T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2274.1 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Mon Jun 20 1994 12:03 | 18 |
| George,
Its a great shame Heather Thomas is no longer around as she would have
a lot to say on this. In fact this has been discussed many times in
this conference (pointers anyone ?).
End of lease is definately the right time to opt out. If you have made
no claims then a letter can be obtained from car fleet/insurance and
may be taken as proof to get you a better insurance deal.
I believe it is also a local matter with your manager as to whether
you can opt back into the scheme or not. The general rule is that
once out you cannot come back in but there are circumstances where
this can be allowed.
Hope this helps
Royston
|
2274.2 | | WELSWS::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Mon Jun 20 1994 12:13 | 2 |
| I think you'll find opting back in is much more of a concern to the
Inland Revenue than to Digital management.
|
2274.3 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Mon Jun 20 1994 12:51 | 6 |
| re .0
If you are an employee who needs a car for their job I believe you only
get 8p per mile not 32p.
Andrew
|
2274.4 | If you could halve those business miles maybe | VANGA::KERRELL | Handle with care - aging fast | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:09 | 5 |
| With 15,000 business miles a year to depreciate your private car (as Andrew
says, it's 8p a mile) I wouldn't even waste my time on the figures. You are
better off with a lease car.
Dave.
|
2274.5 | | ESBS01::WATSON | Entropy: chaos at it's best | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:09 | 9 |
| Re.2
I'm not sure what IR rule Digital are working to but neither me or my
accountant are aware of anything which would stop you opting in and out
of the Co.Car game (Providing that you stay within the Petrol Tax
allowance (n pence / mile) which Digital do). Perhapse someone could
point me to the appropriate legalisation.
Rik-considering-whether-to-opt-back-into-his-car-scheme.
|
2274.6 | .2 and .5 | WELSWS::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Mon Jun 20 1994 16:18 | 6 |
| I can't point you at particular legislation, but the argumrnt revolves
around the 'need' for the company car.
The IR say that if the job hasn't changed, then the need can't have
changed and either you did or didn't 'need' the car. That being the
case they'll try and take you for back tax on the benefit.
|
2274.7 | 32p per mile ? | PLUNDR::GIBSON | from somewhere in the North | Mon Jun 20 1994 17:02 | 10 |
| re .3
I have spoken to car fleet, they tell me I get 2,950pounds p.a.
(this is taxed) I will also get 32p per mile for the first 100 miles
each week, up to a maximum of 4,000 miles p.a., then it's back to
8p per mile.
I think this is why my previous manager would not let me opt out
3 years ago.
George.
|
2274.8 | not sure... | LARVAE::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, UK S.E. PSC - Workgroup Solutions | Mon Jun 20 1994 17:27 | 22 |
| .7� (this is taxed) I will also get 32p per mile for the first 100 miles
.7� each week, up to a maximum of 4,000 miles p.a., then it's back to
.7� 8p per mile.
Are you sure?? I am not doubting your word/typing, just the information
that you have been supplied.....
Things may have changed over the last 2 years, but this rate of 32p a
mile used to be only for those non-qualified drivers.... and these
people did NOT get the 2,950 pounds.
The rules used to be:
EITHER you need a car - so you get 2,950 + 8p a mile
OR you don't need a car, and then you get 32p a mile (although if
you do more than 4,000 miles you obviously DO need a car,
so we will cut back to 8p a mile!).
Cheers, Chris
[btw: John Bull @ UCG is a colleague of the ex-Heather Thomas. John
also has opted out / never opted in, and so may be able to offer some
help]
|
2274.9 | It's 8p | VANGA::KERRELL | Handle with care - aging fast | Tue Jun 21 1994 09:18 | 10 |
| From VTX:-
Employees provided with a car by the Company, employees who choose to
take a car through the Scheme without a Car Supplement, or any employee
with a supplement who declines to take a car, should claim the 'lower'
mileage rate for business travel.
For more information on Digital Car mileage rates, refer to the Expenses
option on VTX.
|
2274.10 | To make the opt-out pay .... | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Tue Jun 21 1994 10:21 | 16 |
|
FWIW, the main reason for opting out on the current, reduced-offer,
scheme is that you don't need the comfort of a new motor, nor the
consequent tax hit ..... & I happen to like large, fat old man's cars.
I'm perfectly happy driving a car more than 1 year old, bought at
auction. Keep it one year, sell privately. You'll find it does wonders
for your per-mile costs. I've never understood why people get excited
about mpg, when depreciation is by far the larger differential/expense
(even for 40k business drivers like me).
