T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2014.1 | Winston Sullivan - Lead paint removal - Lawrence MA | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Apr 04 1988 11:23 | 49 |
| <<< JOET::DUA1:[000000.NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Better living through DIY >-
================================================================================
Note 1214.6 Lead paint stripping contractors? 6 of 8
YODA::TAYLOR 25 lines 26-JUN-1987 08:15
-< An opinion >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We contracted Winston Sullivan, from Lawrence Mass., to do deleading
in our two family in Lowell and I would highly recommend him. He does
not strip the wood, he sands it. So if you wanted to keep some fancy
woodwork intact it would be both difficult and expensive.
As for the cost. The apartments have six rooms each with a good
amount of hallways and windows. He charged $3000 for both, excluding
the exterior of the house which would have been another $2000. We
opted to replace the exterior painted wood and repaint it ourselves.
If you wanted to remove the paint yourself I would recommend stripping
with a chemical stripper or take the peices to a place and have
them dipped, I don't know of such a place but would think that they
are easy to find. Using a heat gun or sand blaster would imbed the
lead into the woodwork. A suitable mask to protect you while sanding
would cost about $400. A little cheaper than the $5000 and clearly
an option.
woodwork
good luck,
wayne
<<< JOET::DUA1:[000000.NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Better living through DIY >-
================================================================================
Note 1214.7 Lead paint stripping contractors? 7 of 8
YODA::TAYLOR 7 lines 26-JUN-1987 08:23
-< forgot to mention >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I forgot to mention that his phone number is 454 6229 and that he
is very active in this state educating people of the dangers of
lead paint and the equipment being used to delead.
|
2014.2 | Radon contractor wanted | JUPITR::SHANK | | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:55 | 14 |
|
Can anyone recommend a contractor for radon mitigation systems?
We're buying a house that has unacceptable levels of radon in
the air and water. We need a cost estimate so we can finish
negotiations with the owners. From what I've read in this
notesfile, not all radon specialists can be trusted. I can't
find any recommendations, please point me in the right
direction if some already exist. Thank you.
|
2014.3 | Pelican and B-dry... | WONDER::BENTO | Send lawyers, guns and money... | Tue Oct 27 1992 12:38 | 12 |
| Don't know where you're located but in Massachusetts, two places
come to mind that we got quotes from;
Pelican Systems
B-dry (they also do wet-basement work)
Both outfits did a professional evaluation and were within $100
of the estimates. We went with Pelican Systems due to time
constraints.
-TB
|
2014.4 | Deleading Contractors - Boston area | NODEX::PAL | | Tue Mar 30 1993 18:14 | 11 |
| Hi,
I am looking for references for deleading contractors.
I need to delead a house in Watertown, MA.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks.
Sumant.
|
2014.5 | Tara Deleading Norwood Ma. | PATE::JULIEN | | Wed Mar 31 1993 11:45 | 19 |
| RE: .4 I had a 3 family house in Uxbridge deleaded last year by:
Tara Deleading
46 Dean St.
Norwood Ma 02062
(617) 551-0116
I was pleased with their work and had no problems with the re-inspection
after the job.. I used J.M. Frohn Corp. from Milford Ma. (508)478-4342)
as the lead inspector and was also pleased with his work.
FYI, I was told by the inspector that after the paint has been
identified as lead paint (by a licensed inspector) it is against the law
for anyone except a licensed deleader to remove the paint in any way,
i.e. you can't even rip it down and bring it to the dump, since it is now
classified a hazardous waste and must be handled as such..
Good luck,
Dave
|
2014.6 | Asbestos removal - Win Hancock | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Mon Jun 28 1993 08:24 | 7 |
| Win Hancock of Holden, Mass., removed a small amount of asbestos from
four short sections of heating pipe for me last week. He was prompt,
helpful, and easy to deal with. I haven't gotten the bill yet, but
he estimated ~$385, plus ~$150 for the air test (that was somebody
else, not him). Not cheap, but it was considerably cheaper (1/10!)
than some of the wildly inflated estimates some people had thrown around.
|
2014.7 | C'ford MA, need oil tank pumped | DANGER::ASKETH | | Fri Jul 23 1993 16:15 | 12 |
| I'm switching from oil to gas and need someone to pump the oil out of my tank
(and remove the tank (in the basement) if it's worth it). The house is in
Chelmsford, MA. I called one place and they wanted $250 to pump the tank and
remove it (through a bulkhead; doesn't need any cutting). They wanted $125 just
to pump out the oil! There's about $100 worth of oil in the tank so that really
makes it like $225!! Anyone know of anyone who charges less and takes into
account the value of the oil? (Actually this guy asked if it was good oil adn
I said it was so I guess he took it into account - I didn't explicitly ask him.)
If it's gonna cost an extra $125 to remove the tank I'll just leave it there
empty!
