[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Cars in the UK |
Notice: | Please read new conference charter 1.70 |
Moderator: | COMICS::SHELLEY ELD |
|
Created: | Sun Mar 06 1994 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2584 |
Total number of notes: | 63384 |
2458.0. "Peugeot 806 SRDT, a quick review" by PLAYER::BROWNL (Tyro-Delphi-hacker) Mon Oct 09 1995 14:37
This weekend my local (UK) dealer lent me a Peugeot 806 SRDT. As time
was tight, and I was travelling from and to Brussels, I only had it
long enough to do about 120 miles, but I did my best to mix the driving
as much as possible. I was able to do town work, country lanes, and
motorway work (well, dual-carriageway, no motorways in Suffolk).
For me, with three children at UK boarding schools, and doing a lot of
cross-channel travelling with half of Sainsbury's in the car, it's a
brilliant vehicle. It comes with either 5 or 7 seats as standard; we
had the 5 seater version. The two front seats swivel and recline, and
the back two rows can be placed in all sorts of configurations. They're
easy to take out and put in, taking only a few seconds each; they also
recline fully, and tip right forwards.
The example I had had twin sunrooves, the front one is a tilt one, and
the back one, a very large glass one, electric and automatic. It
incorporates a tilting wind deflector. At motorway speeds and a little
above, the wind noise was minimal. Full electric windows all round,
including the rear vents, which had switches for the driver, and also
for the rearmost row passengers. Full alarm, immobiliser and deadlocks,
all remotely controlled. RDs radio cassette, and a
key-in-a-4-digit-code engine immobiliser. Options include air-con, trip
computer, CD-player, etc.etc. Comes with twin airbags as standard.
It's extremely roomy. especially at the front, but once again (this
is a fault on the 405), the lack of storage space is more than
apparent. The glove box is tiny, and given the acres of dash, I'm
bemused at to why there're not more places to put things like coins,
pens etc. The front is walk-through like a van, no central console, but
it does have arm-rests for each front seat. It has door-open
indicators, and a full range of lights, satellite radio controls built
into the steering wheel etc. Fully carpetted, and with comfy and shaped
seats etc. This example was metallic Royal Blue, which was a rather
nice colour, with a nice tasteful interior, no day-glo patterns on the
seats or whatever (thankfully).
The rear door is a tip-up type, like an estate car, and there are
sliding doors on each side, a nice feature. Getting in and out of the
thing is no problem, it's not that high up. In terms of size, it's
the same length as a 405 estate, and only a little wider.
A couple of faults on this one, the heated rear-window didn't work, and
the satellite mode command-button for the radio didn't work. Two other
water-related events which may or may not be a "feature". When I
collected the car, it was raining slightly, and I had the tilt roof and
the driver's window open. On deceleration after having driven a few
hundred yards, the former dumped water on my head, and the later all
over my arm and the electric windows/door-mirror switches. Fortunately
with no ill effects!
It drives very well, although I found it rolled a little more than the
405 estate I normally drive; no surprises there really. I found the
clutch very light indeed, so light in fact, that I stalled it a couple
of times when parking: it didn't have the feel I'm used to.
Additionally, the engine is so quiet that it's hard to hear the revs;
well, that's my excuse anyway. At speed, this quietness was still
evident, it's a nice motorway cruiser. In town, the engine, which is
the 1.9 turbo version fitted from the old 205 to the 605, is strong
with good low-down torque. The turbo cuts in at just over 2000 RPM, as
in my 405, and similarly, gives a good belt of power.
In fact, despite the above, the engine is the only negative thing I can
really say about the vehicle. It is just a little under-powered. Not a
lot, and it's fair to say that at less than 200 miles old, the whole
thing is somewhat tight, but I was aware of a need to use more revs
than I'm used to, and to knock it down into 4th much more often that I
have to in the 405. I drove at 85-90 with no problems, it was doing
around 3500RPM in 5th, and not in the least straining. However, and
this is the part that bothers me, there was little acceleration left at
that speed. In my 405, if I clog it at that speed, it surges forwards,
and I can pass safely, or clear any potential problems. I got the
feeling in the 806 that 95 would be more-or-less it as far as speed is
concerned (I have no idea what the advertised top speed or 0-60 type
times are). This is reflected in the fact that 5th gear hills now
became 4th gear hills, and its ability to pull in 5th at low speeds was
much reduced compared to the 405.
