T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1998.1 | as long as car fleet feel like making you wait | TBIRD1::WHITMARSH | Kevin - UK PCI Marketing 830 2604 | Wed Jan 20 1993 11:46 | 8 |
| Keith,
I have just come back from car fleet after chasing some quotes
I requested 5 weeks ago. They were sat in a pile of quotes 3 inches
thick and nothing had been done with them!!! Fleet say that they
will process them today, and I should get the results back in
about 5 days.
cheers
Kevin
|
1998.2 | 5-days ay! | SHIPS::ABBOTT_K | | Wed Jan 20 1993 14:32 | 7 |
| Kevin,
Yes, I had to chase them up before they "found" my quotes. I'm glad I
didn't wait indefinetly!
5-days ay.....we wait and see.......
Keith.
|
1998.3 | The wait goes on.. | BRUMMY::LONERGAN | Do little endians risc it? | Wed Jan 20 1993 16:28 | 28 |
|
K & K,
Well to-day is obviously the start of Car Fleet Admin new year
then! I submitted a car order on 11th of December and having heard
zilch since, decided to give them a call yesterday. I left "please call
urgently" msgs with various people down there to no avail. To-day I did
manage to speak to the man who processes the orders. Guess what, my
order hasn't been dealt with and unlike you guys I had no such promises
that it would be imminently either... the guy told me that he was
working on a backlog from last NOVEMBER.
Last time I ordered a car, it took about 5 weeks from order to
delivery (in the days when Car Fleet was part of Digital). Assuming
that it might take about the same this time around, I placed my order
in the hope I would get my new car before it had gone over the 60000
miles....this definitely wont happen now. If it could be proven that
Fleet Admin's inability to process orders in a timely manner was a
leading factor in Digital incurring penalties from the Leasing
companies for exceeding 60k miles, surely we should be in a position to
pass this fine back to Fleet. Even if this was mooted, I bet we'd see
an improvement in service from them. IMO, yet another example of so
called cost saving measures doing exactly the opposite....but is anyone
accountable, especially the bright sparks who's ideas these were.....
well hardly I'd say, wouldn't you.
Regards,
Se�n
|
1998.4 | | VANGA::KERRELL | David Kerrell @REO (830) x2279 | Wed Jan 20 1993 16:50 | 5 |
| Don't tell me about fleet backlogs! I got my new road fund licence from them on
the 18th January and only because of a personal visit (it ran out on the 1st
January).
Dave.
|
1998.5 | Mine was on time... | CMBOOT::DELANYS | Your pessimism is my realism | Wed Jan 20 1993 17:57 | 4 |
| I have to defend Fleet and say that my new tax disc arrived right at the
end of November, in time for its 30 November expiry....
Stephen
|
1998.6 | If they moan, take their cars away! :-) | EBYGUM::WILLIAMSH | | Thu Jan 21 1993 07:45 | 12 |
| The stories aren't all bad,
I put in 2 quotes on 1-sep-1992
got the acknowledgements 15-sep-1992
got the quotes back 21-sep-1992
send order to Fleet 22-sep-1992
PHH receives order 24-sep-1992
Then wait months and months, including hassling the garage, and car
turns up on 8th Jan (minus floor mats, which I'm still awaiting!).
Huw. (who's tax disc turned up 3 days early)
|
1998.7 | I've just submitted 2 quotes... | KERNEL::BAYLISD | I know pigs exist, therefore... | Thu Jan 21 1993 09:11 | 5 |
| I've just put 2 quotes in this week. When I get a response I'll post
another reply.
Dave.
|
1998.8 | | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | Party on Dudes | Thu Jan 21 1993 09:17 | 11 |
| The secret of succesful quoting/ordering is to hassle them every step of
the way.
When I actually ordered I rang them to 'check' they had received the form,
then rang again to be told it was lost!
Then I rang again and again, until I was given an anticipated date, which I
didn't believe, so I rang PHH, then tracked down the garage itself,
explained that as my car was over 60,000 I was trying to get the new one
asap, and got it 2 months before the fleet anticipated day!
Greg
|
1998.9 | | CHEFS::BRIGGSR | Four Flat Tyres on a Muddy Road | Thu Jan 21 1993 09:46 | 5 |
|
What's all this about car fleet not being part of Digital? Is this
true?
Richard
|
1998.10 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jan 21 1993 10:48 | 14 |
|
Huh, I sent quotes to car fleet, when I rang to find out where
they were, they said they had e-mailed them to me
..................unfortunately their badge number/name database was
over three years out of date, and they had sent them back to my
maiden name - I suppose it was hard-copy printed somewhere and then
thrown away.
So, beware, they don't look at the name on the quote request, only
the badge number - and they don't do much of a job of keeping it
current.
