T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
281.49 | Touch dimmers | ANOVAX::WHITE | Fm the rolling hills of Pennsylvania | Sat Nov 28 1987 17:56 | 18 |
|
Hello,
I am getting ready to do the finish electric on my house. I am
going to be using single pole dimmers in four places and would like
to have a three-way dimmer circuit in two seperate locations. I am
thinking of using the Leviton(hope I spelledthat right) touch
dimmers. They make single pole and also a three way pair that will
allow you to turn the lights off,on, and fully dim to bright at
eather location. Now for the questions, are they reliable?, how
long will they last?, do any of you have them in your home now?
Thank you in advance,
Joe
|
281.50 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Sun Nov 29 1987 15:53 | 9 |
| > a three way pair that will
> allow you to turn the lights off,on, and fully dim to bright at
> eather location.
I may be wrong, but this sounds a lot like the X-10 3-way light
controller. it actually has a switch at only one location, and the
other location sends a signal to the 'real' switch to control the
lamp. If so, you may pick it up for less at radio schack.
|
281.51 | I had this friend.... | PSTJTT::TABER | Alimentary, my dear Watson | Mon Nov 30 1987 08:42 | 14 |
| Re: .1
I think he's talking about the device that looks like a little
metal plate on the wall that you touch to turn the lights on or off, and
toch and hold to make the lights dim. It's not an X10 device.
Re: .0
If that's indeed what you're talking about, I used to hang out
with some people who had one of those in their kitchen. It always
worked and was still working after 5 years when I left town, so I guess
it's fairly reliable. I never liked the idea of having a touch plate
next to the sink, but I don't know how it's isolated. Nobody ever got a
shock, and many wet hands touched it.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
281.52 | ouch plate dimmers | VAXWRK::WOODBURY | | Fri Dec 11 1987 13:20 | 7 |
| I'v had this type of dimmer in my house for about three years.
No real trouble yet, although they seen to respond to warn hands
better than cold. One thing about them is the price ~$18.00 for
a single pole.
Mark
|
281.53 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Fri Dec 11 1987 23:17 | 9 |
| I installed several of these dimmers in my parents house about 8
years ago when leviton first released them. I was working at a supply
house and the leviton vendor GAVE me 10 to install to see how they
worked. The do work very well and I haven't had a single failure
on any of them. I belive the called them sensitron dimmers.
I love DEC but I sure do miss those freebies.
-j
|
281.18 | Adding a wall switch alongside an existing one | 56738::FINGERHUT | | Thu Oct 06 1988 16:00 | 9 |
| How do you add a wall switch alongside an existing switch in a
finished room?
Normally the boxes would gang together, but you can't unscrew the side
of the existing box when there's sheetrock all the way around it.
You can't hold the new box in with a moly-bolt since one side is
right up agains the existing box.
Any ideas?
|
281.19 | Cut Carefully | WIKKET::BRANT | | Thu Oct 06 1988 17:10 | 7 |
|
Last time I did it I got a two switch box, cut the sheet
rock out accordingly then jerked out the existing box and
replaced it with the new one. The new box was the type that
clamped on to the sheetrock.
|
281.20 | Depends on the old box... | MECAD::MCDONALD | | Fri Oct 07 1988 08:46 | 10 |
|
If the box currently in the wall is the fiberglas type
it is very easy to break it into manageable pieces and
remove it (I just did this last weekend) and neatly
enlarge the hole for the new box. Or, you could always
butt a box up against the existing box if you use the
type that clamp onto sheetrock (I love those things,
they make retrofitting so easy!).
* MAC *
|
281.21 | can be done. | CLOSUS::HOE | Sammy's daddy; er, Samuel's father | Fri Oct 07 1988 13:15 | 14 |
| I did exactly that; added a second switch (in this case, a fan
speed control) along side the 3-way light switch. The power feed
was at the base of the stairs so I was able to fish a feed to the
fan. I removed the switch, found which side of the box was nailed
into the wood.
I removed the box by using a hack saw blade to cut the nails
holding the box in place. I cut the dry wall to fit the double
box and used the drywall screws to hold the new box in place
(after removing the nails).
If you have a recipacating saw, the job would be a lot easier.
cal hoe
|
281.22 | Try a "double switch" | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Oct 07 1988 13:54 | 19 |
| Another posibility is to get a double switch -- on that has two
switches on a single mounting strap. You use a standard duplex
outlet plate to cover it. In fact it looks much like a duplex
outlet, except that it has switches instead of outlets and
differently arranged terminals on the back. Most/many hardware
stores sell these with two single pole switches or with one switch
and one outlet. If you go to an electical supply house I think you
can also get them with "three way" switches (for controling the
circuit from two switches).
The only problem with these is that its pretty easy to end up with
more wires in the box than code allows. This is especially true if
you have 12 ga wiring.
As to looks -- thats a matter of opinion. Some people thing that
the smaller switch plate is neater; other people thing that two
switches in half the "normal" space looks crowded and sloppy. But
its surely less work than retrofitting a larger box -- maybe a lot
less work.
|
281.23 | You CAN gang a metal box! | GWYNED::MCCABE | | Fri Oct 07 1988 14:16 | 31 |
| If the box is metal, you can add another box along side of it. the
first thing to do is to cut out a space next to the current box
in the sheetrock or plaster. Next you want to remove the side plate
from the existing metal box. There is only one screw to loosen,
this is the hard part, take a pair of long nose pliers, offset if
you have them and turn the loosen the screw from the top. You may
have to make the hole on top of the box bigger to fit the pliers,
just don't make the hole too big to be covered by the plate. Another
trick is to use a heavy pair of linesmans pliers and bend the side
plate in to release it from the box. Once the side plate is off
take your long nose and back the screw off a couple of turns, not
too far, you want to leave a few threads left on the screw inside
the box. Take your new box, remove the side plate from it and make
sure there are a few threads left on the screw that held its side
plate on. When you join the two boxes, there will be a screw on
the top and bottom to tighten. Remove the knock out for your wire
and strip and insert it in the new box before you put the box in
the wall. Now slip the box in at an angle into the hole, take your
long nose pliers and pull out on the bottom of the existing box
and line up the tabs, one tab will be on the new box and will slip
under a screw on the existing box, one tab will be on the existing
box and will slip under the screw on the new box. Do the same for
the top. When the boxes are together (this may take a minute or two),
tighten up the screws holding the boxes together from the inside with
your long nose pliers on the couple of threads sticking down from
the outside of the boxes. You are done. One hint- Try this with a
couple of spare boxes out of the wall to get an idea of how they
join together before you start.
