T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1884.1 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Thu Sep 10 1992 12:40 | 6 |
| That means mine is costing them a fortune, 'cos the 3 month order
period isn't enough!
Greg
62,000 with new car arriving end of October?!
|
1884.2 | | EBYGUM::GUEST2 | Mother played by Peter Beardsley, father by John Cleese | Thu Sep 10 1992 12:55 | 15 |
| My lease was extended to 36 months last year. This made my
renewal due October '93. I mailed fleet estimating that I
would have 60k miles by January '93 so they reduced the
lease back to 30 months - April '93. Can they only work in
6 month periods? I was told that they couldn't reduce it to
24 months. So this means that I will still be a couple of
thousand over the 60k limit when I renew the car - provided
there's no delay in delivery.
I'd be interested to see some figures showing just how effective
the revised scheme (sept '91) is in terms of reducing expense.
Does anyone know how we might go about finding out?
Ian
|
1884.3 | How to play the game. | CMOTEC::JASPER | | Fri Sep 11 1992 13:32 | 9 |
|
My solution to over-mileage was to take-over a short-life lease-car,
releasing my over-mileage car. The short-life car was then passed to
another when my new car arrived.
(Everyone should try a high-mileage basic car, it really makes you
appreciate the choice we have !)
TJ
|
1884.4 | We need to cut costs. | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Achey Breakey Back | Fri Sep 11 1992 17:07 | 18 |
| I think this should be made very clear to company car drivers
to the effect that they should make their manager or car fleet know
their car is coming up to 60k miles otherwise it will cost the company
dearly.
I'm surprised this hasn't been made known officially to us as there
can be major savings here. Imagine a car that has done 70 or 80
thousand miles. At 20p a mile the cost incurred would be more than
the cars worth !
Christmas has been "cancelled" (didn't Cromwell try this once :-) )
to cut costs so why isn't this issue been highlighted ?
It has always been said in fleet news on vtx that the lease is the time
not the mileage. This should be changed, perhaps with a suggestion to
use a pool car if the mileage is getting too high on your own car.
Roy
|
1884.5 | | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Mon Sep 14 1992 08:49 | 5 |
|
My company car has done 90k miles. No-one has said anything to me about
excess at any time.
Colin
|
1884.6 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Achey Breakey Back | Mon Sep 14 1992 10:37 | 14 |
| Colin,
It would be interesting if you approached your manager to ask him why
you weren't told earlier that you have cost the company �6000 in excess
mileage costs (@20p a mile).
If this really is the case and lets face it, car fleet are not going to
contact everyone from time to time just to check the mileage, then
there should at least be an official procedure for us to follow if cars are
approaching high mileage.
I'll try contacting fleet about this issue and post an update.
Roy
|
1884.7 | They SHOULD know | SEDDFS::KORMAN | tgif!! | Mon Sep 14 1992 11:09 | 7 |
| One of the things I recall from the last change to the car scheme was that
Car Fleet receive regular report from the leasing company on mileage using
information from the servicing invoices.
A quick look at VTX confirms that this is the case - so they don't really have
any excuse for not noticing vehicles with 90000 on the clock!
|
1884.8 | What a rip-off! | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Mon Sep 14 1992 11:36 | 10 |
| How do PHH/Hertz possibly justify 20p/mile?
At that rate, a driver doing 100 miles a day (approx - I haven't done
detailed sums) would be better off leaving his lease car at home and
renting a car from Avis (at DEC rates).
It seems high time that FLEET looked at renegotiating our lease
contracts. Or going to another company.
Dave.
|
1884.9 | Why Just PHH/HERTZ | SASE::FAILTE::THOMSONS | | Mon Sep 14 1992 15:20 | 12 |
|
We have customers that must have 3 quotes for supplies/maintenance/sales etc.
So why do we only stick at 2 with the attitude of "Well its always been that
way".
