| Title: | Cars in the UK |
| Notice: | Please read new conference charter 1.70 |
| Moderator: | COMICS::SHELLEY ELD |
| Created: | Sun Mar 06 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2584 |
| Total number of notes: | 63384 |
My car was clamped in London on Saturday. I am going to protest my
innocence and would like your opinion on my chances. The facts are as
follows:-
In Prince Consort Road (behind Albert Hall) there are several
parking bays, all marked either by a sign or by a Park and Display
meter except one - the second bay (counting from Queens Gate) on the south
side of Prince Consort Road. That's the one I parked in. On return I found
my car clamped (#38), a Fixed Penalty Notice (another #30) and a separate Notice
of Intent to Prosecute by Westminster City Council. Now:-
1. There were 13 spaces in our parking bay and all were full. The next
bays, which had a 'No waiting' bag pulled over the parking signs, were
empty. This would suggest that people genuinely thought it was OK to
park in the unmarked bay. All cars were clamped, BTW. We talked to
about 10 drivers and all were quite upset at what had happened.
2. One of the drivers asked a passing Traffic Warden whether it was OK
to park there. She looked at the parking bays and said "you can't park
in the first one but the second one should be OK". The first bay had a
yellow "no waiting' bag over the parking sign. Obviously he didn't
think it was necessary to take her number.
3. The Police Officer issuing the fixed penalty notices was still there
when we returned and he agreed that tha parking bay wasn't clearly
marked. He thought there should have been a parking sign on one of the
two lamp posts enclosed within the bay area. He said we could quote
him. We've got his number.
4. Two Police Officers stopped by and after our explanations agreed we
shouldn't pay but send a photocopy of the relevant notices to the
respective authorities. We've got their numbers.
5. The Police Officer at the Pound (where you pay the clamping penalty)
said that something must have gone wrong as this was an unusually large
number of clamping from one place. We don't have her number.
We all said we wouldn't pay but write to the Police and Westmister
Council though there were couple of people who later said that they may
just pay and forget it. If we plead no guilty and get convicted, we
could get max. fine #400. They didn't think it was worth the risk.
Does anyone know whether a parking sign in one bay can apply to a
separate bay (separated by yellow lines from the marked one, that is)?
Anyone know of any relevant laws which would apply here?
Still fuming...
Karel.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2089.1 | Take some snaps | BLKPUD::WARNESG | This space deliberately left blank | Mon May 24 1993 11:29 | 7 |
Can't help out on the laws &c, but to assist your case it would help to
get some photographs of the parking bays (when empty!) if you haven't
done so already.
Graham Warnes
| |||||
| 2089.2 | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon May 24 1993 12:13 | 6 | |
I once parked behind a hotel in London, where there were no road
markings at all. I got chatting to the porter who said people had been
clamped for parker there, on the assumption that although it doesn't
say you can't park, it also doesn't say you can!!!
Greg
| |||||
| 2089.3 | RUTILE::BISHOP | Completely wasted | Tue May 25 1993 12:37 | 21 | |
Karel, First of all get some real advice... call the AA legal dept. They may even arrange for a visit to the site. Secondly, although expensive, would it *really* be worth your time to argue? Are you without your car because you didn't pay? I never been clamped so don't know the score. Although annoying (and pricy) it may appear to be that the ticket person and clampers done the whole block without looking at yours properly. I tried to contest a parking ticket in the city near Fenchurch street, and didn't manage to get anywhere (i parked on an unmarked spot). I suppose the best thing to do would get some real advice, then examine your options. Good luck though!!! Lewis. | |||||
| 2089.4 | thanks | SHIPS::QIGONG::KOSKUBA | Karel_the_cotton_fist | Tue May 25 1993 17:31 | 5 |
re: .-1
AA legal dept. I haven't thought of it. Thanks, Lewis, I'll do that.
Karel.
| |||||
| 2089.5 | They're out to get you . . . | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO2-G/M6 | Thu Jun 03 1993 16:44 | 20 |
I _believe_ that the legal position is that parking on the road,
anywhere where it doesn't specifically say that you can, is technically
illegal - "obstruction". The theory apparently is that the roadway is
meant for driving along - not for parking on. This is ancient Law, and
may have been changed by recent legislation.
"say that you can" above includes such things as "waiting limited to 20
minutes" etc (and, obviously, parking meters) - such signs implicitly
give you permission to park.
There's also the "ignorance is no excuse" rule - a friend of mine was
booked for parking on a double yellow line which you couldn't see, as
they'd re-surfaced the road over it. He was "supposed to know it was
there" (this in London, where double yellow lines aren't accompanied by
signs on the lamp-posts). They let him off "in the interests of good
relations" or something, although they claimed that they were technically
right (you're supposed to go to the Town Hall or somewhere and check
the Definitive Maps before you park!)
Dave.
| |||||
| 2089.6 | Update from Karel | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Thu Jul 22 1993 11:29 | 5 |
Karel left Digital a few weeks ago but last night he asked me to tell you that he has now heard from Westminster City Council, who are not proceeding due to a "technicality", and the Police, who are refunding the clamping fine. Dave. | |||||