Chris
|
281.54 | Problem installing a dimmer -humming noise | MARX::MCCROSSAN | Jack McCrossan | Mon May 08 1989 10:45 | 22 |
| I attempted to install a light dimmer this weekend and ran into a problem.
When I turned it on, a humming (fairly loud) started coming out of the electric
doorbell/intercom one foot above the switch on the same wall. The humming got
louder as I increased the lighting.
Two questions (which will probably give you a pretty good idea of how little
I know about wiring):
1. The light switch that I removed had a ground wire attached to it. There
was a screw on the metal face of the switch box, seemingly there for the
ground wire to be attached to it. The dimmer had no separate screw, so I
wrapped the ground wire around one of the screws used to hold the dimmer
in the wall box. Is there something else I should have done with this
wire?
2. The two wires coming out of the wall look identical to each other; the
two on the dimmer I bought also look identical to each other. Does it
make any difference which is paired with which?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Jack
|
281.55 | Bzzzzzzzzzz | WIKKET::BRANT | | Mon May 08 1989 16:01 | 11 |
|
Dimmers are really just a fast switch, they switch power
on 60 times a second and create a lot of transients in doing so.
These transients radiate energy ( noise ) from the audio on up
into the RF range. I've found that by turning off all the dimmers
in the house I can get another 5db gain out of my SW reciever.
I can't remember the brand name but there are dimmers that seem
generate less noise but cost more ( $10 to $12 ).
|
281.56 | May help ???? | VICKI::DODIER | | Mon May 08 1989 16:28 | 17 |
| I may be wrong but I thought that light dimmers (especially
since we're talking about such low current) are nothing more than
variable resistors ?
At any rate, it does seem as though you are getting some sort
of noise from the dimmer as I assume you didn't have the problem
with a regular switch. One quick question, is the dimmer mounted
in a plastic or a metal junction box ? If it's in plastic box, you
may be able to minimize the noise by replacing the plastic box with
a metal box and using a metal faceplate.
If you use a metal box, you can attach the ground wire to the box
and it will be connected to the dimmer electrically when you secure
the dimmer to the box.
Ray
|
281.57 | bet a better dimmer | TROA02::PONEILL | Peter O'Neill DTN 631-7093 | Mon May 08 1989 17:02 | 45 |
| A dimmer is definitely NOT a variable resistor, most models can handle 500
to 700 watts (that's not low power).
If I remember correctly a modern dimmer is actually a Triac, which uses a
variable resistor to regulate the firing voltage. If you were to examine the
wave form, you would see the sin wave being cut vertically, thus the output
at 50% power would look something like this...
****
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
*
*
********** *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
****
If you are dimming close to the rated maximum wattage in addition to
Transmitting electrical interferance , the dimmer and even the filaments in
the bulbs may buzz.
Try a better quality unit available at a commercial electrical supply dealer.
Using a metal box, as previously suggested, may reduce the transmitted
interferance.
Cheers,
Peter
|
281.58 | Audio vs. RFI noise. | SUBSYS::BUSCH | Dave Busch, NKS1-2/H6 | Tue May 09 1989 18:29 | 10 |
| If I'm not mistaken, the waveform in the previous note is reversed. That is, the
triac or whatever is controlling the voltage turns on at some time into the
start of each half cycle rather than off. The sudden change in voltage at the
turn-on is what contributes to the radiated (RFI) noise. However, there is
another noise that I've noticed, and that is an audio noise which emanates from
the bulbs themselves. I'm not certain, but I believe that the filaments of the
bulbs actually vibrate at 60 hz due to the varying magnetic field surrounding
them. The degree of noise seems to depend on the actual brightness setting.
Dave
|
281.59 | Grounded ?? | MARX::MCCROSSAN | Jack McCrossan | Tue May 09 1989 19:14 | 10 |
| I don't remember the brand name of the dimmer (Luton or something like that)
but it was the only one I saw at Somerville Lumber (regularly $16 on sale
for $9). The dimmer is made up of a black plastic box with two wires coming
out of the bottom and a front plate that is made out of something that feels
like a very light metal.
When I installed it I wrapped the ground wire around the screw that was used
to bolt the unit into the box unit in the wall. The box unit in the wall is
metal so even if the front plate of the dimmer isn't, wouldn't the metalin
the box ground it???
|
281.60 | I bought dimmers just for this.. | CVG::CIARALDI | I hate allergy season !! Aaachooo | Wed May 10 1989 11:53 | 6 |
| I made the same mistake.... They have dimmers that make NO noise..
Go to a lighting store that electrical contractors go to and tell
them your situation.. They sell dimmers just for that... I went to
Ralph Pills it cost about $20 for the dimmer and we haven't heard a
Bzzzzz since... Your better off spending your money on the right
thing once....
|
281.61 | oops | WIKKET::BRANT | | Wed May 10 1989 17:04 | 10 |
|
I said 60 but actually the power is switched on 120 times
a second ( every half wave ). A metal box probably won't do
much good unless the wiring between the dimmer and light is
also shielded, the wiring acts as an antenna.
I took a "good" dimmer apart once ( died for another
reason ) and found a couple of coils inside, looked like
RFI suppresion.
|
281.24 | adding a 110v outlet to a 220v line | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Mon Nov 27 1989 12:47 | 33 |
| I have some questions concering adding a 110v outlet as show below
to a current 220 volt line which feeds my well pump. I added the outlet
between the white ground wire and one of the black hot leads.
/
/20A Breaker
<------ black -------------------------------o/| o------------<
|
<------ white -----+-----------------------o |
Pump | | |ganged (Panel)
Motor --- 110V Receptacle --- |
--- - /
| /20A Breaker
<------- black ----+-------------------------o/ o------------<
questions:
1. Is the effective rating of the 220v line 20 Amps?
2. Will a load of more than 20amps in the outlet trip the double pole breaker?
3. How do i ground the receptacle if i only have 2 wires: 1 hot and 1 return?
4. Can i connect the white wire to also the green screw to ground the outlet?
5. Is the above configuration legal? I simply added the receptacle in-line
in a already existing metal box located near the waterpump. It was
just convenient.
6. In a normal 115v circuit using 14/2 with ground wire, i notice that in the
panel, both the bare ground wire and white wire attach to the ground
bar. why thus, is another wire needed to ground the circuit if both the
wires are effectively shorted together?
Thanks.
-jim
|
281.25 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Mon Nov 27 1989 12:56 | 12 |
| As per the usual points, I don't think that your configuration is to
code. The 220 breaker should have both legs tied together, so if one
leg trips, the other should also be tripped, but except for cost
savings, this setup (a 220 V and 110 V on the same service) is not the
greatest idea.
As to grounding, the only place the neutral and ground are supposed to
be tied together is at the service entrance. They must run independent
after that point. The neutral is a current carrying conductor while
the ground should not be.
