T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
362.15 | Einy Meany Meiny! | PEKING::ATKINSA | | Mon Feb 08 1993 12:31 | 26 |
|
I'm considering changing my Astra SR 1.6 D reg,for a G reg Nova Swing
1.2L.My Astra has 60,000 on the clock,the Nova has 15,000 (with full
service history).
Pro's
The Nova is much newer and has less milage.
It's got 5 speed and a good dashboard (Nova SR style)
Insurance will de slightly lower(I've lost my NCB and i'm dreading my
re-newal for my Astra)
The Astra is quicker,and handles better.
Against.
As I drive on the motorway every day,but it has 60k
on the clock.The last Nova I drove was my old 1983 Y reg 1.2L ,not very
impressive.
Question
Are the newer Nova's any better?
Do they sit at 80mph on the motorway(should it be quieter than my old
one).
Is it worth it?
Obviously I have my opinion,but what do you think?
Andy.
|
362.16 | mo | CURRNT::CARSON | | Mon Feb 08 1993 14:29 | 6 |
| Personally, I don't like the dash... but I remember reading in some car
rag a while ago that the Nova as an excellent reputation for
reliability. So if you plan on keepin it a while I recon it'll be a
very good choice.
PC
|
362.17 | | SBPUS4::Mark | at the trailing edge..... | Mon Feb 08 1993 15:29 | 3 |
|
Two big negatives - It's noisy at speed and room (head, leg and luggage) is
much more limited than in the Astra.
|
362.18 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Tue Feb 09 1993 10:47 | 13 |
|
Re: .15
If you can afford it, go for the 1.4 or 1.6 Nova instead. They complain less
about constant higher speeds.
The 1.4 Nova is comparable to a 1.6 Astra in performance terms. The Noise
reduction is better on the bigger Novas, although the headroom is still the
same.
The Nova injection engine is miles better, more responsive, quieter, more
reliable, more economical etc etc, than the carburated versions of all sizes.
|
362.19 | basically | SIOG::KANE | The clot, thickens... | Tue Feb 09 1993 12:31 | 12 |
| -ves are:
brick aerodynamics; noisey & (I would hazard) fuelly, at 80+mph,
looks; look at it !, &
re-sale value; value _could_ fall as the [totally] new model is out shortly
+ves are:
cheap parts &
proven reliability; the reason why so many were sold probably
Mike.
|
362.20 | Vauxhall Tilehurst | PEKING::SMITHRW | Err..... | Tue Feb 09 1993 13:47 | 5 |
| Does anyone know if there was a separate model name for the notchback
version, like Astra/Belmont?
Richard (who hates Novas)
|
362.21 | | CURRNT::CARSON | | Tue Feb 09 1993 15:34 | 1 |
| Crappycar/Reallycrappycar ?
|
362.22 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Tue Feb 09 1993 16:20 | 27 |
|
Re: .19
> -ves are:
> brick aerodynamics; noisey & (I would hazard) fuelly, at 80+mph,
> looks; look at it !, &
> re-sale value; value _could_ fall as the [totally] new model is out shortly
I don't know what Nova's you've driven, but none of the one's I've driven have
been as you describe....looks are a personal thing anyway...
My Nova is quiet up to 115 mph...no noisier than at 50...it does a constant
average of 38mpg regardless of how it's driven, and is most economical at
80-95mph cruising.
resale value is always good, and new models don't seem to affect the resale of
previous models that much.
It is a narrow, short car, and as such has the major positive of being
wonderfully easy to find parking places for :-)
Basically if you like the escort,sierra,astra, etc pear type shapes, you
won't like the Nova shape...but then Mr Atkins likes Minis :-)
|
362.23 | I'm converted ;-) | SIOG::KANE | The clot, thickens... | Tue Feb 09 1993 16:36 | 2 |
|
Hello, Car Fleet ?
|
362.24 | You What! | PEKING::ATKINSA | | Tue Feb 09 1993 16:52 | 12 |
|
RE.21
My,how constructive!!!!
RE.22
>>Mr Atkins likes minis
???Since when???????????
Andy.
|
362.25 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Tue Feb 09 1993 17:05 | 10 |
|
> RE.22
>
> >>Mr Atkins likes minis
>
> ???Since when???????????
