T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
142.42 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Fri Jan 16 1987 18:47 | 8 |
|
"Well," you might say, "if I'm going to put a smallish concrete
support in the ground, why not just dig a round hole and pour?"
One advantage of using a Sonotube is that it creates a support with
very smooth sides. When winter comes, there are no ragged surfaces
for the frost to grab onto and pull the whole thing, little by little,
out of the ground.
|
142.1 | Stairs = small, ascendings decks? | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Fri May 15 1987 12:57 | 5 |
| Try using the same hardware used for deck building. You know, the
brackets that bolt to a steel rod and then nail to the post. Keeps
the wood from contacting either ground or concrete. I know you
already know this but use pressure treated lumber throughout.
|
142.2 | Just keep it from the concrete | ARCHER::BMDLIB | | Fri May 15 1987 14:11 | 19 |
| I think what you're asking is how to secure the post or beam or
stringer to the concrete footings.
I was going thru the same thing when I set my tubes for the footings
for the 14x20 deck. Since the deck was fairly low, I planned on
resting the 4x6 beams on the footings with no wooden posts in between.
Since I don't have the beams yet, placing some sort of brace in
the wet concrete and then hoping the beams were perfectly straight
to fit in the braces (now permenently attached to the concrete)
didn't seem like the way to go.
I asked around, and the overwhelming majority said "that thing is
going to be so heavy, just rest the beams on some piece of metal
to keep it from direct contact with the cement, don't bother with
attaching it to the concrete".
If you really feel you need to connect whatever piece to the footings,
I would use some L-shaped brace that you can cement-nail to the
footings and lag-bolt thru to an identical piece on the other side.
|
142.3 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Fri May 15 1987 14:31 | 7 |
| You might just drill 1/2" diameter holes a couple inches deep in
the tops of the footings with a masonary drill, drop in a couple
of 1/2" diameter x 4" long steel rods (bolts with the heads cut
off, maybe), and drill mating holes in the ends of the posts to
slip over the rods. All you need is something to be sure the
posts don't slip off the footings.
|
142.4 | anchors aweigh | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Fri May 15 1987 17:18 | 12 |
|
There's also a jasper (I think it's called a bolt anchor) you can get
to secure a bolt to the concrete. You drill a hole that is exactly
the size of the anchor, and drop the anchor in the hole. The action
of tightening down the bolt causes the anchor to spread and hold tightly.
I think they are normally used for lag bolts but you could try for a
bolt with threads on both ends. Then you could hold the posts (I've
heard them called "kickers" when they support risers that way) down
with post anchors.
JP
|
142.5 | this isn't Kansas, Toto! | YODA::BARANSKI | 1's & 0's, what could be simpler?! | Sun May 17 1987 17:37 | 11 |
| I really don't like the ideas put forth in the past couple of notes for securing
the deck with bolts, or even just having the deck sit on the footings with no
mechanical securing. I just have this picture of the deck taking off in a
windstorm...
*I* would sink some heavy duty metal brackets into the footings with reinforcing
rod through them, and then drill and heavy duty bolt the beams to the bracket,
or maybe skip the bracket and bolt the beams *through* the columns side to side.
(so you can replace the bolts if need be).
Jim.
|
142.6 | Nothing sinks in hard concrete | ARCHER::FOX | | Mon May 18 1987 13:54 | 10 |
| re .5
That sounds secure enuf, but how are you going to do that with
hardened concrete? We're all assuming you're don't have the luxury
of "sinking" something in wet concrete.
I would try not to stress the concrete too much as you don't want
to crack it. There's a greater chance of that happening than a
gust of wind throwing it off the footings. After all, how long was
it just resting on them before you got there?
John
|
142.7 | Overkill contest #1140 | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Mon May 18 1987 15:35 | 8 |
|
Better yet, why not just get rid of the wood all together and make
to whole shooting match reinforced concrete! ;-) Let me see that
baby move even in tornado!
