T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
502.1 | | ULTNIX::taber | KC1TD - Monoelement 5-bander up 285 ft (ASL.) | Thu Oct 11 1990 08:54 | 38 |
| The basis of the controversy is the effect of low-frequency magnetic
fields on the human body. The studies have been done several times
with some groups claiming a strong correlation between some types of
cancer and living near power distribution lines. (You know, the big
towers with the mega-cables strung between them.) Previously the
studies had been dismissed, but the most recent set have even the
conservative types thinking there might be something to it.
Enter the thinking that if a lot is bad a little must also be bad.
Some people are concerned that the effect of a low powered, low
frequency field right next to you might be the same as a high powered
low frequency field that is a block away. I don't claim to know one
way or the other, I've never done nor seen field strength figures for
these instances. Anyway, the place an electric field is *closest* to
you is when you're sleeping under an electric blanket that uses AC to
heat the coil. (I understand there are DC models as well that are not
being touted as bad.)
The argument about unplugging the blanket has to do with the fact that
the switch generally turns off just one leg of the power. (same as your
light switch -- the switch is on the "hot" side.) The fear is that you
still get the 60-cycle field effect from the remaining wire. I'm not
sure this has a lot of merit. I would expect the field strength would
not be much more than you get being in a room with wiring all around you.
In all cases, the strength of the field drops off rapidly as you
increase your distance from it. (double the distance, the power is cut
four times.) So your body should get a much weaker field from a
baseboard four feet away than a blanket that is right on top of you.
I don't believe there are any studies that are accepted as having
proven a relationship between electric blankets and ill health. The
studies that are accepted concern people living near (under) power
lines. They have shown that what we thought was a safe dose before was
probably off by a few orders of magnitude. You have to draw your own
conclusions from there.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
502.2 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 11 1990 10:28 | 4 |
| There's no current flowing in an electric blanket that is switched off.
The electrons don't "go looking for somewhere to go".
Steve
|
502.3 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Oct 11 1990 12:10 | 10 |
| Well, my grandmother slept under an electric blanket for years and
she lived to be 91, so I wouldn't worry too much. (Yeah, I know,
if she *hadn't* slept under an electric blanket she'd be 119 by now.)
That business about the "electrons looking for someplace to go" when
the switch is off is totally ridiculous. Given that the proponents
of this theory are saying things like that, I have rather serious
doubts about anything else they may be saying.
The BIG high-tension power lines are DC, I believe.
|
502.4 | Electric or magnetic? | SNDPIT::SMITH | Smoking -> global warming! :+) | Thu Oct 11 1990 12:34 | 5 |
| Well, there may be an electric field around blanket that's switched
off, but the problem {appears to be, may be, may not be} magnetic
fields, which are not present when the blanket is turned off.
Willie
|
502.5 | | HPSTEK::BELANGER | Scurvy sea dog | Thu Oct 11 1990 13:39 | 6 |
| re: .3
The big power lines are 220,000 volts AC, DC doesn't do well over
long distances, that's why AC is used.
Fred
|
502.6 | Power is often shipped via DC nowadays | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Shhh... Mad Scientist at work... | Thu Oct 11 1990 14:00 | 11 |
| re .5:
There are now some high voltage DC power lines, and some more are being
installed. They can be more efficient than AC lines, especially when shipping
power over very long distances. They have completed building a �450,000 volt
DC power line that brings hydroelectric power from Quebec through New Hampshire
to a substation in Ayer, MA and are testing it now. Since this is new
technology, these lines are still pretty scarce. Most of the BIG power lines
now in use are 220,000, 345,000 or sometimes 765,000 volts AC.
-Mike
|
502.7 | IN the News... | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Mon Oct 15 1990 16:03 | 25 |
| There was a "news" show on WTBS, channel 17, called "Earth Watch" or
something enviornmentally sounding last night. The subject they were
touting last night was electromagnetic fields set up by electrical
stuff and the dangers to people.
They were measuring the fields with a meter and it was calibrated in
Guasses(sp?). Supposedly 2 Guasses was the dividing line and greater
than 2 was considered a harmful level. They had this guy wandering all
over this test subjects house saying that everything was bad and that
their childern were more likely to develop lukemia.
For instance, the digital alarm clock created an electromagnetic field
which was higher than 2 guasses within in 2 ft of it. The expert
suggested they move if off the headboard and on to the night stand so
it would not contaminate their heads all night long. The water bed
heater should be turned off at night while sleeping because it sets up
a field and the water helps to intensive it by reverberating the field.
They lived under the huge power lines. They finally said that this
house was no worse than any other "normal" house except for the power
lines. They suggested that you take precautions like don't stand in
front of your microwave while it is cooking, don't sit close to the TV,
and move your alarm clock.
They scared the people enough that they plan to move.
|
502.8 | | ULTNIX::taber | KC1TD - Monoelement 5-bander up 285 ft (ASL.) | Mon Oct 15 1990 16:51 | 15 |
| I assume the 2 Gausses (measure of magnetic flux density) off the alarm
clock included the background level from the overhead powerlines? I
had a chance to hear Wayne Greene, noted crackpot of the ham radio
world, talk last weekend and he is claiming that levels in the range of
a couple of hundred milli-Gauss are harmful and is waging war on
"killer blankets" as he calls them.