Mistake on my part......you (unless there's another ATKINS) have noted about
them enough, and never said you *didn't* like them :-)
|
362.26 | | CURRNT::CARSON | | Wed Feb 10 1993 09:29 | 7 |
| .22
> My Nova is quiet up to 115 mph...no noisier than at 50...it does a constant
^^^
Freefall speed perhaps ?
|
362.27 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Wed Feb 10 1993 10:00 | 7 |
| > > My Nova is quiet up to 115 mph...no noisier than at 50...it does a constant
^^^
> Freefall speed perhaps ?
nope, dual carriageway speed....
|
362.28 | Nova Warp Drive! | BRUMMY::RICHARD | Your robot sounds like Pink Floyd | Wed Feb 10 1993 11:02 | 8 |
| > > > My Nova is quiet up to 115 mph...no noisier than at 50...it does a constant
^^^
> > Freefall speed perhaps ?
> nope, dual carriageway speed....
Nah, ridiculously optimistic speedometer reading!
|
362.29 | Re: .28 | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Wed Feb 10 1993 11:55 | 10 |
|
> Nah, ridiculously optimistic speedometer reading!
You don't know Nova's at all do you....
The Nova GSi has a top speed of 117 and can reach that easily, the old SRi has
a top speed of around 110.
Your big-car bias has blinded you to the potential of small light car + largish
engine.
|
362.30 | Where's the sense? | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Wed Feb 10 1993 12:05 | 4 |
| You small car + largish engined cars are blinded by the performance and
to the suicidal potential of 115 MPH on a dual carriageway!!!!
Richard
|
362.31 | | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Wed Feb 10 1993 12:18 | 18 |
| � ... potential of small light car + largish engine.
I have no doubts that the Nova GSi is fairly quick (not what I call fast).
I do have serious doubts that it is as quiet when driving at 50 mph
as it is when at three-figure speeds.
I think that's a false claim.
Or it is very noisy at 50 mph...
Also, Jane, shouldn't you be able to spot wind-ups by now and treat
them for what they are ? You've had plenty of practice at it, but
it still seems that you cannot resist entering yet another short note
to continue the argument(s) ! :-)
J.R.
|
362.32 | Steady on.... | PEKING::SMITHRW | Err..... | Wed Feb 10 1993 12:26 | 8 |
| I'm sure it's entirely safe, but 117mph in a Nova?
I suspect that the combination of a small, light car and a largish
engine is potentially the key to a door I don't want to open....
Richard
|
362.33 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Wed Feb 10 1993 12:32 | 13 |
|
> to the suicidal potential of 115 MPH on a dual carriageway!!!!
almost dead straight, virtually empty, and daylight...nothing suicidal about
that at all...
And Rutter, GSYHUADBB...
car, engine, suspension, brakes, handling are all up to the job, 115mph feels
fine....better in the Nova than in the Golf and Renault...
|
362.34 | Just my views... | COMICS::HALFACREE | Digital Services - Viables | Wed Feb 10 1993 12:50 | 23 |
| Hi,
Well, reading all these comments on the car I thought I would give my
views as I drive a Nova GTE.
1 - I agree, it's not the best looking car around, but I like it for
the price I paid 2 years ago.
2 - Nope...although it's quite sturdy and it feels safe to drive, I
wouldn't want to be in a crash at 115mph. But then again, I
wouldn't want to be in any car that crashed whilst doing 115+mph!!!
3 - Yes, the Nova is capable of 115+ mph...I've done it and that was at
about 6000rpm.
4 - Yes it's relatively noisey at 115mph but not enough to need your
stereo at full blast or with the need to shout to the passenger.
So, it's got its good points and its bad points...but at the end of
the day, doesn't every car???
Mike
|
362.35 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Wed Feb 10 1993 13:52 | 30 |
|
OK (in my experience) cars noiser than a Nova at 100mph+
Golf (can't remember, not a GTi though)
Fiesta XR2
Escort
Astra (old type)
Astra 1.6
Rover 216
Metro
Renault 5
Peugeot 205
Citroen AX
Mini (it's noiser over 60 so it must be if it could make 100 :-))
A Nova at those speeds definitely couldn't be classed as quiet, that would be
something more like a Mercedes, but it's definitely not "noisy"...
