T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2067.1 | WHOOPS | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Mon Apr 19 1993 13:57 | 8 |
| Sorry ...should have read
OPEL ASTRA 1.4 GL 4 DOOR
=
CHEERS,
TR
|
2067.2 | Astra | AYOU35::WARREN | | Mon Apr 19 1993 14:09 | 12 |
| TR,
IMHO the Astra has/is all of these, with added bonus that spare parts would
probably be cheaper than the Jap rivals, but more importantly, no little
git will try and steal your radio cos the set is in 2 parts !
But in the long run, it will be YOUR opinion on the car that counts, not
everyone elses !
Test drive them and see what you like the best.
Warren
|
2067.3 | the BEST and the WORST?? | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Mon Apr 19 1993 17:57 | 16 |
| Warren,
thanks for the reply.
I did feel that the ASTRA blows the rest of them away. It looks
good, has a reliable pedigree, and.....I just plain fancy it.
Course my opinion is of no import in this case , as its for my wife,
he he he.....
An inverse to my original question, which is the worst of the list in
.0 .....and why?
thanks,
Tadhg
|
2067.4 | Good build quality! | PEKING::ATKINSA | | Mon Apr 19 1993 18:02 | 9 |
|
Have you thought of a 214 or 414 Rover.
I see from your list you've gone for 1.3 to 1.4's and the
Honda engine is supposed to be excellent (My Friend loves his).
Any help!
Andy
|
2067.5 | 1.4 = K-Series | MILE::JENKINS | Suitably refreshed | Mon Apr 19 1993 18:09 | 5 |
|
Err.... the 1.4 engine in the Rover is a ROVER engine. The 1.6s are the
Honda units.
Richard.
|
2067.6 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Mon Apr 19 1993 18:11 | 5 |
| And the 1.4 is a good engine - well mine did me well
for 60,000 miles
Ian
|
2067.7 | Rover - The Plane Maker 8*) | PEKING::SMITHRW | The Great Pyramid of Bloke | Mon Apr 19 1993 18:13 | 6 |
| ...and - I risk being ridiculed here - don't ignore the Maestro. It's
got a nice big roomy cabin, rides and handles well and isn't hard to
fix. I had one a lot of years ago and I was very pleased.
Richard
|
2067.8 | The astra is fine | BERN02::BYRNE | | Tue Apr 20 1993 08:16 | 11 |
| Tadgh,
We've had our Oel Astra 1.4 4 door for almost a year and a half now.
We've had no major problems except teething problems since it was the
first off the production line.
Service is every 15,000 kilometers !
Go for it !
Therese
|
2067.9 | A sound choice. | PEKING::ATKINSA | | Tue Apr 20 1993 08:20 | 7 |
|
RE.7
Meastro,not bad mechanically,but UGLY.
Andy.
|
2067.10 | What happens after 60,000 ??? | AYOU35::WARREN | | Tue Apr 20 1993 09:14 | 6 |
| Re 6 :-
Ian, did something go wrong with the car after 60,000 miles, or is that when you
happened to sell the car ??
I would certainly expect to get a lot more than that out of any engine.
|
2067.11 | Maestro!? | ROCKS::CAMP | | Tue Apr 20 1993 09:29 | 12 |
| Re: .7 I had a Maestro years ago (1600cc) and it was without doubt the
slowest and most fuel inefficient car I have ever run. The later versions
bigger engined versions MG and alike might be better. It never returned
better than 30 MPG no matter how gently it was driven, and was so slow
it was stressful to drive on a motorway. Comfortable though, which is
most likely due to the fact that it took such a long time to get anywhere.
I changed it for a Golf GTI which never did less that 35 MPG,
performed brilliantly and was a joy to drive.
So if you want to potter around, in comfort with fair amount of space,
and low mileage the Maestro could be for you.
|
2067.12 | | PEKING::SMITHRW | The Great Pyramid of Bloke | Tue Apr 20 1993 13:18 | 17 |
| I put about 35k on a maestro 1.3L over about 16 months in 86-87. The
water pump failed at 4500 but otherwise reliability was fine. Driving
style was heavy-footed, conditions were mostly in and around London and
motorways/long queues on M4/M25. Mpg overall was about 35 if memory
serves. I thought it was a great car. The 1275cc engine is a version
of the old Mini engine. The 1600 engine has served in the Montego for
many years and if they were generally as bad as yours seems to have
been, I don't think there'd be quite so many Montegoes around. The
Maestro MG Turbo is very thirsty, but gets to 60 faster than Ferarris,
Porsches, Lambos etc
Maestroes are comfortable because they have good seats and a good,
well-damped ride. Handling is fine, very safe but a bit slow because
it's 4 turns lock to lock.
Richard
|
2067.13 | A notesfile sighs | SIOG::KANE | give quiche a tranche | Tue Apr 20 1993 13:22 | 4 |
| �� Maestro MG Turbo is very thirsty, but gets to 60 faster than Ferarris,
�� Porsches, Lambos etc
Emmmm....no I'll not bother
|
2067.14 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Apr 20 1993 13:35 | 1 |
| The lease terminated at 60k and I got a Calibra!
|
2067.15 | thanks | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Tue Apr 20 1993 15:06 | 9 |
| Folks,
thanks for all the replies so far....
what maker offers the best warranty schemes?
ta,
Tadhg.
|
2067.16 | Warrany sir, what warranty ??? | AYOU35::WARREN | | Tue Apr 20 1993 15:25 | 4 |
| None, they are only interested in your money !!
:-)
|
2067.17 | Mitshibushi offers 3 year warranty | UKARC1::ELANGCO | | Tue Apr 20 1993 18:41 | 2 |
| Atleast in Britain anyway.
|
2067.18 | I love my 214. | SAC::WARBURTON | | Tue Apr 20 1993 19:35 | 6 |
|
Rover give a 1 year warranty, and you can pay extra to have it extended
to a 3 year warranty.
Julie.
|
2067.19 | Well I love my ZX 16V | WOTVAX::HATTOS | I think, Therefore I'm paid less | Tue Apr 27 1993 12:07 | 9 |
| Citroen ZX is mising off your list.....
The Aura 1.4 would be worth looking at.
It meets all your criteria, but then so do most of the others. The ZX
like the ASTRA has had rave reviews for quite some time. Personally I
preferred the old Astra shape, but thats down to you, sorry your wife !
Stuart
|
2067.20 | Achtung Tadgh !! | MACNAS::RNOONE | | Wed May 12 1993 14:28 | 10 |
|
The Golf was missing as well. I recently got a car in this class and
looked at all except the Japanese brands. For us it was down to the
Golf or the ZX (hated the Astra, esp. the inside). A close thing but we
got a Golf (great deal from local dealer) and are very pleased.
Robert.
|