Colin
|
2274.11 | Wot no 32p !!! | PLUNDR::GIBSON | from somewhere in the North | Tue Jun 21 1994 18:10 | 42 |
| Thanks for putting me straight on the 32p per mile, looks like
I got duff info from car fleet. (I nearly bought a car on the promise
of 32p per mile !)
I must remember the first rule of the field service engineer,
"never believe anything, anyone tells you".
The way I see the financial equation with the info I have at the
moment.
Income: All figures approx. in pounds
Digital allowance (taxed 75% of 2,950) 2213
Saving on income tax 700
Saving on payment for current car 500
Tax allowance for car loan 500
" " " service, insurance 250
" " " capital cost of car 500
----
Total 4663
----
Expenditure:
Loan repayment 3000
Insurance 500
Servicing 700
Road Fund 130
-----
Total 4330
-----
Many of the figures are guesstimates, I want to buy a fairly new
<10,000 miles mid sized estate for 8-9K pounds, and I'll have to
find 2K for the deposit (Any garages take Opportunity Channel Amex).
I guess I'll make no profit, but I'll have a trade in for the next car,
or a car to drive home in when I get the package.
George.
|
2274.12 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Wed Jun 22 1994 09:31 | 6 |
| Are you sure that one can get tax relief against the loan for purchase
and the capital cost? I thought, and I may well be wrong that one could
only claim costs like servicing, tyres, and depreciation. This would be
reduced in proportion for private/business miles.
Andrew
|
2274.13 | Byebye carfleet | BRUMMY::WALLACE_J | | Wed Jun 22 1994 20:44 | 21 |
| My lease is up. My miles are about the same as .0 ie 75% business,
so 75% of the tax-refundable stuff will come back to me.
I have decided there isn't a huge amount in it financially, but out of
the scheme I am a free agent and can get a better deal than the scheme,
consequently I am opting out before the scheme or the tax situation
gets any worse.
Rover 214GSi+ABS+AC on scheme @ 2k9 per year last year. Stay in scheme
and have v. basic Vauxhall for the same price as last year's Rover.
Or opt out, and for the same cost to me as the "standard" Vauxhall I
can end up with a car I chose myself (Peugeot 306XTdt+ABS+AC).
Rover would have been nearly competitive if I'd been able to buy on the
Rover employee scheme but I'm one of the few people in Brum with no
relatives in either Rover or British Aerospace, so I pay top price. And
insurance on Peugeots is cheap.
regards
john
|
2274.14 | Helpful Taxman ! | PLUNDR::GIBSON | from somewhere in the North | Thu Jun 23 1994 11:38 | 13 |
| Re: .12
I got the info from the local Inland Revenue information office.
The man I spoke to was not an expert, and they have no pamphlet
on the subject, but he sent me a claim form which itemised the
points I mentioned previously.
I don't know if a claim for capital cost and claim for loan are
mutually exclusive.
Anyone tried this claim ??
George.
|
2274.15 | Ask for P87 | CURRNT::PARTRIDGE | | Thu Jun 23 1994 13:32 | 15 |
| Hi,
I have clawed back some money from the taxman using form P87.
It describes about claiming capital allowance and loan interest
relief on the back. It appears you can do both.
My biggest problem has been persuading them to realise that
the Digital compensation of 8p/mile fairly covers petrol.
Ideally they like you to keep receipts for *all* petrol
purchased, then apportion according to business/own usage.
Good luck,
Jeremy.
|
2274.16 | "Fixed profit mileage payments" (?) | BRUMMY::WALLACE_J | | Thu Jun 23 1994 14:40 | 10 |
| The book, Car or Cash, by CCH Editions, referred to elsewhere in here,
talks about "fixed profit mileage payments" such as Digital's setup. If
the scheme is seen to be "fixed profit" it says the revenue shouldn't
care about splitting fuel expenses between private and business travel.
I believe CCH's main business is training seminars for accountants. If
anyone wants to order the book I'll post details tomorrow.
regards
john
|
2274.17 | National Insurance? | ARRODS::BARROND | Stuff up and it blows sky hi | Thu Jun 23 1994 15:39 | 10 |
| Don't forget the NI on the Car allowance. It could be as much as 9%.
This reduces the net amount received to �1947.
Also I would collect _all_ receipts (screenwash, car polish, new road
atlas, etc. The nodding dog or Garfield is not a tax deductable
expense). I suspect that if the money you receive is greater than
your expenditure you may find yourself with a tax bill to pay.
