T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
749.1 | | FREBRD::POEGEL | Garry Poegel | Fri Sep 14 1990 15:30 | 15 |
|
Bravo Vick!
If I only buy one item anywhere, I'd just as well would rather
take the receipt and throw the item in my pocket instead of
wasting a whole bag. I can't see how the company could legally
enforce that policy without posting it. Once you pay for the item,
it's yours to do whatever you want with. The other side is that if
it's not in a bag, you better be able to prove you own it as you
walk out the door.
Sometime when I feel like giving a jerk a hard time, I might just
go buy something there.
Garry
|
749.2 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Sep 14 1990 16:55 | 16 |
| I've had similar experiences, usually at Kmart, Sears and similar
stores. Theire reasoning is that it is easy for them to spot
shoplifters who won't have bags. What nonsense!
Sometimes I'll ask the register clerk to put a "sticker" on the
item or to just tape the receipt to it. If they insist on bagging
and I'm in a determined (or choose your own adjective!) mood I've
been know to let the clerk bag the item, the calmly remove it from
the bag and walk out leaving the bag on the counter.
This is NOT only an issue or recycling. Those bags cost money!
That means we're paying twice -- once for the extra cost the
store encounters to provide the bag and again for the cost of
disposing of it.
|
749.3 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Sep 14 1990 18:08 | 6 |
| I've had no problem declining a bag at Channel and Builder's Square, as
well as at several grocery stores. (I also reuse grocery bags, which
sometimes gets me odd looks at the stores, even those that explicitly
encourage such actions, such as Shaw's.)
Steve
|
749.4 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Sep 17 1990 09:44 | 7 |
| Ummmmmmm......
I know that conservation is important to all of us, but can someone give me a
reason why I shouldn't delete this note? Bags at K-Mart really don't have
anything to do with Home_working.
Paul
|
749.5 | One mans opinion. | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant, VMS Security | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:03 | 29 |
| RE: .4
Paul, I can think of two related "reasons" for leaving this note:
1) Conservation/recycling are issues that touch all areas of our lives:
from disposing of building materials to using recycled materials in
constructions to what to do with paper/plastic bags. While I think
HOME_WORK is probably not the place for general environmental
discussions, I believe discussing topic such as this bag topic are
useful. Consider the scenario where a member discovers a particular
building supply/store that encourages (or discourages) recycling or
environmental awareness. There are probaly other members of this
conference that would wish to express their opinions (to the store)
with their wallet/checkbook.
2) Relagating issues/topics such as this to the "proper" place is a
sure way to get them ignored by the general public. (Out of sight,
out of mind.) If is necessary to discuss these issues in an appropriate
place, only those folks with an interest will search out and
participate; human nature being what it is. By allowing topics such as
this, it is possible to keep people aware of the environmental issues
that affect us all.
As I have indicated I feel that topics sucha as this one can be useful.
Howevr, they also have a significant rathole potential. Perhaps this topic
could serve as a testbed to determine whether or not similar issues should be
raised in HOME_WORK in the future.
- Mark
|
749.6 | | CLUSTA::GLANTZ | Mike @TAY Littleton MA, 227-4299 | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:09 | 10 |
| I for one would like to be aware of stores which support
environmentally sound practises -- or not. I was not aware of this
"store policy" of Grossman's, and will add it to my list of reasons
for not shopping there.
I have not had a similar experience at any other store. In fact, many
stores ask if I want a bag at all (whether paper or plastic) in an
effort to reduce their own operating costs.
In general, though, I try to shop at Spag's.
|
749.7 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:16 | 5 |
| Oh, and one other thing. I am distressed to see that the number one
producer of pink fiberglass insulation has started bagging the stuff
in heavy plastic. What an unnecessary waste!
- Vick
|
749.8 | Just another trouble maker | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Mon Sep 17 1990 11:59 | 12 |
| I have been asking stores to not bag my items for several months now.
Uusally I get a blank look on the face of the clerk. I repeat my
request, "No thank you, I don't want a bag. Help save the
environment." Usually they have already gotten the bag half open and
don't know what to do with it. Most times they wad it up and stick it
under the counter. Oh well.