Eric
|
281.26 | Easiest route not always the best | VICKI::DODIER | | Mon Nov 27 1989 13:07 | 30 |
| This is probably covered else where but I do not believe this
is legal (to code). Although the white and ground are tied together in
the breaker box, this is the only place they should be.
It will work but should a fire result you can kiss your insurance
goodbye. A licenced electrician would not wire it that way and it
would not take a genius to figure this out if something happens
as a result.
The white wire is considered the return wire. It is insulated
and designed to be a current carrying conductor under normal operating
conditions and designated to be that way. The ground is designed
and designated (by it's lack of insulation) to be a current carrying
conductor in abnormal circumstances. Electricians (that I've seen)
tend to do a lot of work with the power on. If you sold the house and
the new buyer had an electrician come in to work on something connected
to this, they would not expect this. You could be liable for anything
that happened around this.
If your going to do it yourself, at least do it the best way
known (not always the easiest way).
There are probably other reason but these are the first to come
to mind.
Ray
BTW - The 20 amps on the breaker is I believe 20 amps per hot wire.
20 amp wire would be 12 awg.
|
281.27 | | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Mon Nov 27 1989 13:09 | 10 |
| > As per the usual points, I don't think that your configuration is to
> code. The 220 breaker should have both legs tied together, so if one
> leg trips, the other should also be tripped, but except for cost
> savings, this setup (a 220 V and 110 V on the same service) is not the
> greatest idea.
They are. The 220v Breaker are actually two 20A breakers tied together
with a bar on the handles.
-jim
|
281.28 | More reasons not to | VICKI::DODIER | | Mon Nov 27 1989 13:38 | 24 |
| Looking at your reply again I noted you indicated the ground
WAS insulated going to/from the pump. This negates one of the
conditions I thought you had.
It still leaves an issue of whether or not this is to code
(which I suspect it isn't). The code is to be followed for reasons
of safety and consistancy (which relates back to safety).
If the hot lead going to the pump (which happens to be the hot
lead other than the one you're using for the outlet) shorts to ground, I
believe you will create a condition which will momentarily put 220v
across whatever you have connected to your outlet. You are also drawing
more current on one leg of the pump breaker than the other. In and
of itself this may not hurt anything but it may trip the breaker
depending on the combined load (i.e. what you plug into to outlet plus
the pump may be greater than 20 amps). A well pump typically draws
a healthy current, especially at startup, and I would expect to see
healthy voltage spikes on the outlet everytime the pump turns on.
There are probably other reasons (like what happens if the pump
gets hit by lightning) but you probably get the general idea by
now.
Hope this helps......Ray
|
281.29 | | MAMIE::THOMS | Ross @285-3151 | Mon Nov 27 1989 13:58 | 33 |
| >< Note 3604.0 by CIMNET::MIKELIS "Just browsing through time..." >
What you wired "may" be code legal.
NEC 210-4 Multiwire Branch circuits.
(c) Line to Neutral Load. Multiwire branch circuits shall supply only line
to neutral load.
Exception No. 1: A multiwire branch circuit that supplies only one utilization
equipment.
Exception No. 2: Where all ungrounded conductors of the multiwire branch circuit
are opened simultaneously by the branch-circuit overcurrent device.
***************************************************************************
Questions to ask yourself:
Is your breaker double pole, single throw?
Do you have a "grounding" conductor in your circuit? (bare copper or green
insulated)? You can't use the neutral (grounded wire) to ground your pump.
What is the total load on this circuit? What is the other equipment?
Running a pump motor has complicated things a bit (motor load is calculated
at 125%).
***************************************************************************
FWIW, I don't like this kind of circuit. It may be legal if wired properly,
but it's not good practice. (short cut).
Ross
|
281.30 | Not the insurance argument again | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Mon Nov 27 1989 16:36 | 15 |
| re: .1 Affect on insurance of code violation
This keeps coming up so I'll repeat what has been said before:
According to an insurance exec neighbor, presence of a code violation
is unlikely to cause an insurance company not to pay, even if the code
violation appears to be the direct cause of the loss. As he told me
it's more cost effective to simply pay up rather than face a complex
litigation to determine who violated what code and where. Where they
draw the line is if the code violation was undertaken in order to
deliberately cause a loss - this they treat the same as you burning
down the house to collect the insurance - i.e., no pay.
You are most definitely taking risks by not following code, but at
least according to one major fire insurance company, it's not likely
to affect any claims.
|
281.31 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Nov 28 1989 08:41 | 8 |
| What .0 describes looks a lot like the way many 220v lines to appliances
work, that is, a 220v two-legged feed with some 110v usage in the appliance.
Clothes dryers, for example, have 220v heating elements and 110v motors
and lights. Electric ranges have 220v elements and 110v lights and convenience
outlets.
Is this substantially different from what .0 describes?
- tom]
|
281.32 | | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Tue Nov 28 1989 09:00 | 13 |
| .0 is not legal but your stove is - here's why:
The use of common ground and neutral for 110V fixtures in 220v
appliances is indeed, from a logical standpoint, what is proposed
in .0. There is some language in the code to cover these as
exceptions - for one thing they have to be dedicated circuits - so in
fact if you broke into the 3 wire line leading to your range outlet
and put in a 110v receptacle the circuit would no longer be
dedica(to the range). The common enclosure of the appliance
seems to be what counts to qualify for the exception. As I read
the proposal, it would only be legal if the 110V outlet was enclosed
in the pump housing or a direct mechanical extension thereto.
|
281.33 | | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Tue Nov 28 1989 09:21 | 23 |
| >Is your breaker double pole, single throw?
Yes, why?
>Do you have a "grounding" conductor in your circuit? (bare copper or green
> insulated)? You can't use the neutral (grounded wire) to ground your pump.
No, the original pump circuit has 3 wires, 2 hot (black) and one
neutral (white). i just wired in the duplex using the white and black
wire. The duplex is not grounded as is.
>What is the total load on this circuit? What is the other equipment?
>Running a pump motor has complicated things a bit (motor load is calculated
>at 125%).
The only load on this circuit is the pump motor. The reason i wired in the
duplex outlet in the same line, was that i needed an outlet near a sofa
for a lamp. Rather than wiring a new circuit, i did indeed take a shortcut.
I don't mean to drag this out, just want to understand the possible
implications of doing this sort of thing.
-jim
|
281.34 | Sounds like a violation to me | VINO::DZIEDZIC | | Tue Nov 28 1989 10:39 | 21 |
| NEC allows use of "combined" groundED and groundING (white & bare
in type NM cable) for certain appliances such as ranges and dryers.