Overkill in certain instances may be justified but I don't think
this is one of them. I think any of the solutions offered would
get the job done more than adequately.
|
142.8 | Must footings go below the frost line ? | SMAUG::FLEMING | | Mon Jun 08 1987 08:55 | 12 |
| I'am building a small deck that's supported by a ledger and five
footings. The ledger board is nailed to my foundation. The footings
are eight inch diameter sona tubes. I've had trouble digging the
footing holes four feet deep. Three are four feet deep, one three
feet deep and one only two feet deep. The two shorter holes aren't
that way for lack of effort. I dug out rocks bigger than basketballs
but finally hit rock that just couldn't be dug out. My question
is this; is it really all important to get footing down four
feet ? Has anyone had any experience, good or bad with footings
that didn't go below the frost line ?
|
142.9 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Jun 08 1987 10:04 | 6 |
| The intent of the footings is to get a solid bearing surface below frost line.
If the rock is really too big to remove then it's OK to set the sonotubes right
on the rock. The rock itself becomes your footing, and it goes below the frost
line, for sure in the 3-foot hole, and close enough in the 2-foot.
Paul
|
142.10 | It depends on drainage! | DRUID::CHACE | | Tue Jun 09 1987 15:36 | 14 |
| .1 is correct.
As for your question about anyone having trouble with footings;
Yes, I've had trouble. A great deal depends on your drainage, and
the type of soil you're working with. The SOIL doesn't expand, it's
the water in it. Thus, if the soil is very well drained, there will
be little or no expansion (so no trouble). In my case I had gone
down 3.5 feet in very poorly drained soil which has a lot of clay
in it. Last winter two of three footings lifted 6". So this year
it's go down four feet with very large holes. Install 3' diameter
cement footings 6" thick at that point and then backfill with gravel.
I shouldn't have any further problems and I doubt you will either.
Kenny
|
142.11 | 4 foot deep footings | FRAGLE::STUART | | Thu Jun 18 1987 12:35 | 10 |
|
If you live in a town that will inspect the footings some building
codes require a 4 foot deep footing. You also may want to look into
a building permit if you haven't already. But it sounds like your
footing will be fine.
Randy
|
142.12 | Footings "below frost line or on bedrock." | DELNI::OSTROM | Andy Ostrom Networks Mktg. 272-7132 | Tue Jun 23 1987 15:00 | 5 |
| The Mass Building Code (Article 21) states that all footings must be either
below the frost line or "supported upon bedrock." (Or words to that effect).
I don't have the building code at work, but I can look up the exact wording
tonight if you like.
|
142.13 | Is the footer below the ankler? :-) | 30519::YANKES | | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:12 | 12 |
|
I'm in the process of digging out part of my back yard for a
patio. Lowering it down to the basement floor level means removing
around 3-4 feet of dirt right beside the house. The digging is
going quite well (almost done :-) but someone this weekend said:
"Are you down to the footer? If so, you might have freezing problems
since the footer would now be above the frost line."
This same person said "not to worry" since it could be insulated
if I was down to it. However, I personally couldn't recognize my
house's footer if it came up and bit me on the nose. What is it
and how do I know if I need to insulate this critter? Thanks!
|
142.14 | He's right - put in insulation | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:42 | 17 |
| I think if there was 3-4 feet of dirt up against the foundation wall there that
it's a pretty safe bet that the footer is only a little bit further down. The
footer is just the bottom of the foundation - a concrete pad that they pour to
put the walls on top of. If the bottom of the footer is not below the frost
line - the deepest that the earth will freeze, which is about 4 feet in New
England - then the frost can crack the foundation by freezing underneath it and
lifting part of it.
And your friend was right, you can solve this problem by putting down
insulation under the patio where it butts up against the foundation. If you're
right down to the basement floor, I'd put in at least 1" foam extending out 2'
from the foundation, and maybe as much as 2" extending out 4'. If your patio
is 16' wide along the house, it would only cost about $40 to go with 2"
extending out 4', which I think would be worth it compared to the potential
cost of repairs if you don't put in enough.