For the money, and as long as you are under 5'8", a comfortable, practical
little car.
now for the definition of "noisy":
The requirement to raise your voice speaking to a passenger.
to have to turn the noise system up (radio/cassette/cd etc)
not being able to hear clearly if someone talks to you
etcetera.
|
362.36 | Stirring up the bee hive! | PEKING::ATKINSA | | Thu Feb 11 1993 07:39 | 13 |
|
RE-15
I've decided to get the Nova.I took a look at it the other day,and was
quite happy with it.I would keep my Astra but being the baby in
amongst you old's,the insurance is a nightmare.
So bye bye Astra :-(
Andy.
P.S. I was at college yesterday,and missed out on all the fun!!
|
362.37 | | RUTILE::BISHOP | What the HELL are you talking about man! | Thu Feb 11 1993 10:32 | 1 |
| Who you calling old!!!
|
362.38 | | SIOG::KANE | The clot, thickens... | Thu Feb 11 1993 11:15 | 1 |
| Yeah; 22 & counting s'il vous plait !
|
362.39 | Nova SR *problem*(moved by mod-RS) | AYOU35::WARREN | | Thu Mar 04 1993 15:50 | 16 |
| Can anybody shed any light on this "problem" :
I have a '91 SR - the facelift model, with 24.5k on the clock.
The problem seems to be in the amount of oil it consumes - volume of fluid
consumed similar to a Scotsman on a Saturday night ! Ok, well not quite, but it
is probably going through about a litre (I think) ,every 3-4 weeks. There is no
drip from the car, but I have noticed a fair amount of gunk on the cylinder head.
I have tightened the top bolts ( most moved nearly a full turn) but other than
that I am lost.
Anyone had any similar problems, and if so, how did you remedy them ??
Another quickie : is the car prone to requiring frequent tuning , cos it seems
to be taking a long time to reach top end ?? - I just changed the plugs, but
noticed a lot of small cracks on the HT leads. Could this have any bearing ???
|
362.40 | | SBPUS4::Mark | at the trailing edge..... | Thu Mar 04 1993 16:00 | 3 |
| How many miles do you do ?
I think the manual says about 1litre per thousand miles.
|
362.41 | Keeping Castrol GTX in business !!! | AYOU35::WARREN | | Fri Mar 05 1993 08:32 | 19 |
| Mark, that manual must be about right, cos I probably do close to 600 -700
miles a WEEK ! Travel from Glasgow to Ayr every day (circa 80 miles roundtrip)
then there is all the other journays on top of that.
it does still seem quite a lot of liquid over a relatively short distance.
Anyone know what the *real* top-end is on the SR ?? My speedo shows about 112
but I dont quite think so !
Another point, any SR/SRI drivers in the Vauxhall SR owners club thingy ??
If so, how much is it, what do you get from it etc etc ??
Cheers,
Warren
|
362.42 | | SBPUS4::Mark | at the trailing edge..... | Fri Mar 05 1993 10:29 | 6 |
| I know it seems a lot. Most of the Vauxhalls are quoted as using quite a bit
of oil.
Strangely, if they're are ever rebored/ring replaced, then the problem stops.
Whether this means their build tolerances are over large, or they know
something about the engine that I don't, is anybody's guess.
|
362.43 | Yes, Vauxhalls do. | RDGENG::RUSLING | Dave Rusling REO2 G/E9 830-4380 | Fri Mar 05 1993 10:36 | 6 |
|
Yes, my wife's Cavalier SRi drinks oil at about that rate. This
has always surprised me, specially since the Marlin with its Ford
lump uses very little oil.
Dave
|
362.44 | Could add extra weight... | AYOU35::WARREN | | Fri Mar 05 1993 11:50 | 6 |
| Well. it seems the best solution is to carry a 25 litre oil drum in the
back seat (it probably wouldn't fit into the boot!)
Glug glug
Warren
|
362.45 | | VANGA::KERRELL | but that's not my real job | Fri Mar 05 1993 12:25 | 5 |
| My last three cars and my current car were/are all Vauxhalls, none of them
used more than a litre between services and that's approx. the difference
between the minimum and maximum marks on the dipstick.