Heather
|
1998.11 | How to fudge the system | LARVAE::SMART_A | Resists anything except temptation! | Thu Jan 21 1993 13:11 | 10 |
| I wish I saw this yesterday ;-)
I was in DECpark so I paid Fleet a visit. Yep! There is a stack of
quotes about 3" thicks and mine was found half way down (submitted four
weeks ago) - it's now on the top and this morning there was an All-in-1
acknowledgement. I shall await with interest to see how long the quote
is coming.
So it just goes to prove, he who shouts loudest.... with apologies to
all those whose quotes got leap frogged. What a way to run a business!
|
1998.12 | I wonder what _some_ people's Job Review was like? | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, TCC, Birmingham UK | Thu Jan 21 1993 13:49 | 61 |
| This is an ABSOLUTELY ridiculous situation!
I don't know what is going wrong here, but it stinks of mis-calculated
cost cutting.
On 25-Jun-1991, Alastair Wright sent us all a memo detailing how much
we could save by changing the lease scheme.
At the time we were told that it cost �26M per year to run, but the changes
would save ...
�709,000 Immediate Savings - Extend existing leases by 6 months
�617,000 Savings per year - Extend new leases by 6 months
�200,000 One off savings - No new pool vehicles
Additionally, insurance would be loaded onto employee contributions,
saving yet further money and discouraging high insurance group cars.
Last year, on 14-Oct-1992, Alastair Wright sent us all a memo saying that
they would save �150,000 per year by offering ex-lease cars at a discount.
Wow!, looks impressive hey?
SO WHAT IS GOING WRONG?
The "basket of quotes" is so horrendously out of touch with the real prices
of cars that NOBODY uses it! Thus every new car is a fresh quote, but we no
longer have "quotes valid for everyone for one month" on VTX, so there are
bound to be duplicate quotes going through. WHY HAS THE PERSON WHO THOUGHT
THIS IDEA NOT BEEN SACKED? I am not allowed to buy a newspaper on expenses,
but others can throw away millions!
It is also funny that the car scheme STILL costs �26M per year, despite all
the cost cutting measures and reduction in headcount. But maybe we shouldn't
believe any of the above, because simple maths proves it wrong.
Assume that we have 5000 UK employees, and assume that EVERY SINGLE ONE of
them has a company car. Well the standard company car (not including any
market supplement, which is a salary component, not car component) is
based on a lease cost of �3,400 per year (including insurance), according
to a memo from Alastair Wright, 30-Jun-1992.
Thus the scheme costs 5000 * �3,400 = �17,000,000! Why is this nowhere
near the �26M banded about all the time by the BOM?
Now "rumours" tell us that fleet has now been "vendorised" to improve
competitiveness. HOW THE H*LL DOES ANYBODY MEASURE THIS?????
The cost in wasted employee time, excess mileage charges, de-motivated
employees etc is never calculated. The fact that there is a three inch
thick pile of quotes waiting to be processed SURELY must indicate a
problem, but does anyone who can do anything about it care?
I will personally but all the beer they can drink in a day, for the
manager who can actually get this whole mess sorted out. Thats a
serious offer (expires on 30-Jun-1993), 'cos if someone can fix this
problem then maybe there is hope for all the other problems in other
bits of the company!
mb
|
1998.13 | | VANGA::KERRELL | David Kerrell @REO (830) x2279 | Thu Jan 21 1993 13:58 | 4 |
| Last time I looked, Ray Bird was responsible for Purchasing, try sending your
comments to him.
Dave.
|
1998.14 | Queueing theory | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | | Thu Jan 21 1993 14:17 | 3 |
| If you have to wait ages for a special quote then soon everyone
will give up and take a std quote....but if someone complains process
them in order to keep the level of noise down.
|
1998.15 | Take the challenge ... | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, TCC, Birmingham UK | Thu Jan 21 1993 14:37 | 10 |
| Just to let you all know ...
i have just had a phone call from someone who is going to attempt to
get the "free beer for a day"!
Lets wish him/her all the best (i can't name them)
Cheers,
Martin
|
1998.16 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Thu Jan 21 1993 14:39 | 5 |
| It should be remembered that even if you ordered from the preferred
list, car fleet will still have to put in a quote. It just means that
you will pay the price on the list if the quote is higher.
Roy
|
1998.17 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Fri Jan 22 1993 09:01 | 4 |
| Don't you mean you'll pay the price on the list regardless of whether the
quote returned is higher or lower?
Ian
|
1998.18 | Dissatisfied Customers ay! | SHIPS::ABBOTT_K | | Fri Jan 22 1993 13:38 | 16 |
| Oh Dear! I didn't realise I'd be stirring up this much of a hornets
nest when I wrote .0! Looks like there is a lot of dissatisfied
cutomers out there!
Re .12. Martin....Is it a manager that has taken up your challenge?
If not whose going to be brave enough to copy this whole note to a
senior manager!