Should we not be inviting other people to tender for this as we keep hearing
that in the past DIGITAL have always been a soft touch for their suppliers.
Stuart
|
1884.10 | Digital Today warns of lease-car clampdown | CMBOOT::DELANYS | | Mon Sep 14 1992 17:31 | 18 |
| I'm trying to be objective with this note, but this month's Digital
Today, page 3 (it would be...) pulled me up. It's the bit in there
about cost-cutting and mileage.
To quote: "The use of company cars is also going under the microscope".
It then talks about drivers who exceed their contracted mileage, but am
I reading too much into that quoted sentence? I just wonder if private
mileage could be limited in the future...
Surely all they needed to say was something like: "If drivers exceed
the contractual mileage on their lease cars, then Digital is liable for
a sizeable excess charge. Company car drivers should inform Fleet in
good time if it looks as if they will exceed the contractual mileage
within the agreed period".
Stephen
|
1884.11 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Achey Breakey Back | Mon Sep 14 1992 17:42 | 15 |
| I've been in touch with the author of the memo quoted in .0
and apparently car fleet are looking into this matter at the moment.
They need to give 9 months notice to the lease company to arrange
a different termination date so if you think you are going over
60000 miles contact them asap.
If you already are over 60000 miles then it might be an idea to
speak to your manager as you may be able to takeover another
car temporarily.
Something should be done to officially communicate this to all
company car drivers as this issue probably affects a lot of people.
Roy
|
1884.12 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Sep 14 1992 21:06 | 7 |
| I did everything right, I warrned them I would be well over 60,000 by
next april, so they reduced my lease until October this year. I then
told them in May/June that I would have done 60,000 by August, and that
my next car would be 3 months delivery, so could I order in June and I
was told NO WAY.
Greg
|
1884.13 | Efficiency - huh! | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Tue Sep 15 1992 00:07 | 2 |
| I mailed them over three weeks ago to shorten my lease - no reply.
The next one's going with a read receipt and copies to managers.
|
1884.14 | The tail is wagging the dog.. | MIACT::RANKINE | | Tue Sep 15 1992 17:59 | 30 |
| Im currently in discussions with car fleet about this. VTX is full of
contradictions re the lease scheme, and it doesnt help when you get
different info from them when you contact them. VTX states clearly
that the driver must inform car fleet of expected mileage at time of
order. Based on previous 30-35 miles per annum I put this on the order
form. They confirmed that the lease scheme would be 2 years. Then the
lease schemes were extended by 6 months without proper analysis as to
the effects of high mileage users. So now they say I must hold on to a
car for 6 months longer with an existing 63,000 miles (and growing)
with a cost to Digital. They also claimed that nowhere in VTX does it
say that they monitor service records,,,I told them where to find it
!! A colleague ran a mileage up of 93,000 miles cos he believed car
fleet would tell him when to re-order..at a cost of 17p per mile excess
this is over �6000 !!! not exactly cost cutting is it. Lets face it
PHH and Hertz need us more than we need them..if they aint flexible
dont use them ..there are plenty leasing companies out there.
I performed a straw poll in our group about car fleet ...it seems
nearly everyone has a gripe/horror story about them. Whats being done
about it ??
A colleague ran them today to inform them that 11 months into his lease
he had done over 30,000 miles, with the likelyhood that htis would
increase to 40,000 per annum. They told him to inform them of the
mileage in 6 months time...if they need 9 months notice to re-negotiate
lease terms, why are they telling people to come back to them ???
To be honest, Partick Thistle are more consistent than Car fleet... no
offence intended to any Jags fans out there !!
Paul
|
1884.15 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Wed Sep 16 1992 16:37 | 16 |
| I just spoke to fleet. Here is my story. Apparantly, hertz offer a deal where
you can send the car back up to three months before the lease term ends
if it has clocked up the agreed mileage. For me this means that if I do 60k
in January as I estimated, and my car is due for renewal in April, then I will
be able to send it back in January. I will also be able to start the process for
ordering a new car three months prior to the new termination date of January.