Paul
|
142.15 | know your footing from your... | VICKI::MONTIVIRDI | | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:49 | 19 |
| Your footing is that section of your cellar which provides
a base for the wall itself. It is usually 12 inches thick, ( your
cellar wall is 8 inches). The diagram shows the relationship:
--------
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
__|______|__
| | <---- footing
If you expose your wall down to the footing you run the danger
of getting frost under the footing and possibly cracking it.
If you have to expose that much you can probably insulate it
with rigid foam insulation. Hope this help, happy digging.
|
142.16 | Am I missing something? | ARCHER::FOX | | Wed Sep 23 1987 13:07 | 6 |
| Excuse these possibly dumb questions but...
Why are you digging so deep for a patio? Why not dig just enough for
your base and whatever surface the patio will have?
I have never heard of trenching out the entire area down to the
frost line for a patio!
John
|
142.17 | Thanks for the quick replies! | 30519::YANKES | | Wed Sep 23 1987 13:46 | 29 |
|
Re: .1
Thanks for the confirmation. The guy that warned my brother
(who then warned me) is supposedly making up a list of ways of
insulating it and foam was at the top. You're right -- it sure
is a low low low price for long-term peace of mind!
Re: .2
Aha! I have hit the footer. When I was digging, I noticed
an area at the bottom that came out a few inches further than the wall.
Thanks for the picture!
Re: .3
Well, John, I agree that the depth might be a bit unusual for a DIY
patio project, but my basement had a (leaky!) bulkhead that I really
despised and the wife and I wanted to have a walk-out patio instead.
Next summer, we're planning on putting a deck off the first floor
above the patio (and screening in the patio to keep those little flying
critters away!) which further dictated having the patio at the basement
floor level.
The sides will have a 3-4 foot retaining wall but the front will be
terraced going out of the patio to lessen the underground feeling that it
might otherwise have.
|
142.18 | Curious. | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Thu Sep 24 1987 12:52 | 6 |
| Im curious. I have a walk-out basement (that doesn't have problems).
I assume the builder simply dug deeper so the retaining wall still
goes down 3-4 feete from the basement doorsill?
/Dave
|
142.19 | | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Sep 24 1987 14:18 | 8 |
| > I assume the builder simply dug deeper so the retaining wall still
> goes down 3-4 feete from the basement doorsill?
Yup. Typically called a frost wall. It's usually just a very deep footing, so
if you dug it up you would still find the top of the footing in the normal
place.
Paul
|
142.20 | | STAR::GOLDSTEIN | Andy Goldstein, VMS Development | Fri Sep 25 1987 18:32 | 5 |
| > The sides will have a 3-4 foot retaining wall but the front will be
> terraced going out of the patio to lessen the underground feeling that it
> might otherwise have.
Uh, have you worked out where the water is going to go when it rains?
|
142.21 | But where do I put the diving board? | 30519::YANKES | | Mon Sep 28 1987 11:09 | 7 |
|
Well, I figure that this winter I'll have enough water in the
bottom for an ice-skating rink and then after the spring rains I'll
have a swimming pool!
Just kidding. I'll have a drain leading into a dry-well.
|
142.42 | don't move, groove ! | CASCO::PASCO | Mark 'PASCO' Pascarelli | Wed Dec 23 1987 08:57 | 26 |
142.22 | To use footings or not to use footings | DREAMN::FLAHERTY | TOM | Mon Jan 18 1988 17:06 | 30 |
| OKAY, I've just spent an hour looking for an answer to my foundation
problem and didn't see one.
A crack developed in my wall from floor to ceiling and guess what??
You got it, water leaked in. The foundation is 2 years old.
I hired a contractor to fix it. He dug up the outside all the way
to the footing (I believe) and did quite a bit of work on it.
He filled the crack (with what, I don't know) he then put sealant
over the whole area and did the same on the inside. Well, it rained
and rained a few times after and nothing leaked in.
Now my wife calls and today's mini-thaw is leaking in.