Dave.
|
362.46 | | AYOU35::WARREN | | Fri Mar 05 1993 13:30 | 10 |
| Re .45,
Dave , were your Vauxhalls in the *performance* class ?? I also had a Cav diesel
and it used little oil between services.
Could it be any greater an engine pressure or something ?
Only a thought.
Warren
|
362.47 | | VANGA::KERRELL | but that's not my real job | Fri Mar 05 1993 13:34 | 12 |
| re.46:
What does performance class mean?
They were;
Cavalier 1300L Saloon - driven until 74K miles
Astra GTE 1.8i Hatch - " " " 56K miles
Cavalier SRi 2.0i Hatch - " " " 34K miles
Cavalier CDi 2.0i Hatch - " " " 36K miles
Dave.
|
362.48 | Well, it didn't need oil at lunchtime ! | AYOU35::WARREN | | Fri Mar 05 1993 14:05 | 22 |
| Sorry, what I meant was SR, SRI, GTE GSI etc.
Being fairly new to the SR I just found it surprising that I was going through
so much oil compared to other cars I have owned.
ie Cavalier 1.6DL
Alfasud 1.5SC
Rover 213S
None of these were exactly *performance* cars. (With the possible exception of
the Alfa, but it always needed oil as it had a leak as well as a dodgy breather
hose, which caused oil to spew from the dipstick - eventually solved)
I just thought that some of the sportier cars in the range may for some reason
or another use more oil than others in the range.
It appears from the responses that the answer to my original question was Yes,
it is normal for the car to use a fair amount of oil.
Sorry for the confusion over *performance*
Warren
|
362.49 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Fri Mar 05 1993 15:34 | 6 |
|
I have had the Nova GTEi and now a Nova GSi
The only additional oil ever needed with either of them was a � litre top up
before the GTE had it's first service. Neither has required extra oil between
services, since then.
|
362.50 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Fri Mar 05 1993 15:51 | 11 |
| RE: .-1
>> The only additional oil ever needed with either of them was a � litre top up
>>before the GTE had it's first service. Neither has required extra oil between
>>services, since then.
presumably, except when you are "burning off" other cars!
;-)
Mark.
|
362.51 | that's not even funny as a wind-up | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Fri Mar 05 1993 18:11 | 3 |
| > presumably, except when you are "burning off" other cars!
what a remarkably stupid comment....you should never over stress a new engine.
|
362.52 | | SBPUS4::Mark | at the trailing edge..... | Mon Mar 08 1993 11:51 | 5 |
| Well, whatever you lot think and whatever miraculous experiences you have
had, Vauxhall are under the impression that cars built more than a couple of
years ago use 1l oil per 1k miles.
|
362.53 | my 2 pence worth | KERNEL::TYLERC | | Fri Mar 12 1993 10:07 | 23 |
| Re last.
I agree with the last remark. I had two 1300L Astras (5 door) as my
first couple of company cars. The MK1 was bought with 20K on the clock
and was sold at 70K. The MK2 was brand new up until it died abruptly
due to a broken engine mount at 60K.
The MK1 always drank oil. In the end it was always 1 litre per
1000 miles.
The MK2 started off ok, but after 30k it started to drink oil as
well, eventually reaching the same rate.
It should be said that these cars were well used/abused doing lots
of high speed (85mph) for long milages. Also I never filled tha car
with the same oil. When I filled up with petrol, I bought 500ml and
poured it in, irrespective of who made the oil. Using hindsight, I'm sure
this did not help matters.
Since I have had a variety of cars which have included two MK2 Astra
CD 1.8i's. One handed in with 60K and the other I still have with 45k on
the clock. Neither of these cars drink the same quantity of oil. I use
the same oil as the garage (GTX) but I don't do the same type of
milages. Some times I have to add oil inbetween services and some times
I haven't.
Chris
|
362.54 | Who's a big bore ! | AYOU35::WARREN | | Thu Mar 18 1993 14:51 | 13 |
| Another question to get you all talking...
Anyone put a big bore exhaust on the Nova SR ??
If so, was it worth the money ?
Did you notice any increase in performance ?
How much was it ?
What make was it/ would you recommend ?
I am thinking of a back box (not complete system) and would appreciate any
comments.
