T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1918.1 | try the taxi rank | LARVAE::IVES_J | Bad Karma in the UK | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:28 | 3 |
| try you're local taxi rank. I drive a Citroen 19TGD and the Basingstoke
taxi service use the same. many opf theirs have 100,000+ and have
probably been badly driven.
|
1918.2 | 100,000? Pah! | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @REO 830-2279 | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:39 | 4 |
| When I was taxi driving and we used cars with the BL 1.8 'B' series engine, we
reckoned on 180,000 before the first engine went.
Dave.
|
1918.3 | Diesels are generally stronger than petrols! | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Fri Oct 16 1992 14:31 | 15 |
| Why on earth would you consider the life expectancy of the engine?.
Most modern cars have an extremly long life.
There are exceptions (there always are). I've known drivers of both the
BX diesel and petrol engine's have the cylinder-heads go. But then so
have drivers of virtually every other car on the road (I know a BMW
driver who's cam belt went and shot all the valves). However, your
more likely to consider if the Turbo, or the hydraulics pump or the
wheel bearings or the gearbox or the ....... are likely to go.
YOU know how it's been treated, YOU know how it's been serviced. YOU
know if it's been reliable or not. YOU are in the best position to
judge if it's a lemon or a gem!
Richard
|
1918.4 | I've got a non-turbo one... | SUBURB::JASPERT | | Mon Oct 19 1992 14:10 | 4 |
| ...Peugeot 205 1776cc non-turbo
currently 107,000 miles, uses no oil between oilchanges.
TJ.
|
1918.5 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Life begins at 40(Mhz) | Tue Nov 10 1992 10:32 | 11 |
| I'm shortly collecting my new 405 GLDT Estate, my first ever diesel
car.
What tips can the panel give me for general maintenance and care of the
engine with a view to maintaining efficiency and prolonging engine life?
I'd also be interested to hear of any tips on general driving
techniques that may be relevant to a turbo diesel, and which differ
from driving a "normal" car.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
1918.6 | my 2p worth | LARVAE::IVES_J | One i-node short of a file system | Tue Nov 10 1992 11:35 | 47 |
| I've the BX Diesel which uses the same engine unit (none turbo).
I have rarely opened the bonnet, as its a fleet car, and I've never had
to.
My only advice is that :-
1) I believe water is inclined to collect in the engine which is
trapped in a special chamber which you should pump-out every couple of
thousand miles. I've never done this as this forms part of the service,
but it's simply a button you press a few times inside the engine
compartment. I guess the water is one of the many byproducts from
burning diesel..
2) I run mine on the nearest-diesel-to-me-when-the-gauge-gets-low,
however I agree with some notes that say that the cheap diesels are
rather smokey. Shell,BP,Esso are all fairly clean and one of them
(forget which) does a diesel plus. I've not yet tried cooking oil :-)
3) Stand well back when filling up as if you overfill your tank and get
diesel down your trousers it don't come out !
4) Even with the turbo's i think you'll find the 0-30 acceleration not
QUITE up to what you are used to, but after a whil you dont notice it.
However I think you'll be surprised in the 30-70 range where diesels
are often better than similarly sized petrol engines.
5) When you start the engine turn the key to the heater position till
the little light goes out. This takes about 4 seconds , and having done
this you'll find the engine starts first time. Mine has never failed to
start first time when I follow this ()correct) procedure, even in
frosts,snow etc.
6) If it was my car I'd probably spend more time cleaning around the
fuel cap as this area gets really dirty after fuel spills, as the
diesel is thick and sticky compared with petrol which simply
evaporates.
Most diesels you see have a dirty yellow discolouring around the fuel
cap, which if you clean it regularly (I don't I'm ashamed to say) can
be avoided.
7) Enjoy the economy ! When Digital sends me to Katmando (or worse -
Ipswich!) I don't get frustrated - I just drive there and think about
the pennies I'm accumulating (3p a mile might not seem much but when
you do a 300+ mile journey it adds up - almost the price of a CD )
Happy driving
|
1918.7 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Life begins at 40(Mhz) | Tue Nov 10 1992 11:53 | 19 |
| RE: .6
Thanks.
Two things interest me:
0-30. The 0-60 speed of the 405 1900 Turbo is a little over 12 seconds,
and the top speed is 112. I'm not anticipating any complaints there!
The 70+ acceleration (in 5th) was stunning, I was really surprised, and
when I eased off at 85ish (I test drove in the UK) it was still pulling
like a train. In performance terms, it was perfectly adequate for
family transport.
Lastly, a rathole. It's funny you should mention Ipswich, that's where
I'm collecting the car from. What with me being local and all...