My quote acknowledgements arrived with me on the 18th. I'll let you all
know when the quotes come through.
Keith.
P.S. Perhaps when I booked my ferry crossing for August '93 I should have
given them my current registration!
|
1998.19 | Help is on its way ... | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, TCC, Birmingham UK | Fri Jan 22 1993 14:23 | 12 |
| Keith,
yes, it is a *manager* who has taken up the challenge, and one who is
(hopefully) in a position to do something about the current problems.
This person specifically asked me to maintain anonymity, but rest assured
that they are fully aware of the problems, and _constructive_ comments in
this notes conference can only help to improve things!
I just hope that this person isn't a heavy drinker ;-)
mb
|
1998.20 | One back. | SHIPS::ABBOTT_K | | Mon Jan 25 1993 11:07 | 11 |
| All,
Just to let you guys know that I have just had my first quote back,
that is 7-days since the quote was acknowledged, although it was sent
at 8:44 PM on Friday. That's not too bad is it?
For info, although I'll post it under recent quotes, Vauxhall Astra
GLS TD Estate with tow bar and twin Electrics - �211.
Keith.
|
1998.21 | still waiting.. | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Mon Jan 25 1993 16:16 | 7 |
|
Question...
How long does it take to get a quote acknowledgement back???
Sharon
|
1998.22 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Tue Jan 26 1993 10:12 | 7 |
| Mine took about 10 days for the acknowledgement, then 7 days for the
quote.
I think they've got a backlog now though so it may take longer.
Ian
|
1998.23 | 10 days - Humbug. | BAHTAT::DODD | | Wed Jan 27 1993 09:16 | 8 |
| I sent my quote on 14/12/92. Still no sign - not even an
acknowledgement. This despite ringing and being told things like "I'll
move it to the top of the pile", "I'll do it today" on more than one
occasion.
My patience is running out.
Andrew
|
1998.24 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Jan 27 1993 09:47 | 1 |
| Perhaps someone's trying to tell you something Andrew ;^)
|
1998.25 | Tired of waiting!!! | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Wed Jan 27 1993 10:44 | 11 |
|
That makes me feel a lot better, I phoned the chappie in Car fleet
yesterday and he said "I'll do these quotes today"...and there was me
thinking he meant it. I must be so gullable (sp?)...probably goes with
phrases like:
"Of course I love you" and "The world is flat"
Who is that masked man/woman who is going to save us from all this???
Sharon
|
1998.26 | TAKES A LITTLE PUSHING | SHIPS::FINNIMORE_C | | Wed Jan 27 1993 14:21 | 11 |
| QUOTE(s) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TOOK 1 MONTH
QUOTE(s) TOOK 5 DAYS AFTER CHASING
I rejected both on expense grounds and got the guy to work on another
quote I had put in coz I though the first two were lost(yes that's
3 so far) He did this in real time while I dictated it to him on
the phone.
C.
|
1998.27 | 2nd Quote Back | SHIPS::ABBOTT_K | | Thu Jan 28 1993 09:55 | 8 |
| Just to let you know that I had my second qoute back 8-days after
acknowledgement.
Now to place an order! The quote says that its only valid for 30-days
so I guess that they have got to submit it by
then........................haven't they?!
Keith.
|
1998.28 | | TRUCKS::BEATON_S | I Just Look Innocent | Thu Jan 28 1993 13:15 | 16 |
| I apologise if this is the wrong place....
Did anyone else notice the article in Computer Weekly which stated that
IBM are to adopt a cost-cutting policy whereby all authorised car users in
IBM must now choose a Vauxhall car or else pay a �100 premium to have
the privilege of driving something else. This is all through a special
deal between IBM and Vauxhall?
Any thoughts or comments on this from the panel ?
Reargards,
Stephen
|
1998.29 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Thu Jan 28 1993 15:27 | 6 |
| I wouldn't be surprised if our car scheme adopted a similar approach in the
near future. I wouldn't like it, but it would save the company a lot of
money.
Ian
|
1998.30 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Thu Jan 28 1993 15:34 | 11 |
| re .28 �or else pay a �100 premium
We are effectively already do that by paying extra for insurance on
performance cars.
I can't see that the company would be better off by dealing with just
one manufacturer. At the moment the company is offering us an allowance
and if the car we want costs more then we pay the difference. Its as
simple as that.
Roy
|
1998.31 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Thu Jan 28 1993 16:12 | 13 |
| Roy,
Olivetti get GIVEN extra money by Vauxhall for every car they buy,
because all fleet cars are Vauxhalls. This is on top of the discount
they get from the fleet buyers.
BTW IF you think that's bad, they've now all been told that their
choice is Vauxhall DIESELS only! Many unhappy SRI drivers just about to
renew their cars ;^)
Now you can see why the company would be better off!