I have been trying to tell them I don't want a bag before they start
but they usually blithly ignore me. They hear me talking but are not
listening. When I repeat myself, they get mildly upset that I messed
up the routine. They can not comprehend that anyone would not want a
bag. People who act like robots.
|
749.9 | | STARVU::YOST | | Mon Sep 17 1990 13:24 | 6 |
|
re. 7
Can't agree. Good safety measure (keeps fibers out of the air
and off skin) and also protects the insulation from moisture and
dirt. It's a good idea to place new rolls in plastic bags at a job site.
|
749.10 | if they only bothered to look for a solution | CLUSTA::GLANTZ | Mike @TAY Littleton MA, 227-4299 | Mon Sep 17 1990 14:16 | 2 |
| I thought of that, too, but there are degradable wrapping materials
which would accomplish those goals just as effectively.
|
749.11 | why would i want a bag anyway | CRBOSS::CARDINAL | | Mon Sep 17 1990 14:20 | 5 |
| I always ask that they withhold their bag if I can carry the stuff in
my hands. Believe it or not though, I had the same problem as the base
note...."company policy" at Ben and Jerry's who claim to be
environmental...?
Ken
|
749.12 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Sep 17 1990 14:25 | 24 |
| re:5
> Conservation/recycling are issues that touch all areas of our lives:
True, but so are all sorts of other issues. That doesn't make this the right
place to discuss them. People have tried in the past to start notes on such
general things as tax preparation, and have had their notes deleted.
> Relagating issues/topics such as this to the "proper" place is a
> sure way to get them ignored by the general public.
True, but again, the same is true for many other issues. Should we have notes
here about nuclear waste disposal and global disarmament? The only tenuous
connection in the base note to home_working is the fact that it was a
Grossman's store, and that is really only incidental to the base note (at least
as I read it).
My tendency is still to delete this note as not appropriate for this
conference. I don't really care if people use one note to go off on this
tangent, but given that we've been able to come up with almost 4000 notes on
topics that ARE directly related to home_working, I get leery about expanding
the charter.
Paul
|
749.13 | grossman's ??? | CURIE::DIMAN | | Mon Sep 17 1990 15:14 | 14 |
| Re: Grossman's in Nashua
Why would anyone want to go there to buy a light switch? Plus given
their out-of-date policies regarding bagging, etc. I've shopped there
in the past - its like the other big chain stores - they seem to have
difficulty trusting their customers, don't provide much help on the
floor, etc...they're just going for volume.
Best store hardware store in Nashua is Hammar's. Courteous, plenty
of help to answer questions, quality products...and they ask if you
if you want a bag.
|
749.14 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Mon Sep 17 1990 16:10 | 5 |
| RE: SEVERAL BY PAUL MODERATOR
If you believe that this belongs/fits better in the CONSUMER
conference, perhaps you'll extract it and put it their?
|
749.15 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Mon Sep 17 1990 16:44 | 6 |
| re: -.1
Speaking as the moderator of another notesfile I can, with authority,
say, "It ain't his job, man." Delete away Paul, the subject has run
its course anyway.
Vick (the instigator) Bennison
|
749.16 | Lots of environmental issues already here | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Mon Sep 17 1990 16:44 | 11 |
| This particular topic really doesn't pertain to homework as such
and I'd say delete or move it. But, that doesn't mean there is no place
in Homework for conservation/environmental type issues. In fact, I think
they deserve their own keyword. The environmentally related discussions
we've had include how to handle/dispose of asbestos, safe disposal of
paint residues, treated lumber concerns, disposal of roofing materials,
pesticide topics, rainforest hardwoods (or was that Woodworking...).
Anyway, there are issues directly related to Homework that the
conference is open to discussing.
George
|
749.17 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Sep 18 1990 10:27 | 13 |
| I'm not moving this anywhere.
There already exists the keyword WASTE_DISPOSAL, which covers most of the
environmental issues you brought up.
I can't be bothered deleting all this now; notes won't let me delete a block
of notes, I have to delete them one at a time. I'm just going to add the
keyword NO_KEYWORD to the base note, so that in our next cleanup it will go
away.
Till then, you all can continue this as much as you like.
Paul
|
749.18 | | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Wed Sep 19 1990 10:18 | 2 |
| Also try looking at the SAFETY keyword. It contains some of those
topics as well.
|