T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
305.1 | I can't believe they'd be that picky | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Fri Aug 15 1986 11:12 | 3 |
| Don't bother. Replace the blocks, remove the jacks, and work fast.
Steve
|
305.2 | I can't either!! | CADCAM::COVINO | | Fri Aug 15 1986 12:12 | 9 |
| I'm planning on using 4x4's for jacks and wedging them up to the
correct height. (only about 2-3 inches). Problem is that this the
front of the house, and there are a total of 9 columns that have
to be knocked out and reset. I'm starting to think that the way
to go is to just do it, but I'm also REAL worried about it since
the work is so obvious. What do you know about the permit process??
jc
|
305.3 | Damn the torpedos! | FUTURE::OPPELT | Ignore health and it may go away | Fri Aug 15 1986 13:09 | 14 |
|
You didn't give your name or address when you called, did you?
Once they know that you called and then ignored them, you may
have trouble (even if you are ultimately right!)
You do not need a permit to repair existing structures. If
you intent to alter its appearance significantly (ie enclose
open porches) then you should have them. No one will bother
you, and the neighborhood should be thankful that you are
improving its appearance.
Joe O.
|
305.4 | Big city - little mind | CADLAC::COVINO | | Fri Aug 15 1986 14:01 | 21 |
| Joe,
I gave the girl I talked to my name and town, but she barely heard
me. Also, the Boston office is staffed with primarly '9-5' help,
unless I signed something or caused a big stink they tend to forget
who they talked to a minute ago. Some I'm not worried about that.
If an inspector drove by and cited me for a violation he wouldn't
be doing it because someone told him to check 'Covino's house' in
Jamaica Plain. But inspectors have been known to drive by!
I have a question for you. Are you saying I don't need a permit
in Boston to repair existing structures, or in the towns/cities
that you are familiar with? I am under the impression that different
towns may have different ordinances. By the way - I honestly have
no intention of altering anything, it really is appearance only.
thanks
jc
|
305.5 | ignorance is bliss! | OLORIN::SEGER | | Fri Aug 15 1986 16:20 | 11 |
| I've done a variety of modifications and the approach I take is to just go ahead
and do it (as Grace Hopper says, "it's easier to apologize than ask
permission"). If someone were to confront you over it, you could always say
that you didn't realize you needed a permit. However, if it came to that you'd
then probably have to follow through and get the dumb permit.
The times I've gotten permits were for structural changes or electrical work. I
figure if my house falls/burns I want to get my insurance company to at least
pay off!
-mark
|
305.11 | Do you get building permits? | KELVIN::RPALMER | Handyman in Training | Wed Jan 14 1987 13:36 | 30 |
|
Why I don't get building permits (unless I get caught) Vol I
by Ralph Palmer
God, how I hate the inspectors in my town! They are a bunch
of fat ass old men who couldn't make it as plumbers, builders and
electricians so they make money picking on everyone else. If you
use one of their favorite contractors, no problem, they don't even
go to the site!
I avoid permits like the plague. It is not that I'm trying
to hide sub standard work it is just that I don't want to have to
sit around for days waiting for them to come out. I had to get
a permit to have my service upped to 100 amps. The inspector made
an appointment for 11 am for the final inspection. At 1 pm I called
his highness and he informed me that he was too busy to come out.
When he did finally come out he wouldn't sign off because the subpanel
door was *TOO HARD TO OPEN*. The electrician came out and worked
on the door so now it swings freely. All I have got to do is take
another (couple of) days off. I've been yanked around by the plumbing
and building inspector also.
What is the general feeling about permits in Home_works land?
Some jobs (like additions) need permits because they are visible
from the street. Do you call and see if the job requires a permit
or do you just go ahead and do it?
=Ralph=
(sorry for the soapbox type note, I'm a little hot under the
collar today)
|
305.12 | I give up! | COGITO::MAY | | Wed Jan 14 1987 14:27 | 28 |
| Although we built our house 11 yrs ago, I can understand the fire
in your heart. The inspectors were prompt, but the plumbing inspector
and plumbing contractor went round and round.
It seems the whole mess started about the pressure relief valve on
my HW tank. The plumber didn't put one on. The well tank has a pressure
relief device which releases before the HW tank could. BTW: The
well tank pressure is also lower that the HW relief valve. The
inspector then stated "I don't care if it is needed in this case
or not. The code says and it will be there or else I won't sign."
This then prompted the inspector to examine all plumbing with a
fine tooth comb.
As for the electrical inspector, what a joke. They both laughed
and joked, while the inspector showed he knew how to use a polarity
checker.
Being in town for several years, I know it would do no good to inform
the town management, as the inspectors are usually appointed by
the town. The only way to change the inspectors is to change the
management of the town.
I built a storage shed in the side yard. Two years later it showed
up on my tax bill. The law is usually very clear in this case. No
permit, the fine is double the permit fee. Guess what? NO FINE!
danas
|
305.13 | permits=tax assessors | RSTS32::BROWN | | Wed Jan 14 1987 14:32 | 19 |
| I agree with you Ralph, they are a pain in the butt. My next door
ex-neighbor had his house built by one of the "favored" builders in
town and no problems. Of course the inspector didn't think there
was a need to inspect this house as it was built by a local yocal.
When the new neighbor moved in he called the inspector to ask how
the house passed inspection with a drain pipe hanging below a finished
garage ceiling? The reply was we missed it BUT! you have to make
it right.
Last spring I built a large addition(highly visible) and called
the inspector for each milestone. This winter thru spring I'm
finishing of my workshop and cellar...of course you know I'm
going to call the inspector :^)
Incidentally the day after I got approval for the "rough framing"
the *@@#$! tax assessor showed up.
canuck "cut twice still too short"
|
305.14 | How about insurance claims? | VINO::TREMBLAY | | Wed Jan 14 1987 16:33 | 12 |
| One justification for having certain inspections done might be
for insurance purposes. I asked my friendly on-the-level
insurance man about the consequences of such practices and he
inform me that if I had an insurance claim resulting from work
that was not inspected and the insurance company found out, that
they would not be obligated to pay out my claim (eg: house fire
due to an electrical short). This monetary loss could be quite
significant and might make some people think twice. But then again,
like permits/inspections/tax assessors....you gotta get caught first.
/Glenn
|
305.15 | | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Jan 15 1987 08:27 | 13 |
| I've gone both routes. When I do something that involves an inspector
(such as building an addition or installing a wood stove), I call him up
first and humble myself. Tell him exactly what I want to do and what to
look out for. Now he's on my side and things usually go fairly well.
The only other inspector I had to deal with was an electrical one and he
never even look at the breaker box!
just out of curiosity, if someone builds something without getting it
inspected and the house caves in or burns down, how can anyone prove
that it wasn't done by the previous owner?
-mark
|
305.16 | previous owners | RSTS32::BROWN | | Thu Jan 15 1987 09:01 | 15 |
|
>.4 A friend of mine recently moved to Merrimack and discovered
the fireplace in his new "previously owned" house had only half the
flue constructed, this had been inspected and approved. The end
result was the building inspector called in all parties to witness
the construction(mason,previous owner,original building inspector).
The previous owner and the mason had to make it right at their own
expense or face legal action. The records are kept on file to keep
track of who did what and when.
I dont know what would happen if the previous owner had moved far
away say like Bogata,Columbia(sp?).
canuck "cut the dam thing on the line and found out the line had
moved.
|
305.17 | Previous owners and liability | VINO::TREMBLAY | | Thu Jan 15 1987 13:38 | 7 |
| Proving who was at fault is one thing, but I'm sure the issue of
liability is clearly dictated in your Purchase and Sales agreement.
Hmmm. ...think I'll take a glance at it this weekend.
/Glenn
|
305.18 | I went for the good night's sleep | MIZZEN::DEMERS | Chris DeMers Worksystems | Thu Jan 15 1987 13:51 | 11 |
| I just installed another circuit for an appliance. I decided to
play the game and took out a permit. I spent time making sure I
did the right thing. Good idea, the inspector took 5 minutes to
look at it and was only concerned with the polarity. I had left
the fuse out because it made sense that if there was an installation
problem, then having it inspected after the house burnt down didn't
make any sense. I wanted the inspector to tell me the installation
looked good and then I would put in the fuse. He thought that was
weird!
/Chris
|
305.19 | You know it is going to be a bad day when.. | KELVIN::RPALMER | Handyman in Training | Fri Jan 16 1987 08:16 | 24 |
|
Guess what I woke up to yesterday morning? I found the following
posted on my door.
STOP WORK ORDER
Town of Norwood
Building Department
Per section 122 of the State Building Code you are hereby ordered
to stop work immediately on this building........
Well I went down to the town hall and took out a permit. I
explained to the inspector that I really had not done anything yet
and was *planning* on getting one later. There was no problem,
no fines and no ruffled feathers. It seems that the inspector was
checking out the house next door and noticed the pile of stuff in
my back yard.
The main reason that I did not get a permit was that I could
do my own plumbing. Well my plumber came by and quoted me $250
for sink and dishwasher installation. The existing plumbing is
a joke and the new sink is going to have to be vented.
Well, I got caught and it was no big deal. I'd do it again
to avoid the building department.