Greg
|
1998.32 | goto BOSS: | BRUMMY::LONERGAN | Do little endians risc it? | Thu Jan 28 1993 16:39 | 17 |
|
8 days on from my my reply (.2 or .3 I think), Im still waiting.
Like several of the people in here, when I spoke to Fleet 8 or 9 days
ago, I got the impression from the guy that he would do his best to
deal with my order. When I called again yesterday, he had obviously NOT
processed it, in fact we went through the same routine again...badge
number, dtn etc etc and I got the impression rightly or wrongly that he
hadn't remembered my call of last week. Being a little unimpressed by
all this and getting no assurance that he would deal with my order
asap, I asked him who I should escalate it too. Well Im not giving
names away either but my manager has mailed the contact he gave me and
at least there's been a response from that contact. I'll let you know
how things progress from here....my boss is not at all impressed that
delays are gonna cost his CC real money so wants something doing like
now!
Se�n
|
1998.33 | acknowledgement acknowledgement! | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Fri Jan 29 1993 10:24 | 6 |
|
Things are looking up, I received two quote acknowledgements this
morning (nearly 1 month after sending them in). Now how long did we
say from acknowledgement to quote...was it 8 days or 80???
Sharon
|
1998.34 | On the way... | BRUMMY::LONERGAN | Do little endians risc it? | Fri Jan 29 1993 13:59 | 8 |
|
Well there's a thing. One day after "higher level involvement" and
guess what I got to-day, MY QUOTATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. What a shame to
have to resort to such measures but if thats how its gotta be done....
Now to wait for my order ack..
Se�n
|
1998.35 | Here goes. AHHHGGHHG!!! | LARVAE::DECARLO_K | I came, I saw, It 'panic'ed!! | Mon Feb 01 1993 18:32 | 28 |
| OK
Here is my Constructive feedback.
Mid December I sent two quotes off to car fleet.
Mid January contacted the chap in car fleet who deals with quotes, he
told me that there was a massive backlog and that if I didn't hear from
him, then he had found my quote and started processing it. I didn't
hear anything so was confident my quote was being processed.
1st February 1993, 14:00, called the same chap, he wasn't there, but I
was told he would call me back this afternoon.
1st February 1993, 17:20, called car fleet - NO ANSWER FROM ANYONE
1ST February 1993, 18:25, still have not heared anything.
My car has now done 60250 miles, the lease expires on 6th or 9th of
Feb. I had better not get a reminder from car fleet that my lease has
expired.
I will let you all know what happens.
Regards
Ken De Carlo
|
1998.36 | -.1 You are not alone! | COMICS::SCOBLE | Cantankerous. Me! | Tue Feb 02 1993 11:09 | 22 |
|
May I add to this litany of despair!
Quotes I put in 6-7 weeks ago haven't been acknowledged never mind
prices being returned on, although they are believed to be in the
system somewhere, as my name is remembered as sticking out a bit!
I have also asked for a price on my current car whose lease expires
in less than a fortnight, and I'm still waiting 3 weeks down the
line, although vtx dutifully informed a response will be forthcoming
in 5 working days. On enquiry I was told 10, now we're up to 15 and
counting!
I'm not necessarily feeling angst at car fleet, as they are caught
in the middle with the lease companies, and have tried to be helpful
when I've called. Perhaps we need a Service Level Agreement with the
lease companies, or even better to shop around a lot more with a response
to a quote request needing to be responded to within x days or a bid for
the business is lost. That might buck a few ideas up!
Gordon (Calland-Scoble)
|
1998.37 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Feb 02 1993 12:14 | 5 |
| But just think of all the money that has been saved since the September 1991
overhaul!
Ian
|
1998.38 | | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Tue Feb 02 1993 13:21 | 17 |
| I am only too well aware of the quotes backlog problem in Fleet. I
am taking action today, to try to radically reduce the backlog.
You can help us by making sure that the car you request a quote for is
the current model, that you are clear about the options you want and
you allow the people doing the work an opportunity to do it.
Please restrict yourself to the two quotes we have traditionally given.
At the moment we are being asked to give quotes at the rate of 4,000 a
year. For a company that only changes about 1,200 cars a year, that is
more quotes than is neccessary.
In the last few weeks, we have had some successes in CarFleet and we
have an agenda for getting it right. I am determined to succeed in this,
but cannot do it without my customers' help and goodwill.
Doug
|
1998.39 | quotes quotes and more quotes | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Tue Feb 02 1993 13:52 | 28 |
| �we are being asked to give quotes at the rate of 4,000 a year.
Doug
First of all, thanks for your comments on this subject. For a long time
we have been wanting to hear from someone "in the know".
*FLAME ON*
We understand that if we order from the preferred list that a quote has
to be submitted anyway. Are these quotes included in your figure ?
Also it is common knowledge that by submitting you own quote it is
likely that it will be cheaper than on the list.