Warren_lets_hope_the_Chancellor_doesnt_increase_the_cost_of_Castrol!!
|
362.55 | Go fast Nova. | SUBURB::STEPHENSP | | Mon Jul 26 1993 14:28 | 19 |
| When the first SR's came out my brother put a big bore exhurst on his
and it did help the top end.
Mind you something was wrong with his as it would rev past the end of
the Tacho and cruise on the motorway at over 100 all day. (his license will
back this up). The speedo was only used to record the mileage as all speeds
were worked out using the rev's and the gear ratios.
He ran a good oil and changed it every 10K and when he finally sold it
with nearly 50K on it it sounded and went like new.
On one of the few times I was allowed to drive it on a bright sunny day
I pulled out of a side raod put my foot down and thought the clutch was
sliping but when the smoke started appearing from under the wing I
reliesed that the tyres had just let go. In the wet it was a nightmare.
It was great fun and stright out of the garage.(mind you when we did
check the cam one weekend it seemed to have about 50% more lift than
standard one.!!!?
|
362.56 | Gear ratios | AYOU35::WARREN | | Thu Aug 19 1993 16:17 | 10 |
| Anyone any idea where I can find out the gear ratios on the SR (1.4) ??
I would like to get an *accurate* speed indication.
I have tried the owner manual, but found nothing.
Ta
Warren
|
362.57 | this the sort of thing you want ? | ERMTRD::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Thu Aug 19 1993 17:20 | 21 |
|
Speed (mph) per 1000rpm manual transmission
4th 14.7
5th 18.5
Transmissions
Clutch Diameter 7.5in.
Gear ratios 1 3.55:1
2 2.14:1
3 1.43:1
4 1.12:1
5 0.89:1
Rev. 3.31:1
Final Drive Ratios 3.94:1
Engine size 1389cc
Max power 72 PS (53kW) @5600rpm
Max torque 79.7 lb.ft. (108Nm) @3000rpm
Compression ratio 9.4:1
|
362.58 | Can the car go this fast...? | AYOU35::WARREN | | Mon Aug 23 1993 12:10 | 12 |
| Thats the berries Heather.
Does that mean that "theoretically", if the car was pulling 6000 revs in 5th gear
it would be travelling at 6 * 18.5 = 115 mph ??
All theoretical of course...
As in, would this be a more reliable indicator of the speed you were going,
rather than using the speedo reading ?????
Warren
|
362.59 | Scuse me | AYOU35::WARREN | | Mon Aug 23 1993 12:11 | 1 |
| I mean 111 mph , not 114. Bad arithmetic I'm afraid.
|
362.60 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Aug 23 1993 12:24 | 9 |
|
>Thats the berries Heather.
Methinks I never said a word.
Heather
|
362.61 | | ERMTRD::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Mon Aug 23 1993 12:54 | 10 |
|
Re: .59
> I mean 111 mph , not 114. Bad arithmetic I'm afraid.
Yep its top speed is theoretically approx 111mph
(and I'm not Heather :-) )
|
362.62 | Agopolies | AYOU35::WARREN | | Mon Aug 23 1993 14:11 | 7 |
| Er, sorry folks, bad case of forgetf... what was I talking about there ????
SHould have read thats the berries Jane (correct this time or do I still not win
a watch??)
Warren
|
362.63 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Mon Aug 23 1993 14:17 | 5 |
| �SHould have read thats the berries Jane
Well.......... If ::ALFORD doesn't bother to sign their name !
Royston (most of us know its you though Jane :-) )
|
362.64 | Hmm, how often does that happen? | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Mon Aug 23 1993 14:30 | 13 |
| When was the last time Jane and Heather were confused for each other?
One's about 5' 2", one's about 6' 2", so that's usually a good distinguising
feature.
But of course, whithin Notes, you can't tell how tall the noter is.
That d**n non-verbal communication catches you out again.
Peter.