The price per mile over the agreed limit is 17p, but this is not chargeable to your
Cost Centre. Fleet have a pot mof money. If a car is returned under the agreed
mileage, then fleet get some money back from the lease company, if the car
is returned over the mileage, then fleet have to pay something (17p per mile).
As for PHH, well, mine is hertz so I didn't ask. Does this clarify the situation?
Ian
|
1884.16 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Achey Breakey Back | Wed Sep 16 1992 17:13 | 14 |
| Thanks Ian for shedding more light on the subject.
Its good to know the company gets some money back on low mileage cars.
Presumably though if you hadn't contacted fleet to find out this
information and blindly clocked up a massive mileage with a view to
renewing at 3 years you never would've been aware that you would have
saved to company a couple of grand by ordering early.
As I don't believe that this notes file has an audience that extends to
all company car drivers, don't you agree that this should be officially
communicated in some way ?
Roy
|
1884.17 | another disatisfied customer of car fleet!! | TBIRD1::WHITMARSH | Kevin | Wed Sep 16 1992 19:35 | 36 |
|
I have been going through this with car fleet as well. About 3 months
ago (when my car was 20 months old 56k miles), I went and asked fleet
to shorten my lease. I was instructed to send a mail to person X,
which I did, expecting to get the lease shortened to october '92.
Person X forwarded my mail to person Y for action. Well, suprise
surprise, nothing happened! Two weeks ago I went to see them again,
and they told me that person Y left SIX months ago!!!, and told me
to send them another mail!!!! (mileage then 64k). They then
told me that the lease can only be shortened in 6 monthly invervals,
and that 3 months notice is required. ie: if they had done something
when I originally asked, they could have shortened the lease to
October, now only to April '93. By which time I shall be pushing
100k miles. (�0.20 X 40000 = �8000)
They also told me that the mileage penalty is on average
20p per mile, and that this is only just being introduced. To
send the car back earlier will incurr an early termination penalty.
I have asked fleet to tell me how much this penalty is, well 10 days
later I am still waiting for a reply!!! of course this penalty
needs to be borne by the drivers cost centre, the mileage penalty
by car fleet.
As to taking over an existing lease, I would be happier to do
this if fleet would recognise that these are second hand cars
and not expect to get the original leasing cost. I dont think
much of the idea of paying a frequently higher cost than a new
lease for a frequently lower spec car that is second hand!!
It would also be useful if VTX listed the mileage of the
second hand cars, there would be little point in my taking
over a car with 50k miles and 18months to go.
Disgruntled of DECpark. (mileage now 66.5k)
|
1884.18 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Maintain the rigidity | Thu Sep 17 1992 09:33 | 5 |
| If you lot don't escalate this to someone who will do something about
it, fleet will continue in this manner. Posting notes here achieves
nothing except making you feel better.
Laurie.
|
1884.19 | | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Thu Sep 17 1992 09:39 | 9 |
| � Posting notes here achieves nothing except making you feel better.
A bit like the 'plonker' who had parked over two parking bays in DECpark ?
All the slagging off in here, including suggestions as to what obscene
words to carve into his windscreen, when it turned out that the car
had been dumped by some thieving/joyriding git...
J.R.
|
1884.20 | Ya gotta escalate ... | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Thu Sep 17 1992 10:16 | 9 |
| PLEASE escalate this, and all the other frequent gripes about Fleet.
I can't myself, as (at this moment :-}) I have no personal problem with
them.
But if people just lie back and let themselves be messed around by
Fleet, nothing will ever be done.