Dave
|
2274.18 | For aN INFORMED decision, read this | BRUMMY::WALLACE_J | | Sat Jun 25 1994 15:48 | 13 |
| The following book provides detailed information to help you to choose
whether to stay in or to opt out.
Car or Cash ISBN 0 86325 330 x
Written by Coopers+Lybrand and the AA
Published by CCH Editions Ltd (Tax, Business and Law Publishers)
Orderable by phone from CCH in Bicester on 0869 253300
Price �4.99
I have the 1993 edition but I believe nothing much has changed
regards
john
|
2274.19 | How not to be fair with people perhaps? | PEKING::GERRYT | | Mon Jun 27 1994 14:21 | 16 |
| Just a thought.....a somewhat unpleasant one perhaps....
Those that opted out of the scheme just before the 'new' scheme came
into existence last year retain the higher (previous scheme) supplement
values.
For how long?
Surely to be fair to all employees, the allowance should reduce to the
current supplement 3 years after the anniversary of the introduction of
the reduced supplement....or is there a legal precident why this can't/
shouldn't happen.?
Comments anyone?
Tim
|
2274.20 | Now read the book | PLUNDR::GIBSON | from somewhere in the North | Thu Jun 30 1994 10:51 | 10 |
| John,
Thanks for the details of the book "Car or Cash" I've ordered it.
The current edition is 5-99 pounds (some prices seem to rise even
quicker than the digital mileage rate) .
George.
|
2274.21 | 8p/mile & the IR ? | LARVAE::HARVEY | Baldly going into the unknown... | Thu Jul 07 1994 15:11 | 9 |
| Anyone care to comment on the following snippet which I picked up from
someone recently ??
As Digital only pay 8p/mile and everyone - AA and even the IR - recognises
that running a 2 litre car costs @25p/mile - I am led to believe that the
"difference" of 16p or so, can be offset against tax as legitimate running
costs. Makes quite a difference as to whether to opt out....
Rog
|
2274.22 | Two options on opting out! | YUPPY::BRISTOWA | | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:11 | 24 |
| Rog,
I've just taken delivery of the book "Car or Cash", written by the
AA/Coopers and Lybrand.
We have the option to do one of the following;
a)You can treat any payments from Digital as non-taxable, i.e 8p/mile
and say thanks very much. (This then excludes you from claiming any
other tax relief on your other motoring costs.
or
b) Treat the 8p/mile as taxable and then claim tax relief on HP
payments/ petrol/ insurance/ maintenance and depreciation.
Option b) depending on the car and its running costs, this can
potentialy turn your 8p/mile into something like 20p+.
Regs
Andy
|
2274.23 | ONLY 8p??!! | FAILTE::RENNIEJ | | Thu Jul 07 1994 22:43 | 5 |
| I thought the 8p a mile was for company cars and there was a higher
figure for your own car, aout 25-30. I don't have any documentation on
this but if you could get hold of an ex-Kienzle/now Digital employee
he/she may have more info.
Kienzle ran a policy of being able to use your own car for business.
|
2274.24 | Still 8p | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Fri Jul 08 1994 10:47 | 15 |
|
I looked into this ....
If you are in the car scheme you get #3560 (for level 8's) to put towards
a lease car (if you spend less you get the difference in your salary) plus
8p/mile for all business miles.
If you opt out the company gives #3560 (again for level 8/9), but still ONLY
8p/mile. Digital state that they provide money in lieu of car and that this
covers both purchase and running. You ONLY get 32p/mile if you are not getting
the car supplement (ie. DEC does not give you any money on top of your base
salary).
Andy.
|
2274.25 | Shifted left a bit | ESBS01::WATSON | Entropy: chaos at it's best | Fri Jul 08 1994 12:51 | 23 |
| <<< TIMMII::DISK$USERS1:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CARS_UK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Cars UK >-
================================================================================
Note 2274.24 Opting out experiences 24 of 24
SUPER7::HUGHESA "Swimming against the tide @#%*" 15 lines 8-JUL-1994 09:47
-< Still 8p >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I looked into this ....
If you are in the car scheme you get #3560 (for level 8's) to put towards a
lease car (if you spend less you get the difference in your salary) plus
8p/mile for all business miles.
If you opt out the company gives #3560 (again for level 8/9), but still ONLY
8p/mile. Digital state that they provide money in lieu of car and that this
covers both purchase and running. You ONLY get 32p/mile if you are not getting
the car supplement (ie. DEC does not give you any money on top of your base
salary).