To qualify, you must use at least #10 wire. If you use cable
(rather than conduit) you must use service entrance cable with
two insulated conductors and a third non-insulated conductor.
Also, the feed for the circuit must originate at a main panel,
not a subpanel, since only at the main panel are the groundED
and groundING conductors connected (the neutral busbar in a
subpanel MUST be isolated from the subpanel enclosure, rather
than being bonded to the enclosure as in service entrance).
If the pump is 240 volts, then it sounds like someone used the
white wire as a groundING conductor, which is against the NEC
in this case. Of course, it also depends on whether or not
the wires are run in conduit, which itself would serve as a
groundING conductor (although I'm not sure why they need a
white goundED conductor for a 240 volt pump).
I'd be safe and run your outlet off some other branch, and also
check with a licensed electrician to see if your pump circuit
really does meet the code.
|
281.35 | | WOODRO::THOMS | Ross @285-3151 | Tue Nov 28 1989 10:40 | 15 |
| >< Note 3604.9 by CIMNET::MIKELIS "Just browsing through time
Jim, If you re-read my reply (re:5), you'll see that I typed the
pertinent National Electric Code chapter. (Multiwire branch circuits).
And if you further notice, Exception #2 is what applies to your situation.
You must have an interupting device (circuit breaker) that is capable of
opening all ungrounded wire "simultaneously". This is why I asked if
you had a double pole, single throw breaker.
However, You are in violation of the code by wiring in an ungrounded recepticle.
See NEC chapter 210-7, 210-8.
Ross
|
281.36 | | WOODRO::THOMS | Ross @285-3151 | Tue Nov 28 1989 11:07 | 24 |
| >< Note 3604.10 by VINO::DZIEDZIC >
> -< Sounds like a violation to me >-
>>
> NEC allows use of "combined" groundED and groundING (white & bare
> in type NM cable) for certain appliances such as ranges and dryers.
> To qualify, you must use at least #10 wire. If you use cable
Be careful. NEC chapter 250-60 states #10 copper/#8 aluminum. Also, This
is *not* true for mobile homes.
> (rather than conduit) you must use service entrance cable with
> two insulated conductors and a third non-insulated conductor.
> Also, the feed for the circuit must originate at a main panel,
> not a subpanel, since only at the main panel are the groundED
> and groundING conductors connected (the neutral busbar in a
> subpanel MUST be isolated from the subpanel enclosure, rather
> than being bonded to the enclosure as in service entrance).
This isn't pertinent to the originator's question. Since we're not talking
range or clothe dryer, the violation is: not having a grounding conductor
in his circuit.
Ross
|
281.37 | liability | BOXTOP::SIRIANOS | | Tue Nov 28 1989 12:32 | 6 |
| Re: .6 I don't think it's good to say don't worry about the insurance
companys. You may have gotten some bad advice from this guy. It
does matter. Negligence cannot be excused or accepted. If something
is illegal it shouldn't be done. That's why electricians must get
a license, to know the what's legal and what's not (in this case,
definitely NOT.)
|
281.38 | ground/neutral connections? | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | | Tue Nov 28 1989 13:03 | 28 |
|
I might get slapped on the wrist by the moderator for asking this, but:
To pursue the issue of connecting the white neutral to the ground being
allowed only at the service entrance, tell me if something is wrong with
this connection:
Clothes Dryer: No spare breaker locations in service entrance, so use
a subpanel with 30 amp, double throw breaker. Tap off
220 at lugs in service entrance with 10-3 with ground
Romex, tying white neutral and gnd to gnd busbar;
run the wire to
subpanel, 2 hot wires to breakers, and neutral and ground
together on bus bar; run other side of breaker to hot
terminals of dryer outlet; run white neutral and ground
from
subpanel busbar to third (center) terminal of dryer outlet.
If this is against code, please tell me how to connect the neutral a
and gnd wires after they leave the service entrance.
Did an earlier note indicate that this connection is ok for dryers?
Thanks, Steve
|
281.39 | I don't have my code book with me | VINO::DZIEDZIC | | Tue Nov 28 1989 13:26 | 10 |
| I think the set-up you're describing would NOT fall under the
classification of a subpanel in the NEC (I'd have to check the
code to be sure), since the feed to the "box" is taken from a
source which is not controlled by overcurrent protection (other
than the main breaker). BUT, I don't think you'd be allowed to
use cable as a feed between the two boxes; a metal-to-metal
connection boxes (conduit, nipple, etc.) would be required.
With a REAL subpanel (with floating neutral) you'd need to use
a 4-wire cable (two hots, a goundED, and a groundING wire).
|
281.40 | | WOODRO::THOMS | Ross @285-3151 | Tue Nov 28 1989 14:34 | 20 |
| >< Note 3604.14 by MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON >
> -< ground/neutral connections? >-
What you're proposing is a feeder tap. (see NEC 240-21). Yes, It can be done
in accordance with this article. (I typed the criteria and lost my line).
- tap conductors less than 10 feet in length
- ampacity of conductors = control device they supply
- " " " load they supply
_ protected in a raceway
- don't extend beyound overcurrent protection device
NEC 250-60 states you can use the grounded conductor as a grounding conductor
in a clothe dryer circuit.
|
281.41 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | | Tue Nov 28 1989 14:50 | 13 |
| re .15, .16
So, what you're indicating to me is that this is okay, except that I need
to enclose the "feeder" between the service entrance and the overcurrent
protection device in conduit?
This would make sense, since if that Romex wire got damaged somehow, and the
hot wire shorted to ground, the only protection would be the main
serice entrance overprotection device, which would be much higher in
ampacity than the capacity of the 10-3, which could result in a fire.
Right?
|
281.42 | | WOODRO::THOMS | Ross @285-3151 | Tue Nov 28 1989 14:59 | 23 |
| >< Note 3604.17 by MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON >
>
>
>re .15, .16
>
>
> So, what you're indicating to me is that this is okay, except that I need
> to enclose the "feeder" between the service entrance and the overcurrent
> protection device in conduit?
Use an "offset nipple" with bushing caps. Also make sure the feeder taps are
on their own lugs in the service panel.
> This would make sense, since if that Romex wire got damaged somehow, and the
> hot wire shorted to ground, the only protection would be the main
> serice entrance overprotection device, which would be much higher in
> ampacity than the capacity of the 10-3, which could result in a fire.
>
> Right?
That's one idea.
|
281.43 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Tue Nov 28 1989 15:30 | 5 |
| Does a subpanel in a different building need to maintain the separate neutral
and ground? In other words, if I wish to add a breaker box fed with 220 in a
detached garage, do I need 3 or 4 conductor wire to feed it?