Dave.
|
1884.21 | Same dept, different story. | ARRODS::BARROND | Snoopy Vs the Red_Barron | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:27 | 21 |
| <<< Note 1884.15 by KERNEL::FISCHERI "Tonight I fancy myself" >>>
<<<The price per mile over the agreed limit is 17p, but this is not
<<<chargeable to your Cost Centre. Fleet have a pot mof money. If a car
<<<is returned under the agreed mileage, then fleet get some money
<<<back from the lease company, if the car is returned over the
<<<mileage, then fleet have to pay something (17p per mile).
<<< Note 1884.17 by TBIRD1::WHITMARSH "Kevin" >>>
<<<They also told me that the mileage penalty is on average 20p per
<<<mile, and that this is only just being introduced. To send the car
<<<back earlier will incurr an early termination penalty. I have asked
<<<fleet to tell me how much this penalty is, well 10 days later I am
<<<still waiting for a reply!!! of course this penalty needs to be borne
<<<by the drivers cost centre, the mileage penalty by car fleet.
Bit of a contradication here chaps!
Or am I missing some obvious, like these two guys work for different
companies?
Dave
|
1884.22 | Or is there a more official way ?? | MIACT::RANKINE | | Thu Sep 17 1992 15:11 | 7 |
| The last mail I got from Car Fleet stated that the info from VTX is
created and entered by Personnel, and the Car fleet have no control
over the content. This goes some way to explaining the contradictions
in the car fleet section of VTX. Perhaps someone of more technical
capability than I could extract this topic and send it to the CAr Fleet
manager ??
Paul
|
1884.23 | Car Fleet should take ownership of VTX pages | FUTURS::FIDO | The Man With No Personal Name | Thu Sep 17 1992 15:27 | 12 |
| .22>The last mail I got from Car Fleet stated that the info from VTX is
.22>created and entered by Personnel, and the Car fleet have no control
.22>over the content.
This is absurd - anyone who can use an editor can easily be taught the
couple of things which VTXPrep requires of a document. All that is
needed then is for the VTX pages "owned" by car fleet to be allocated
to a different VTX Information Provider, who would be in the Car Fleet
organisation. Then, there would be no excuse for not maintaining the
information on VTX.
Terry
|
1884.24 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @REO 830-2279 | Thu Sep 17 1992 18:05 | 6 |
| re.23:
Perhaps Personnel are there for a reason? Digital's contract with Hertz/PHH
may have different terms to the Digital/Employee contract managed by Personnel?
Dave.
|
1884.25 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Fri Sep 18 1992 13:21 | 9 |
| According to the unnamed person I spoke to in fleet, the three month "window"
around the lease termination date is for Hertz only. If the car us returned outside
of this three month period, say in November when renewal is due in April,
then the lease companies impose a penalty for early termination.
By the way, I'm waiting for a call from Rob Allen - Senior Administrator at fleet
to discuss some sort of official communication on this. I'll keep you posted.
Ian
|
1884.26 | Carfleet 54, where are you ? | SUBURB::JASPERT | | Fri Sep 18 1992 14:04 | 2 |
|
Car fleet, come in. Car fleet, come in. Over.
|
1884.27 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:26 | 19 |
| OK. I just spoke with Rob. Here is the siuation as he sees it.
During the first year of owning your car, you should be aware of how long it'll take
you to hit the 60,000 mile limit. If you feel you will exceed this before the termination
date of the lease, then you should send a mail to car fleet explaining the situation.
Hertz have a three month window for returning cars before the lease has expired
if they have hit the agreed mileage. PHH have a two month window.
This information has not been made common knowledge as the system would then
be open to abuse. If you are nearing the agreed mileage, then you should notify fleet
who will then tell you about the "windows".
As stated before, cars returned under mileage mean money in the pot. Cars over
the mileage mean money out of the pot. The system tends to break even.
That's about it. They are his words (not quoted) so don't have a go at me.
Ian
|
1884.28 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Achey Breakey Back | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:36 | 8 |
| Did he mention anything about official communation about saving the
company money by arranging to return cars avoiding mileages over 60k ?