(all sizes approximate, by the way - I don't want to start another
rat-hole about measurements!)
|
362.65 | I'm a number not a name... | ERMTRD::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Mon Aug 23 1993 15:10 | 3 |
|
Of course I don't sign my name....that's my option !
|
362.66 | cider drinker, pasty eater, and cash-taker | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Aug 23 1993 15:49 | 10 |
|
Look folkes,
I am the Devon Dumpling, always have been the Devon Dumpling, and have
always been called Heather.........
and I'm not 6'2"
Heather
|
362.67 | | ERMTRD::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Mon Aug 23 1993 17:56 | 4 |
|
Oh yes, and I'm not 5'2"
:-)
|
362.68 | Bulbs should only be flowers. | AYOU35::WARREN | | Tue Aug 31 1993 09:53 | 14 |
| Anyone ever tried taking the new style dashboard apart ??
Reason...
one of the bulbs behind the heater controls blew, so I pulled it out (the bulb)
and bought a new one. All fine and well. Then I tried to replace the bulb ;-(
I promptly pushed the bulb holder into the depths of the dash, and I fear the
only way to retrieve the B*&^*ything is to sstrip off part of the dash.
Any tips for doing so ??
Can I get away with only removing part of the dash ??
Why do simple jobs always end up giving you heartache ??
Warren
|
362.69 | | FORTY2::TEER | That's just what they'll be expecting us to do... | Thu Apr 14 1994 11:11 | 7 |
| Would anybody be able to hazard a guess at a reasonable price for an A or B reg
Nova 1.3 SR, in reasonable condition. I'm looking to buy one soon, and have no
idea about a fair price. Prices in this weeks auto trader can be as high as
1900 quid 8-(
Mark
|
362.70 | Car Prices | WELCLU::KINGI | Don't call me Wayne or Joe | Thu Apr 14 1994 14:15 | 11 |
|
Not sure about an A or B but my wife just sold her F - reg for 3600.
Have you tried looking in that book they sell monthly at newsagents;
the prices in there are pretty realistic, from my experience. I think
it's called something like Car Prices and has about A5 size pages.
Ian
|
362.71 | | FORTY2::TEER | That's just what they'll be expecting us to do... | Thu Apr 14 1994 15:49 | 2 |
| I had a look, but they only go back to 1985 Bs... I really want an A, seeing as
that's probably all I can afford 8-(
|
362.72 | You pays your money and takes your chance | AYOV20::WARREN | The man with no plan | Fri Apr 29 1994 11:01 | 10 |
| Mark,
Looking at that reg of car, I personally would not spend more than � 1200-1300
on it. You will need to obviously bear in mind, that this car aint an "ordinary"
Nova, and will no doubt have had the ar*e kicked out it by most/all of the
owners.
But I'm sure you'll be aware of that.
/warren
|
362.73 | | FORTY2::TEER | That's just what they'll be expecting us to do... | Fri Apr 29 1994 11:13 | 7 |
| Ahhhh - just about as much as I can stretch to...
I'd heard that Vauxhall engines weren't up to lots of punishing driving, so I'll
have to be careful. Still, it'll probs be in better condition than the engine
in my Mini!
Still looking....
|
362.74 | My Tuppence worth | FAILTE::BURNETTD | DAVE BURNETT | Fri Apr 29 1994 13:26 | 16 |
| I think that the Nova SR uses the 1.3 OHC engine, with a close ratio
gearbox. This is the same engine as I had in my old 1.3 Astra which was
a wee cracker! It is strong and reliable, flexible and potent (for a
1.3). It also responds well to basic tuning mods, such as a decent air
filter and exhaust. These give it significantly more oomph in the mid
range, but don't really do much to the 0-60 time (which isn't too bad
anyway)
You also get good instumentation and comfy recaro seats and alloyish
wheels.
Judging by the amount of old Novas kicking around I would say it was a
good buy!
Dave
|
362.75 | | RIOT01::SUMMERFIELD | It's automatic, but you have to press the switch. | Fri Apr 29 1994 13:40 | 7 |
| .73> I'd heard that Vauxhall engines weren't up to lots of punishing driving, so I'll
Who told you that? I've got a 16v Calibra which has been driven hard for 120,000 miles
and, apart from the classic Vauxhall ems quirks, it's never given me any trouble. Does'nt
even burn oil.
Clive
|
362.76 | | FORTY2::TEER | That's just what they'll be expecting us to do... | Fri Apr 29 1994 14:12 | 6 |
| A friend of mine (who's in the car business!!!!) mentioned it.
I must admit that I'd never heard of a problem with them, and a lot of my
friends have had Vauxhalls that sort of age...