=Ralph=
|
305.20 | | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Fri Jan 16 1987 09:36 | 5 |
| Hey Ralph... are you sure the building inspector hasn't been reading
this notes file ?!?!?
Charly :-)
|
305.21 | Shrewsbury Inspectors | LSMVAX::POWELL | Reed Powell - LCG Marketing - 297-4261 | Fri Jan 16 1987 10:27 | 15 |
| Well, it seems inspectors vary just like contractors: some are
a pain, others are reasonable, and some are just downright helpful
and make the whole project a breeze. If you live in Shrewsbury,
you are in the latter catagory. The building inspector allowed
me to start construction (excavation, foundation, etc) on the addition
BEFORE he issued the building because the delay was on his end.
He even came over and did the inspection in advance of the permit.
The electrical department didn't even charge for the permit. The
plumbing inspector is part time, so you usually get your inspection
in the early morning or evening hours.
Like I said, it varies a lot.
|
305.22 | Just rambling on a Saturday night... | JOET::JOET | Wind up workin' in a gas station... | Sat Jan 17 1987 17:42 | 7 |
| The building inspector for Spencer and Oakham used to work for my
wife. He's a real reasonable guy. If you ask him for advice he'll
practically design your project for you, but if you do something
stupid without a permit, he'll bust your chops from here to the
Statehouse.
-joet
|
305.23 | cheap, and time is money... | REMEDY::KOPEC | Tom Kopec, again.. | Mon Jan 19 1987 12:09 | 7 |
| re .10:
> The electrical department didn't even charge for the permit. The
I hope he didn't. I live in shrewsbury in a two-year old house
and either the inspector was blind, or never showed up.
...tek
|
305.24 | But, the Inspector is an Expert!! | NACHO::DIGRAZIA | | Mon Jan 19 1987 13:17 | 21 |
|
I agree that inspection is sometimes a joke; I guess it's
the best scheme we have.
I asked ours about the formula for area of attic vents.
He wasn't sure there was a formula, and he had to look it up.
I asked him how my house with only 2 square feet of
gable vent got past him. He admitted that he never
computes the area, he just checks to see that the
attic is indeed vented. He thought the idea of computing
the area was a trifle outlandish. Hurray for Cowhampshire;
Taxachusetts isn't the only noodle-headed country. (Ok, Ok,
all you over-sensitive Taxachusettians, don't get all
bent out of shape. I'm one myself, though I won't admit it
in public.)
Incidentallly, in the '60s, in Wilmington, I had some wiring
done by the wiring inspector (figure that out). I had to go
around the house correcting his poor workmanship: loose
connections in outlet boxes.
|
305.25 | inspectors in Pepperell | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Wed Jan 21 1987 13:54 | 2 |
| Anyone know how the inspectors in Pepperell, MA are?
|
305.26 | Honesty is Best! | HERMES::AREY | Proofreader for a Skywriting Company | Wed Jan 21 1987 23:19 | 31 |
| Then there's just plain ole dishonesty! A few years ago, I
worked on the old Children's Museum in Jamaica Plains, Mass. This
was about a $500k renovation into condo's. The building inspector
was giving my boss, the general contractor, *one* *heckova* *bad*
*time*. Then he (insp.) came in toward the end of the week and said to
him: "You know, you'n I'd get along a lot better if you'd leave
about five hundred bucks in an envelope on that desk over there."
Yeah? My boss (a good friend) just stared him down. It don't
pay to fool around with those kind. Much later on, I was a
subcontractor on a large job at Ft. Devons, Mass. I had unknowingly
paid my help less than the government declared price: The general
contrator (*not* my friend) asked me to "adjust" my books! Told
him that he was welcome to retire to that religious place of eternal
punishment...!
So the guy at the Inspector's office is not straight and plays
every political trick he can on you... *YOU* do what's right and
go by the correct procedure! Don't hide your work, don't try to
get away with anything! Honesty is a lonely word, but it *always*
pays in the end!!! If I or my friend had taken either of those
jerks up on their "request" one or both of use could be in jail
right now! No foolin'!
Don Arey
p.s. being honest about that Ft. Devens deal cost me $2500.-! But
I don't lose any sleep over it!
|
305.27 | inspecotrs corrupt? | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Tue Jan 27 1987 12:22 | 26 |
| re inspectors in Pepperell, Ma:
I've had many problems when I lived there. The biggest was when
I wanted to install a swimming pool. The building inspector said
"no problem", go ahead and the permit will catch up with you.
One month later, after being reviewed by the conservation commission,
wetland commission, planning board, then building inspector, I was
told I would have to have an electrical permit BEFORE the building
permit. You can't install the electrical outlit before you build
the pool(above ground). What they forgot to tell me was the electrical
inspector's son was the 'normal' electrician for the work. They
made it clear that an electrican was the only one who could sign
the permit and do the work. So two weeks later (pool up-no permit)
I finally get an electrican to signe the permit and do the work.
Here's where it gets good. The electrican I hired was the town's
OLD electrical inspector. Seems like he and the new inspector have
problems getting along. I had the work inspected 4 times, each
time the electrical inspector found something new that he didn't
like. Each time they were nit-picks.
I gave up, enjoyed the pool without permit process complete.
ed
|
305.28 | GET PERMITS!!!!!!!!! | MILVAX::SULLIVAN | | Wed Mar 11 1987 12:49 | 9 |
| I JUST GOT INTO THIS NOTE SO SORRY I AM A LITTLE LATE IN TELLING
YOU ABOUT MY HORROR STORY. MY EX PUT A DECK ON THE BACK OF MY
HOME 14 YEARS AGO (NO PERMIT). I PUT MY HOUSE UP FOR SALE AND WAS
LUCKY TO SELL IT IN TIME TO PASS PAPERS ON A HOME IN LEOMINSTER.
THREE DAY'S BEFORE PASSING ON THE MAYNARD HOME THE BANK CALLED AND
INFORMED ME THAT I WAS OUT OF VARIENCE ON THE PLOT PLAN. WHAT A
NIGHTMARE, IT LASTED THIRTEEN WEEKS. PLANNING MEETINGS, ZONEING
BOARDS AND SO ON. THE PERMIT WOULD HAVE BEEN A HELL OF A LOT EASIER
THAN THE BULL AND THE MONEY IT COST ME IN THE END.
|
305.29 | Bob never gets them ??? | SCOTIA::PASCO | Mark 'PASCO' Pascarelli | Wed Mar 11 1987 18:11 | 16 |
| Read a interesting article in this mornings paper.
Seems like Bob Villa ( Yes, from this Old House) is tied up in a
little problem. Before the infamous show was born he added a Penthouse
apartment to some building in the Back Bay. He did however, forget
to get any building permit. Now some years go by and he sells the
apartment and more time goes by and now the second owner gets a
notice about the lack of building permit and please remove the whole
penthouse and restore the roof to it's original appearance
OR ELSE !!!
The apartment is now worth between $225 K and $300 K. The owners
have until March 22 to remove the problem.
Pasco
|
305.30 | add key pests | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Mar 12 1987 15:21 | 9 |
| Just another case of why building departments get such a bad name. The thing
has been there for years, and all of a sudden they want it gone? Without
regard to whether it's built soundly or not? Sheez, don't they have anything
better to do?
I personally would be a lot happier if each and every building department went
the way of the dinosaurs.
Paul
|
305.31 | | MILT::JACKSON | Gross and wilful fashion violations | Fri Mar 13 1987 07:16 | 16 |
| RE: .-1
I'm sure its not really the building department, but the people
who want to conserve the original appearance of the buildings in
the back bay. (Back Bay Conservation society or something like
that) I read a while ago that someone had put up a satellite receiver
on his roof and they made him take that down too.
These people decide that they don't like something, look up to see
if the proper permits were pulled and if not, report you to the
building inspector. The city has nothing else that it can do except
to take action. Their hands are tied.
-bill
|
305.32 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Mar 13 1987 07:42 | 14 |
| > I'm sure its not really the building department, but the people
> who want to conserve the original appearance of the buildings in
> the back bay.
Where were they x years ago when he built the thing? He built an apartment
several years ago, and apparently no one took any notice at the time or in the
intervening years. The apartment is now worth about a third of a million
dollars, and because some yo-yo walking down the street doesn't like the look
of it, some subsequent owner who most likely had no idea that the apartment was
built without a permit has to tear it down? Alright, perhaps the building
department isn't totally at fault here. But the fact remains that the building
department is there for the yo-yo's to use as a tool.
Paul
|
305.33 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Fri Mar 13 1987 07:55 | 6 |
| The lesson is clear:
If it's in public view, get a permit.
If it's within the walls of your castle, do what you damn well please
(keeping in mind that the castle might change hands some day).
|
305.34 | \ | MILT::JACKSON | Gross and wilful fashion violations | Fri Mar 13 1987 12:02 | 10 |
| Actually, the lesson should be: GET A PERMIT
I think the satellite thing in the Back Bay was not visible from
anywhere except from the top of some other building (one, if I
can remember right)
they STILL made him tear it down.
-bill
|
305.35 | Neighbor see it = yes = permit??? | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Fri Mar 13 1987 12:18 | 7 |
| I'm considering some landscaping (leveling, adding fill and top
soil), cutting down trees and adding a small deck in the back yard.
