T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1820.1 | | SBPUS4::Mark | I'm having a bad year | Tue Jul 07 1992 10:48 | 2 |
|
Who is your car with currently ?
|
1820.2 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jul 07 1992 11:46 | 12 |
| > Does anyone know of insurance companies which will insure a US driver
> for a month of my (personnel) car, at a reasonable cost (less than 150
> pounds)?
Have you tried adding an "any driver over 35" to a policy.
We changed our policy from 2-named drivers, to "any driver over 35"
and it cost us an additional 30 quid for the year.
Heather
|
1820.3 | Re: Heather's note.. | SBPUS4::Mark | I'm having a bad year | Tue Jul 07 1992 15:12 | 28 |
|
Dodgy.
A US citizen driving your car is a material contribution to the potential
losses your Insurance Company may suffer. And you haven't disclosed it.
What this means in practice is, that if you get stopped by a policemen, then
the driver will be covered. This is because there are limitations to
the restricitions that may be put on a certificate of insurance. However, if
he had an accident, only the third party injury (may include TP damage these
days) will be paid; this is all detailed within the policy rather than the
certificate. Theoretically they could avoid the entire claim, but they will
then be asked to pay it by the relevant bodies. You will have to withstand
your own losses and potentially re-imburse the insurance company for any
payoout they made. In addition they will decline your insurance in future,
and this will massively affect your insurance premiums with anyone else.
Insofar as declaring who you are adding, then the effect on your policy
(pocket) depends on the Insurance COmpany. For example, the Norwich Union are
quite liberal about foreign nationals in general, and US nationals in
particular. OThers most definitely are not.
US Nationals are considered a liability since they are entitled (as we all
are) to sue from either the country in which the incident occurred or their
own country. The civil liablity payments in the US are the problem.
M.
|
1820.4 | Ask your own insurers | RDGE88::ALEUC7 | | Tue Jul 07 1992 15:54 | 8 |
| You could try contacting your own insurance company and asking them.
My insurance agent (Co-op) has told me that I can temporarily add an extra
driver to my "self & spouse" policy for a small administrative fee.
I would expect it to be quite a common request for insurance companies
to deal with.
Carol.
|
1820.5 | | IOSG::FREER | Three spellings short of a dictionary? .. | Tue Jul 07 1992 16:04 | 5 |
| Re: .1
My car is currently with the RAC Insurance.
S.
|
1820.6 | | IOSG::FREER | Three spellings short of a dictionary? .. | Tue Jul 07 1992 16:11 | 14 |
| Re: .2
As I am currently 27, any driver over 35 would rather cut me out of
things! 8^)
Of course if any one out in digital land (Reading) is going on holiday
around the weekend of 7th to 10th of August and would like to have
someone look after there leese mobile, instead of having to park it in
an airport car park, and risk it being stolen/broken into, then I would
be glad to volunteer! 8^)
Cheers,
Steve
|
1820.7 | you learn something every day | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jul 07 1992 16:54 | 14 |
| > -< Re: Heather's note.. >-
>
>
>Dodgy.
>
>A US citizen driving your car is a material contribution to the potential
>losses your Insurance Company may suffer. And you haven't disclosed it.
Are you saying that a policy which states any person over 35 actually
doesn't mean that, and it limits you to British people?
Heather
|
1820.8 | | IOSG::DAVEYJ | | Tue Jul 07 1992 17:05 | 7 |
| re .several
Well my wife is a US citizen, and is insured to drive my car. I didn't
declare that she is a US citizen on the proposal form -- does that
leave us in a dodgy situation if she prangs the car?
John
|
1820.9 | | SBPUS4::Mark | I'm having a bad year | Tue Jul 07 1992 17:16 | 19 |
|
Re: Last two
I would, in both cases, tell the Insurance Companies concerned. It *IS* a
material fact, and even if they decide not to charge, they still must be
told. IF they say it's ok, you've lost nothing. If they get difficult, you've
potentially saved yourself a nasty situation.
More specifically - Heather
No, that wasn't what I said. Pick up your Insurance Certificate, What does it
say under driving restrictions ? Read your Policy, what does it say under
declaration of material fact. (Material or not is something they will decide.
It says, if in doubt, tell them).
Your Insurance Company is unlikely to be the RAC, I suspect they are the
brokers. Do you know who the Ins. Co. is ? (the Ins. Cert. will tell you.)
M.
|
1820.10 | | SBPUS4::Mark | I'm having a bad year | Tue Jul 07 1992 17:18 | 8 |
| John,
Didn't the proposal form ask some sort of nationality related question ? I
know they had trouble with this and they were potentially going to have to
remove the question from the form, but I don't know if they did. I've been
out of the industry for 6 years now.
M.
|
1820.11 | | IOSG::DAVEYJ | | Tue Jul 07 1992 17:30 | 8 |
| re .10
As far as I recall, there was no nationality question on the proposal
form. (It was a Norwich Union form). However I did clearly state that
my wife has had a US licence for x years (she doesn't have a British one
yet) so they may or may not have construed something from that.
John
|
1820.12 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | It's what abroad's for... | Tue Jul 07 1992 17:49 | 18 |
| Mark's correct. Most insurance policies have what's called a
"claw-back" clause, which basically states that if you fail to disclose
something they later consider a material fact, although they will
fullfil their legal obligations as regards paying out, they will take
action against you to recover their losses.
A good example of this is a student at college in London who 'comes'
from say, the wilds of Yorkshire. If he/she told his local (to home)
brokers he still lived there, and yet in reality spent a large
proportion of his/her time in London, in the event of an accident, the
insurer could invoke "claw-back". They would do this because the time
spent in London seriously affected their risk, hence the premium, and
hence was a "material fact". I realise a lot of people do this sort of
thing all the time, and get away with it, but if it were a very
serious claim, say multiple deaths through bad driving, the insured
would be in it "good and proper". Yes, Mark?
Laurie.
|
1820.13 | | SBPUS4::Mark | I'm having a bad year | Wed Jul 08 1992 10:14 | 14 |
| Yes.
Usually it's worse because not only is the location wrong, they've insured it
in the parent's name. Sure you save yourself 200 quid, but the ramifications
can be awful. ALthough, an Insurer will find it tough to prove in the event
of a single claim. In fact, what they will normally do is agree to pay the
claim if you pay all the back premiums you should have paid. However, that
depends on the seriousness.
Re: John
It sounds as if you may have mentioned your wife's nationality to your
broker, hence they've put you with Norwich Union. But, if I were you, I'd
double check in writing.
|