-Mike
|
281.44 | 3 with external ground | VINO::DZIEDZIC | | Wed Nov 29 1989 07:20 | 4 |
| You feed the subpanel with 3-conductor wire; 2 hots and 1 neutral.
The neutral bus bar is isolated ("floating") from the subpanel.
You run a separate groundING lead from the ground bus bar in the
subpanel to an earth ground (grounding rod).
|
281.45 | | MAMIE::THOMS | Ross @285-3151 | Wed Nov 29 1989 08:20 | 12 |
| RE:20 is correct. 3 wire, separate neutral and ground bus at the garage.
Also need a separate grounding electrode at the garage.
NEC 250-23 and 250-24 spell out the details:
250-23 states that A grounding connection shall not be made to any grounded
circuit conductor on the load side of the service disconnecting means.
(separate neutral and grounding bus)
And 250-24 states that two or more buildings supplied by a common service must
have an grounding electrode at each site.
Ross
|
281.46 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Wed Nov 29 1989 16:03 | 8 |
| Thanks. At least I can use a piece of the 350' 3 conductor service cable I
have rather than having to buy more...
Doing it the way the code words it means the ground conductor of an auxillary
building is never connected to the neutral anywhere (except through the
ground itself), correct?
-Mike
|
281.47 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 29 1989 16:16 | 4 |
| In that case, the only place the ground is connected to the neutral is
at the service entrance of the main panel.
Eric
|
281.48 | | WILKIE::THOMS | Ross @285-3151 | Thu Nov 30 1989 10:35 | 5 |
| >< Note 3604.22 by RAMBLR::MORONEY "How do you get this car out of second gear?" >
Mike, The intent of the code is to eliminate the effects of "ground loops".
This condition puts a potential voltage on the ground bus.
Ross
|
281.4 | NEC question about switch location | TALLIS::KOCH | DTN226-6274 ... If you don't look good, DEC doesn't look good. | Mon Aug 13 1990 12:01 | 5 |
| Here's another NEC question:
In income producing residential property -- an old house converted
into a college dormitory -- are there any requirements about switches for
private living areas being within those areas and not in public hallways?
|
281.62 | Try different make bulbs? | ADVLSI::MACGREGOR | | Wed Aug 15 1990 12:33 | 18 |
| I also had a problem with humming noise from my track lights.
Regardless of the setting of the dimmer, the bulbs themselves were
making a very audible noise. I was using a $10 dimmer, Lutron or
something, bought at Sommerville Lumber. I did what a previous reply
suggested and bought another dimmer at a commercial electrical supply
store. The humming was less but still there.
I noticed that my recessed lights, using the same model dimmer, made no
noise. They used a different type of bulb. So, I went and bought new bulbs,
from a different manufacturer than my current bulbs and voula`, no
humming on my track lights, even with my original dimmer!
The bulbs were 75Watt R30 bulbs used in track lights. The original ones
(the noisy ones) were bought at Light and Leisure (don't remember the
brand), were I bought the track lights. The replacement bulbs were
made by Sylvania (GTE) and cost the same.
So, if replacing the dimmer doesn't work, try replacing the bulbs.
|
281.63 | Bulbs are cheaper!! | BCSE::WEIER | | Wed Aug 15 1990 15:36 | 9 |
| Definitely the bulbs ..... we have 2 dimmer lights. Both dimmers are
identical, but the bulbs in the lights are different. The one in the
kitchen is a 'good' bulb (sylvania I think). The one at the top of the
upstairs is one of those 10 bulbs for $1.00 deals, and drives us a
little nuts sometimes. BUT, since it's at the top of the cathedral
ceiling, it'll hum till it burns out. I notice that it's a lot louder
when the light is dimmest, and I can't hear it at all when the light is
full bright. Not sure what causes it .... I always thought it was the
filament vibrating (don't know why I think that ....)
|
281.64 | | ESCROW::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Wed Aug 15 1990 15:53 | 13 |
|
It is the filament vibrating. I'm not sure whether this is related to
the relative expense of the bulb, but a filament that has a shorter
unsupported span will vibrate less. Some of the more ornate bulbs
(clear glass or large globes) have very long, straight filaments and
will absolutely sing.
The dimmer works by chopping off the normally clean AC sine wave at
varying point in each half-cycle - the earlier in the cycle, the less
energy gets to the load. At full bright, the wave looks pretty normal,
but at dim, it gets pretty spikey. My theory is that this causes
either thermal shocks or an electromagnetic response in the filament.
|
281.65 | And it turns on at very low light levels, too | RUNAWY::QUEDOT::DVORAK | dtn 297-5386 | Wed Aug 15 1990 16:59 | 9 |
|
I've found a dimmer at Spag's that does not make the bulbs buzz at all
(or I have gone deaf). It is styled like a regular light switch, with
a small toggle, rather than like a regular light dimmer with a big
round knob. I can't remember the brand name right now, but I'll look
next time I go to Spag's. The price was $7 if I recall correctly.
gjd
|
281.66 | Eh? What'd he say? | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Wed Aug 15 1990 17:16 | 6 |
| re: -.1
You went deaf. :-) I've got those switches and my very cheap .25/bulb
bulbs hum.
-Bob
|
281.67 | It's possible, with the planer running | RUNAWY::QUEDOT::DVORAK | dtn 297-5386 | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:18 | 8 |
|
RE: -.1
Do you really have the same part?
Power Controls # 143-131 Toggle Dimmer, $5.98 @ Spag's.
The dimmer I had before, a leviton?, made the bulb buzz, but this one is
quiet, and I have the same bulb in the lamp.
|
281.68 | yup | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Fri Aug 17 1990 10:40 | 16 |
| yup. I found one still in the pack that I've not yet installed and that
is what it is, and that's what I installed in the house. The humming
won't keep you awake but is annoying if you're reading and yes I do buy
my bulbs when the cheap ones go on sale at 4/$1.
-Bob
<<< Note 3217.14 by RUNAWY::QUEDOT::DVORAK "dtn 297-5386" >>>
-< It's possible, with the planer running >-
RE: -.1
Do you really have the same part?
Power Controls # 143-131 Toggle Dimmer, $5.98 @ Spag's.
The dimmer I had before, a leviton?, made the bulb buzz, but this one is
quiet, and I have the same bulb in the lamp.
|
281.69 | dimmer energy saving? | SNAX::HURWITZ | | Thu Oct 18 1990 21:55 | 11 |
| I had a cheap dimmer connected to my track lights when I lived in an
apartment and it wasn't bad when turned up from about 75% to 100% full
power, as far as buzzing goes, but anywhere under 75% or so and the
dimmer hummed pretty loud.
Question....(maybe stupid).... Once the dimmer is on are you using the
same amount of energy when its low as when its turned up all the way?