Also the fact that as quotes are officially "personal" it means that
even though quotes are reproduced in this notesfile (see #1538) no one
else can order from them (or so we've been told).
It seems that the current system is designed to generate quotes _not_
reduce them.
It would be sensible to look at ways of reducing the number of quotes
by allowing a more flexible system.
*FLAME OFF*
Roy
|
1998.40 | God it's hot here | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Tue Feb 02 1993 14:03 | 6 |
| Being very careful Roy, (.39), I might say that you make a very valid
point. With the benefit of hindsight, it looks as though we have,
albeit with the best intentions, produced something which is too
complex to be managed properly.
Doug
|
1998.41 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Free the Brew XI | Tue Feb 02 1993 15:17 | 10 |
| I would like to commend .40 as the most honest note from a person with
responsibility, that I've seen in a long time. If my assumption that
Doug is a new(ish) appointee, then there seems to be hope for the
future.
Secondly, opening a direct dialogue with your user community is a
sensible decision. Feedback is instant and honest, and as such,
valuable. Notes is a powerful tool, a good friend, and a deadly enemy.
Laurie$not_a_permie.
|
1998.42 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Feb 02 1993 15:39 | 8 |
|
Also, now the "recent quotes" have gone, people like me - who take the
money - put in their two quotes to decide whether to continue to stay
out, or join.
So its not just dependent on the number of cars coming up for renewal.
Heather whos_thinking_of_changing_her_car
|
1998.43 | And on the other hand... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | So, who did vote for the Tories? | Tue Feb 02 1993 16:02 | 8 |
| Car Fleet have handled my quotes and order without any problems. They
have given me details of the new car, and the supplying dealer...
so sometimes it does work well. Mind you, they also couldn't tell me anything
about the tyre replacement policy, and said both lease companies have the
same rules....
Peter.
|
1998.44 | | CHEFS::BRIGGSR | Four Flat Tyres on a Muddy Road | Wed Feb 03 1993 10:55 | 6 |
|
Well having read the catalogue of woes in this note it was with much
trepidation I put two quotes in the week before last. I got quotes back
within 7 days!
Richard
|
1998.45 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Feb 03 1993 12:09 | 5 |
| Well, surely tnat goes to show that whinging in Notes conferences does
have some effect.
Ian
|
1998.46 | AAAAARRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!! | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Wed Feb 03 1993 12:23 | 32 |
|
This depends on how loud you Whine I suppose...
I got my two quotes back this morning after much chasing and a visit to
car fleet by my husband (who was chasing his as well) and one of them
has been rejected!!!
Only if you have had a quote rejected can you understand how
frustrating this is because you do not get a reason, instead you have
to phone up and find out why.
And the reason was....
One of the optional extras is no longer an optional extra!
** FLAME ON**
WHY THE H**L COULDN'T THEY JUST RING AND TELL ME THAT! I NOW HAVE TO
HAVE THE SAME QUOTE RESUBMITTED, MINUS THE ONE OPTIONAL EXTRA AND
START THE WHOLE GAME AGAIN.
I THOUGHT SOMEONE WAS SORTING THIS MESS OUT - PERHAPS THEY OUGHT TO
START WITH THE BASICS LIKE "HOW TO USE A TELEPHONE!!"
** FLAME OFF ***
FWIW the other quote was zero priced but no options.
Sharon
|
1998.47 | Two weeks and counting... | KERNEL::BAYLISD | I know pigs exist, therefore... | Wed Feb 03 1993 12:48 | 9 |
| re .44
I put a couple of quotes in two weeks ago, (to the day) and have heard
nothing yet. Oh well, maybe I'll have some mail waiting for me tomorrow
morning !.
Dave
(The wishful thinker !!!).
|
1998.48 | | WIZZER::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Wed Feb 03 1993 13:16 | 12 |
| re .46>
Someone in this office had their quote for a Citroen BX
rejected because he specified it as a hatchback but it's
actually a saloon. The fact that the BACK of the car consists
of a wacking great HATCH is immaterial, Citroen call it a
saloon and so must you.
His second quote for a TGD SALOON was also rejected because
it's now a TZD!
Ian.
|
1998.49 | | WIZZER::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Wed Feb 03 1993 13:20 | 5 |
| Having just added a whinge, I'd like to wish Doug Arnold
good luck in sorting the mess out. My own constructive
suggestion is to return to the previous system.
Ian.
|
1998.50 | | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, TCC, Birmingham UK | Wed Feb 03 1993 13:36 | 16 |
| I too, would like to wish Doug all the best in sorting out fleet, even
though it is going to cost me a crate of beer (although he would prefer
Dom Perignon) ;-)
I just hope that he gets the _authority_ to do what he feels necessary
to improve things (all things, costs, quality of service, morale of
his staff etc), and isn't battered down by the bean counters.