I agree they should not need to tell all and sundry all the loop holes
where the scheme is open to abuse but there are thousands to pounds to
saved here.
Roy
|
1884.29 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:39 | 7 |
| He said the "window" stuff would not be made "official" as it is open to abuse.
All the information I got off him was in my last reply - sorry!
Ian
Someone else may want to try. Maybe the more people pestering him the better!
|
1884.30 | | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, TCC, Birmingham UK | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:52 | 15 |
| So what happened to the statement, in VTX, in
2 Car Fleet
1 Preferred Car List Guidelines
4 Leases
Where it says "All mileages are monitored through service records"?
I supposed both PHH and Hertz must be laughing their socks off with this ...
"Hey, look, another car being serviced over 60,000 miles, should we tell DEC?"
"Nah, we make loads of money on this fiddle!"
mb
|
1884.31 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Fri Sep 18 1992 17:18 | 8 |
| Ah yes, that reminds me. I forgot to mention that Fleet have no access to
service records. These are dealt with purely by the leasing company. "That's
what we pay them for" were something similar to what Rob told me. So,
unless you notify fleet of your mileage yourself, then they haven't the foggiest
what mileage your car has done.
Ian
|
1884.32 | You cant beat them, they make the rules up... | MIACT::RANKINE | | Fri Sep 18 1992 17:30 | 20 |
| Re .30
martin,
That was my point to them about info on VTX..they even said that it was
not said on VTX, and that no-one in Car Fleet knew wher eI got this
info. As you know I an a level headed Scot, who never loses his
temper, but I dont like being called a liar. I pointed out where they
could get the info, as per a previous note, which is when they stated
that they have no ownership of the data in VTX. This strikes an
interesting question....do we believe any of the rules/guidelines in
Car Fleet VTX ??..given that there are a few contradictions in there,
it means that they can play to any rule they wish. In fairness they
are understaffed, but it seems that they need to re-evaluate the lease
scheme terms and re-post them to avoid any confusion.
Everone I speak to at the moment seems to have a gripe/ horror story
about car Fleet, how long can they continue like this ??
Cheers
Paul
|
1884.33 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Maintain the rigidity | Fri Sep 18 1992 17:37 | 15 |
| RE: <<< Note 1884.32 by MIACT::RANKINE >>>
� Everone I speak to at the moment seems to have a gripe/ horror story
� about car Fleet, how long can they continue like this ??
I thought I'd given a tiny clue as to the answer to this. Here's
another, after an <FF> to protect the weak-hearted or those of nervous
disposition.
They will continue to behave like "this", and to get away with it, just
as long as whoever it is in senior management who is responsible for
this area, remains in blissful ignorance as to the consequences.
Laurie.
|
1884.34 | Pence Per Mile is OTT | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Fri Sep 18 1992 19:09 | 15 |
| re:17p or 20p per mile over the 60,000.
I was speaking to a chap at Mentec today. They have a similar scheme,
i.e. for for every mile over 80,000, they have to pay an amount. His
car has done 80,000, so they're allowed to replace it. Furthermore, get
this, the amount they pay per mile is 8p. He nearly fell off his chair
when I told him what we pay.
Now, I'm not dur to change my car until I don't know when, but I think
I'll bang a mail into fleet telling them how many miles I've done, so
that they know now.
Colin
P.S. 29,000 in 13 months, and rising.
|
1884.35 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Sep 21 1992 10:43 | 10 |
| I think the main problem is this 3 month order window.
My wife's new company car was ordered 5 months ago, to arrive the day
her current lease runs out.
My new Digital leasemobile was ordered 27th July and will arrive end of
October, well past the 10th August I could have had it because of
excess mileage!
Greg
|
1884.36 | Straight from Fleet (the horse's mouth?) | LARVAE::SMART_A | Amnesia is loss of ...er..umm | Tue Sep 22 1992 19:49 | 11 |
| As I was in DECpark today I called into Fleet to find out what the
situation was with my car (23 months old, 48K miles).
