T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1107.1 | | LARVAE::BRIGGS | They use computers don't they? | Mon Jun 11 1990 15:53 | 10 |
| Are you new to BMWs or just this model?
If you are new, I had a 316 till recently. The only criticism I ever
really had (apart from wet weather handling) was heating and
ventilation. It was by far the worst I have ever experienced on a car
and this was AFTER a BMW mod kit was fitted. That is the one area I'd
check for improvements on before getting another.
Richard
|
1107.2 | Performance issues. | LARVAE::BRISTOW_A | | Mon Jun 11 1990 17:07 | 9 |
| Thanks for the advice.
I don't think the 318iS suffers so much in wet weather due to the
suspension mods on the rear. Not as tail endish now.
Really just want to find out how it performs in relation to the
standard 115bhp 318i and 320i 6 cyl.
Andy
|
1107.3 | Love it | MAJORS::GAMI | Raj Gami X 6365 | Mon Jun 11 1990 19:36 | 16 |
| I've got one on order, but I have driven one on two occassions.
To me, the car is great, it has the M-Technic suspension, sports seats,
etc. The handling was great, I was pushing it hard, with no problems.
Performance seems good, but not that great, but having spoken to
several BMW dealers, who are quite excited about this model, indicates
that it will kill both the 318i and the 320i, and will give the 325i, a
run for its money !
It is rated at: BHP 136
MAX SPEED 126 mph
0-62 9.9 secs (0-60 8.3 Secs)
I loved it. Cant wait to get it on 1 August !
Raj
|
1107.4 | | OVAL::KERRELLD | sponplatter lager | Tue Jun 12 1990 11:03 | 7 |
| re.3:
> 0-62 9.9 secs (0-60 8.3 Secs)
60-62 1.6 secs, that's a bit slow isn't it?
Dave.
|
1107.5 | Lets Clarify | MAJORS::GAMI | Raj Gami X 6365 | Tue Jun 12 1990 11:07 | 8 |
| re .4
9.9 secs is the BMW quoted figure for 0-62.
8.3 secs is the fastest figure i've seen in mag reviews for 0-60.
Make sense now !
Raj.
|
1107.6 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Is "Bones" the real McCoy ?? | Tue Jun 12 1990 14:00 | 1 |
| Also, 60-62 might be the time to change from 2nd to 3rd.
|
1107.7 | Where was this info published? | VANISH::BARRON | Snoopy Vs Red_Barron | Tue Jun 12 1990 14:23 | 9 |
| > It is rated at: BHP 136
> MAX SPEED 126 mph
> 0-62 9.9 secs (0-60 8.3 Secs)
>
60-62 in 1.6 secs? A flat spot?
Dave
|
1107.8 | performance figures | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:16 | 24 |
| Performance figures vary a lot depending upon the conditions under
which the car is tested. I've only seen two road test reports on
the 318iS - Performance Car measured its 0-60 as 9.3 seconds, while
Auto Express measured it at 8.5. The difference is that Performance
Car specify that all speed tests are done with two people in the
car, and a full tank of petrol. I suspect that the Auto Express
results are one person, empty fuel tank, which might account for
this much difference.
How much does manufacturing tolerance play a part in whether two
'identical' cars are faster/slower than each other? It would be
interesting to know what an acceptable percentage of variance the
manufacturers allow. Would you expect a so called 'quality'
manufacturer such as BMW to have stricter quality controls ?
I've also noticed that the glossy brochures for performance cars
give very conservative 0-60 times. Maybe they're timed with the car
full of people! Or is it the slowest time that any car of that model could
be expected to achieve, so that we don't all attempt to sue the
manufacturers 'cos our car isn't as fast as the brochure says it should be.
Just a little food for thought there.
Pete
|
1107.9 | Maybe _ | IOSG::MITCHELL | Elaine | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:33 | 11 |
|
>>
I've also noticed that the glossy brochures for performance cars
give very conservative 0-60 times. Maybe they're timed with the car
full of people! Or is it the slowest time that any car of that model could
be expected to achieve, so that we don't all attempt to sue the
manufacturers 'cos our car isn't as fast as the brochure says it should be.
>>
Maybe these are the times that a purchaser would expect to achieve,
rather than someone who is prepared to really thrash the car, just to
get a better figure.
|
1107.10 | 318iS spec | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Mon Jun 18 1990 11:57 | 7 |
| The 318iS sounds interesting and I might even be able to afford one,
just.
Can someone tell what the spec of this car is? Also there is a new 3
series car due out in spring 91, does anyone have knowledge on how firm
this date is? I need to think about whether I would want a car that
would be new in December and then becomes an old model within 3 months.
|
1107.11 | | IJSAPL::CAMERON | Studying fluid dynamics, from a stein | Mon Jun 18 1990 12:22 | 14 |
|
Last thing I read, in CAR magazine, was the new 3 series would
be out, albeit 4 door version only, at the end of this year.
Spring/summer would see the introduction of other models, including
a "semi-coupe" model.
As for exact dates, these are shrouded in the usual amount of rumours,
and nobody seems to know, except for BMW themselves, I hope !
The new 3 series should also have more, if not all, 16 valve engines,
so rumour has it...
Gordon
|
1107.12 | new models | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Mon Jun 18 1990 14:39 | 21 |
| In Germany, there's a 320iS released, with a 24 valve head. It's
supposed to closely match the 325i in performance. I went in to
Snows BMW garage in Portsmouth to ask about the availability of
that here, and they gave me the latest release dates that they had
heard, which is:
New shape 318 released 'spring' next year, but old shape 320 & 325
continuing until summer. 320iS will be available here from summer
next year, in new shape body. Incidentally, they showed me a picture
of the new 3 series shape. Not from any advanced sales literature,
but from the centre spread of 'auto express'. Looks similar to the
new cavalier, a lot more streamlined than the current 3 series.