If a few more higher level managers took note of what said in conferences
such as this, rather than branding us as "whingers", then perhaps changes
in the organisation and business practices would reflect the real issues,
and not those of deck-chair attendents!
Good luck Doug,
mb
|
1998.51 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Feb 03 1993 13:43 | 7 |
| I thought another major revies of the car scheme was already underway
and has been for some time now. Does anyone have any details? Will
we return to more public access to quotes? Will we all be driving Sierras/
Mondeos? Will driver prices increase?
Ian
|
1998.52 | If it wasn't pathetic it would be John Cleese | BAHTAT::DODD | | Wed Feb 03 1993 14:09 | 10 |
| On a side issue. I mailed Sally Fountaine (Car fleet takeovers) asking
to take over a car until fleet process my quotes and added the request
that if the Passat I'd asked for had gone please tell me what was left.
Sally would not tell me, mail or phone, what was left and said that I
should wait for the new list later this week.
So I'm driving my car with the miles mounting and Fleet won't tell me
what's left - it makes me want to cry. Well almost.
Andrew
|
1998.53 | Just a thought, from a customer... | SUBURB::MCDONALDA | Shockwave Rider | Wed Feb 03 1993 16:27 | 10 |
| Are the people who are currently revising the car scheme
a) the same as the cretins who devised the fiasco in place today?
and
b) asked the users for feedback both on the problems and suggested
solutions?
Angus
|
1998.54 | Another suggestion re.40 | FAILTE::THOMSONS | | Thu Feb 04 1993 15:12 | 10 |
|
Re .40 asking for all quotes to be up to date correct model etc , would it
not seem reasonable to have all old models removed from the Preffered Car
List and the list to be updated with the current models/options .
At the same time it would seem quite sensible to add in the most popular
makes/models that have been requested or ordered , this would surely save a
lot of wasted time both for car fleet customers and car fleet themselves.
Stuart
|
1998.55 | Very faintly related to quotes, as I've submitted two but... | SUBURB::MCDONALDA | Shockwave Rider | Thu Feb 04 1993 16:30 | 18 |
| Two weeks ago I ring up fleet and ask when my lease expires: 2nd Feb
1993 came back the answer. Note this is the original expiry date for 30
months. I complete two quotes and submit them. Not trusting the system,
I mail fleet to confirm the expiry date; I want it in writing. Fleet
responded the next day (yes, don't fall off your chairs, you did read
it right, the next day) to confirm that the lease expires on 2nd August
1993. So, hwo do I believe?
Today, I put my car in for repairs to the clutch. The garage ring up
Hertz to get authorisation for the repairs and for a 30K service; I
didn't ask for the service (forgot) but the garage were on the ball.
Guess what? As far as Hertz are concerned, the lease expired two days
ago (2nd Feb 1993) and they were expecting the car yesterday.
I assume fleet have ripped up my quotes, but its a big assumption.
Angus
|
1998.56 | | KRAKAR::WARWICK | Can't you just... ? | Thu Feb 04 1993 17:02 | 6 |
|
Reading all this stuff makes me even more glad that I never opted in to
the "hassle free motoring" available under Digital's car lease
scheme...
Trevor
|
1998.57 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Thu Feb 04 1993 17:09 | 13 |
| Angus
We were all informed some time ago that our leases would automatically
be extended to 36months if we already had a car on a 30 month lease.
I don't know how this was done, but your car appears to have been
overlooked. Maybe the leases weren't extended on all cars.
For anyone with a car that was originally for 30 months and is clocking
up a high mileage, you can advise fleet and change your car at the end
of the original 30 month period. This is what I am doing.
Roy
|
1998.58 | Not just Angus | SAC::HAYCOX_I | Ian | Fri Feb 05 1993 10:58 | 13 |
| Your not the only one who has been overlooked.
I phoned up PHH about two weeks ago to determine when my lease was
due for renewal and they still had the 30 month date, whereas Fleet
said it was the new 36 month date. The person I spoke to at PHH did
say that Fleet can change the length of the lease period at any time
before expiry.
I also asked PHH if there were any penalties for late return, but they
said they didn't speak to drivers and I'd have to take up the matter
with fleet.
Ian.
|
1998.59 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Fri Feb 05 1993 11:38 | 8 |
| The other thing to check if your car originally had a 30 month lease
and you are keeping it for 3 years, is to check the fleetcard expiry
date.
You may need to ask for a new one. You will get problems if you try
using for repairs after the expiry date.
Roy
|
1998.60 | | VANGA::KERRELL | ('O^O') | Fri Feb 05 1993 14:00 | 5 |
| >is to check the fleetcard expiry date.
Mines 09/95 and I've had the car two years!