It would replace an existing brick patio. From the sounds of this
discussion, I would probably need a permit for something. I guess
it's safe to say if your doing anything to YOUR property which some
else may see from THEIR property, you most likely need a permit.
I guess I'll make some calls. Boy, nothing is simple anymore.
|
305.36 | A horror story | CADSYS::BURDICK | Ed Burdick HLO2-2/G13, dtn 225-5051 | Sat Mar 14 1987 19:01 | 25 |
| In 1975, I bought a house in the Santa Cruz mountains, west of the famous
Silicon Valley. This house had originally been a single story house built
on a hillside, so that it had about 3/4 of a full basement above ground.
The previous owner took advantage of this space by leveling the floor, pouring
a slab, and building walls inside of the original walls, to add sort of a
building inside of a building. Then he added a little wiring, a new propane
FHA central heating system, and a stairway up to the living room. No permits
for any of it. Later, I removed the heating system, and replaced it with
a heat pump. This was done by a contractor, and was all legal. In 1980, I
accepted a job at DEC in Hudson, MA, and put the house on the market. Houses
were not moving very well, so after a couple of months, DEC brought in a
third party relocation company to handle the house. These companies buy houses
and resell them just so the owner can get the equity out of them quickly, and
they charge a huge fee (~18% of house value) to do it. When the house was
appraised, as part of this deal, the appraiser suggested to the relocation
company that they check for permits, because this was obviously not original.
To make a long story short, the contract was cancelled, and I ended up selling
the house, for a few thousand dollars less than what I could have had, about
a month later, with a swing loan, etc. This was a very painful process.
The actual work in question looked to me to be up to code, but to get permits
would have required drawing up full plans, hiring a general contractor, etc,
all from 3k miles away, while holding a builder at bay for my new house closing.
We were very lucky things came out as well as they did. I would NEVER do any
work without getting permits if there were ANY chance that it would be noticed.
This means anything beyond replacing an outlet, faucet, etc.
|
305.37 | don't think you need a permit to move some dirt | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Mar 16 1987 08:19 | 7 |
| rep:-2
I've never heard of a permit for landscaping. I've taken out permits multiple
times over the last 10 years and there is no reference anywhere to work outside
the house itself.
-mark
|
305.38 | | BLISS::DIAMOND | | Mon Mar 16 1987 12:09 | 36 |
|
Here are a couple of incidents I ran into in Syracuse NY with boulding
inspectors.
#1. My best friend while going to Syracuse University Architech
School worked as a building inspector for the City of Syracuse.
His life was threatened by some very high officials in Syracuse
after he threatened them he would tell the newspapers what is going
on here. The City of Syracuse inspectors are very corrupt. Bribes
are a common way of life for them. There was one building inspector
that my friend worked with that drove a Mercedes, had a summer camp
in Canada, also had a $200,000 home. This was pretty good since
his salary (on paper that is) was only 21,000 a year. The honest
building inspector in Syracuse is non-existant.
In Syracuse you can't do your own wiring or plumbing. It must be
done by an liscensed electrician or plumber.
#2. My brother-in-law bought a house in East Syarcuse NY for an
investment. The house was in real bad shape. It had to be rewired
and new plumbing had to be put in, almost new evrything. My
brother-in-law did the wiring himself (in this small town you can
do your own wiring, it just has to be inspected). My brother-in-law
is a plant manager for the Crysler plant there, so he got all the
wire he need from the work. The wire he got was 12 gage. The code
called for 14 gage. He wired the whole house with the 12 gage wiring
he got free from work using 15 amp circuits. When the building
inspector came he failed the house because 14 gage wire wasn't used.
We tried to explain to him that 12 gage was better then 14 gage.
But he wouldn't listen. My brother-in-law took the town to court.
He won, but it took 4 weeks to clear it up. The building inspector
they had didn't know anything about wiring or plumbing (or anything
else for that matter). He just went by what it said in the book.
|
305.39 | DYIers Fight Back! | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Thu Mar 19 1987 09:48 | 11 |
| I saw this in the paper this week and did it bring a smile to my
face. :-)
In the town of Winchendon Mass, (I believe this was the town.....
maybe someone could confirm it for me), a petition signed by fifty
residents was present that called for the immediate removal of
the town's building inspector. The main complaint was that they
would no longer stand for his lack of knowledge and common sense
pertaining to building pratices and permits.
Charly
|
305.40 | My buddy and me | KELVIN::RPALMER | Half a bubble off plumb | Thu Mar 19 1987 12:11 | 15 |
|
The problem with a lousy building inspector is that no one
can afford to take the guy on. If you were a builder would you
stand up at a town meeting and say what you really thought about
the inspector? Have fun when you need your permit signed off. The
people who run the town usually have no contact with the building
dept.
I don't particularly like my building inspector, contractors are always
complaining, and he loves to hassle my plumber. What am I going
to do? Nothing, absolutely nothing. After being caught once
and getting off after pleading ignorance, me and the inspector
are best buddies :^).
=Ralph=
Hats off to the people with enough guts to stand up for themselves
|
305.124 | Board of Health holding money | MRMFG1::C_DENOPOULOS | | Fri May 27 1988 15:34 | 10 |
| I just called the Board of Health to find out if my septic system
plans have been approved yet for the town of Billerica. The woman
told me that I have to come down, get what's called an assignment
form, bring it to the bank and put $2,500 in an account that's held
for either 1 or 2 years after occupancy. This is something new
to me. Do all towns do it? What is the reason for it? I could
really use that $2,500 for new appliances and stuff. Do I collect
interest on that money?
Chris D.
|
305.125 | not much help... | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Wed Jun 01 1988 10:23 | 15 |
|
How strange!! I had a new septic system put in about 18months
ago in Billerica....nothing like that happened...
Have you talked to the Inspector directly (used to be Peter Gray
-- maybe still)? I found the secretaries in all of the town
offices very *unhelpful* as well as completely unknowledgeable...
but maybe they have new ones now.
Are you close to where the sewers are to be installed in town?
Maybe they are trying to delay you till they can get the town
sewers in......
Or maybe its just new 1988 laws. Talk with the inspector, or
the selectman...they might shed some light on the situation.
Deb
|
305.126 | | HEYDEN::BBARRY | | Wed Jun 01 1988 10:59 | 20 |
| < plans have been approved yet for the town of Billerica. The woman
< told me that I have to come down, get what's called an assignment
< form, bring it to the bank and put $2,500 in an account that's held
< for either 1 or 2 years after occupancy.
This seems to be becoming a common pratice. I vaguely recall debating this at
a town meeting a few years ago, but I don't remember if our town adopted it.
The $2500 escrow account is set up to make sure that in case of a septic
system failure there is money available to redesign and rebuild the septic
system. If a septic system fails in the first two years it is assumed to be a
design problem, after two years it is assumed to be a maintainence problem.
Is Billerica part of the Nashoba Regional Health Board? They seem to be a
driving force behind this.
Depending on your finance company you maybe able to include this in your
construction loan and mortgage minimizing your short term expenses. Then in
two years you will have a $2800.
Brian
|
305.127 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Wed Jun 01 1988 12:08 | 16 |
| STATE: So you want a septic system eh? Well!
It has to be designed according to *OUR* regulations.
It has to be built to *OUR* specifications.
It has to be installed by someone licensed by *US*.
It has to be inspected by *OUR* people.
Oh yes, and by the way, if there is a design flaw and
the system fails, *WE ARE NOT* responsible.
Sign here: ................
MR. TAXPAYER: Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir.
|
305.128 | | HEYDEN::BBARRY | | Wed Jun 01 1988 12:14 | 11 |
| < STATE: So you want a septic system eh? Well!
<
< It has to be designed according to *OUR* regulations.
< It has to be built to *OUR* specifications.
< It has to be installed by someone licensed by *US*.
< It has to be inspected by *OUR* people.
You left out:
WE hire a consultant with YOUR money to verify the design.
|
305.129 | ESCROW IF I SELL. | MRMFG1::C_DENOPOULOS | | Tue Jun 07 1988 10:25 | 7 |
| I just got back from vacation today with the info. I do not have
to get an escrow account unless I sell the house within the first
year. If I sell, then the account stays for two years. I had to
sign a form agreeing to that. I guess this is to protect the new owners.
Thanks for the responces.
Chris D.
|
305.41 | The *real* reason for building permits | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Wed Jul 13 1988 09:02 | 10 |
|
Over the past two years, I have: gutted and redid my kitchen,
added a bathroom and added a deck. I have got my permits
and waited around all day for the inspectors. What has been the
main result of the permits, a 15% tax increase.
The town revalued my neighborhood and because I have done 'extensive'
(their word not mine) work to my house my taxes went up by 15% more
than the average house. Sometimes you just cant win.
=Ralph=
|
305.42 | I can relate. | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Wed Jul 13 1988 10:20 | 7 |
| Since buying my home I have added a basement,deck and at least 10
other things requiring a permit. Did I get one he(( no! But that
dident stop my taxes from taking a 12% jump. There is no winning
it seems when the subject is tax increases.