All things considered, I may be being unfair, and I must say that aside
from that, I was very impressed by the car. Perhaps another drive, in a
looser one, might sway me, but I can't help feeling that with 5 people,
and a pile of luggage, the 1.9TD 806 will be struggling to maintain its
momentum, with a consequent reduction in fuel consumption, and extra
wear on the engine. I can't imagine what the non-turbo version must be
like... Given that I'm 95% convinced that I should buy it, and that the
missing 5% is the engine, I'm vacillating between ordering one, or
waiting for the promised 2.1TD next autumn. The thing is, if I'm going
to spend nearly 20K on a car I want to be 20Ks worth of happy with it,
and I want to keep it for a fair while; right now, I'm still
unconvinced that its good enough in the engine department. Sure, the
petrol version will be ok, but given the mileage I do, and the price
difference in Europe between diesel and petrol, that's not really an
option. Fuel consumption as advertised comes in as about 10% higher
than my 405, which seems about right. Mind you, what it's like under
load etc., I don't know.
For most people though, who drive differently to me, and whose car
usage pattern will be different, I suspect this'll be a brilliant buy,
and if you're considering buying such a vehicle, I strongly recommend
you try one. It's due for UK release at the UK Motor Show later this
month.
Cheers, Laurie.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2458.1 | | COMICS::CORNEJ | | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:12 | 11 |
| I've also been awaiting a test in one of these. I'll have to chase the
dealers again now that I know they are actually available.
re the high speed performance - does anyone know what the Cd is? It
could be worse than the 405 and drag becomes much more significant at
high speed.
Is the 806 all metal, or does it have plastic panels like the Espase?
Jc
|
2458.2 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Tyro-Delphi-hacker | Mon Oct 09 1995 16:23 | 16 |
| They yet aren't freely available, AFAIK; my dealer has been after one
for a long time. I suspect the one he has is now his as a demonstrator
as it had an Ipswich registration. If you want to try it, you'll need
to go to Ipswich. His name is Stuart Patience, 01473-720101
I have no technical data at all, but I may well have some stuff in
French at home; possibly the Cd will be in there. I'll look tonight.
What I do have is prices, standard equipment and extras etc.
As for plastic panels, I don't know, but I'd suspect so. Even the 405
has some smaller panels in plastic. Given the construction, I'd be
surprised if any other than valences and grills etc. are plastic.
Certainly, no parts of the doors, bonnet, sills etc seemed to be in
plastic, and the vehicle felt very solid.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
2458.3 | Confused? Ask roger! | COMICS::CORNEJ | | Mon Oct 09 1995 17:34 | 11 |
| Ta Laurie,
I only asked about the plastic cause I have this little extra wire
sticking out the top, held on with a bloody big magnet. Wouldn't want
to get a car and find its plastic :-) Apart from that, its properties
as a ground plane would be useless.
Cheers,
Jc
|
2458.4 | The test drive, phase 2 | PLAYER::BROWNL | Tyro-Delphi-hacker | Mon Nov 13 1995 15:24 | 48 |
| I borrowed the same 805 this weekend, at the insistence of the dealer,
Stuart Patience. He said that now that it'd done over 2000 miles, it
was a different car, and had loosened up considerably. Aside from the
fact that I'm predisposed to be convinced, and the fact that I really
like this car, and wasn't at all averse to driving one again, I readily
agreed.
This time, we did only a little town work, and mostly main-road
driving. We drove up from Ipswich to Oundle to see my son George who's
at school there, thence to Stamford for an early dinner, then Ipswich
via Oundle again; a round trip of some 280 miles. What a difference!
It took me a little time to get used to the different feel of it, to
remember the handbrake is on the "wrong" side, and to remember that the
gear lever is in a different place. It's taller than the 405, and
handles differently. It's not van-like by any means, but it isn't a
well run-in brilliantly-handling car like the 405. It doesn't even roll
and pitch that much, although of course it does a little more than the
405, but it does handle, well, just differently.