The contractor want's to talk to the person who works for him
that did the actual work, but he was telling me if the footings
are not below freezing or there are no footings then it could have
re-cracked and therefore he will probably tell me how he is not
responsible.
Which leads me to my two questions.
1 - if the footings were not below freezing or non-existent would'nt
I be having a lot more problems than this one crack?
2 - if the bottom of my foundation wall is four feet below ground
level, do I need footings (still further below)??
Thanks for any advice,
I'm ready to go back to renting and let the landlord have these
problems....<:)
Tom
|
142.23 | to foot or not to foot | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Jan 18 1988 21:41 | 17 |
| When I added on to my house I watched the guy with the backhoe do his thing.
When he got down to the footings, shazam! no footings... he told me that
was not uncommon.
When the forms people showed up they too told me footings are not required.
Actually I was told that the soil my foundation was set on PROBABLY didn't
require footings. Needless to say, I sprang for the extra $$$ for some piece
of mind.
So, to get back to the original question, it sounds like it's strictly a
question of the soil conditions, though I would expect most contractors to put
them in.
As far as your contractor trying to whimp out if you don't have footings, why
didn't he tell you as soon as he found out rather than completing the job?
-mark
|
142.24 | "foot the bill" | FRSBEE::DEROSA | Because A Mind Is A Terrible Thing | Tue Jan 19 1988 08:00 | 8 |
| When I added on to my house two summers ago, the builder told me
that the bulding code (at least in my town) requires footings. Also
the town building inspector made sure they were there. They were
at LEAST 4 ft. down.
In my opinion footings should definitely be used to keep the foundation
wall from shifting or sinking or even cracking.
|
142.25 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jan 19 1988 08:21 | 8 |
| My experience has been that it's incredibly difficult to patch a
crack in a concrete wall so it doesn't leak. The forces of freezing
and thawing are *incredible*, and the wall has to move just ever-
so-slightly to open up the crack again.
Not to discount the possibility that the contractor did a lousy
job, but I think it's much more likely that he did the best job
he could in the circumstances.
|
142.26 | Hairline or Grand Canyon? | VAXWRK::BSMITH | Noters do it with keypads | Tue Jan 19 1988 08:49 | 9 |
| I think footings have to be 4'6" below grade. Mine are about 4' in the front
of the house (split). Is the grade pitched away from the house?? Do you have
gutters?? Do you have footing drains?? The biggest problem I have with
moisture coming in is from having no gutters on the roof. How big is the
crack?? Hairline cracks are 'normal'. I watched a this old house show
where the addition had no footings, reason being that the ground was packed
enough so they weren't neccessary.
Brad.
|
142.27 | Only hairline...Still a problem | DREAMN::FLAHERTY | TOM | Tue Jan 19 1988 13:11 | 21 |
| .4
It is graded away from the house. (Also a split)
I DON'T have gutters.
I have foundation drains that work. (Water comes out the end in
a rain storm.)
The crack at this point is hairline. Not much water comes in yet.
Before I had it repaired, about four times as much water was coming
in.
If the water is going into
the drain and it's not a water table problem, would gutters make
a difference?
My soil is very clayey(?)
It's especcially a bummer because the house is a split and I would
love a family room down there.
Am I forever going to be patching leaks in my wall no matter how
small or can I do something permanent?
Tom
|
142.28 | Relieve the pressure | CHART::CBUSKY | | Tue Jan 19 1988 13:44 | 23 |
| If you have foundation drains that work, presumably directly below the
crack, I would have the area opened up again down to the foundation
drain. Repair the crack with some type of flexible caulking compound (I
have used GE Silicon for this with good results). Then install a
section of peforated drain pipe vertically from the foundation drain up
to almost the surface with a cap on the top. Position this pipe so that
is aligns with the crack. Then back fill the hole with crushed stone
for about two feet around the pipe.
The flexible caulk should seal the crack and but allow minor shifts in
the foundation due to expansion and contraction. The pipe and stone
should relieve the water pressure that is obviously building up near
the crack and allow the water to fall to the foundation drain and
then away rather than forcing its way through the crack.