-j
|
305.43 | to each his own... | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Jul 13 1988 13:13 | 12 |
| Maybe I'm just paranoid, but my fear is that on something MAJOR, you should get
one. Part of the reason being for insurance in case something goes wrong or
possibly at the time of a sale. I found during my structural inspection that
my bedroom window was too small and has to be replaced. I'd hate to think of
what would happen if I went to sell the place and it failed the bank inspection
because of that.
On the other hand, stuff like a deck or woodshed or even some minor interial
framing (like moving a wall or two) I'd probably not bother with. Ditto for
small wiring jobs.
-mark
|
305.44 | Get a permit | HEYDEN::BBARRY | | Wed Jul 13 1988 14:42 | 34 |
|
<On the other hand, stuff like a deck or woodshed or even some minor interial
<framing (like moving a wall or two) I'd probably not bother with. Ditto for
<small wiring jobs.
Decks or woodsheds(also pools) are hard to hide, so you should get a permit.
When your property is reevaluated and there is a discrepency, it can be
reported to the building inspector.
Minor internal framing is also one of the biggest problems for inspectors, based
on comments from a friend in the inspectors office in Mesa, Arizona. Many
people do not know the difference between a load bearing wall and a non-load
bearing wall(or that there are such things as load bearing partitions). To
encourage people to get permits, they have a form letter they use when no permit
is required(i.e. nonstructural walls). It basically says your plans have been
inspected and are on file, and no permit is required. In Arizona, permits are
required less frequently then Massachusetts where you need a permit for anything
more complicated then hanging a picture:-).
Small wiring jobs? If the circuit is 110V, 15A(i.e. no kitch/dining rooms)
standard breaker(i.e. no bathrooms), and competient electrician, I probably
would not pull a permit(in AZ it used to be unnecessary). A good house
inspector could tell after the work is finished if "new work" had been done
and find most of the major hazards.
Permits are good for three things(in order of importance):
1) Protect future owners. Towns careless if your house colaspses on you.
2) Protect you from your insurance company. No permit+bad work=no claim
3) Aid in reevaluating property. Some permits in some locations are not
available for tax reevaluation(e.g. gas) to encourage people to get permits.
Brian
|
305.45 | "when in rome", is a cute saying, but.. | JUNIOR::SHAW | Well and truly trucked | Thu Aug 04 1988 14:32 | 21 |
| I am moving into a house I bought this weekend, after just relocating
from the UK. A friend is building a deck, and I am converting the
smallest bedroom of 4, to a 2nd bathroom. After;
* seeing what my taxes are, and what I get for paying them
* realising I have to produce/have produced plans that will indirectly
increase my taxes
* having to pay "points" to the bank for the priveledge of giving
them vast amounts of interest over the term of the mortgage
* having to qualify to the bank where my money was made in the UK
(have you seen how house prices rise there?!!!)
* having to lie to the bank to get a home improvement loan to improve
my home, because they won't lend money against the idea of adding
equity? (They expect to charge "risk business" interest rates,
without taking risks....why?)
Will I apply for a permit? So they can screw me more? The first
punch was free.....
Brian.
|
305.46 | and when you thought it was safe out there | HIHOSS::HOSSFELD | I'm so confused | Fri Aug 05 1988 12:28 | 25 |
| -< watch the second punch... >-
> Will I apply for a permit? So they can screw me more? The first
> punch was free.....
I am trying to avoid the second punch!...
Having made the same decission for the same reasons, I built a
deck around an above ground pool! Unknown to me untill after
building was complete, I have a very civic minded neighbor who
wants to make sure that our neighborhood is up to the city
standards. She walks around daily and when she sees some
addition or change that is not on the city records,which she has
committed to memory. She reports it to ensure that everyone is
protected against faulity construction.
The only problem I have with this is she only reports it to the
Tax office!
My pool is well hidden by the house and I am making all attempts
to ensure that is remains so after the trees loose there leaves.
|
305.47 | a.k.a. you'll get shafted if you don't | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Fri Aug 05 1988 14:05 | 5 |
| Call the town hall and inquire about a permit. If a permit
IS needed and one does NOT request same, one is INVITING the
wrath of -frequently- vengeful, narrow minded bureaucrats who are
none the less in power.
|
305.48 | 100% valuation spoiled it for me. | SALEM::NOYCE | | Sat Aug 06 1988 01:20 | 15 |
| I doing things without a permit and everything went ok until 100%
evaluation came along. The city sent out people to look over all
property in the city and give each a full valuation. They found
my deck, an added on back porch, and my second shed out back,
which were duly recorded on the tax records. I had waited to
put in some new windows and other improvments to the house until
after the assessor had gone thru the house. I did the improvments
last year. This year they apparently did another upgrade of the
assessments to 100% evaluation and published all property assessements
in the newspaper by address and name. Of course it went up!! I
think they are supposed to do the evaluations every 3 years by Mass.
law. Right???
Ken
|
305.67 | Occupancy permits | PAR5::C_DENOPOULOS | | Thu Sep 01 1988 12:28 | 14 |
| Is there such a thing as towns issuing a "Temporary" occupancy
permit??? The house is complete, electricity, plumbing, septic and
heat are all in. Inspectors for the plumbing, electricity and health
department have all signed off.
The problem is the excavation on the property is not done yet.
To get an "Official" occupancy permit, the excavation has to be
done too (because I need a certified plot plan). I don't see why
we have to wait.
Chris D.
p.s. I can't believe the beurocratic B.S. you have to go through
to put up a house. No wonder people hire contractors to do that
stuff.
|
305.68 | Banks don't take promises | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Thu Sep 01 1988 13:04 | 7 |
| I've been in the same situation before. I had already closed on
my house and had no choice. We moved our furniture in, and took
the risk. The inspector didn't even bother us, for that matter we
didn't tell him we moved in. But until you do that excavation
the bank has no assurance that the work will get done, they're only
protecting themselves in case you default on your mortgage and don't
do the work.
|
305.69 | Bank has no involvement here. | MRMFG1::C_DENOPOULOS | | Thu Sep 01 1988 13:57 | 6 |
| re: .01 Thanks for the response but this has nothing to do with
the bank. This is just regarding the occupancy permit from the
town only.
Chris D.
|
305.70 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Thu Sep 01 1988 14:25 | 20 |
|
I don't believe there is such a thing as a temporary permit.
The town's view is probably, does the property meet the requirements
set forth for occupancy or not. Excavation not done? Doesn't meet
the requirements. No permit. However, you may be able to convince
them to let you move in before receiving the permit, or convince
them to let you move in with the permit under agreement that the
work will be done within a specified period of time. That's what
happened to me. There were some electrical things that did not
meet code (lights on every house exit) but the inspector gave us
permission to move in since our lease ran out at the apartment.
Of course, telling him my wife was pregnant, sobbing a little, and
then getting down on one knee and begging didn't hurt either.
(just kidding)
Contractors go through the same b.s., and end up delaying you from
moving in. You know, "it'll be ready in just one more week". You
don't see the inspection problems, but some people end up bringing
the contractor to court for not finishing the project in time.
|
305.71 | Bank may be involved | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Sep 01 1988 14:26 | 14 |
| > re: .01 Thanks for the response but this has nothing to do with
> the bank. This is just regarding the occupancy permit from the
> town only.
When I tried to get my occupancy permit a little early (I think
the paint on one wall was still tacky or something), the inspector
told me he couldn't give it to me because by giving me an occupancy
permit, he's telling the bank that all work had been completed.
If the work were never completed the bank would sue the town.
So the bank may be involved in your case, even though they don't
know anything about it.
|
305.72 | Inspector General | PAMOLA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Thu Sep 01 1988 15:34 | 16 |
| > To get an "Official" occupancy permit, the excavation has to be done too
> (because I need a certified plot plan). I don't see why we have to wait.
1. nit: I'm not sure what you mean by "certified plot plan". This
sounds like the thing we got from the septic-design-engineer-type-person,
without which we couldn't build at all.
2. Bottom line is your town's inspector. Whether his position is
legally defensible or not, his word counts (without getting nasty). It seems
that something like the teary-eyed pleading ( :-) a couple replies back) might
be worth a try! Important: Get on his good side!
And each town inspector's different. The guy in the town we're building
in (southern NH) sounds pretty flexible - upstairs can be very unfinished
("no bare wires"), downstairs carpets and/or flooring isn't necessary, railings
on stairways are. It all depends.
BTW, our bank says, in order to close, "Variable-rate mortage? no problem.
Fixed-rate? your lawn grass must exceed 3" in height. (slight exaggeration)
|
305.73 | Explain "excavation" pls? | MEMV03::ROGUSKA | | Thu Sep 01 1988 16:11 | 4 |
| I'm confused.......What do you mean by excavation? Do you mean
the landscaping? Do you mean the backfilling around the foundation?
I'm just curious......
|
305.74 | Some details | PAR5::C_DENOPOULOS | | Thu Sep 01 1988 17:08 | 14 |
| By excavation I mean the tarred driveway, sifting and spreading
the loom, seeding, cementing the platform and retaining walls for
the cellar walkout. This stuff has to be done for the certified
plot plan. BTW, we had to have a plot plan done to build the house,
now we have to have another one done just in case something ended
up a couple of inches off from the original plan. The building
inspector has to have that before giving us an occupancy permit.