My assumption is that the brighter the lights are on the more energy it
takes to get them that way. i.e. if using a 100 watt light bulb with
the dimmer half way up is it using only 50 or so watts?
|
281.70 | | REGENT::GETTYS | Bob Gettys N1BRM 235-8285 | Fri Oct 19 1990 11:05 | 9 |
|
As you turn a dimmer down, the lights use less energy,
but not as fast as you might think. Half brilliance is still
about 2/3 (rough estimate) power consumption. BTW - a dimmer
turn all th eway down but not OFF is still consuming
electricity. It takes a bit of energy to ge the bulb hot enough
so that you can see some light being given off.
/s/ Bob
|
281.71 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Originality = Undetected Plagiarism | Mon Oct 22 1990 15:22 | 15 |
| Moreover, the lower you turn the dimmer, the less efficient the
bulb becomes because of two factors ... first that as the light becomes
dimmer, teh spectrum emitted becomes more red and effectively looks
like less light .. and second that as a light is dimmed, its electrical
resistance drops (it's a non-linear device). So, a 100 watt bulb dimmed
to give the same amount of lumens as a 15 watt bulb will use significantly
more electricity than a 15 watt bulb. And a 100 watt bulb dimmed to
give the same amount of apparent light will use even more electricity.
So, if you want a night light, a 5 watt bulb is a lot cheaper to use
than a dimmed 60 ... on the other hand, the 5 watt bulbs do seem to
burn out a lot more often with their ridiculous cost.
Stuart
|
281.5 | | CSS::THOMS | digital index operator | Wed Oct 31 1990 07:51 | 14 |
| A while back, I was absolutely lambasted for suggesting counter top
outlets be spaced no more than 24 inches apart. Well I'm finally taking
the electrical code update for 1990 and guess what? Article 210-52 (c)
Counter tops, has a change stating "Recepticles shall be installed so that no
point along the wall line is more than 24 inches", ...
FWIW, other significant changes: outlets in unfinished basements or crawl
spaces must be ground fault and washing machines in a bathroom must be on a
ground fault circuit. If I come across any other important changes, I'll post
them.
Ross
|
281.6 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Oct 31 1990 08:24 | 8 |
| Just a nit:
24" apart <> "No point further than 24 inches"
No point further than 24 inches means that the outlets can be 48" apart, and
any point between them is no more than 24" from one or the other.
Pau
|
281.7 | | CSS::THOMS | digital index operator | Wed Oct 31 1990 08:42 | 16 |
| ><<< Note 2966.32 by VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS "Trade freedom for security-lose both" >>>
>
>Just a nit:
>
>24" apart <> "No point further than 24 inches"
>
>No point further than 24 inches means that the outlets can be 48" apart, and
>any point between them is no more than 24" from one or the other.
>
>Pau
Correct, That's what the code requires as a minimum standard, but I still
favour even tighter spacing. Who knows, maybe in 1993 the code will require
even tighter requirements.
Ross
|
281.72 | Dimmer problem. | CHIPS::DACOSTA | | Mon Jun 22 1992 14:03 | 15 |
| I had a problem over the weekend with a dimmer switch and I was
hoping that someone out there could help me out. I installed a
new bedroom light which was controlled by a dimmer switch. The
light I installed held 3 (75 watt max.) bulbs in which I used
Sylvania halogen bulbs (these are made to replace incandescents).
I changed the light, but as I turned on the dimmer, I immediately
heard a loud pop from the dimmer. Needless to say, the lights never
went on.
Is the problem in the dimmer switch, or in the light? I heard
(after the incident) that halogen lights should never be used
with dimmer switches. Is this true?
/Tony
|
281.73 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 22 1992 14:32 | 5 |
| I'm aware that the Sylvania halogens say don't use them with dimmers, but
I've got five of them running off a Lightolier dimmer in my kitchen and
they've never given me a problem. You may just have a defective dimmer.
Steve
|
281.74 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 22 1992 14:32 | 4 |
| BTW, if you plan on running the bulbs at a low level, you'll seriously
reduce the life of the halogen bulbs.
Steve
|
281.75 | Perhaps bad light? | CHIPS::DACOSTA | | Mon Jun 22 1992 14:47 | 3 |
| I don't have a choice of a dimmer. After the loud pop, there
was no electricity going to the light. I'm wondering whether
I have a bad light (short) or bad dimmer. Any thoughts?
|
281.76 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 22 1992 16:03 | 3 |
| I'd suspect the dimmer first.
Steve
|
281.77 | | KAHALA::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:28 | 6 |
| Also check all of the wiring around the dimmer. When we were doing our
living room, we had a problem with some bare wiring touching the metal
box and blowing the dimmer switch. Tightened wiring (fixed insulation
problem) helped solve the problem.
Ed..
|
281.78 | Speed controller for a fan | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Fri Jun 26 1992 08:44 | 12 |
| I recently tried to install a speed controller on a ceiling fan. I bought a
wall mount dimmer (speed controller) at Somerville that explicitly said "for
ceiling fans". However, upon installing it, I get a noticable HUM from the fan.
I got the fan from BJ's, I believe the brand is Northern. (It does contain this
warning: "To avoid the possibility of electrical shock, do not use this unit
with a solid state dimmer."
For now, I replaced the dimmer with an on off switch, and attached a long chain
to the fan to use it's built in 3 speed switch. But I would like to control the
speed with the dimmer on the wall. It's gotta be possible, I've seen other
installations.
|
281.79 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri Jun 26 1992 10:41 | 6 |
|
The motor has to be set up for it. I believe your's isn't. I have a fan
on my wood stove that's the same way. I'd love to put it on a 2 speed
switch, but can't.
Mike
|
281.80 | | SNAX::HURWITZ | | Fri Jun 26 1992 22:21 | 7 |
| re .25
Just curious. What speed did you leave the fan on when you tried the
dimmer? The fastest speed I presume? Did you try the middle speed?
again just curious,
Steve
|
281.81 | | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Mon Jun 29 1992 08:25 | 8 |
| I tried all 3 speeds. High speed made the most hum. Low speed the least, but
it doesn't go fast enough. All speed made an audible hum.
Is there any way of telling what kind of motor it is. There is no indication
in the papers. Let me put it a different way: What kind of motor works with a
dimmer, and what kind does not?
A correction, by the way, the brand is Northman.
|
281.82 | Humming slowly diminished | EVMS::YAHWHO::PETROVIC | Looking for a simpler place & time... | Mon Jun 29 1992 10:44 | 23 |
| re: .27, .28
About 6 years ago I installed a ceiling fan and was warned of the humming by
the retailer who sold me the setup. After installation, it did hum on all
settings (variable speed control), but not to any great degree.
