T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
160.17 | Wiring components questions. | THORBY::MARRA | All I have to be is what You made me. | Fri Jun 27 1986 09:45 | 10 |
|
I am getting ready to start the wiring in my basement. I figure I
need about 20 plugs, four switches, antanae cable, some wire and boxes.
What brand name outlets/switches should I look for/look out for. Where
do you think I can get the best package deal (in the Nashua area).
thanks,
.dave
|
160.18 | Try Ralph Pill Electric... | ALIEN::PETROVIC | Just a willow in the wind... | Fri Jun 27 1986 10:07 | 13 |
| I'd suggest Ralph Pill Electric Co. on Lake Street in Nashua. If you
head into town from D.W. Highway northbound , Lake street's right across
from the Simoneau Plaza and Mr Donut. Take a left and it's on the left
(I don't remember exactly how far).
I found that his prices are about as low as the bargain basement
(grossmans, etc.) places and he's got *EVERYTHING*. If he doesn't,
he can get it in a couple of working days.
'Bout the only time you can do a little better is when a place like
sears, grossmans, etc has a sale on wire and boxes...
Chris
|
160.19 | another suggestion for electrical | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Jun 27 1986 11:27 | 9 |
| If you have a complete list of what you need it might be worth it
for you to go to SPAGS. They have *EVERYTHING* too. Their
prices for electrical things are good. For example, 250' of
14-2 is about $15. (That's the regular price, it sometimes goes
on sale for less). I doubt if any electrical distributor or
can touch that price. Outlets are 60 cents.
The brand at SPAGS is LEVITT.
|
160.20 | SPAGS! | CRETE::GORDON | | Mon Jun 30 1986 10:52 | 4 |
| agree with -1, SPAGS beat the price my cousin's electrical supply
house formally located in Nasgua could do for price when he offered
me 'contractor prices' on exactly the same components. And this
also included the Mass sames tax!
|
160.21 | try 12/2 wire | 25008::KROLL | | Thu Jul 24 1986 13:30 | 3 |
| I agree with spags but it is better to use 12/2 with ground for
your wireing. then if you change your mind about what to have on
a perticular circuit you don't have to rewire.
|
160.22 | Remember the practical side... | JOET::JOET | Thela hun ginjeet | Thu Jul 24 1986 15:43 | 9 |
| re: .4
When I'm laying out the room on paper, putting 12-2 everywhere
seems like the way to go.
When I'm trying to stuff seven devices into a 5-ganged box, I wish
Romex came in 22-2.
-joet
|
160.23 | You don't need it for lights | BEING::WEISS | Forty-Two | Fri Jul 25 1986 08:30 | 7 |
| It's usually a good idea to keep the light circuits separate from the outlet
circuits. That way if you blow the breaker by putting too much load on the
outlets, you still can turn on the lights to get to the basement. And if you
do that, 14-2 is perfectly adequate for a lighting circuit. I do agree that
it's a good idea to use 12-2 on all outlet circuits.
Paul
|
160.24 | there's a question at the end of this (somewhere) | THORBY::MARRA | All I have to be is what You made me. | Fri Jul 25 1986 09:40 | 17 |
|
Well, I have four circuits in place, only one is 12/2 and that is
for the garage and the tools out there (three or four plugs).
I have 10 plugs on one line; 8 plugs (2 switchable) and a light on
another; and 3 plugs (2 switchable) and 3 lights on the other.
Each circuit is about 1/2 of the downstairs, that way if one pops
the lights (at least 1) will be usable still.
I finished most of the studding last night - i'm having a lot of
fun with this...
Question: Do I need a vapor barrior in the cealing downstairs?
(remember this is the downstairs of a split).
.dave.
|
160.25 | | LATOUR::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Mon Jul 28 1986 16:03 | 6 |
| > Question: Do I need a vapor barrior in the cealing downstairs?
> (remember this is the downstairs of a split).
Assuming that the downstairs will be a living area maintained at
roughly the same temperature as the upstairs, no vapor barier is
needed.
|
160.26 | Lightning induced electrical problems | DB::FEENAN | | Mon Aug 25 1986 13:40 | 38 |
| After reading note 290 on the problem with an electricla circuit
here is something I just wanted to share with you:
Problem: came home and noticed that there was no water after a few
flushes of a toilet.....
Logic behind solving it:
Ah' we had a lightning storm this afternoon while I was out I wonder
if we got hit again (this would be the third time)....down to the
electrical box....circuit breaker blown.
So we fixed that, now there is water...but during the evening lights
started flickering, fans started going from normal speed to very
high and then down to almost a dead crawl.
Well down to the electrical box again....pull them breakers...find
some "fyed ones" replace those. See if there is some short in my
line to the pump that could be causing this...doesn't seem to be.