By the time the rest of the landscaping/excavation is done, then
getting the surveyors up, and getting the street department up
to check the tarring job (believe it or not), and getting the fire
inspector up there (they are really slow) and then getting the building
inspector up, I'll be old and grey.
Chris D.
|
305.75 | It took me 4 years to afford loam. | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Sep 01 1988 17:54 | 4 |
| This probably doesn't count for much, but I've never heard of
a town requiring the landscaping to be done to get an occupancy
permit.
|
305.76 | Order of Conditions | CURIE::BBARRY | | Fri Sep 02 1988 12:44 | 20 |
| re: .5?
The occupancy permit and completion are unrelated events. An
occupancy permit can be issued when minimum building requirements are
meet and no unsafe conditions exist on the building site.
< This probably doesn't count for much, but I've never heard of
< a town requiring the landscaping to be done to get an occupancy
< permit.
This will depend on your order of conditions issue by the consevation
commission when you file for a building permit. The order of conditions
will specify thing such as limiting the area of the construction site,
can haybail or plastic barrier be used, all kinds of requirements on the
well and septic, landscaping requirements if adjacent to or drain
into wetlands or potable water, and limits on paved surfaces to
maintain aquifer replenishment. In Townsend the conservation commision
has been requiring landscaping on a lot of new construction.
Brian
|
305.77 | | PAR5::C_DENOPOULOS | | Fri Sep 02 1988 13:52 | 14 |
| I talked to the Conservation Commisioner in my town and he said
to tell the building inspector not to hold up the permit because
of him and if the inspector wants to he can call him. That's the
first good thing that's happened with the town so far. So yes,
the landscaping has to be done for release from the order of
conditions. There are still some things that have to get done before
the certified plot plan gets done so what I'm going to do is finish
getting the other signatures and then go to him and say "Do we really
have to have the plot plan before we can move in?" Maybe if I beg
and shed some tears he'll give in if I promise to get it to him
as soon as it's done.
Chris D.
|
305.78 | dd | GRANMA::GHALSTEAD | | Sat Sep 03 1988 00:51 | 4 |
| Ask some builders how strict your inspectors are in your area about
moving in before the final permit is issued. Our inspectors wouldn't
tell you of course but they were not strict at all in my area .
I lived their two months before getting final inspection.
|
305.6 | Does NH require NH licensed electrician? | TLE::JENKINS | | Wed Jul 19 1989 13:27 | 13 |
| This question is specifically with regard to NEW HAMPSHIRE building
code requirements.
I need to have my electrical service upgraded to 200 AMP. Since my
town office is closed today and the electrician (my cousin) is coming
to check out the work tonight, I would appreciate any information
people can provide.
Does NH require that a NH licensed electrician pull the permit
for a service upgrade?
(My cousin is licensed in MA but not in NH.)
|
305.7 | Derry does... | GYPSY::GOETZ | | Wed Jul 19 1989 14:15 | 4 |
| I know that Derry requires a master electrician to pull the electrical
permit. I'm not sure if that would apply in your town.
Al
|
305.8 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Wed Jul 19 1989 14:32 | 7 |
|
re .6
It depends upon the down. In Goffstown NH, it just has to be inspected
by either the Town/County inspector or signed off by a Electrician.
Mike
|
305.9 | YOU pull the permit for YOUR house | FREDW::MATTHES | half a bubble off plumb | Wed Jul 19 1989 16:00 | 16 |
| Where are YOU located ??
Last I knew Nashua did not require a licensed electrician to work
on your OWN house. If you let slip that your cousin is going to
do the work they may ask for his license.
Pull the permit yourself. Help, and I mean help your cousin do
the actual work so that when the inspector comes you can explain
why you did things the way you did. Your cousin will have to bring
you up to speed while he does the work.
It's not all that difficult. Just requires a little experience
and confidence. I did it myself a couple of years ago and the only
place I had any problem was that I failed to realize that you need
to upgrade your ground wire to the water pipe and drive a local
ground rod as close to the box as possible.
|
305.10 | I'll post what I find out tomorrow. | TLE::JENKINS | | Wed Jul 19 1989 16:06 | 16 |
| Thanks fro all the replies so far. I forgot to mention that I live
in Auburn, NH. My cousin is a MA licensed master electrician. He
voiced the concern to me that because he was not licensed in NH he
may not be able to pull the permit. As was suggested in .-1, if
I am able to pull the permit myself and help him with the work (which
I do intend to do) that may solve my problem.
From the varying replies, it seems that I will still have to check with
my town inspector to find out what his/her requirements are.
Thanks again for the quick and encouraging replies. Anyone familiar
with the specific requirements in Auburn??
Thank You,
Patsy
|
305.79 | Minimum requirements? | WANDER::BUCK | | Tue Aug 21 1990 13:03 | 12 |
| -> The occupancy permit and completion are unrelated events. An
-> occupancy permit can be issued when minimum building requirements are
-> meet and no unsafe conditions exist on the building site.
What types of things are deemed "minimum building requirements"?
Some specifics would be appreciated. For example, could a occupancy
permit be issued if the subfloor was exposed and interior trim was
not completed?
agb
|
305.80 | Some of the requirements. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Tue Aug 21 1990 14:13 | 17 |
| re: .12
In regards to the subfloor: the floor must be completed for Occ.
A somewhat general listing of the requirements follows. Keep in mind
that each town/inspector will have specifics that must be followed.
1) Must have running water
2) Must have electricity
3) Must have 2 exits from first floor
4) Kitchen must have sink, countertop (of some type) and flooring
5) Bathroom must be complete
There are others, but my memory is fading. I will attempt to look them
up in the codebook.
Dan
|
305.81 | Think of it as a large scale parquet !! | WANDER::BUCK | | Tue Aug 21 1990 14:49 | 8 |
| Thanks,
So, you don't think "they" would buy it if I said I WANTED a plywood
floor? :)
agb
|
305.82 | We lived with plywood for a while | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Wed Aug 22 1990 10:43 | 13 |
|
When we bought our house the carpet was back ordered so for
about a month we had 'beautiful' plywood floor until the
carpet came.
Actually it turned out pretty well because we were moving
furniture etc. in and since the yard consisted of just loam
we didn't end up tracking it all over a new carpet.
Mike
----
|
305.83 | | WANDER::BUCK | | Wed Aug 22 1990 11:13 | 5 |
| Yea, Plywood isn't too bad for a while. If the bank requires a
occupancy permit to close out a construction loan, it seems that plywood
subfloors don't cut it.
andy
|
305.84 | Be creative! | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Aug 22 1990 12:40 | 5 |
| Couldn't you put in el cheapo sheet vinyl or indoor/outdoor carpeting to
get your occupancy certificate? I have some friends who carpeted their
back yard for a party. They rented a tent, but they bought the carpeting.
I'm sure they didn't pay a lot, and they ended up using some of it to
carpet their enclosed porch.
|
305.85 | Finish the Plywood! | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Wed Aug 22 1990 12:51 | 18 |
| RE: Plywood subfloors don't cut it
Do what we did when we couldn't afford the carpet and knew we'd be
living on the plywood for a while;
STAIN IT!! It really doesn't look all that bad. We stained and
polyurethaned two rooms, (sanded first), and 2 1/2 years later, we're
still not in a hurry to get the carpeting. It really doesn't look as
bad as you think. We could afford the stain, but not the carpet we
want. The subfloor was laid with sheetrock (I think) screws, that have
black heads, which seem to add character to the floor. And with 2
small boys, the floor has been a lot easier to maintain than carpet
would've been. A few throw rugs, and most people have never noticed it
was plywood. They'd have to go look at it again AFTER we told them.
Is there a law that says you can't have a plywood floor??
Patty
|
305.86 | | AKOV14::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Wed Aug 22 1990 13:21 | 6 |
| I think that the code couldn't say you can't use plywood for the floor.
I suspect that it requires at least a subfloor that covers the joists. After
all, where does the code writer get off telling us what we can and can't have
for a floor?
Ed..
|
305.87 | Inspector needs to see finished floor. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Thu Aug 23 1990 09:03 | 7 |
| RE: - a few
What the inspector looks for is not PLYwood vs vinyl or anything else,
but a FINISHED floor. Staining then finishing the plywood is finishing
the floor, therefore no problem.
Dan
|
305.88 | 3 days/$50.00 = Start Moving! | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Thu Aug 23 1990 10:02 | 14 |
| Well, $$Dollar$$ wise, it cost us about $50.00 and about 3 days labor to
sand, stain and polyurethane the floors (spread over about a week to
allow drying time and sore muscles to heal). That was with a hand-held
power sander (what a MESS!) Compared to ~$800.00 for the carpet we
want(ed). I suppose you could rent a finish sander, but the plywood
might be too soft for that. Anyway, it looks _sort of_ like a
wide-pine-board floor. (With enough drinks it REALLY looks like it!)
The only thing I don't like is that it's slippery - but no more so than
any other wood floor.
We had time, but no money. Worked out well for us!
Good luck!
Patty
|
305.89 | | ISLNDS::HAMER | | Fri Aug 24 1990 14:23 | 16 |
| re: plywood subfloors
Living with plywood subfloors bothered one bank we were talking to
about using to convert our construction loan to a mortgage. Their
definition of "finished" (mainly, I suspect, to facilitate selling the
mortgage) included either carpeting or what they defined as permanent
flooring.