Thanks!
|
2014.8 | Use it up? | ASDG::SBILL | | Fri Jul 23 1993 16:28 | 14 |
|
Why don't you just wait a while to switch over and use the oil in the
tank up instead of having to have it pumped out and disposed of? When
you switch from oil to gas don't you switch burners too? That way you
won't really have to worry too much about mucking up the oil burner
with cruddy oil (I mean the stuff that could be at the bottom of the
tank), that is, if it's being replaced anyway, it doesn't really matter
does it? It may cause a little problem with timing though, like can
you get them to do the switch on short notice so that when you finally
use up the rest of the oil you can get them to hook up your gas quickly
enough?
Steve B.
|
2014.9 | can't use furnace... | DANGER::ASKETH | | Fri Jul 23 1993 17:48 | 6 |
| The furnace needs replacing cause the heat exchanger is rusting out. There is
already some soot coming out the registers so I haven't used the furnace since
I moved in (end of May). (luckily it's not winter time!) Nice idea otherwise
though.
B
|
2014.10 | | SNELL::ROBERTS | Back Mountain native | Mon Jul 26 1993 12:21 | 6 |
|
Did you check with your supplier? I know some offer this service.
Why not advertise tank and oil for free in exchange for removal?
Gary
|
2014.11 | Alpine Environmental | WMOIS::ECMO::SANTORO | | Mon Jul 26 1993 14:31 | 12 |
| I'm sure Alpine Environmental in Westford would do this type of job. 1-800-660-7261. In fact
I think they did exactly what you want done to the last "This Old House" in Wayland. As I
recall they pumped two tanks, washed them (to get the sludge out), hauled them away (they are
crushed and recycled), and also removed the external pipes (I guess more than one oil
delivery person has made a mistake and dropped 250 gallons of oil into people's basements).
I think they said it would be about $1000 and they recycle the oil and sell it. But
then they are expensive since they don't often do small residential jobs.
Unless you need the space or are worried about the tank's integrity I'd leave it.
|
2014.12 | | SIENA::DONADT | | Wed Jul 28 1993 09:06 | 9 |
| You might try Frank Martin of Martin Oil Burner Service in Lawrence.
He is a small operation and specializes in removal and installation of
oil tanks. He just did some work for me and did a good job and was very
reasonable. I did have a small oil leak in my underground tank, but
that's another story...
Frank's phone is (508)683-4747.
Ray
|
2014.13 | De-Leaders and lead inspectors? | BXCSRV::JULIEN::JULIEN | | Mon Jun 06 1994 11:37 | 2 |
| I live in Lunenburg and am looking for a lead inspector and de-leader. Any
recommendations?
|
2014.14 | J.M.Frohn + Tara Deleading | PATE::JULIEN | | Mon Jun 06 1994 15:13 | 12 |
| Re: .13
I used J.M. Frohn (508)478-4342 from Milford Ma. as an inspector, and
Tara Deleading (617)551-0116 from Norwood as the contractor.. They
deleaded a 3 family I own in Uxbridge. This was back in Feb. 92..
I had no complaints about either, they were both professionals and
worked well together..
Dave
(Nice last name) :))
|
2014.15 | potential hazardous waste on property... | 3744::SUTER | and now for something you'll really like! | Wed Aug 07 1996 11:39 | 45 |
|
This seemed to be the best place I could find for this...Mods,
please move if I misguesssed.... thanks...
We've signed a P&S on a serious fixer upper under the FHA 203K
program. The location is prime waterfront. The house is in "fair" to
"poor" condition. For those not familiar with 203K, the program lets
you finance the house and all the improvements (less the down payment)
and the only stipulations are that you can't overbuild for the neighborhood
or exceed the completed market value by more than 10%.
The house falls under 203K because it has no water. The well that
used to feed this house was split off to the abutting property. We've had
the house inspected and it came out about where we thought it would. Some
framing and lally columns are needed, needs a heating system, wiring is recent
but needs some work to bring it into code. Plumbing is in pretty good shape.
All in all the total cost of the house and the improvements would still
total well *below* the market value.
Here's the problem.... The house inspector found remnants of an
Underground Oil Storage tank (UST). After inquiring with the owner of
the abutting property, sure enough there *IS* a UST on her property. The
lines run from her property to the 203K house cellar. The tank was supposedly
drained, but not filled with sand. A new oil tank is in the basement of the
203K house.
Here's the "other" problem.. There is a "casual dump" on the opposite
end of the property. A quick inspection shows items like paint cans, bicycle
frames, a car frame, flooring, wall lathe, brush.
Our thoughts range from "run away, far away and don't look back because
future liability could be deadly", to "Let's do it and just keep our mouths
shut".... What we'd like to see is the bank (forclosed property) clean up
these items then move forward, but we feel they wouldn't even bite on this one.