Today, there's so little hum, that I can't say I hear it. That could be for
one or more of the following reasons:
1. I'm getting older and my hearing just ain't what it usta be.
2. Whatever was humming in the motor got all hummed out or has gotten stuck
somehow.
3. It's still humming at the same intensity, but, I'm getting older and I
just don't care.
Some other considerations also... the fan's in the family room and I've got
three kids, 7, 5 and 2. They are quite adept at making high level humming noises
themselves. The TV's in there and, because of the kid-noise, is running at a fair
dB level itself. Maybe if I slept in there, I'd find the humming intolerable.
Chris
|
281.83 | Same fan problem | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Jun 29 1992 13:49 | 24 |
| I have the same problem described in .25
I bought a Casablanca fan which my electrician said was a very high
quality brand. I also installed a light on the fan so I am using a dual
dimmer switch, one for the light and one for the fan.
I noticed the humming also. The humming is at its loudest when the
dimmer is at its lowest setting. I also noticed that when the fan pull
chain is used to select the lowest speed, and the dimmer is moved to
the lowest setting, the fan seems to run *faster*. This doesn't seem to
happen, or at least, be as noticable at the higher speed settings.
In any event the dimmer only seems to control the fan speed
*within* the setting on the fan itself. The fan has three speeds, when
it is on the lowest speed I can use the dimmer to select various speeds
all in the low range. At high speed I can lower the speed with the
dimmer somewhat but not lower than the middle speed.
All in all I like the dimmer for the light but for the fan is
wasn't worth it.
|
281.84 | Not just a dimmer...a motor speed control! | RESYNC::D_SMITH | | Mon Jun 29 1992 15:49 | 8 |
| I also experience the hummmmmmmmmm with the dimmer/fan combo.
I figured I needed a motor speed control and not a standard
incondecent light dimmer control.
Has anyone gone the motor speed control route and eliminated the hum?
Dave'
|
281.85 | they didn't work for me | SALEM::DILLON_M | Major Mudd, my hero. | Mon Jun 29 1992 16:03 | 11 |
| Ref .31
I just went through all this. I first started off with the variable
control "fan" switch and got the hum at low speed. My son the electrician
purchased a three speed switch for the fan. It had an OFF, HI, MED, and LO on
the dial. It clicked at each setting. It too hummed! I gave up and put the
toggle switch back on and it eliminated the humming. All of the above switches
were for fans, not lights.
Mike
|
281.86 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 29 1992 17:33 | 4 |
| Some motors can be used with speed controls, some can't. I don't know what
it is about the design that differs.
Steve
|
281.87 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Mon Jun 29 1992 18:26 | 21 |
| Typically, fans are driven by shaded pole motors (oversized record
player motors) ... the motor, unloaded, will operate at a fixed
speed depending on the number of poles. In a fan application,
the motor slips under load. One way of controlling the speed is
to control the power applied to the motor field windings. When
insufficiently powered, the amount of slip increases dramatically
and hence lower speeds. Another way is to essentially change the
number of poles by applying power to more windings ... the more poles
the faster the motor.
The problem with speed control via a dimmer is that the shaded poles
are in essence "tuned" for low frequency operation. A typical dimmer
introduces a strong 120 Hz harmonic component into the power feed
which will cause a vibration that you hear as hum.
There are some types of motor that will work with this kind of speed
control, but the shaded pole motor is not one of them.
Universal motors as used in drills etc are best for this kind of dimmer
speed control.
|
281.88 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Tue Jun 30 1992 09:43 | 5 |
| You can vary the speed of an induction or shaded pole motor by
varying the frequency of the AC voltage from something other
than 60HZ, but that requires a fairly elaborate circuit to pull
off. Basically, you have to change it to DC then fake it back
to a pseudo-AC at the desired frequency.
|
281.89 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Tue Jun 30 1992 11:10 | 6 |
| But Steve, you'd never get the required amount of circuitry in a
switch box! And when you rstore it to pseudo AC, it shouldn't be
a wafefor with a high 2nd or 3rd harmonic ... otherwise you'll hear
HUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM! :-)
Stuart
|
281.90 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Tue Jun 30 1992 11:16 | 6 |
| Right, it's totally impractical for this application. It's used in
industrial applications to control the speed of machinery that's
driven by induction motors. Warner Electric makes a nice solid-state
unit to control 3-phase motors up to 1hp, I believe it is...a mere
$500 or so.
|
281.91 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Tue Jun 30 1992 12:20 | 2 |
| And in general, in those applcations, it would be rare for anyone to
care about a little extra hum from the motor!
|
281.92 | Skip the speed control... | ESKIMO::CASSIDY | Aspiring conservationist | Thu Jul 02 1992 01:13 | 15 |
|
Back when I worked in an electical supply store, the Casablanca
fans had a very high return rate. Something on the order of half!
They may have been improved upon since then but you'll never con-
vince me of that. IMHO, I'd go with Hunter for best quality and
quietest operation. I bought their bottom of the line and it's
very quiet (a priority for me).
As for speed control, I've never had a problem with the three
speeds hard wired into the fan from the factory. If low speed
isn't slow enough, you probably don't need to be running a fan.
BTW, even dimmer controls make noise. Light bulbs don't resonate
the vibration as well as a big paddle fan so it's not nearly as
noticable.
Tim
|
281.93 | Thanks, but... | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Thu Jul 02 1992 08:56 | 5 |
| The fan is totally quiet, when it's running on a switch. I was hoping to be
able to get speed control from the wall switch, rather than having a 4' long
chain hanging down in the middle of the porch, which is what I have now. On a
dimmer, the fan hum is loud enough to be heard over the stereo (which we don't
play too loud, but...).
|
281.94 | Try a NuTone wall mount multi-speed switch | NECSC::ROODY | | Thu Jul 02 1992 16:36 | 13 |
| I don't know if this will work with your fan, but NuTone sells a three
or four speed wall switch which seems to work fine without any buzzing.
We have two of their fans, and each one has one of these and there is
no hum on any of the settings. I don't know how the internals of the
switch are wired, but maybe they have balanced the frequencies at
specific speeds so you don't hear it?
In any case, try it, and if it doesn't work, take it back.
It may be it's designed to work only with NuTone fans.
/greg
|
281.8 | Feeling very dense right about now... | SCHOOL::P_ROMAN | | Thu Oct 20 1994 15:22 | 11 |
|
OK, what am I missing here?? I read this whole note, and didn't really
see that the initial question was answered! I have a dimmer with two
wires coming out of it that I want to install in a PLASTIC box with
three wires coming into it (neutral, power and ground). Although the
front of the dimmer is all metal, there is no place to attach a ground
screw. Is it legal to just not ground the dimmer, put a wire nut on
the ground wire coming into the box, and call it a day? Or do I need
a different dimmer (one with a ground connection). Thanks in advance,
Peter
|
281.9 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 20 1994 16:23 | 4 |
| The metal plate is a heat sink - most dimmers (and indeed many switches)
aren't intended to be grounded. Just cap the ground wire.