Question, Is this crack in a long wall with no breaks (door way
openings) or corners? A foundation wall of with a straight run of 40
feet or more is considered LONG and prone to cracks. I have a front
foundation wall of 44 feet and right about in the middle is a floor
to ceiling crack. The wall should have been poured with an expansion
joint to prevent the problem.
Charly
|
142.29 | Relieve what pressure.. Water or MINE!! | DREAMN::FLAHERTY | TOM | Tue Jan 19 1988 13:57 | 13 |
| Good advice .6
I like that idea about a vertical drain pipe!!
Yes, my wall is long. It's 42ft with an opening for a bulkhead at
on end. The crack is just about in the middle of the wall.
(FYI. I have another similar crack in the middle of my side wall
in the garage that's 24 ft long. The wall, not the crack <:) )
Brings a question to mind. What's an expansion joint and can one
be installed now, post-construction??
Tom
|
142.30 | You already have ONE | CHART::CBUSKY | | Tue Jan 19 1988 14:52 | 19 |
| There is no need for you to install an expansion joint now, YOU ALREADY
HAVE ONE, and I'm not kidding. As long as it's not growing, it
shouldn't be a problem. All you have to do now is seal it and keep the
water pressure away from it.
The cause of your crack could also be settling or a combination, but
the fix should work for both. Especially the part about directing the
water to the foundation drain.
An expansion joint is a pre-determined break point in the concrete and
in a wall can be achived by inserting a flexible material (could be a
rubber or fiber seal) to seperate the two pieces. In side walks and
road ways they usually divide the area up into sections and pour every
other section and then fill in the missing sections after the first has
set, so that there is a natural break or they can score the slab into
sections with a special trowel to create a weak point. That way the
cracks run across the road or side walk rather than any which way.
Charly
|
142.31 | do it inside | RANGLY::MITCHELL_GEO | ya snooze...ya lose! | Tue Jan 19 1988 19:08 | 8 |
|
Theres a product on the market called "Water Plug". It is like
cement. You mix it like any patching compound. What makes this
product unique is that it expands as it dries thereby sealing the
leak/leaks. There's also a paint that seals cement walls against
seepage...why not try them both in concert...cant hurt
___GM___
|
142.32 | "Water Plug" = hydraulic cement | PLDVAX::TRANDOLPH | | Wed Jan 20 1988 10:09 | 1 |
|
|
142.33 | Yes, gutters will help... | VAXWRK::BSMITH | Noters do it with keypads | Wed Jan 20 1988 13:30 | 14 |
| RE:.5>
> If the water is going into
> the drain and it's not a water table problem, would gutters make
> a difference?
Yes because you would put a discharge pipe at the end of the downspout
pointing it away from the house. Think about it, right now you have
probably a 42 X 14 (or so) square foot area that is directing all its water
runoff about 1 foot away from the foundation with now place to go but
down into the ground next the wall, along the entire length. Gutters
removes this exposure to the wall.
Brad.
|
142.34 | | MADMAC::REZUCHA | | Thu Jan 21 1988 10:28 | 8 |
| I bought DIY vinyl gutters, hangers, and downspouts to get rid of the
drip of the porch roof onto the entryway stairs. The downspout dumps
the water very far away from the house. The vinyl gutters were very
easy to put up and look good. I have a fieldstone basement which was
always damp and it is _noticably_ drier down there now.
Kind regards,
-Tom Rezucha
|
142.35 | I think I'll stay a homeowner | DREAMN::FLAHERTY | TOM | Thu Jan 21 1988 13:08 | 11 |
| Thanks for all the advice.
I think i'll do a little of everything. GE silicone the crack and
put in a vertical drainage pipe. Then put up gutters, which I wanted
to do anyway for the porch and entrances.
Of course, it won't be till spring....
Thanks again, it's nice to know I'm not alone.
|
142.36 | Drainage ills | ODIXIE::ODENWALDER | | Thu Apr 21 1988 15:52 | 8 |
| There are a few things to recognize. Reroute the water from the
foundation because you may cause shifting in addition to leaks.