Firstly the 36 month/60K miles is a myth! The person I spoke to told
me that it was never official and that the lease is as originally
advised, that is 30 months/50K miles. When I asked should I renew it
now I was told to hang onto it until April (end of the lease) when it
will have 60-65K miles but to start getting quotes January to order
February for April delivery.
Suits me.
|
1884.37 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @REO 830-2279 | Wed Sep 23 1992 09:56 | 6 |
| re.36:
So we're all driving around believing we've got 36 month leases and we have not?
Strange myth, I seem to remember some pretty official communication on this.
Dave.
|
1884.38 | Why not ask? | LARVAE::SMART_A | Amnesia is loss of ...er..umm | Thu Sep 24 1992 14:57 | 7 |
| Dave,
I suggest that everyone calls fleet and determines exactly what is on
the database for their individual vehicle. I can only repeat what I
was told by Fleet. As for the message, I remember it well!
Alan
|
1884.39 | Car Fleet? A figment of the imagination! | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Fri Oct 02 1992 16:07 | 14 |
| If you can get ANY response from anyone in Fleet let me know.
I would love to be able to get hold of a car from the take-over list...
but after multiple phone calls, mails (as yet unread) etc I have given
up...
My car was due to go back on 8th August, but has only done 43000 so I
guess at the moment its not a problem...
I'll let them chase me...
Xtine
|
1884.40 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @REO 830-2279 | Fri Oct 02 1992 17:58 | 7 |
| re.39:
You should tell Alistair Wright. He thinks it will take a lot of work to make
savings on the lease fleet. Sounds like they just need someone to answer
queries!
Dave.
|
1884.41 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Achey Breakey Back | Fri Oct 02 1992 18:01 | 5 |
| I think one of the problems is that the car fleet administrators have
little interest in motoring (judging by their lack of input in this
conference). IMHO.
Roy
|
1884.42 | :-( | FUTURS::WATSON | More ham please | Sat Oct 03 1992 01:08 | 5 |
| Roy,
This could be because (I believe) that H.R. personnel are NOT
ALLOWED to use notes ! (See discussion in UK_Digital).
Rik
|
1884.43 | F&A, A&L, ??? | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @REO 830-2279 | Mon Oct 05 1992 10:01 | 6 |
| re.42:
Car Fleet is not part of HR. It's admin and therefore in whatever the admin.
org. is called nowadays!
Dave.
|
1884.44 | The reason? | LARVAE::SMART_A | I can resist anything but temptation | Mon Oct 05 1992 19:53 | 6 |
| At the risk of being inundated with mails to the contrary, I believe
that the majority of Fleet are not in fact Digital employees but
contractors/temps. I suggest that their goals are not inline with
ours.
If my suspicions are unfounded, then I will withdraw the comment.
|
1884.45 | | MAJORS::QUICK | Don't worry, he'll stop after a mile or two... | Tue Oct 06 1992 13:14 | 4 |
|
Re .44 - oh good, anti-contractor prejudice. How mature.
JJ.
|
1884.46 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Two legs good, four legs kinky | Tue Oct 06 1992 13:52 | 4 |
| Leaving aside the pathetic dig at contractors, I'll say once again that
whining in here is ineffectual. ESCALATE.
Laurie.
|
1884.47 | No digs, just fact | LARVAE::SMART_A | Resists anything except temptation! | Tue Oct 06 1992 18:24 | 11 |
| At the risk of a rathole...
Re .45 - it was not not an anti-contractor dig but a statement of fact.
Perception - Fleet seem to have a high turn-over of staff who work a
process and seem to add little value. Like it or not, contractors are
goaled on delivering a completed task whereas permanent employees (one
hopes) have a different attitude. For the record, I have worked on
both sides.