Well another day of flickering lights...well before I call the
electricial (because as on the three stooges <can't resist this
I love them>...."This house has sure gone crazy!"), I called the
power company.
I wasn't home so I didn't get the entire scoop (second hand from
my wife). But they replaced somethings and told here that it was
possible that 'the neutral to the house was actually carrying current
periodically....we replaced somethings and if that doesn't work
call the electricial...it is in your house'.
Well that fixed it...and the best part...FOR FREE.
-Jay
PS: Just installed a lighting arrestor between the pump and house.
|
160.27 | | THORBY::MARRA | All I have to be is what You made me. | Mon Aug 25 1986 15:04 | 11 |
|
All this talk about lightning and other forces that tend to detonate
the electricals of a house have got me wondering...
What/where/how/who/??? are/is/was/etc... are these surge protectors
and other gizmos used to protect ones home and electronics from self
destruction?
Where do they go? where do you get them? how much? etc..??
.dave.
|
160.28 | Which Protects Which? | GENRAL::HUNTER | from SUNNY Colorado, Wayne | Mon Aug 25 1986 15:16 | 11 |
| There are many "so called" lightning protectors on the market.
Radio Shack sell them and so do a lot of other places. Be VERY
careful when buying something like this. If you are trying to protect
a motor or heater or something like that, they WORK FINE. If you're
trying to protect a transistor TV, micro-computer controlled micro-wave
oven, Computer, or etc., THEY'RE USELESS. The voltage rises so
fast on the power lines after a lightning strike that a solid state
TV or etc. actually ends up protecting the protector. If the
protection devices within the solid state units can't protect it,
it can't be protected..... So, think what you want to protect
before you buy any of these units.
|
160.29 | They can work! | REGENT::GETTYS | Bob Gettys N1BRM | Mon Aug 25 1986 21:23 | 22 |
| The usefulness of the protectors depends on the type
use. The older style gas discharge tube type, didn't work worth
a d$%^ with solid state stuff. It didn't work fast enough. The
newer MOV type, can work if installed properly. Properly means
for a 110v appliance, on between each of the conductors. If it
is an appliance with a two prong cord, one MOV of the proper
rating can do it. If it is a three wire cord, you would need
three! MOV's. One from hot to neutral, one from hot to ground,
and one from neutral to ground (the one most often left out!).
The reason for the neutral to ground is that while ground and
neutral are nominaly at the same potential, when you get a
surge, all kind of strange currents and voltages get set up.
BTW - NONE of the protectors will protect against a
DIRECT HIT!! But you don't need to be hit directly to have a
problem.
For more on this subject, there is an interesting
article on it in the September issue of QST (an amateur radio
magazine published by the ARRL).
/s/ Bob
|
160.30 | | HIBOB::KRANTZ | Next window please. | Fri Oct 30 1987 19:53 | 11 |
| Better late than never?
MOV's will only protect against a certain size spike, the power
company (in theory) limits spikes with larger gizmo's so that
MOV's will be adequate. Are they good enough? I'm at the
end of a run in a semi rural area, when I had my power
upgraded from 50 amp, I had the electrician place one of the
gizmo's in the box on the pole. I think it was about 40$, about
the size of an 8 oz can.
Joe
|
160.36 | Work shop wiring | LDP::BURKHART | | Fri Apr 29 1988 14:55 | 22 |
|
I Need a couple of quick answers to some wiring questions for
a project I want to finish up this weekend.
1) For garage & basement work shop areas what is the max number of
outlets allowed on a 20 AMP circuit? This circuit is more for
convenience than for big power tools. I'll have a separate single 20
AMP outlet for the big power hogs.
Also how many for a 15 AMP circuit in the same area?
2) Are there any specific codes/practices regarding 2 separate
circuits in the same box? (ie 2 circuits in a 3 or 4 gang switch box)
Thanks...
...Dave
|
160.37 | Max Outlets | CHARON::FERREIRA | | Mon May 02 1988 18:13 | 10 |
|
RE: Question #1
1.5 amps per duplex outlet NEC section 220-3(c).
Jim
|
160.31 | Shop Light | HPSRAD::POULSEN | | Mon Oct 02 1989 13:41 | 8 |
| I want to put a 4' shop light in my basement. I saw one that has a
power cord attached. On the box it says not to cut the cord. Why?
I'd like to wire the light to a switch. Do I have to add a junction
box with a receptacle to plug the light in, and then run the box off
a switch?