Andy.
|
2274.26 | I know nothing about this! | WOTVAX::HARDYP | | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:17 | 8 |
| Chaps,
If you opt out, isn't the supplement taxed as normal income?
In which case the Revenue would then only see the 8p as being towards
the cost of the milage. Then you might be able to claim the difference.
Peter
|
2274.27 | | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, Central PSC, Birmingham UK | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:19 | 6 |
|
Isn't that what .22 (b) was saying???
This sounds like a good deal!
mb
|
2274.28 | perhaps | WOTVAX::HARDYP | | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:57 | 8 |
| mb,
I think that .22 was talking about the .8p per mile. I was thinking of
the �2k-�5k supplement.
But then again, I did say that I knew nothing about it!
peter
|
2274.29 | Is this still true? | COMICS::TRAVELL | John T, UK VMS System Support | Sat Jul 09 1994 02:28 | 28 |
| The way it used to be, and (I think) in principle still is as I understand it.
An employee is either a `Qualified user', i.e. can have cash or car along with
the job, or is NOT a `Qualified user', i.e. NO cash and if you have a car you
pay full whack.
If you are NOT a `Qualified user' you get a mileage allowance that includes a
contribution to depreciation, tax, insurance, wear & tear etc.
If you are a `Qualified user' you get 8p/mile to cover fuel costs only, the
depreciation, tax, insurance, wear & tear etc elements are provided in your
cash allowance, or if you have a company car they are not at your expense
anyway...
One way of looking at the car scheme is to consider that every `Qualified user'
gets a cash allowance to spend on a car, some people choose to use this to pay
for a company car, others `opt out' and buy their own car.
My reasons for opting out are that after 15 years of running a company car, I
had NO asset, NO no-claims bonus, and if my job evaporated, NO transport.
In addition, the vehicle I want to own is much too expensive for me to afford
a NEW one every three years. The ONLY way I can afford it is to buy an old,
(relatively) cheap one, then upgrade it every few years.
I estimate that having opted out is building my asset at about �100 per month,
at a cost of `roughing' it in an older car for a few years. I can live with that.
John Travell.
|
2274.30 | Claim, Claim, Claim! | YUPPY::BRISTOWA | | Mon Jul 11 1994 10:47 | 17 |
| re.-1 and .22
Everybody can exercise the options a) or b) within .22. The 32p per
mile is to compensate NON-Qualified users because they do not have the
benefit of the car supplement every month.
So, If you are NOT Qualified and do 10,000 business miles per year in
your own car, then..
1. Get a company car on DIGITAL, or,
2. Start filling in the expenses tax return form from our friends at
the revenue!
Regs
Andy
|
2274.31 | <3 yrs old | WELCLU::KINGI | Don't call me Wayne or Joe | Wed Jul 13 1994 17:12 | 7 |
|
re -.2
If you opt out I was of the impression the Car you bought instead had
to be less than 3 years old, so as to give the right impression to our
customers (what customers?).
|
2274.32 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Wed Jul 13 1994 17:37 | 2 |
| I've never heard of this before and know several people
who have opted out who have cars much older than 3 years.
|
2274.33 | scruffy | PIECES::ALCOR::RUSLING | Place holder for NOTES | Wed Jul 13 1994 18:03 | 6 |
|
So, I've got to sell my 18 year old MG BGT? I think that
what car is "appropriate" depends on your job. I'm in
scruffy engineering...
Dave
|
2274.34 | It certainly WAS true! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Thu Jul 14 1994 14:09 | 6 |
|
Many years ago - like about 15 - when I was in Field Service, my own car
became "over 3 years old," I was told in no uncertain (but not unpleasantly)
that my car must be replaced. I joined the cocar scheme.
Malcolm.
|
2274.35 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Hakuna matata! | Thu Jul 14 1994 16:38 | 4 |
| I can find nothing in PP&P to support the three year old car rule. Unless
someone can provide a reference to policy I'd assume it no longer applies.
Dave.
|
2274.36 | No age mentioned | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Fri Jul 15 1994 21:41 | 5 |
|
When I opted out recently, I had to sign that I would run a vehicle "of
suitable appearance for business use", or somesuch. Not age related.
Colin
|
2274.37 | | FUTURS::LONGWY::LEWIS | Imagine being without a Newt | Mon Jul 18 1994 10:15 | 5 |
| Did they count the number of wheels ?
Just a thought...
Rob
|
2274.38 | Not across the board | TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Wed Jul 20 1994 13:56 | 5 |
| When I opted out last septtember I was never asked to sign anything!.
Obviously different rules!
Richard
|