T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2203.1 | | PAPERS::CORNE | John Corne - Product & Technology group | Wed Jan 12 1994 15:27 | 8 |
| re.0,
>>Is there any reason why Diesel engines don't require detergent?
Of course - they are clean enough already. All the dirt comes out the
exhaust :-)
Jc
|
2203.2 | Ha Ha | WOTVAX::MACDONALDI | Stalybridge Celtic | Wed Jan 12 1994 17:41 | 10 |
| re: -1
A classic one liner response.
Made me laugh for ages.
im
|
2203.3 | No Reply? | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Fri Jan 21 1994 00:11 | 12 |
| Was my original question too boring/difficult/abstruse for a meaningful
reply? Where are all the Petrol-heads (or should that be Diesel-heads)
with the answers at their finger-tips?
Ian
PS - Thinks...maybe they've all been right-sized (downsized,
capsized...etc). Maybe anybody caught Noting is automatically made
redun
AAAAGGGGHHHH!
|
2203.4 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:27 | 8 |
| Ian, apologies for the lack of tech assist these days but there yer go.
The fact that diesel engines last twice as long as their petrol
counterparts (with regular oil and filter changes) shows that the
need for 'detergents' would have limited benifit in the fuel
(IMO or course).
Royston
|
2203.5 | Not just long life. | FUTURS::SAXBY | Is it friday yet? | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:32 | 6 |
|
I don't know about longevity, but isn't one of the main advantages of
detergent in petrol supposed to be more efficient running which must
be of interest to those smog-heads amongst us. :^)
Mark
|
2203.6 | Ummmmmmmm...... | CGOOA::PITULEY | Ain't technology wonderful? | Tue Jan 25 1994 14:35 | 7 |
|
Correct me if I'm wrong (I'm sure you will) but isn't one of the major
components of diesel kerosene? And isn't kerosene a rather good
cleaner all on its own?
Brian
|
2203.7 | On the other hand, I could be quite wrong - I often am! 8-) | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Wed Jan 26 1994 08:43 | 10 |
|
As far as I know, Diesel is a waste product after all the usable things
are taken out of the crude oil. This would mean that Kerosene would NOT be a
constituent part of Diesel.
I read many years ago that if Diesel couldn't be sold as a "propellant
fuel" for engines, that the only thing it is good for is straight forward
burning, ie. as a boiler fuel.
Malcolm.
|