Anyway, it was soon apparent that Stuart was correct, it *is* a
different car. This time, there was real surge at motorway speeds in
5th, and no sense of struggling on long hills. It reached 85 easily,
with no fuss, and just for one quick burst I took it up to 100, where
it was still pulling happily. It cruised at 80-odd at just over
3000RPM, and that left bags of oomph to pull out of trouble. All my
earlier reservations about performance have gone. It's true that it
isn't as quick as my 405, but it's easy to accept that it's just a
different sort of car, and therefore, as long as performance is
adequate and reasonable, that's enough. It is both of those.
I found the clutch was still a little light, but there was more feel to
it, and the engine, being looser I suppose, never stalled once.
Five-up, from Oundle to Stamford, with coats, some luggage and a
computer on-board, it still pulled well; I doubt a full load will phase
it. I didn't measure the fuel consumption accurately, but judging by
the gauge, and the miles done, it was very reasonable, easily within
10% of my 405. I'd expect that to improve with time and as the engine
beds in.
Later this week I should have an idea from the Peugeot export
department of when they can provide my car, and I look forward to
driving my own 806. Again I have to say, anyone who is thinking of
getting one of these MPV things, dash down and organise a test drive.
If you have a problem with the thought of a Peugeot, then try the
Citroen or the Fiat. Really, it's a gem.
Laurie.
|
2458.5 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Tyro-Delphi-hacker | Tue Jan 09 1996 13:15 | 4 |
| Just a quick update: I've ordered one of these, a 7-seater, Royal Blue
one, due for delivery in March.
Laurie.
|
2458.6 | Another quick update! | PLAYER::BROWNL | Cyclops no more! | Thu Jun 06 1996 15:20 | 35 |
| Well, March has been and gone, as have April and May. June's well on
its way, and still no car. I've just spoken to the dealer, and
apparently, my car has now been made (What again? How many times do
they want to make my car?), and will be delivered nearer the end of
June, something like the 21st. I'll believe it when I see it.
The reason for the delay is, allegedly, higher demand in LHD flavour,
so RHD cars are being given second priority. As a result, what was a 6
week delivery, is becoming more like 6 months. The dealer says this is
hurting him, so more people buy cars like the smaller Ford, and so it
cycles on...
Still, I mustn't complain too much, because, some 10 weeks ago, when my
car was "due in next week", the dealer lent me a brand new 806 (46
miles on the clock) to use in the meantime. It's not as good as mine,
no air-con, no ABS, and only manual windows in the back, but it does
have the twin sunroof option, thank goodness, and it is a turbo diesel.
In view of the delays, he's since said that I can keep it until mine
arrives.. I've just passed 5600 miles in it, and next weekend, it's in
for its first service! Ya can't knock free motoring, and now I've run
it in, it runs a treat...
As for what I think of the car after all this time, well, it's great. I
have no regrets whatsoever, and I wonder how I managed without it
before. I just wish I had mine for the air-con and the electric windows
in the back. I want the latter, because at more than 70mph, with the
large roof open, the air buffets inside a lot. When the side-hinged
rear vents are open, the air can escape, and the through-draft is most
pleasant. The manual ones have two main problems. Firstly, they're a
pain to remember to open and close, and a bloody long way from the
driver's seat, and secondly, at speed, the wind shuts them! The
electric ones don't suffer from these problems, and are therefore, IMO
essential for an 806 with the twin sunroof option.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
2458.7 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Cyclops no more! | Mon Jul 01 1996 14:24 | 15 |
| Another update, for those of you interested... My car has arrived; it's
here in Belgium! It's a higher spec one than the loaner I just gave
back (7300 miles!), and it's markedly different. The seats are far more
comfortable, the trim spec is much higher, and everything just seems to
be better quality; switches, knobs, etc. It's quieter, and doesn't roll
as much on fast cornering. I'm surprised at the difference actually.
Anyway, not much to add; the digital air-con is magic, dial a
temperature, and it maintains it, controlling flow, distribution etc,
to maintain a steady temp. all over the car. The stereo has 8 speakers
instead of the 4 on the lower level car, and the rear seats recline as
well as the front ones. I'll try to remember to report back in a few
months...
Cheers, Laurie$much_poorer!
|