Anyway, keep the info coming, especially technical stuff.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
1918.8 | Some more | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Tue Nov 10 1992 13:06 | 26 |
| Well to correct .6 a bit, Yes water does tend to collect in the fuel
filter, but you don't empty it by pressing the plunger, that's there to
prime the circuit if you ever run out of fuel (unlikely as there's a
low fuel warning light) as you shouldn't run the engine without fuel
as it acts a a lubricant for the pump/distributor assembly.
You empty the water by unscrewing a drain screw usually located at the
bottom of the fuel filter (You find this by following the pipe back
from the distributor unit)
As for diesel driving:
Change up earlier, the maximum revs are only 4,500
Change gear less often, there's terrific torque, make use of it.
For Turbo D's I'd probably add
keep it above 2,000 RPM and you'll really motor!
The advice on the little heater light is good, but this is only
necessary on a cold engine. If you've been using the car it'll re-start
no problem, and in the summer it'll usually start straight away from
cold.
Oh, and I found my first BX used to soot up the injectors if I used
TEXACO fuel.
Richard
|
1918.9 | And more | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Tue Nov 10 1992 16:23 | 8 |
| RE: non-evaporating fuel -
Also be careful where you step around the diesel pump: as these are
(often) used by truck drivers, there are sometimes puddles of the stuff
around. If you step in these puddles, and then all over someone's new
carpet, you'll get very unpopular!
D.
|
1918.10 | avoid HGV pumps | LARVAE::IVES_J | One i-node short of a file system | Tue Nov 10 1992 16:56 | 11 |
| Another thought :-
when you pull in at services, particularly on the Motorways I tend to
avoid using the HGV pumps. A lot of services also have a
motorist-orientated diesel pump. The trouble with the HGV pumps is they
have a huge nozzle (ohh err missus ;-) ) which don't really fit in the
Fuel pipe of my car very easily. Plus these things dump about a 1000
gallons in a second which explodes all over you Plus you get filthy
looks from the HGV drivers queing up behind you.
when it comes to nozzle size , its control over size anyday
|
1918.11 | | RUTILE::LETCHER | Runaway Argument in Hotspot | Wed Nov 25 1992 09:35 | 10 |
| I was test driving a Peugeot 405 GRDT the other day and the garage
owner said, after I'd switched off the engine, that I should have let
it idle for a few seconds before switching off. Why is that?
Other things he said about looking after the car were that I shouldn't
accelerate wildly while the engine is still very cold (the first couple
of minutes, anyway) and that it was essential to give it regular
services (which I knew).
Piers
|
1918.12 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Nov 25 1992 11:07 | 5 |
| The same rules applied about my old Renault 5 Turbo. Can't remember the
reasons though, wade through the Renault 5 topic, I'm sure it is
discussed in there.
Greg
|
1918.13 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Mean and Brooklands Green! | Wed Nov 25 1992 11:48 | 5 |
|
Bearings in the turbo are very prone to wear (they spin at 100,000
rpm+). They need oil!
Mark
|
1918.14 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | The pipeline's been right-sized | Wed Nov 25 1992 11:59 | 3 |
| Tell me Piers, what did you think of it?
Laurie.
|
1918.15 | | RUTILE::LETCHER | Runaway Argument in Hotspot | Fri Nov 27 1992 07:07 | 36 |
| I went through a fair range of tests:
o Citroen BX Diesel Turbo -- Nippy and responsive, but the slushy
suspension and overall feel and look (no, I can't be more precise)
made Martine reject this one.
o Renault 19 GTD -- Easily the fastest of the lot, but it felt as if it
was working flat out the whole time. Also, and I know this sounds
stupid, but I didn't like the shape. And the man trying to sell it to
me was a real slimeball; incredibly reluctant to let me drive it, and
said I'd have to wait 3/4 months to have one, if I wanted a new one,
and that the secondhand market was non-existent.
o Peugeot 205 Turbo Diesel -- Much too noisy.
o Peugeot 405 GRTD saloon -- Felt less robust than the Renault or the
VW; though still a treat to drive. I was much more impressed by the
Estate version.
o Peugeot 405 GRTD Estate -- Liked this, but something of a family car
(I don't yet have a family). It's highly likely that I'll replace the
existing Peugeot 305 GLD Estate I have with this in a couple of years
-- it has a solid, roomy feel to it.
o Opel Astra/Corsa Diesel (couldn't find a turbo) -- Not impressed; I'd
like to try the turbo some day.
o VW GOLF GTD (series II) -- Not as fast as most of the above, but I
cared for it more than perhaps I should. It would be a) cheaper to
buy, but b) much more expensive on parts etc. than almost all the
others. I like the look and feel of it very much. And, when it came
down to it, it was the only one of all the ones I tried that Martine
wanted. So I bought it.