The house is located in New Hampshire, and we currently have plenty
of contingencies which would let us out of the contract unscathed.
What would you do?
thanks,
Rick
<cross-posted to Real_estate>
|
2014.16 | | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, SPE MRO | Wed Aug 07 1996 12:40 | 12 |
| "prime waterfront" is hard to get. I'd check into EPA regs and find
out how much you'd have to pay to get that oil tank out of there. If
it's not too much to bear, then go for it and help clean up the
environment.
Lots of places have casual dumps. Unless you have reason to believe
that there's asbestos in there, I'd just clean it up enough that it's
not an eyesore.
Where are you getting water? Well, or town? Contingency for that?
Mark
|
2014.17 | ...a BIG dumpster.... | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Wed Aug 07 1996 17:53 | 17 |
|
Review - existing house, water supply well 'split off'
to adjoining property. Same adjoining property has UST which
fed house in question.
Did both lots formerly belong to the house in question, and
the 'adjoining' building get built recently, at which point the
water supply was 'stolen' and the house in question abandoned? This
is what it sounds like. Both lots are now independent, right?
I don't see how the UST tank would be a problem - it's not
on your property! The neighbor will have to pay big bucks to have it
removed and all the 'contaminated' soil removed and replaced, not you.
The dump sounds domestic, so just get a dumpster (you'll need one for
the renovations, anyway...) Drill a new well (whose plot is the current
one on?) or connect to town water and you're set. But wait - what about
septic? Where's the field, on which plot?
|
2014.18 | More info... | 3744::SUTER | and now for something you'll really like! | Thu Aug 08 1996 11:02 | 41 |
| > <<< Note 2014.17 by PCBUOA::TARDIFF "Dave Tardiff" >>>
> -< ...a BIG dumpster.... >-
>
>
> Review - existing house, water supply well 'split off'
>to adjoining property. Same adjoining property has UST which
>fed house in question.
New house and 203K house (the one we are considering) previously
shared the same lot. Existing well on New house property is currently piped
to both houses, although shutoff in the new house so no flow is going to
the 203K house any longer.
> Did both lots formerly belong to the house in question, and
>the 'adjoining' building get built recently, at which point the
>water supply was 'stolen' and the house in question abandoned? This
>is what it sounds like. Both lots are now independent, right?
Yes...
> I don't see how the UST tank would be a problem - it's not
>on your property! The neighbor will have to pay big bucks to have it
>removed and all the 'contaminated' soil removed and replaced, not you.
>The dump sounds domestic, so just get a dumpster (you'll need one for
>>the renovations, anyway...) Drill a new well (whose plot is the current
>one on?) or connect to town water and you're set. But wait - what about
>septic? Where's the field, on which plot?
True, the UST is not on the 203K house's property, *BUT* the
lines are and it sits right beside the property line. Would this be minimal
exposure since 1) UST is on other property 2) Supposedly it's empty? Would
I be liable to some extent because of the lines which run to the 203K house
in the event of a spill?
Both houses have town sewer. However, town water is too far away
to be a financially feasible option, a new well must be drilled for the 203K
house.
thanks,
Rick
|
2014.19 | ...ask about old burial grounds, too... | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Thu Aug 08 1996 14:41 | 22 |
| > True, the UST is not on the 203K house's property, *BUT* the
>lines are and it sits right beside the property line. Would this be minimal
>exposure since 1) UST is on other property 2) Supposedly it's empty? Would
>I be liable to some extent because of the lines which run to the 203K house
>in the event of a spill?
Talk with the relevant officials in the town. Explain the tank
situation, and see what the risks are. If it never leaked, then you'd
be ok - worst case would be that they'll assume a leak and come in and
require you to remove it all (including the 'contaminated' dirt). Seems
that the neighbor would get most of that burden, though - you might get
just the edge plus the feed line trench (that can't be that bad...).
While you're there, ask about the well - whether the 'risk' of
the tank puts any restrictions on possible wells.
I'd believe that the existing, drained tank will be grandfathered
safe. (This is NH, right?). I think the automatic must-pay-to-remove stuff
kicks in only if you de-commission a tank, and even that may be by state.
This is where the local officials come in - they can explain the risks.
My old house has a basement tank, on a dirt floor. How's that
any different from an UST? Hmmm...perhaps I shouldn't tell anyone that?
|
2014.20 | Epilog on UST... | 3744::SUTER | and now for something you'll really like! | Tue Aug 13 1996 14:38 | 12 |
|
Just to close this latest string.......
We've decided to pass on the property with the Underground
Storage Tank next door. We recently found that even though the tank
may reside on someone else's property, the abutters (US!) can be
liable for cleanup costs and they can be extensive (upwards of 80K!).
Cases such as this have already occurred in Mass. While this property
is in NH, we cannot afford to have an 80K+++ liability hanging over our
heads.
Rick
|