The building inspector didn't care a hoot about the plywood floors. As
far as I was concerned, **he** was the code. We've painted the plywood
with floor/deck paint and are doing OK with it. Just as soon as the
stock gets back to 199 we'll put down the nice hardwood. :-(
John H.
John H.
|
305.90 | I think the standard subfloor isn't strong enough | NETRIX::wallace | | Fri Aug 24 1990 15:42 | 10 |
| I think you might have trouble getting an occupancy permit if all you have
is the standard half inch plywood subfloor. The reason is that your usual
inch thick hardwood flooring is not just decorative, it is also structural.
And if you don't have hardwood flooring then you have some other sort of
underlayment to increase the strength of the floor. I've heard of an extra
thick (1 inch +) T&G plywood that is intended to act as both subfloor and
underlayment, which you might want to look into if you really want to move
in with just a "subfloor" down.
Vince
|
305.91 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Aug 24 1990 16:55 | 9 |
| re: << Note 2609.23 by NETRIX::wallace >>>
> I think you might have trouble getting an occupancy permit if all you have
> is the standard half inch plywood subfloor.
I think that the standard for subflooring is 3/4, not 1/2 inch.
In any case, "standard" subflooring plus carpeting is O.K. and the
carpeting surely doesn't add any structural strength!
|
305.92 | try carpet remnants | CSDNET::DICASTRO | A.Faulk in Athol | Fri Aug 24 1990 17:44 | 10 |
| re - a few
$50.00 to finish the floor, could have been spent on a rug. Several
places sell carpet remnants for $79.00 [for anything in the store].
They come as large as 12 x 14. Even though it is temporary, they can be
reused, as opposed to the work you did on the floor, which will be covered
someday.
FYI
|
305.93 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Aug 27 1990 12:32 | 11 |
| What is needed for an occupancy permit is determined largely by the town. I
believe that there are some close-in Boston suburbs (Weston, maybe?) which
require LANDSCAPING before you move in - they don't want unfinished-looking
houses around. On the other extreme, some friends of ours built a house in
northern NH - the building inspector wanted a waterproof roof and at least one
flush toilet connected to the septic system for their occupancy permit. That's
it. They didn't need electricity, interior walls, siding, or anything else.
Talk to your town building inspector to find out what the case is in your town.
Paul
|
305.94 | Also, investigate temporary occupancy | MARX::SULLIVAN | We have met the enemy, and they is us! | Mon Aug 27 1990 14:05 | 25 |
| As -.1 stated, the rules vary widely from town to town, inspector to inspector,
and bank to bank. Most of the folklore comes from bank rules. They are the
hardest since they don't want to be stuck with an unfinished house.
I live in a partially completed house. On our street there are three new
homes. All three of us well given widely different rules on what needed to
be complete from the banks. The building inspector was mainly interested in
a working kitchen, bath, and other normal building code metrics.
You can get a "temporary" occupancy in most towns. This is usually allowed when
the house is complete enough to live in but no finish floors, paint, etc. They
are used to let people occupy their homes under the agreement that they will
be completing the rest "soon". Some towns set a time limit, others look the
other way forever.... I know some people who still have temporary occupancy
permits and they have been in their houses for 10+ years. I imagine they will
have problems when they go to sell. And some banks won't accept temporary
permits for a final mortgage.
In summary, separate the two steps. First you need to worry about
occupancy being granted by the town in order to live in the house. Second,
you need to meet the banks rules for a final mortgage. The latter is much
more difficult. If you are doing this with no intention of obtaining a
mortgage, you will have a much easier time.
Mark
|
305.49 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 20 1991 09:52 | 17 |
| I am thinking about buying an 85+ year old house. The inside has seen
extensive renovation. A wall was removed between the livingroom and
diningroom to open up the living space. An exposed beam was put in
place of the wall. Since the wall runs through the middle of the
house, I assume that it is loadbearing and not just a cosmetic touch.
The two rooms were also expanded into the front porch area - from the
outside you could see where the porch windows used to be.
My question is, is a building permit required to perform these type of
renovations? Is there anything a home inspection can tell me about the
quality of the work if there weren't permits in place? I'm concerned
because there are poorly patched cracks in the plaster of the wall
directly above it in the master bedroom. The realtor did say the
cracks were caused by the removal of the wall downstairs. I'd also be
putting a king size water bed in that room. Even though the weight of
the water is well spread out in a water bed, I want to make sure the
room as a whole can support the weight.
|
305.50 | | KAHALA::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Wed Mar 20 1991 16:14 | 50 |
| I can tell you what I have encountered. We are just finishing a project very
similar to what you have described. In fact, it is almost exactly what we have
done (hey - you aren't trying to buy my house are you?)
When structural work is done, usually a permit is required. We did get a permit
for our job, even though I preferred not to.
One thing we found is that the beam has to be sized large enough. We have a
house that had the traditional hall leading along the staircase, with doors into
two rooms. We removed the hallway wall, and the wall between the two rooms.
This required us to put in TWO beams. One beam went from the front of the house
to the back. This beam is not the load bearing direction. The other beam goes
from the front-to-back beam to the outside wall. By doing this, BOTH beams
have become load bearing (the front-to-back beam being only a point load). In
our kitchen, the previous owner removed a wall and sized the beam too small.
The wall has sagged upstairs over this beam.
Our beams are pretty good sizes. One is something like 12 inches and the other
is something like 9 inches (I don't have the exact measurements here, they are
at home).
As long as the beams are big enough, I can't see many other problems you could
have. Except to be sure that the beams are attached to the posts strong enough.
We nailed the posts to existing studs, and nailed 2x4 cats to attach the post
to the beam. We have one post which is somewhat open. For this post, we
installed two steel plates (one on each side). We drilled 4 holes (2 through
the beam and two through the post). We then BOLTED the steel plates to the post
and beam. Where the beam point loads front-to-back beam, we again BOLTED a steel
bracket to the front-to-back beam. We then set the other beam in the bracket
and again BOLTED the beam.
So, some things to look for are how the beams and posts are connected. There
probably had to be some wiring changed, so check how this was done. There was
also probably some steam piping which had to be changed (at least for us).
We found both steam pipes and power going through one of the walls we removed.
The plaster would have probably cracked when the beams were installed. In
order to install our beams, we had to do some serious lifting. It seems that
over the 90 years, the load bearing wall had allowed the floor above to settle
some. I also sistered 2x6s to the existing floor joists to help stiffen the
upstairs floor. The little bit of creaking totally disappeared after that.
You can also check in the basement to see where the posts were placed. They
should be right over the main supports. If not, verify that they can handle
the load of the house.
I can tell you more about what we did, if you want.
Ed..
|
305.51 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | Reality is a cosmic hunch | Thu Mar 21 1991 07:48 | 8 |
| Permits are definitely required for this type of stuff. You should be
able to go to the town building department and pull the permit and may
even be able to look at the plans of what was done. I know that when I
removed a portion of the main load bearing wall in my house I had to
make a set of plans showing what work was to be done, the support
points, beam sizes etc. and leave them on file.
George
|
305.52 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 21 1991 08:32 | 8 |
| Thanks for the info. I did get some more info from the realtor.
Apparently the seller's father-in-law did the work. He's been a
contractor for over 50 years. It doesn't sound like a permit was taken
out. There was some handwaving too over whether or not it was a
loadbearing wall which was removed.
We did some more thinking and decided that the house is just too small,
so we aren't going to pursue it any further.
|
305.95 | Building Permits B4 the B.O.H. | HDLITE::SPECHT | | Mon Mar 25 1991 16:00 | 12 |
| Quick question on building permits ...
What building permits go the board of health for review? I know that
if you add bedrooms in a proposed renovation or addition the b.o.h.
will need to review the permit before it is ok'ed, but how about simple
expansions or renovations where the number of bedrooms is not
increased? And what criteria do they use in their review.
Thanks,
Jodi
(Central Mass)
|
305.96 | | TOKLAS::feldman | Larix decidua, var. decify | Mon Mar 25 1991 16:58 | 9 |
| The building inspector may, as a matter of protocol, send copies of all permits
to all departments. However, I don't believe the Board of Health will have
any say over the construction unless you're adding bedrooms, bathrooms, or they
already know of problems with your septic system. If they know that you
have a system on the verge of failing, or else an antiquated system such as
a cesspool, it's possible (but not necessarily the case) that local
rules may require you to update the system along with any renovations.
Gary
|
305.97 | maybe... | ROYALT::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Mon Mar 25 1991 17:40 | 11 |
| We have a three-bedroom Cape which was originally built as a
three-bedroom cape. The last owner turned the downstairs bedroom into
a dining room, making it a two-bedroom Cape. We have just nearly
completed adding a third bedroom, making it a three-bedroom Cape
again.
Even though our septic system was designed for three bedrooms, we
had to have it inspected before we could put up the addition. It had
to meet the current requirements for a three-bedroom. I live in Stow,
MA, and I'm sure every town is different.