Don
|
160.32 | I dunno, but the extra outlet comes in handy anyhow | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Mon Oct 02 1989 18:18 | 10 |
| I dunno, either, so I had an outlet put on the workshop ceiling, right
next to the shop light, and plugged the thing in there, with a switch
mounted on the wall next to the workbench. It is actually sort of
handle to have an outlet up there sometimes, since a cord plugged in
there doesn't run across the bench or the floor where it might be in
the way of whatever I am working on, or get tripped over. The shop
light came with a very short cord, maybe all of two feet long, with a
grounded plug on the end.
|
160.33 | swinging lights should be plugged in. | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Mon Oct 02 1989 23:54 | 12 |
| re .13:
> power cord attached. On the box it says not to cut the cord. Why?
> I'd like to wire the light to a switch. Do I have to add a junction
my guess would be that the reason is associated with the chains. if you
hang the light from the chains it should probably be plugged in as in a
movable type appliance. on the other hand, i have opened those lights up
and hardwired them in with a switch, but i also screwed the light to
ceiling permanently.
craig
|
160.34 | can you say forseable misuse? | CSSE::CACCIA | the REAL steve | Tue Oct 03 1989 10:42 | 18 |
|
Why the short cord? Cost reduction, of course. They save upto $0.15 per
foot of cord depending on the type and the supplier.
Why not cut the plug off? U.L. listing or recognition would be
invalidated. So what you say? Well that really is no problem, all that
means is that the unit they tested was safe for a customer to use if it
was used in the exact manner described by the vendor and in the exact
condition submitted.
The vendor KNOWS, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that with the cord so
short someone is going to cut off the plug and do strange things with
the line cord. So- to protect themselves against a lawsuit from a handy
dandy DIYer who burns down the house (or worse) because he wires the
light wrong, They put a warning label on the fixture to meet U.L.
requirements and satisfy their obligation to warn. (silly tort law
legal jargon)
|
160.35 | Yeah, but it's a short FAT cord | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Wed Oct 04 1989 10:01 | 9 |
| In my miscellaneous electrical junk box I'll bet I have a dozen
one-foot cords from workshop flourescents I've hard-wired over the
years. They make good replacement cords for power tools (where
you usually use an extension cord anyway).
If they're trying to save money, why are these cords 16/3 wire for
a 2x40 watt fixture? That's about 3/4 amp draw on wire that can
take 10 amps. Thinner and longer would cost the same and be much more
cost effective.
|
160.1 | Conduit not needed -- here's what is | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed May 30 1990 18:24 | 27 |
| I'm not an expert, but I believe that the rules for running romex (which
is modern plastic sheathed wiring) go like this:
1) Never leave it exposed in a living area.
2) If you run it perpendicular to the joists, you must cover it so that
no one can hang anything from it.
3) You must run it at least 3/4" (or is it 1") in from the edge of the
joists, so that no one can put a nail into it. Or else you must
put it behind metal of a specified thickness (I forget what), for
the same reason.
4) If you run it along a stud or on the underside of joists, you must
fasten it securely at short distances.
Needless to say, my own basement doesn't even come close. They put in
20' runs of romex just laying on the sill -- I can't imagine why the
wire inspector didn't get them for that. And worse things, like taped-
over wire nuts (*all* connections must be in boxes!).
Also, my basement has a bunch of the old "snake-like" conduit stuff.
I'd like to replace it all -- generally those taped over wire nuts
occur where somebody connected romex to the metal sheathed stuff.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
160.2 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Thu May 31 1990 16:47 | 7 |
| I wired my basement shop with EMT conduit (thinwall metal) because most
of my runs would be perpendicular to the joists. The conduit is not
very expensive, but remember to use the correct wire in it (not romex)-
actually separate conductors that are not in a sheath. I've also used
PVC conduit and it also works well.
Eric
|
160.3 | The NEC statement on bored holes. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Thu May 31 1990 17:49 | 16 |
| RE: Back a few
The code states for bored holes in joists:
"... holes shall be bored so that the edge of the hole is not less than
1 1/4" (31.8mm) from the nearest edge of the wood member. Where this
distance cannot be maintained the cable or raceway shall be protected
from penetration by screws or nails by a steel plate or bushing, at
least 1/16" (1.59mm)thick, and of appropriate length and width
installed to cover the area of wiring."
Rather than spend the money on EMC and THHN wire for a basement, I
would bore holes in the joists and use regular Romex.
Dan
|
160.4 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Tue Jun 05 1990 12:25 | 7 |
| I guess its a matter of personal taste and what kind of wiring you're
planning to do. When I did my basement, I was wiring up 2 shops with
multiple circuits and conduit runs that went along the foundation wall
for power tool outlets. If you're only installing 1 outlet, then romex
would be fine.
Eric
|
160.5 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Jun 05 1990 12:44 | 7 |
|
Check with the local building code. I know in Syracuse NY all wiring in
the basement has to be in conduit if it's in the open. Here in NH it
dosn't. I think NH complies with the National code, while Syracuse
adopted some local code to override the National code.