Piers
|
1918.16 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | The pipeline's been right-sized | Mon Nov 30 1992 12:25 | 32 |
| Well, I collected the 405 GLDT Estate (1900 engine) on Saturday, and
drove it back to Brussels that evening. First thoughts:
I'm still VERY impressed with the engine, performance, fuel economy,
handling, quietness etc. The interior is nice, roomy and so on.
Generally I'm very happy. Motorway driving is a doddle, with bags of
power in 5th from 55mph upwards. At running-in RPM (3500) it'll do
90mph which is perfectly acceptable. So far there seems to be no sign
of the "It'll use a lot of fuel until it's done 3000 miles, Sir"
syndrome, which leads me to believe it's exaggerated. Assuming the
gauge is accurate, I've got over a quarter of a (70 litre) tank left
after 380 miles. I've driven it pretty fast since I got it (although
under 3.5K rpm), and "demonstrated" it to lots of people, with lots of
low-speed, low gear accelleration and stuff. It's turning in 33ish mpg
which is good considering. I expect to average some 45mpg once it's all
running smoothly, had its first service, and I stop driving it so hard
through the gears showing off! The turbo cuts in at about 2100 and
makes a huge difference to performance (and fuel consumption!). First
gear is very "short".
A couple of negative points though, which even though I was aware of
them before I bought it, are quite irritating. The glove box is tiny,
so small it's a struggle to get the handbooks in there. There's no tray
in the front, all that dash in front of the passenger is completely
wasted. The cubby box between the front seats is just too low to rest
one's elbow on it comfortably. The fuel gauge is a bit "wobbly", and
seems easily affected by the car's attitude.
Aside from that, well chuffed. It's a superb family car and I'm looking
forward to many miles of inexpensive motoring.
Laurie.
|
1918.17 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Whatever happened to Sally James? | Wed Dec 02 1992 18:06 | 13 |
| I've given it its first fill-up since I filled it the day I collected
it. On the day in question, for some reason I found myself at the
commercial vehicle pumps. Mindful of advice from in here, I was very
careful of the flow-rate. Anyway, as a result, what with the foaming
and everything, I couldn't get it completely full.
After a few days of mixed driving in which I have made absolutely no
concession to economy at all, aside from keeping it under 3,500 RPM,
it's turned in 36.44 MPG. This figure is distorted by the fact that I
got more fuel in this time, but probably not by much. For a new, tight
engine, I'm well pleased with this.
Laurie.
|
1918.19 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | No... I've had my ears lowered | Tue Aug 24 1993 12:32 | 8 |
| I can't answer your specific questions, but I can say that 120K is no
big deal for a properly maintained diesel, especially one of the PUG
ones. Do not skimp on oil and filter changes, and change the fuel
filter/separator regularly. Cam belts are also a problem, and must be
changed on time. If it has a full service history, you should be ok. If
not, service it NOW.
Laurie.
|
1918.18 | 405GTDT with 120K.. | MACNAS::B_WALSH | | Tue Aug 24 1993 14:27 | 14 |
|
Folks...I've just purchased a Peugeot 405GTDT with 120k on it,
drives like a dream, any ideas on what I should be looking
out for as I've received 6 months parts and labour.
Any idea or info with regards to fuel consumption /
performance ??
Anybody got a Pug 405 T/D with over 100K on it and any
problems ????
Brian.
|
1918.20 | A compromise | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Tue Aug 24 1993 15:39 | 6 |
| Although Haynes don't do a manual that covers your exact model, they do a
Peugot 405 manual, and a Peugot diesel engines manual. Between the two you
should be covered. (although it's twice the price then!)
Richard
|
1918.21 | More on the 405... | MACNAS::B_WALSH | | Wed Aug 25 1993 11:56 | 14 |
|
Thanks for the replies...the garage I bought the car from said that
Pugs with 100K+ on then end up having to replace some bushings on
the rear axle which would mean striping the axle..this was completed
and also they give radiator problem..I see a new one has been fitted
but thye coolant low warning light flashed yesterday during a short
journey can I top it up with water ?? also passenger window motor seems
to be on the way out..do the start to lie down and sound painfull when
near the end of their time.
Thanks for the replies on the manuals...I've heard that there are
other manual manufacturers - any ideas ??
Brian.
|
1918.22 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Wed Aug 25 1993 12:24 | 14 |
| Brian,
You mention you bought it from a garage so is there a warranty ? If so
there are a few things to talk to them about here.
Regarding coolant loss. You say a warning light came on. So what ? What
about checking under the bonnet to see how much coolant is there. If it
is low this could indicate a leak which should be rectified as all
modern cooling systems are sealed these days. As a "get you home" you
can add water (make sure the engine is cold first) but you will weaken
the anti freeze so it should be drained and refilled with a fresh
mixture of anti-freeze and water or a premixed coolant.