--tom
|
305.98 | What is the policy and who makes it? | HDLITE::SPECHT | | Wed Mar 27 1991 09:18 | 19 |
|
My understanding is that the septic system is in support of x bedrooms
- not x baths or square footage... based on the fact that what is
supported is based on the number of people inputing to the system, not
how many places they can input from.
How is a system defined as needing updating? If it was installed prior
to what - 1976(?) then it is not title V. - Does that make it
"antiquated" and needing updating? Even it is functioning?
I am having a hard time putting a finger on exactly what criteria is
used to determine (a) when the board of health has right-to-review/deny
a permit and (b) what specific criteria they use to make their
determination as to approval/denial of the building permit.
Does the b.o.h. also review "repair only" building permit applications?
jodi
|
305.99 | Repair = new code applies. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Wed Mar 27 1991 10:40 | 11 |
| Any time a repair includes part of the septic system, the repair must
conform to current code requirements. Yes the system is sized
according to the number of bedrooms and baths. There was a change, I
believe in 1984 or 1986 which increased the basic size of the system.
The earlier code required a tank to be sized starting with 500 Gals
plus some factor of bedrooms and baths. The result was usually a
500-750gal tank for 1-2 bedroom homes. This was increased so that the
typical size is now 1000-1500 gal. I don't have the exact numbers with
me at the moment but I can get them from the code book.
Dan
|
305.100 | BOH for addition/not me | CSDNET::DICASTRO | Quantity time! | Mon Apr 01 1991 16:58 | 10 |
| re.0
We recently added over 1000 sq. ft. including a bedroon, and 1/2 bath.
I was the GC, and applied for all permits, and did all the interfacing
w/ city hall. Never had to deal w/ Board of Health at all. And I live
in Central MA. However I do not know if the Building inspector had
to notify them or not, I certainly did not have to.
FYI/Bob
|
305.53 | After-the-Fact Building Permit(s)? | WMOIS::FERRARI_G | | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:19 | 22 |
| Time to re-open this note....
5 years ago we bought an older (75 years) house in Athol, MA. The
previous owners (elderly) had vintage 1950 everything. A lot of work
went into it. I had contractors do some things, and I did the rest.
Well, recently there was a memo in the paper reminding people that
permits are necessary for most everything, especially swimming pools
in excess of 4,000 gallons. Well, I was thinking about the things I've
done without a permit: Rewired the entired house, installed a 24'
above ground pool, a 2-floor deck (approximately 26 x 12), amongst
numerous other things that _probably_ required a permit. (The pool
and deck can't be seen from the street). My taxes/valuation for taxes
haven't increased enough to reflect the work. In addition, I've
refinanced a couple of times and saw slight increases in the valuation
(keeping in mind the current housing market).
Anyway, should I get an "after-the-fact" permit, or just live with it,
and deal with it when (and if) the time comes? Pros/Cons?
Gene
|
305.54 | not worth the possible hassle | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:47 | 16 |
| No. Don't tell them now.
A building permit is closed when the work is inspected and signed off.
For certain types of work that may mean re-opening things and fixing
them, etc. Inspectors are known to be subjective and spiteful.
Also, you may be in for penalties. I know when I inquired about a
buying a house that had been "improved" in Lexington, that they would
levy 3x normal fees if a post-fact permit was pulled to fix something
wrong.
There do exist grandfather clauses for "existing conditions" and there
is a sort of "statue of limitations".
Just be careful in the future.
Dave.
|
305.55 | | SSGV02::ANDERSEN | Figures lie and liars figure. | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:49 | 4 |
|
Well, you could apply for the after the fact permits and potentially
still be fined or let a sleeping dog lie.
|
305.56 | Now who did that??? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon Jul 19 1993 11:05 | 8 |
|
"OH, its been this way as long as I can remember!".........
When the go around again to do a revaluation, they'll
be more that happy to get more tax money.:)
|
305.57 | | DANGER::ASKETH | | Mon Jul 19 1993 15:24 | 20 |
| The woman I jsut bought a house from had a deck put on in OCt 1990 without a
permit. When the plot plan was done for the bank it was determined that the
deck was 7" (yes, 7") too close to the lot line. Title insurance covered the
bank so they said they'd let it go. My title insurance wouldn't cover it
though. My lawyer made all sorts of phone calls. I could (a) leave it like it
is and in 10 years or something it would be ok cause it'd been there that long
wtih no complaint, (b) cut off the 7" (it's more of a platform than a deck, 8"
high or so, so it's not as big a deal as it sounds), have it resurveyed and get
a building permit issued (this was agreed to by the building inspector and in
fact, the surveyors said they'd be the go between) and get $200 from the seller
to cover the costs, (c) just leave it and deal with it when I sell the house if
that's less than 10, or whatever the number was, years from now, or (d) have the
seller fix it. I first opted for d until I found out she was just gonna have
someone cut off the required amount and not finish it off again or make it
symmetrical (it's an angle cut due to the lot line being at an angle). I ended
up doing the work with help from a friend and am waiting to hear back from the
surveyors. There are no fines involved. THe permit is $25. The material (a
new header board) was $8. The surveyors trips to check it out should be around
$60. It was a pain to do the work but it's over and done with now and I don't
have to worry about it years down the road.
|
305.58 | Another tax... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Thu Jul 22 1993 01:03 | 10 |
| I was told by an inspector that I could not start any work
until a permit was issued or the permit cost would be doubled.
The `intent' of the inspection is to make sure things are safe
(to code). Problem is, you pay for the permit and then they'll
boost your property taxes to reflect the increased property
value.
If you do a job without a permit, don't get caught. If they
question any `existing' improvements, "It was like that when I
bought the house."
Tim
|
305.59 | got permit but no one ever came to inspect | KAHALA::PALUBINSKAS | | Fri Jul 23 1993 10:48 | 5 |
| I just had an in-ground pool installed, had to obtain building permit
before contractor could start work. No one from the city ever came to
inspect...not sure what the purpose of the permit really is. I think
it is just another way for the city to get money.
|
305.60 | use MA-Bell | 20438::MCCARTHY | COMPUTER: end simulation | Fri Jul 23 1993 11:22 | 7 |
| re: .48
I assume you or the contractor called the town saying you were ready for an
inspection.
bjm - who like to be on the good side of all inspectors - they can make your
life hell!
|
305.61 | inspector | KAHALA::PALUBINSKAS | | Fri Jul 23 1993 12:30 | 4 |
| geez...I did not realize it was my responsibility. On the permit was
the inspector who was responsible for inspection, I just assumed it was
their job to contact me.
|
305.62 | multiple inspections for pools (Merrimack) | MILORD::BISHOP | A way in the desert and streams in the wasteland | Fri Jul 23 1993 12:54 | 20 |
| When we had our pool put in, we had to get the permit and display it
all through construction (it was nailed to a convenient tree).
Once the hole was dug, the walls erected the concrete skirt poured
and the initial wiring done (especially the ground), then we had a
first inspection.
After that, the sides were backfilled, the concrete surround poured,
the liner and water put in, the electrics finished off. I then called
the inspector back for the second inspection. He found two problems.
One with the wiring, simply corrected by the contractor, the second
was the fence. I'd put a temporary one around while the work was done
and wanted to leave it that way until spring (it was then November).
He said I must put the proper permanent fence up immediately, he
wouldn't sign off until that was done.
Imagine erecting a fence and installing a gate during December, with
the temperature at 10-15�F. Miserable. :-(.
- Richard.
|
305.63 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Jul 23 1993 15:27 | 5 |
| Re: .48
Did you call the inspector when the work was done?
Marc H.
|
305.64 | no inspector | KAHALA::PALUBINSKAS | | Wed Jul 28 1993 11:40 | 4 |
| No, I did not call, I guess I just assumed it was the contractors
responsibility...the pool is in, the electrical work completed ...don't
think it is necessary to call inspector now.
|
305.65 | better to have you contact them then the other way around | TLE::MCCARTHY | COMPUTER: end simulation | Wed Jul 28 1993 13:19 | 5 |
| Don't know what town you are in but they may just find out that the permit was
never closed out and then pay you a visit anyway. I'd call and ask (playing
dumb).
Brian
|
305.66 | call forward! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon Aug 02 1993 14:09 | 4 |
|
You might want to call and find out if its still open.....
JD
|
305.101 | - How about only one permit for the job ? | PCBUOA::ERSKINE | | Mon Jan 23 1995 13:20 | 15 |
|
We just purchased a 2-family house, and will be remodeling the kitchens
and baths. We have done this type of work before, (plumbing/wiring/
carpentry) however, we are thinking of using a plumber to save some
time. He insists on pulling a permit.
Here is my question...(this is in Arlington/MASS)...can he pull a
permit, and have the inspection done, and we do the wiring later ?
OR, is the inspector going to expect to see wiring at the same time,
or check with his elec. inspector buddies about the house, etc.
Is it risky to not enlist an electrician if we are going to use a
plumber who pulls a permit ?
rke
|
305.102 | risky in what way? | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Disabled Service Button | Mon Jan 23 1995 17:13 | 31 |
| Any permit is going to let the town know that you are doing work.
In MA (at least in the south shore) when remodeling is concerned the plumbing
and electrical inspection could be totally seperate - usually because the
plumbers hate to be around when the electrians are there (just kidding) but the
plumber won't like it if the electrical work is done first.