.46 is right - if you don't like the service, do something about it. I
have!
|
1884.48 | still waiting... | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Oct 07 1992 13:25 | 14 |
| So have I... the mail mentioned earlier was sent to Chris Palmer...
who still hasn't read it.
Today I left my third message (this time with Rob, the last two were on
an answering machine) asking him to read it and reply.
What use is an Electronic Mail system if noone reads it - and it is
marked Urgent!
Xtine... still disgruntled...
|
1884.49 | | SUBURB::VEALES | Simon Veale - DEC Park, Reading | Wed Oct 07 1992 15:11 | 10 |
|
Just because you request a read receipt in ALL-IN-1 doesn't mean you'll
actually get one. The message may not be received in another ALL-IN-1
account, and even if it is, it may be set up to not send out read
receipts.
However, along with all the other signs, you are probably correct in
thinking that he hasn't read it. :-)
Simon-whose-account-doesn't-send-read-receipts
|
1884.50 | | UNTADC::TOWERS | | Wed Oct 07 1992 16:13 | 7 |
| When you were a child you may have thought that putting the appropriate
textbook underneath your pillow the night before an important exam was
all that was needed for the information to get into your brain. A lot
of equally immature managers seem to think that printing their All-in-1
mail serves a similar function.
Brian
|
1884.51 | Anyone know if Fleet's still there ?? | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Thu Oct 08 1992 11:48 | 11 |
| Is anyone getting any response at all from Fleet?
I get the distinct impression that they're deliberately ignoring us (my
car is now well past its lease end date, not that it worries _me_ as
it's low mileage and still suits me fine).
Am I being paranoid if I think I might see a connection with Alastair
Wright's memo about expense reduction ("The car scheme currently cost
us �26 million a year . . .")?
Dave.
|
1884.52 | Go straight to Alistair | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | | Thu Oct 08 1992 12:06 | 6 |
| How about someone that sits in the same building as Mr Wright, collating all
the complaints in here and going through them with him.
I'd do it but I'm in Leeds, and on customer site until Mid November!
Greg
|
1884.53 | There's always a better way... | MILE::JENKINS | Suitably refreshed | Thu Oct 08 1992 14:20 | 4 |
|
Why not just put an order in for a new car?
Richard.
|
1884.54 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Thu Oct 08 1992 15:56 | 5 |
|
Re: .51
Are you aware that it is *your* responsibility to ensure a replacement car for
when your current lease runs out, not Fleet's to remind you to do so ?
|
1884.55 | Yes, I know it's my responsibility | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Thu Oct 08 1992 18:05 | 3 |
| Yes. I've had a quote request in for 2� months now.
D.
|
1884.56 | FLEET Dept, Where are you ? | CMOTEC::JASPER | | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:32 | 7 |
| ...Still amazed that no-one from our fleet dept, regardless of status,
appears to take any interest in CARS_UK, especially when so many Cries
From The Heart are being voiced here.
I guess we're all shouting in the wrong room, or being ignored.
So, come Fleet, fight back !!!
|
1884.57 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Tonight I fancy myself | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:37 | 4 |
| I was told that they don't have time to read notes!!!!!
Ian
|
1884.58 | And there's more... | MILE::JENKINS | Suitably refreshed | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:59 | 2 |
|
They don't have time to read mail either....
|
1884.59 | In their defence | LARVAE::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, TSE - Technology Services, End-User Computing | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:47 | 23 |
| I sent a mail to car fleet about 3 months ago......
No replies, no acknowledgement...
Then the end of last week I had a reply!!
This was the reply that I wanted (shortening the lease period to
match the mileage I am doing), and will provide something for me to
do over Christmas (looking at cars)!!
Thank you to Lucy / Nicole from car fleet:
The mail was sent from:
From: NICOLE WHEATE
WHEATEN AT A1_PEKING at SUBURB at REO
Dept: A&L
Tel No: (7)830 4700
although the name on the bottom of the mail was:
Lucy Marper
(DIGITAL FLEET)
|