Also try to put on a parge coat of quarter inch mortar for the
exterior. Do the whole wall if it must be cosmetic otherwise just
do one yard square for each crack and bury it.
Ode
|
142.37 | Backfilling around footing and foundation | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Mon Feb 20 1989 13:24 | 52 |
| This seems like an appropriate note to ask this question, so here
goes.
We have a foundation for an attached garage already in place. It's
positioned at a slight angle and about 6 feet further back than
the house, so a top view is:
|house walkout basement door
| | __/
| _________________||___
|garage |X
| | \
|_______| \
Area of concern
The interior of the garage has already been backfilled (that's another
question, but one thing at a time). The area directly behind the
garage and on the outside (the left of the above picture) has also
been filled, and is quite steep, so there should be no drainage
problem there.
The problem area is the point marked X. This area hasn't
been filled, so that the top of the footing is barely visible.
There are a lot of boulders in the area, mostly in the 1 foot to
2 foot diameter range. The ground at that point does still slope
away from the house, so that we don't have a pond there, but it
obviously needs to be fixed. The area to the right of that point,
along the back basement wall of the house, slopes up sharply away
from the garage, and then slopes down again, not quite as sharply,
to accomodate the basement windows along the back wall, and then
the basement door. This area also slopes towards the back yard,
although since we have no gutters, most of the runoff seems to move
to the right, towards the basement door, and then towards the lower
right, to the back yard, which really is much lower, though not
as steep.
The questions are this: First, should we have the boulders
removed? I'm sure we could use some of them for landscaping, though
I don't know if we could use them all. Is it safe to call in some
excavator/landscaper, and ask them to remove the boulders, without
causing accidental damage to the foundation? Should we wait until
the ground has thawed?
What should we specify for backfilling? Should we just put in dirt,
or should we put in gravel or something else, and if so, how much
of each.
Finally, as long as we have a certain amount of exposed foundation
that will covered, should we bother putting tar or insulation on
the exposed part?
Gary
|
142.38 | 12" CONCRETE FOOTINTGS? | LEDS::PERKINS | | Wed Sep 04 1991 09:38 | 18 |
| We are just putting together specs to build a new cape home. The
builder gave us his specs and we are seeing whether they are what we
want.
Question: He has listed 12" concrete footings to support a 10" wall.
Someone had told me to upgrade to 16" footings to allow for more
support.
Is that worth considering and, if so, what would the expense be to do
that? Considering the possibility of future resale, would the expense
be worth it?
Please answer at LEDS::PERKINS.
Thanks in advance!
Susanna
|
142.39 | 12" which way? | MAST::WEISS | | Thu Sep 05 1991 18:40 | 10 |
| Is that 12" wide or 12" tall? The normal size footing for a 10" wall
should be about 20" wide by 10" tall/deep. The rule of thumb for
footings is to make them twice as wide as the wall thickness, and just
as deep. 8" thick poured concrete walls are typical in residential
construction, resulting in an 8x16" footing size. Local building codes
may vary, so you may want to check with your local building inspector
to get the best information.
...Ken
|
142.40 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Sep 06 1991 16:53 | 4 |
| Nowadays they are sometimes pouring walls without any footings at
all...it depends on what the soil is. Personally, being a
conservative type I'd want to put them in, but if you have the
right kind of soil you may not need any at all.
|
142.41 | Add rebar, not concrete | MEMORY::MYERS | CSSE | Wed Sep 11 1991 15:48 | 10 |
| I concur with the previous replies that 10" depth is adequate for
footings to support the 10" walls. They typically use 2x10s for
the footing forms so it may turn out to be slightly less.
If you are specing a house (down to the details as you indicated),
for added strength to footings AND the walls I'd be more apt to
spec 1/2" #4 rebar rather than deeper footings. Also be sure that
the footings are deep enough (48" frost walls in MA).
/Russ
|