Steve
|
281.10 | ground the box | PCBUOA::RIDGE | the trouble w/you is the trouble w/me | Tue Oct 25 1994 12:26 | 7 |
| Wouldn't it be correct to attach the ground wire to the metal box with
a grounding screw? That would make the dimmmer switch grounded since it
would be attached to the metal box with screws.
Thats' what I would do.
(the other) Steve
|
281.11 | | TEKVAX::KOPEC | You have left basic services | Tue Oct 25 1994 12:36 | 6 |
| .14 is perfect if you're using a metal box, but not with a plastic box.
If the coverplate depth will allow it, I usually wrap the ground wire
around a mounting screw and trap it between the device and the box..
...tom
|
281.12 | if it does not provide a means, don't invent one | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | I'm still not ready | Tue Oct 25 1994 13:33 | 12 |
| >> If the coverplate depth will allow it, I usually wrap the ground wire
>> around a mounting screw and trap it between the device and the box..
This is, of course, not a legal ground (but you don't really need one). The
method used to ground a device can ONLY be used for grounding - if its used for
something else (for example to hold something in place) - its against code.
A common example of this I used to see is homeowners wrapping the ground wire
around the same screw that was clamping the RX wire in the box - and of course
cutting the extra so there is no way to get a good ground anymore...
bjm
|
281.13 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Oct 25 1994 16:30 | 4 |
| The metal box is not necessarily grounded - my house is mostly wired with
14/2 wire and no ground, the metal boxes are just boxes.
Steve
|
281.14 | While we're at it... | SCHOOL::P_ROMAN | | Tue Oct 25 1994 17:54 | 19 |
|
On a related note, what's the deal with light fixture mounting straps?
All the light fixture boxes in my house connect the incoming ground to the
metal box, and have a pigtail available for connecting to the fixture.
Is it legal to just connect the pigtail to the light fixture, and not
bother grounding the mounting strap? If not, and both the strap and the
light fixture have to be grounded, is it legal to simply screw both the
pigtail AND the ground from the fixture under the mounting strap ground
screw? Or do I have to create two pigtails, one for the strap and one for
the light fixture?
Also, interestingly enough, I've found that I don't need a mounting strap
with most of my fixtures, since the screws in the fixtures lined up
nicely with the holes in the box itself. Or did I violate an obscure
section of the code by omitting the strap...!?
Thanks,
Peter
|
281.15 | Anybody out there? | SCHOOL::P_ROMAN | | Fri Nov 04 1994 13:37 | 5 |
|
Does anybody have the answers to those questions? (If they were really
stupid questions, please let me know too! Any info. would be helpful,
since I'm replacing every fixture in the house). Thanks.
|
281.16 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Nov 04 1994 14:58 | 4 |
| I don't think the strap is required, but I think you're supposed to attach
a ground wire to the box somehow. Some boxes have screws for that purpose.
Steve
|
281.17 | I think you are safe not using them | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | I'm still not ready | Sat Nov 05 1994 08:17 | 20 |
| I belive there are some silly rules (may actually be local, but they may also
come from the rule about the method of grounding can not be used for anything
else) about when the fixture is NOT mounted, it still needs to be grounded -
that is, if for some strange reason the screws holding the fixture onto the box
let go, the fixture would be haning in the air, still grounded via the ground
wire to the ground screw on the mounting strap and then to the grounding wire
that is part of the house wiring.
If you are not using a mounting bracket and the fixture has a ground wire for
it, you should connect it to the house ground - somehow - usually via a wire
nut.
I do NOT think the code gets into mounting methods of various fixtures - just
into the flow (or potental flow) of electrical current. It most likly has
details about "when this mounting method is used, a seperate ground must be
required" - but I don't think details of ceiling fixtures would covered.
(disclaimer - its been several years since I've even held a NEC book,
never mind read one).
bjm
|
281.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 19 1995 12:56 | 4 |
| Yes, cheap switches. I have some which also do this. Replace them with
"Spec grade" switches - will cost a buck or so, rather than 49 cents.
Steve
|
281.2 | how do I know? | PASTA::DEMERS | | Mon Jun 19 1995 13:09 | 1 |
| do they say "Spec grade" on the package?
|
281.3 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 19 1995 13:53 | 4 |
| Yes they do, and on the switch itself (stamped on the metal or on the switch
housing).
Steve
|
281.95 | Moving the electrical hardware forward | COOKIE::LAWSON | Carpe Heli Diem, eh? | Thu Mar 28 1996 17:53 | 11 |
| We just recently had granite countertops installed. At the same time,
we had the same (3/8 inch think) granite placed on the walls as a
splash.
The problem is that when we went to put back our switchplates and plug
covers, the screw isn't long enough to reach all the way back to where
the electrical hardware is (now that the switchplates are 3/8 inch
farther forward).
Is there an easy way of moving the electrical hardware forward by 3/8
inch?
|
281.96 | but since granite does not burn, I guess its OK | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Thu Mar 28 1996 20:15 | 15 |
| No easy way to move the boxes forward - if they were put in as new-work, they
are nailed to studs and won't move :-)
You can get longer screws - you want screws with an 8/32 thread.
But the other issue is "covering" that 3/8 of an inch. I think the code has
something in it about devices (ie the outlets) should be mounted "in" the
boxes, when you have them hanging out 3/8 of an inch, you don't meet that
requirement. But of course, its done all the time.
If you want to cover the area, the best was I've heard described it taking a
new plastic outlet box, cutting 3/8 of an inch off the front and use that as an
extention to the recessed box.
bjm
|
281.97 | box extenders | EVMS::MORONEY | while (!asleep) sheep++; | Thu Mar 28 1996 20:28 | 3 |
| I have seen devices for this: A shallow box with no top or bottom that's
placed over the existing box and screws into it where the device would.
The outlet/switch/whatever screws into this box. No idea what they're called.
|
281.98 | | 2082::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Mar 28 1996 20:40 | 3 |
| They're called box extenders, and you can find them at Home Depot, etc.
Steve
|
281.99 | never seen plastic ones | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Fri Mar 29 1996 05:45 | 6 |
| Hmm - they make them now huh? The only ones I have seen for sale were metal
and for either 4" square boxes or handy-boxes (the single-gang metal box on the
side of your furnace is a handy-box - at least that is what they were called
'in the trade' 10+ years ago).
bjm
|