Dave ;-)
|
1998.61 | Ah yes...the fleet card!!!! | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Fri Feb 05 1993 20:53 | 7 |
|
I've just had National Breakdown out cos my petrol cap got stuck, lucky
they didn't ask for the fleet card as it ran out 09/92 when the car was
originally due to expire - never thought of it till now but the car
only has a month to go now so it's a bit late to get a new card.
Sharon
|
1998.62 | I wonder what they charge for a stuck petrol cap? | WIZZER::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Sat Feb 06 1993 22:51 | 8 |
| >> I've just had National Breakdown out cos my petrol cap got stuck, lucky
>> they didn't ask for the fleet card as it ran out 09/92 when the car was
I doubt whether National Breakdown are that bothered about
fleet cards. We have them on a "pay-as-you-use" basis, i.e.
Digital is billed for each callout.
Ian.
|
1998.63 | One down, one to go... | KERNEL::BAYLISD | I know pigs exist, therefore... | Mon Feb 08 1993 09:24 | 9 |
| Waiting for me in my mail this morning was an Acknowledgment from car
fleet, two and a half weeks after I submitted the quote. The odd thing
is I submitted two quotes in the same envelope and have only had one
acknowledged !.
Still maybe tomorrow ?.
Dave.
|
1998.64 | Gawd, back to work. | SUBURB::MCDONALDA | Shockwave Rider | Mon Feb 08 1993 10:21 | 31 |
| Sorry folks, I've been on leave so I haven't kept up with this note.
I contacted fleet about my 'over due' car. They said that all cars had
been automatically extended and that Hertz/PHH were informed of this.
They then went on to say that the operation was so huge (3700+ cars)
that it was inevitable that some cars would be missed. It never occured
to the managers of Fleet to get a list of 'modified' lease dates from
Hertz and PHH and cross check that all had been extended. A souless
boring task I'll admit, but it could have been done in a couple of
days. Already my boss and I have wasted a day on this.
When I first phone Fleet, four weeks ago, it was Fleet who informed me
that my car was due for renewal on 2nd Feb. Not trusting Fleet a
micrometer, I sought verification in writing and was duely told 2nd
August. Then Hertz inform the servicing garage that it was due on 2nd of
Feb. I'm now back to being told its the 2nd of Aug.
Fleet also said that although my Prime card had expired, this should
cause no problems. We'll see.
I asked about penalties for overdue cars i.e. if Hertz reckon my car
was overdue would they hit my cost center with charges. Fleet said
there were no penalties. Again, we'll see.
I can deal with the leases being extended, in fact its somewhat
advantageous as it gives me a chance to see what Lamont (have I got it
right :-) has in store for us and what the diesel Espace looks like.
What I can't deal with is all this running around in a process that is
supposed to have saved us money.
Angus
|
1998.65 | | IOSG::HORSFIELD | Special Finest Tippy Golden Flowery Orange Pekoe | Tue Feb 09 1993 09:18 | 8 |
|
4 jan 1993 - submit first quote
3 feb 1993 - quote acknowledged
8 feb 1993 - submit second quote
8 feb 1993 - quote acknowledged!
jack
|
1998.66 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Tue Feb 09 1993 10:02 | 6 |
| �8 feb 1993 - submit second quote
�8 feb 1993 - quote acknowledged!
Is Doug at work already ?
Roy :-)
|
1998.67 | *HE* is at work!!! | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Tue Feb 09 1993 10:13 | 10 |
| Re: last
I think he must be, I got my "resubmitted" quote back this morning.
Although I think the credit has to go to Hilary Bailey who dealt with my
re-quote personally because the other chappie was training.
This one was also zero priced so the order went straight in...now I
wonder how long...???!!!
Sharon
|
1998.68 | Order Acknowledgement | SHIPS::ABBOTT_K | | Tue Feb 09 1993 16:45 | 12 |
| Sharon,
I posted my order from home, directly to REO F3 on Thursday 28th Jan.
(I don't trust internal mail!)
Allowing for the fact that it probably didn't get to DECPark until
Monday 1st Feb, I guess Fleet should have had it by Tuesday 2nd. I had
confirmation that the order had been placed with the leasing company on
Wednesday 3rd.
Can't beat that really, can you.
Keith.
|
1998.69 | The earth hasn't moved for me...Still waiting | WELCLU::YOUNG | | Tue Feb 09 1993 23:29 | 8 |
|
I sent in 2 quote forms about 3 weeks ago......not even an
acknowledgement yet.
Still waiting
Richard (Young)
|
1998.70 | 3 weeks is not a long time ..... | WELLIN::HARRINGTON | A Software What.....? | Wed Feb 10 1993 14:42 | 10 |
| I sent 2 quotes in at the beginning of December '92. I was told in
Jan'93 that they were on the system. I have since found out that they
are still not in the system ...!!
My car ran out yesterday, and is due a 63,000 service ....!!
How long are quote supposed to take ....!!!??