>> Here is my question...(this is in Arlington/MASS)...can he pull a
>> permit, and have the inspection done, and we do the wiring later ?
Sure.
>> OR, is the inspector going to expect to see wiring at the same time,
>> or check with his elec. inspector buddies about the house, etc.
Most likly - depends on how much you rip apart.
>> Is it risky to not enlist an electrician if we are going to use a
>> plumber who pulls a permit ?
Risky in what way? That you will "get caught"? Yes its risky.
I know you are not supposed to do your own plumbing in MA but I have forgotten
if you can still do your own electrical work. I think its left up to the town
you are in. I have done work in Arlington but it was a long time ago (10+
years) and I think I recall the inspector being a pain in the butt - he may be
gone by now.... not of any work I did, just said several times "I would have
done it this way" to several things...
bjm
|
305.103 | Should I get a building permit or not? | AKOCOA::ORTIZ | | Thu May 11 1995 17:24 | 14 |
|
I Need advice on what to do about a permit for a three season
porch. I would like to enclose the three season porch and
convert it to a family room. The door opening is already there and
I would like to add a few windows, new wiring, ceiling fan and skylights.
I don't believe we need to move any walls, or beams. Should I go to
the town hall and get a permit or what will happen if I do all that
work without a permit and the inspector gets notified. I would like
to hear any suggestions. I live in Maynard. Anyone from Maynard who
done this without permits??
Thanks
Gloria
|
305.104 | Wiring Permit | BUSY::CLEMENT | Smells like Nirvana | Fri May 12 1995 09:48 | 17 |
| I did this about 6 years ago in Milford MA. I thought I could just
build up the half height walls, as it turned out there was so much rot
from water and carpenter ants I had to gut the whole thing. All that
remained was the concrete slab and the roof.
I did get a permit, but it was only a wiring permit. I did have to get
a building permit for the attached deck I was building and the shed
which I was also building at the same time. But all I needed was the
wiring permit for the room itself.
Every town and inspector probably has different rules.
BTW, I always get permits when it comes to major wiring jobs because I
do not want to risk an insurance company denying a claim should a fire
start.
Mark
|
305.105 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri May 12 1995 15:28 | 2 |
| Call town hall and ask them. Between the wiring and the modifications
to the roof, I would expect you would need some kind of permit(s).
|
305.106 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri May 12 1995 15:49 | 2 |
| I think the base noter was asking not whether a permit is legally required
but what's the risk of not getting one.
|
305.107 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Mon May 15 1995 14:26 | 2 |
| I guess that depends on whether or not you can persuade the inspector
not to report your lapse.
|
305.114 | Building permits, specific questions? | DIODE::CROWELL | Jon Crowell | Sat Jul 01 1995 22:33 | 22 |
|
What work requires a building permit in Boston. It's unclear
from the notes other than:
-Electrical work
-Plumbing work
-Changing the structure
Do you need a permit for:
-Stripping wallpaper and repainting?
-Putting down 1/4" plywood and adding a new ceramic floor?
-Replacing windows with do-it-yourself install kind?
-Putting up sheetrock to cover the walls of my kitchen
and repainting?
-Hooking up my new gas stove which may just be screwing in
the flexible gas pipe?
Thanks,
Jon
|
305.115 | None of the things you listed | TLE::PERARO | | Wed Jul 05 1995 10:42 | 6 |
|
I believe the items you listed do not require a permit. Wallpapering,
flooring, etc. do not require you to get a building permit.
MEP
|
305.116 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Wed Jul 05 1995 12:36 | 5 |
| . . . however, I wouldn't be a bit surprised that they'd be happy to "sell"
you one anyway, if you asked.
:^)
|
305.117 | "Man didn't have the right forms!" | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jul 05 1995 13:14 | 4 |
| "This is a plumbing permit with the word 'plumbing' crossed out and
'wallpapering' written in in crayon!"
Steve
|
305.118 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Reformatted to fit your screen | Wed Jul 05 1995 13:39 | 2 |
| Isn't hooking up a gas appliance forbidden in the PRM without the
skilled assistance of a licensed practitioner i.e. a plumber?
|
305.119 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jul 05 1995 13:42 | 1 |
| Why not call up the authorities and ask? 635-5306 might be the number.
|
305.120 | Fences?? | HDECAD::MICHAUD | Think about software that thinks! | Mon Jul 10 1995 13:46 | 4 |
|
What about fencing? Does this require a permit?
John
|
305.121 | Call your Town Hall/Building Inspector | PASTA::DEMERS | | Mon Jul 10 1995 14:00 | 3 |
| Varies by town. While I don't need a permit to erect a fence, the town
by-laws do stipulate some "look and feel" things like min. height
around a pool, etc.
|
305.122 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Jul 10 1995 14:45 | 1 |
| I think most places require a permit if the fence is over a certain height.
|
305.123 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Mon Jul 10 1995 15:07 | 19 |
| And... If you live in Auburn Mass. even a tree house needs a
building permit as one sad sole has discovered!
Although after reading several of the articles of this on going
story, it sounds like there's more than meets the eye here.
This guy started to build a tree house for his son and his
girl friend's son, who are both autistic. The tree house was
suppose to be a special get away for the two boys since they
don't have too many playmates at the local park.
The building inspector stopped by and slapped a stop work order on
the struction and now begins the fun...
The guy is a former building contractor and a former assitant
building inspector in town and is now butting heads with the
current building inspector in the town.
Charly
|
305.108 | what inspector? | TLE::WENDYL::BLATT | | Fri Aug 04 1995 15:32 | 32 |
| If you don't get a permit, there's nothing to be inspected, right?
I have friends who will be selling their house in the next several
months. The husband (also known as "Mr. Project Man") has done
lots of work over 17 years, including electrical, plumbing, structural.
They are wondering now if they are going to get "caught" and face the
possibility of having to rectify the lack of several building permits
never pulled.
I'm wondering who cares --
o The buyer's bank? -- they do appraisal for market value. I don't
see where they would be motivated to check building permits.
o The buyer's home inspector (if any) -- he might find something
not built to code that needs correcting, but still there's no
legal connection between Mr. Project Man and the "permit-police".
o The sharp buyer? -- he or she may make inquiries and find out
that there were no permits pulled. So what? Maybe the
house came that way. Don't like it? don't buy it.
o The tax assessor? Although not involved in the buy/sell transaction,
at some point the assessor may figure out that a new bathroom
got built and wonder why the building dept. didn't tell them about
it at permit time (I'm sure the two departments work closely together
so the tax dept can get extra $$ as soon as possible).
Does the tax man notify the permit-police? And if so, Mr. and Mrs.
Project Man may be out of state by then.
|
305.109 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Aug 04 1995 16:21 | 6 |
| The tax assessor is likely to look for permits for features not present on the
last assessment.
The sharp buyer might use lack of permits as a negotiation point.
Steve
|
305.110 | denial of insurance? | JOKUR::FALKOF | | Fri Aug 04 1995 16:35 | 5 |
| wouldn't there be an issue at a later date if there were some damage
and an insurance claim and subsequent investigation? To me, this
becomes something to be wary of, if a project did not conform to code
or was somehow overlooked.
|
305.111 | Urban myth?? | 11581::BWHITE | | Fri Aug 04 1995 16:53 | 20 |
| I havent scanned the file for this, but I have never heard of an actual
case that involved what .7 said, where an insurance claim was denied
because permits were not pulled or where work was not up to code in a
residential dwelling. I once scanned my homeowner's policy, and saw no
mention of this either. Anyone have a concrete example, or is this
another urban myth??
As far as the original question goes, an additional room or bath would
probably show up if a complete assessment was done (interior - many
assessments are drivebys). I would think whether or not somehow that
got back to the building inspector would depend on a lot of factors
(size of town, relations between assessors office and bldg. inspector,
etc.) I doubt if remodling projects would trigger anything, even if
the remodling required re-wiring, plumbing, etc. The only actual cases
I have really seen along this line is when structures have been added
and dont conform to zoning (shed, pool, additional room too close to
property lines). Some of these have been pretty hard line, i.e. remove
it. Probabaly most other permit disputes could be worked out without
too much hassle, expecailly if you were the new owner and the non
permit work was done before you arrived. Just my 2 cents....
|
305.112 | If I were an insurance company | ROCK::MUELLER | | Tue Aug 08 1995 11:39 | 8 |
| If I were an insurance company, and a home burned to the ground due to faulty
wiring which was done by Mr. Fix It and was never properly inspected, I would
certainly NOT cover the loss! That's why we have laws that say you have to have
certain things inspected by a professional.
Just my opinion
Rob
|
305.113 | There are too many laws and too many lawyerrs | LUDWIG::CASSIDY | Tim Cassidy, #365 | Wed Aug 09 1995 23:13 | 10 |
| >certainly NOT cover the loss! That's why we have laws that say you have to have
>certain things inspected by a professional.
That and the fact that revenues are earned by the issuing of
permits. And the fact that you will most likely have to hire an
electrician or a plumber, etc., to perform the work at >$25.00 an
hour, plus their marked up cost of materials.
I smell a rat-hole... so I'll stop.
tim
|