I'm willing to believe there is more to it than we thought a few years
ago, but I am unwilling to believe that more people are dying from
electric blankets than AIDS or automobiles. A beneficial side-effect
if there's enough of an outcry on the subject will be better shielding
of electrical devices. But usually the benefits of government
intervention carry a high cost, and I'm not sure I'm looking forward to it.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
502.9 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Tue Oct 16 1990 10:37 | 6 |
| I bet that gauss meter would wrap its silly pointer around its peg
if they turned it on in my office.
- Vick (I've moved the VSII box from between my legs) Bennison
|
502.10 | The answer | POCUS::SEARL | | Tue Oct 16 1990 14:50 | 3 |
| If you're going to sleep under an electric blanket, you can strap an
aluminum pie plate to your butt and head to shield these most sensitive
parts of the anatomy. Replace the plate when it begins to glow.
|
502.11 | Use both conductors: one may prove insufficient. | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Wed Oct 24 1990 14:00 | 11 |
| .10:
No need to replace it -- just take a set of jumper cables and carefully
hook up one end to the aluminum pie plate, after you have hooked the
other to the breaker box's ground stake, or to the water pipe coming
into the house. If you use the water pipe, though, be sure to avoid
grounding through the water meter; it's not good for the meter, and if
you have one of those remote readout thingies (like in Billerica) it
will never read right again...
Dick
|
502.12 | Don't smoke the rodents... | KALE::KILGORE | $ EXIT 98378 | Wed Oct 24 1990 14:41 | 4 |
|
Make sure you isolate your alternate energy guinea pig before
degaussing the pie plates (replacement parts are hard to get).
|
502.13 | Second hand magnetic fields found harmful to health!! | XK120::SHURSKY | IRAQ is not a terrible thing to waste! | Fri Oct 26 1990 09:55 | 14 |
| I have a problem. I am exposed to second hand magnetic fields. My wife
keeps the heat in the bedroom (fortunately on a separate heating zone :-)
at 75+. AND uses an electric blanket. I am in the same bed sweating with
just the sheet. Meanwhile, I am exposed to all those magnetic effects.
BTW, don't you have to use a magnetic material to shield from magnetic
fields? The aluminum pie plates will only shield against the eletric
fields. (If I remember my E&M correctly)
BTW, in the near field of a long conductor the effects drop off as 1/r.
From a point source like an alarm clock they drop off as 1/r**2. Does
anybody remember the math for the near filed of a plane (or blanket)?
Stan
|
502.14 | what's wrong with this picture? | CLUSTA::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 @TAY Littleton MA | Fri Oct 26 1990 11:06 | 5 |
| The field falls off as 1/1. For a planar source, there's no
attenuation of the field at all until you get out of the near field,
which extends to approx 1/2 the diameter of the planar source measured
from its center. Full strength radiation. You're a dead man. I can't
even understand how you managed to enter the last reply :-).
|
502.15 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Originality = Undetected Plagiarism | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:08 | 21 |
| What we need is mu-metal for magnetic screening, not aluminium.
There are an awful lot of dead people out there if em fields are
very dangerous.
Moreover, people who live in un-electrified houses should live longer
than we do, all other things being equal. Given that all other things
are rarely equal, general life expectancies don't seem any better for
us than those of our predecessors.
Other comparisons ... in the UK and Europe, they use higher voltages
and hence higher E fields and consequently they have lower currents
typically (given that they use a similar total power to us ... which
is not true ... they typically use much less ... but anyway) and hence
lower M fields. They have no significantly higher or lower life
expectancy than North Americans that cannot be explained other ways.
So, I would put tend to believe that at normal domestic field strengths
(e and m) there is little risk.
Stuart
|
502.16 | | ULTNIX::taber | KC1TD - Monoelement 5-bander up 285 ft (ASL.) | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:29 | 12 |
| Re: .15 People in un-elctrified houses
Intuitively you'd think they'd live longer, but I think they actually
have a shorter life span 'cause they fall down stairs and break their
necks when they get up in the middle of the night to raid the icebox
(and we're talking *real* ice here...) 'cause they can't flip on the
light. They also have higher mortality because, if they make it to the
icebox, there's no telltale fridge light to give them away, and so they
stand there longer and eat more of the things that are bad for them and
have heart attacks.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
502.17 | frazzled frumps | FSTVAX::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Oct 31 1990 08:23 | 6 |
| a large percentage fall to fatality from frustrated fraus who find
feces from fathers who fail to find the front of the john and fixate on
faucets instead.
fred
(alias tony)
|
502.18 | I'm going TWICE as fast. . . | MVDS02::LOCKRIDGE | Artificial Insanity | Thu Nov 01 1990 12:41 | 7 |
| I'm gonna die twice as fast as most people 'cause I sleep with an
electric blanket AND electric mattress pad. The mattress pad is used
to make the bed toasty warm and then shut off, but seeing as how these
things emit death rays even when turned off I guess I should write my
obituary before it's too late. :-)
-Bob
|
502.19 | use down | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Christine | Sat Nov 03 1990 08:31 | 7 |
|
Instead of electric blankets, why not use a nice fluffy down comforter
instead? If you can, have a friend in Europe buy one there on their
way over here; you get more down for less money on the other side of
the pond.
CQ
|