I'm 90% convinced to get the 318iS (depending how much the quote
comes back at), but I too am a little bit concerned about it being
superceded fairly quickly.
If anyone out there has had their quote back for one of these, how
long did it take ?
Pete
|
1107.13 | It will be interesting to see the cost... | IJSAPL::CAMERON | Studying fluid dynamics, from a stein | Mon Jun 18 1990 14:53 | 13 |
|
Pete,
did the BMW garage have any indication as to the price of the new models
compared to the current range ?
I'm wondering how they're going to price the new 325i against the 24v
320iS, given the comparable performance . Or will they give the 325i
24 valves, stick 4 or 5 grand on the price, and market the 320iS in
its place at about the same price.
Gordon
|
1107.14 | For the price of a badge.... | ANNECY::PARKER | | Mon Jun 18 1990 15:16 | 22 |
|
.all Just snooping around in here and thought I'd stir up some
brown mucky stuff amongst all these BMW worshippers. What IS it
about these BMWhatsernames anyway? I've driven 316 and.....yeah
nicely built but 'orrible seats (for big Bavarian bums I suppose),
unfriendly, spartan interior,handled like a barge, steering wheel size
of a London bus and CRAMPED in the back.......and EVERYTHING cost
extra......maybe its 'cos they last longer than ORDINARY cars?......
Well no, parked next to a 6 year old in the supermaket car park
yesterday and talk about RUSTY!!...my Dad's Maestro is holding up better!!...
So folks how about taking those BMW blinkers off and checking out the
much praised Rover 416 Gti, it doesnt have a litle blue badge on
the front BUT it has beaten allcomers in the Car rag roadtests.....
Equally good build quality according to the CAR, WHAT CAR? etc
reports, better handling, all the equipment a car crazee
could want and its BRIT built.....do yerself a favour and reduce the
trade deficit....you know it makes sense.
Light blue touchpaper and wait for the impassioned replies!!
Dave
|
1107.16 | Nicely Priced !!!! | LARVAE::BRISTOW_A | | Mon Jun 18 1990 16:43 | 14 |
| Ignoring .14.!!!!
The new BMW's due for release in Mid 1990 are to have their prices
hiked up by Approx 20%. This will probably compensate for the fact that
the 320iS is to be on par with the current 325i in the performance
stakes.
The 24 valves will add some spice to the current straight '6' 12 Valve
that is on the market.
|
1107.17 | 318is test drive | ROLL::ZETTERLUND | | Thu Jun 21 1990 19:30 | 13 |
| I had the opportunity to drive a U.S. version 318is at Lime Rock Park
(1.53mi road course) a couple of weeks ago as part of an evaluation by
the BMW CCA magazine (The Roundel). Current owners of 2002/2002tiis
were asked to do six laps and fill out an evaluation form. The car had
definite but progressive (and useful) trailing throttle oversteer and
was very stable under power. This was especially noticeable in the
very bumpy, 80+ mph Diving Turn that leads onto the pit straight. The
16 valve engine was smoother and had a better top end than my old tii.
All in all, the 318is is a worthy successor to the tii. Now with
stiffer springs, shocks, and anti-roll bars and bigger wheels and
tires....
Bjorn.
|
1107.18 | LSD option needed? | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Fri Jun 22 1990 12:27 | 6 |
| Anyone got views on the desirability of the limited slip diff option on
the 318iS?
I'm sure a 325 would need an lsd due to the 170BHP and great torque,
but does the power of the 318 16V motor justify the extra expense?
|
1107.19 | Limited Slip Diffs | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Fri Jun 22 1990 14:36 | 18 |
| re .18
I currently drive a Renault 5 GT turbo, which is rated at
120 BHP, and is easy to wheel spin despite being front wheel
drive, with most of the weight over the front wheels (ie engine).
The 318iS is 136 BHP to the rear wheels, and although the car is
a lot heavier than the Renault, has proportionally less weight over
the driving axle, so in theory ought to wheel spin fairly easily
also. That was the reasoning I used when I worked out what to include
on the quote.
As it's an option that makes driving potentially safer, I reckon that
396 quid for the LSD isn't too excessive (compared to the prices
quoted for the radio/cassette players - but that's another story)
Pete
Pete
|
1107.20 | | VOGON::ATWAL | Dreams, they complicate my life | Fri Jun 22 1990 14:46 | 8 |
| re.19
an lsd is not a device that prevents wheelspin
it is used to put power on the road on tight bends (hence of use on racing
circuits)
...art
|
1107.21 | | VANILA::LINCOLN | The sun has got his hat on | Fri Jun 22 1990 14:52 | 7 |
| Also, FWD cars will always tend to wheelspin more since the
Torque reaction from the driving wheels tends to reduce the
weight on the wheels whilst with RWD it increases it.
The effect is very noticeable in dragsters.
-John
|
1107.22 | Oops ! | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Fri Jun 22 1990 19:20 | 13 |
| OK, I stand corrected.
A LSD is useful in situations where one wheel is likely to start
slipping before the other. With a normal diff, when one drive wheel
spins, the differential equalises the lower torque between both wheels,
resulting in little or no forward drive. A LSD at least keeps some
power going to the non-spinning wheel. This can be an advantage not
only when driving hard around corners, but also on wet/icy/bumpy roads
where one wheel may loose traction.
re .21 - yeh, I'd forgotten that !!
Pete
|
1107.23 | | VOGON::ATWAL | Dreams, they complicate my life | Mon Jun 25 1990 08:56 | 4 |
| re.22
can't you get BMW's ASD on this car then?
..art
|