Royston
|
1918.23 | !!! | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Wed Aug 25 1993 14:03 | 4 |
| Methinks the garage are telling porkies! The 405 doesn't have a rear axle, the
rear wheels each have their own spindle. Definitely not a lot of work!.
Richard
|
1918.24 | | PEKING::SMITHRW | Off-duty Rab C Nesbit stunt double | Wed Aug 25 1993 14:14 | 11 |
| Re: axles
On my last BX (the one I smashed up at 125k), what had to be replaced
was the bushings for the swinging arm pivots. This sharpened up the
handling a bit and stopped the klunk-bang noises when reversing....8*)
As the BX and 405 have a fair commonality of parts, I suspect this is
what was meant.
Richard
|
1918.25 | 405 coolant indicator/MPG | MACNAS::B_WALSH | | Wed Aug 25 1993 14:28 | 10 |
|
From under the bonnet...there just seems to be the fill up point on
the radiator, no top up or expansion tank as in other cars..Am I
totally dependant on the light in the dash to indicate that I am
low on coolant.
Any ideas on MPG have'nt had a chance to test it yet...??
Brian.
|
1918.26 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Wed Aug 25 1993 14:45 | 7 |
| �just seems to be the fill up point on the radiator
If this is the case, then when the engine is _stone_ cold open the
filler cap. The level should be at the neck of the opening. Fill it
slowly to prevent air locks. I guess it depends how low the coolant is.
Royston
|
1918.27 | I'll try it out.. | MACNAS::B_WALSH | | Wed Aug 25 1993 14:50 | 7 |
|
Thanks....I'll give it a try...
Brian.
|
1918.28 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | No... I've had my ears lowered | Wed Aug 25 1993 15:13 | 7 |
| A mate of mine has the 1700 non-turbo version, he claims 45-50mpg. His
has done about 70K miles.
My 1900 turbo has now done 13K and still averages 40mpg in mixed
driving.
Laurie.
|
1918.29 | 1769 v 1900 t/d | MACNAS::B_WALSH | | Thu Aug 26 1993 11:03 | 8 |
|
Laurie...
How does the 1900 compare with the 1769 turbo and how do
these compare to the BX turbo's. I think the 1769 engine is 92BH what
does the 1900 deliver.
Regards..
|
1918.30 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | No... I've had my ears lowered | Thu Aug 26 1993 12:31 | 4 |
| I can't remember, and the books are at home. I'll attempt to remember
to bring them in.
Laurie.
|
1918.31 | Power little change, torque greatly | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Aug 26 1993 13:37 | 4 |
| I think from memory the power is little changed (90BHP for 1.7, 92 for 1.9)
It's the torque that went up significantly.(can't remeber numbers)
Richard
|
1918.32 | Should easily get 40MPG | SCOTMN::CORNE | John Corne - Product & Technology group | Tue Aug 31 1993 12:13 | 9 |
| I've had the turbo diesel for 1500 miles now and kept a careful record
of the fuel I've put in. Its averaging at 40MPG overall, with
individual fillups doing between 37 and 43 MPG. I don't hang about if I
don't have to...
Only fault so far is that the fuel gauge doesn't work! (hence the
record above...)
Jc
|
1918.33 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Coito ergo sum | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:03 | 10 |
| I revisited this topic to look up the stuff on water in the fuel (I
have said warning light flashing at me...) and I noticed all the stuff
about fuel consumption etc.
Well, mine's now done almost 38K and still returns an average of 40mpg.
I still drive it hard, and I still think it's a gem. I looked at the
new 806 the weekend before last, and I'll definitely be buying one next
summer when they're released in the UK.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
1918.34 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Coito ergo sum | Thu Oct 06 1994 15:24 | 6 |
| Well, I searched under my bonnet, and I can't locate the fuel filter.
Does anyone out there know where it's located on a Pug 405 1900TD?
November 1992 vintage? There's rather a lot shoehorned under that
bonnet! Maybe I have to get at it from underneath...
Cheers, Laurie.
|
1918.35 | By the battery | TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Oct 06 1994 15:46 | 11 |
| I haven't got one.... but I know a man who has......
Under the bonnet, on the right (look at it) there's the battery, and it's on
a bracket coming off the infacing end of the battery tray. Proably got 4
pipes going to it
Hot water in/out
fuel in/out.
Alternatively, trace the fuel feed back from the fuel pump/distributor (mounted
nearest you on the front left of the engine.
Richard
|
1918.36 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Coito ergo sum | Thu Oct 06 1994 18:15 | 6 |
| Thanks. I'll have a look tonight. I did see such a beast, but I
couldn't find any kind of 'tap' on the bottom to release the water,
neither could I see the glass bowl I expected to find (too much time
fixing tractors).
Cheers, Laurie.
|