (What again? How many times do
    they want to make my car?), and will be delivered nearer the end of
    June, something like the 21st. I'll believe it when I see it.
    
    The reason for the delay is, allegedly, higher demand in LHD flavour,
    so RHD cars are being given second priority. As a result, what was a 6
    week delivery, is becoming more like 6 months. The dealer says this is
    hurting him, so more people buy cars like the smaller Ford, and so it
    cycles on...
    
    Still, I mustn't complain too much, because, some 10 weeks ago, when my
    car was "due in next week", the dealer lent me a brand new 806 (46
    miles on the clock) to use in the meantime. It's not as good as mine,
    no air-con, no ABS, and only manual windows in the back, but it does
    have the twin sunroof option, thank goodness, and it is a turbo diesel.
    In view of the delays, he's since said that I can keep it until mine
    arrives.. I've just passed 5600 miles in it, and next weekend, it's in
    for its first service! Ya can't knock free motoring, and now I've run
    it in, it runs a treat...
    
    As for what I think of the car after all this time, well, it's great. I
    have no regrets whatsoever, and I wonder how I managed without it
    before. I just wish I had mine for the air-con and the electric windows
    in the back. I want the latter, because at more than 70mph, with the
    large roof open, the air buffets inside a lot. When the side-hinged
    rear vents are open, the air can escape, and the through-draft is most
    pleasant. The manual ones have two main problems. Firstly, they're a
    pain to remember to open and close, and a bloody long way from the
    driver's seat, and secondly, at speed, the wind shuts them! The
    electric ones don't suffer from these problems, and are therefore, IMO
    essential for an 806 with the twin sunroof option.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
2458.7PLAYER::BROWNLCyclops no more!Mon Jul 01 1996 14:2415
    Another update, for those of you interested... My car has arrived; it's
    here in Belgium! It's a higher spec one than the loaner I just gave
    back (7300 miles!), and it's markedly different. The seats are far more
    comfortable, the trim spec is much higher, and everything just seems to
    be better quality; switches, knobs, etc. It's quieter, and doesn't roll
    as much on fast cornering. I'm surprised at the difference actually.
    
    Anyway, not much to add; the digital air-con is magic, dial a
    temperature, and it maintains it, controlling flow, distribution etc,
    to maintain a steady temp. all over the car. The stereo has 8 speakers
    instead of the 4 on the lower level car, and the rear seats recline as
    well as the front ones. I'll try to remember to report back in a few
    months...
    
    Cheers, Laurie$much_poorer!