Mike
|
160.12 | Wiring basement 2X3 side walls | DATABS::ROYAL | | Mon Feb 25 1991 09:49 | 12 |
|
I'm currently finishing a room in my basement. I'm putting up 2x3
walls along the perimeter, leaving myself anywhere between 2 and 5
inches between the 2x3 wall and the concrete wall (mainly for
evaporation purposes and/or room for pipes etc). Now comes the question
of "How do I wire the room?" or better phrased "How do I secure the romex
to the studs?". I'd rather not drill holes through the 2x3's since it
would take away from their sturdiness. Any ideas?
Thanks.
-- Phil
|
160.13 | Use cable ties. | YOSMTE::REID_DA | | Wed Feb 27 1991 12:10 | 3 |
| I think you might be able to use cable ties. Just run your romex behind
the 2X3, put the cable tie loosely around the romex and hold the cable
tie to the side of the 2X3 with a nail bent over or a staple nail.
|
160.14 | Staple at the box and drape behind the 2x3s | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Wed Feb 27 1991 17:33 | 9 |
| I can't seem to find the correct reference in the code but...
A number of electricians I know recommended to just place the wire
behind the 2x3s. The code does require that the cable be attached
within 4 inches of the box though. What this means is that the wires
are stapled to the stud with the box and just draped behind all of the
others.
Dan
|
160.15 | how bout this... | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Mar 05 1991 15:09 | 10 |
| RE:.4 Draping the wire between boxes...
I don't know if I would do this regardless of code, seems to me this
put unnecessary strain at the staples, why not just run the wire behind
each stud and at every other stud staple it to the side of the 2x3 then
keep running the wire behind the studs to the next odd stud... This
way the wire is only running unstapled for a maximum of 32"... The tie
wrap idea is pretty good too, don't know much about the code though.
Fra
|
160.16 | | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Wed Mar 06 1991 07:37 | 8 |
| RE: .-1
I realize that it would appear to cause undue strain on the staple but,
I usually would have the cables entering the box from below. Mainly
the staples are supporting the cable as it enters the box only. The
majority of the weight could be resting on the floor.?
Dan
|
160.6 | Does NM have to be covered between joists? | MAY21::PSMITH | Peter H. Smith,MLO5-5/E71,223-4663,ESB | Mon Dec 30 1991 17:12 | 7 |
| An earlier reply mentioned that NM cable must be "covered" to prevent
things being hung from it when crossing joists. I just made a rough
run by drilling holes in the centers of 2x10's and stringing the NM
through it -- this is in the basement, and I'm not intending to put
up a cieling. Is this likely to fail inspection? (I'm in Lancaster,
MA). And I thought I was being helpful by avoiding the "cable on a
board" method of crossing the joists...
|
160.7 | Should be OK. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Tue Dec 31 1991 07:39 | 9 |
| RE: .6
Running the NM cable thru the hgoles should pass with no problems. If
you has stapled the cable to the bottom of the joists rather than drill
the holes, then you would need to have strapping on each side of the
cable. I am told that this is to protect the cable from being struck
by you moving stuff around.
Dan
|
160.8 | | FSDB45::FEINSMITH | Politically Incorrect And Proud Of It | Tue Dec 31 1991 17:14 | 5 |
| Having been in the same situation, I actually found it easier to use
EMT conduit for the runs (the EMT is fairly cheap anyway) rather than
do all that drilling.
Eric
|
160.9 | | TLE::MCCARTHY | DECTPU | Thu Jan 02 1992 07:07 | 6 |
| re: condit vs drilling:
It all depends on the drill and bit you are using. A Milwalkee right
angle drill with a 1" 'nail eater' bit goes much faster than doing up pipe.
That, if you are doing the pipe box-to-box with offset etc.
Brian
|
160.10 | Romex inside conduit?? | BUFFER::TINGLOF | | Fri Jan 31 1992 00:07 | 11 |
| Is it legal to run Romex cable through conduit, assuming that the
conduit is only being used to mechanincally protect the wire?
Our dryer outlet is mounted on the cellar wall will a piece of
conduit running up the wall. The cable simply enters the conduit
at the top (no box) and runs down to the outlet. Presumably this
was installed when the house was built but I'm wondering if it still
up to code.
-Mike
|
160.11 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Fri Jan 31 1992 20:16 | 11 |
| RE-.1
>>
Is it legal to run Romex cable through conduit, assuming that the
conduit is only being used to mechanincally protect the wire?
Yes, It is legal provided you still follow the rules for number of
conductors and wire gauges allowed in a conduit of the size you are
using.
-j
|