He must have been talking out of his .......
|
362.77 | | WOTVAX::FIDDLERM | The sense of being dulls my mind | Fri Apr 29 1994 14:17 | 8 |
| RE.73
I have an Astra SRi which RIOT01::SUMMERFIELD drove hard for a great
many miles, and its still on the road! Well...you say the name 'Clive'
out loud and it visibly shivers, but it still goes. It also seems to
go faster all by itself the nearer it gets to Barnsley...
Mikef
|
362.78 | | RIOT01::SUMMERFIELD | It's automatic, but you have to press the switch. | Fri Apr 29 1994 14:23 | 3 |
| re .77
Amazing, isn't it. Anyone would think I was a car abuser. :^)
|
362.79 | | WOTVAX::FIDDLERM | The sense of being dulls my mind | Fri Apr 29 1994 14:35 | 5 |
| re-1
Isn't that 'trainee' car abuser?
Mikef
|
362.80 | | RIOT01::SUMMERFIELD | It's automatic, but you have to press the switch. | Fri Apr 29 1994 15:23 | 5 |
| re .79
No, just 'inexperienced' car abuser.
Clive
|
362.81 | Some other pointers | AYOV20::WARREN | The man with no plan | Fri Apr 29 1994 16:54 | 27 |
| I would definately agree that the engine is a reasonably good performer.
The only problem is sometimes when you are doing nearer the 80-90 mark and
you want to overtake, it could do with a bit more oomph, but what do you
expect from a 13/1400 ?
I am hoping that with regular maintence (and some TLC) that my SR's engine will
do 100,000 + .
BTW, dont worry too much about leaky gaskets on the rocker cover, as they all do
that. I even had a new Vauxhall gasket fitted and it still seeps out.
- the faces were all smooth before the cover went back on.
The close ratio box is also good.
But the brakes are crap. I am considering the calipers and vented discs from a
GTE Nova/Astra/Cav to help the problem.... comments welcome here thanks.
Re a couple back...
What sort of air-filter and exhaust were you referring to ??
I just wondered on the use of a Peco big Bore 2.
then I found the hole in my exhaust is in the middle section ;-(
/warren
|
362.82 | He's out of date !! | NEWOA::CROME_A | | Fri Apr 29 1994 17:43 | 9 |
| .73> I'd heard that Vauxhall engines weren't up to lots of punishing driving,
.76>A friend of mine (who's in the car business!!!!) mentioned it.
He was talking about Chevettes and the old mk1 Cav's - and before anyone jumps
I know people who have driven both of the afore mentioned to over 125,000 miles,
but without reasonable care these engines generally didn't last very long.
Andy
|
362.83 | The exhaust was a JETEX | FAILTE::BURNETTD | DAVE BURNETT | Fri Apr 29 1994 18:40 | 23 |
| I can't remember the manufacturer of the air-filter, but basically it
was a foam equivilent of the standard paper one. I think I got the name
and address out of one of the car mags... Fast Car I think. I just
unclipped the cover from the air filter box and popped it in. Dead
easy.
The exhaust I used was a Jetex... cost a bomb and weighed a lot more
than the original! It didn't increase the noise too much but it did
sound a lot better!! A deeper rumbling sort of sound... The only
problem I had with it was that the rubber band that holds the back
silencer on kept breaking 'cos of the extra weight!! I eventually
"reinforced" it with a length of copper wire!!
I also "fixed" the brakes, which suffer from disk warping with TAR-OX
disks and pads... Phenomenal braking power!!!!! They would be good with
ABS!! They dropped the pedal pressure needed to stop you by about 70%!!
ie I had to be DEAD carefull in the wet or it would skid!!
After all this I flogged it and got a dog , two weans and a Pug 505 GTI
estate!!
Dave
|
362.84 | Cylinder head gasket. | KIRKTN::IMCGREGOR | | Sun May 01 1994 09:29 | 9 |
|
The only criticism I can make about the Nova, is the cylinder head
gasket tends to blow around the 50,000 mile mark. This happened to me,
it has also happened to a few of my friends.
The cylinder head gasket was the only thing to go, and the car had done
90,000 miles. The car was serviced regularly, every 6,000 miles.
Iain...
|