Mark
|
1998.71 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Wed Feb 10 1993 14:56 | 6 |
| The replies to this note have been very informative.
It would seem that the sensible thing to do is phone car fleet if you
haven't had a quote acknowlegement within 7 to 10 days.
Roy
|
1998.72 | If you can't beat them..... | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Wed Feb 10 1993 15:02 | 6 |
| I would say it was a must cos if you don't and all the other people
waiting for quotes are ringing them, your's just gets nearer and nearer
the bottom.
Sharon
|
1998.73 | NURSE - you see this spear in my chest.. | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Wed Feb 10 1993 16:54 | 12 |
| In my reply (.38) I said I was taking action to deal with a backlog of
quotes. This has happened but has inevitably taken longer than I
anticipated owing to the size of the problem and the need to put in an
additional administrator who needed system training.
In terms of response, I have stated that quotes will be dealt with in
strict "received date" order and in two sections (2 Admin people
2 sections geddit glenda ?) one section from the Preferred Car list
and t'other for car outside the PCL.
I intend to keep you updated as we progress (YES that was PROGRESS !!)
Doug
|
1998.74 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Thu Feb 11 1993 08:32 | 3 |
| Thanks for keeping everyone informed Doug!
Greg
|
1998.75 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Thu Feb 18 1993 13:12 | 26 |
| Doug
Are you in a position to comment on the following ?
Note 1538 and its replies has always been useful for getting an idea
of driver costs for cars not on the preferred list. However, it is
understood that as these are personal quotes then nobody else can order
from them.
Is this still true ? Only it seems that some people have had
authorization to order from someone elses quote.
Could you explain why it is a problem to order from someone elses valid
quote as this seems a good way of cutting down on the number of quotes
that are generated.
The other thing is that someone has had a quote rejected because he
wanted a quote for a car with the option of locking wheel nuts and
told to order from the preferred list. As you have to get a
seperate quote for an order off the preferred list anyway, what is
the problem with submitting a personal quote with a locking wheel nuts ?
Thanks
Roy
|
1998.76 | Another view of Fleet | ARRODS::WHITAKER | The man from Hull | Mon Feb 22 1993 18:34 | 15 |
|
While I'm sure Car Fleet are doing their best I would like to point
out that I submitted my quote request in mid December (92). I finally
received an acknowledgement back on the 11th of February after the
usual phone calls to hurry the system up. Today I received a ridiculous
price notification which being 1000 pounds dearer than I expected
prices the car completely out of my league. I wish I understood the
system they used for arriving at the price because I can't work it
out !
It has taken just over two months to get this far and I've got five
weeks before my current car runs out.
Andy
|
1998.77 | Theory and pracxtice may not be the same! | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Feb 23 1993 10:15 | 19 |
| > I wish I understood the
> system they used for arriving at the price because I can't work it
> out !
Whatever PHH and Hertz can lease it at to make a reasonable (excellent?)
profit!
Something like cost of financing car over x months
plus costs of servicing (new exhaust/tyres)
plus admin
plus profit
less estimated recovery value of car when sold-on
The idea of the preferred list, is so they can do a better deal on the
cost of those cars.
Heather
|
1998.78 | They're getting There!!! | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Thu Apr 22 1993 13:40 | 11 |
|
I dropped a couple of quotes into the office on Monday afternoon and
as if by magic Thursday morning the acknowledgments were waiting in
my Inbox having been mailed Wednesday evening.
The only strange thing is both quotes acknowledegments are saying
36 months/36000 miles, is this something new , does it mean the lease
cost will be cheaper????
Regards Martin
|
1998.79 | | PAPERS::CORNE | John Corne - Product & Technology group | Thu Apr 22 1993 13:55 | 6 |
| How many miles per year did you put on the quote form? I put in one a
couple of weeks back with 20k per year and it came back as 36m/60k.
Seems about right. (changed from 30 months about 3 years back, soon
after I got the current car).
Jc
|
1998.80 | | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Thu Apr 22 1993 14:20 | 3 |
| I stated about 12,000, But in didn'y think they did 36,000 mile leases.
Regards Martin
|
1998.81 | It was with PHH | CURRNT::PAYNE_A | Book early to avoid disappointment | Thu Apr 22 1993 17:14 | 5 |
| When I put in a quote for my car I put down 12000 mile pa, and the
quote came back for 36 months, 60000 miles which is a good thing as
I've done 12,000 in 7 months.
Andy
|
1998.82 | PREFERED not updated | UBOHUB::PAYNE_R | | Tue Apr 27 1993 10:45 | 9 |
|
How come the "Prefered" car list is not being updated ??
How many Ford mondeo's are being quoted, and how many show up on
the list...
Come on. UPDATE the list..
|
1998.83 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Tue Apr 27 1993 11:53 | 5 |
|
> How come the "Prefered" car list is not being updated ??
It gets done once a year, June I think.
|