T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
308.1 | It's your money.... | SSVAX::SARAO | The ZIP | Thu May 22 1986 14:01 | 13 |
| Be sure that you go with him through every nook and cranny of the house. I had
my current house inspected by ASTRA and they missed that the cellar walls
oozed water when there is a torrential rainstorm of 2-3 days (which doesn't
happen very often). Make sure you ask questions, because like Bill Cosby says
on the E.F. Hutton commercial....It's my money.
Robert
Helpful hint: Bring a small level with you and put it on the main beam in the
house, because if that is not level...Nothing is level. Also bring a marble
or other small hard ball put it on the high side of a floor you think is not
level. This is a very dramatic technique that drives realtors crazy.
|
308.2 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Thu May 22 1986 16:43 | 4 |
| ...I absolutely LOVE the idea of the marble! Just the thing to
make a realtor think about getting an honest job.
Steve
|
308.3 | More comments on 'Inspecting" | HARRY::RILEY | | Fri May 23 1986 09:47 | 38 |
| I 've had one other old house (ca. 1900) that was not inspected.
The 'superficial' defects were obvious (Old furnace, needed
roofing, yard was a mess (gone wild), interior not done in 20 years.
I had a house in Baldwinville inspected, and the inspector pointed
out the potential leakage problems where the lower kitchen roof
joined the main house, non_standard cab's in kitchen, non_code
wiring, non_code plumbing, evidence of a 'torch' used on plastic
pipes, bad sills (approx. 60% support left) .. not critical,
but would need replacing, what's under the plastic sheathing (could
be dry rot, hidden structural damage, hidden fire damage, etc.)
Foundation cracks needed repairs (minor), wood chimney could
be 'refaced', but not necessary, roof condition, leaks (the current
owner used the cellar for drying wood .. nice sign of a dry cellar),
Ask questions about anything you are not 100% certain about, including
estimates/time to repair. FOr some states, how much Lead Paint is
used in interior (if you have a young child .. under 5 I think)
that need to be REMOVED or covered.
CHimney .. pLanning in a wood stove ? It might have to be relined
at a cost of $900- 3500 depending on size.
There's lots of help in this file . just gotta take th etime to
read, and take pointers to your library of WHAT to look up.
There are mny books on HOW TO BUY AN OLD HOUSE, and on remodelling
older homes (As well as restoration). Whether or not you want to
restore/remofel is immaterial. THe dialogue shows WHAT is to be
changed, why it is desireable for some to change it, and How to
fix existing problems. Indirectly, it shows what to look for, if
you DON'T want to remodel (shows by implication).
[end]
|
308.25 | RESALE AND INSPECTIONS? | DSTAR::SMICK | Van Smick | Tue Dec 16 1986 08:39 | 14 |
| Note 650.3 got me thinking about resale and inspections:
What inspections are required when one resells a house?
For instance, if I live in one of the towns which requires a licensed
electrician to do all wiring, and I do some wiring myself -- say
a bunch of lights and electrical outlets in an unfinished basement
-- what problems are likely when I go to sell my house. Let's assume
that the job LOOKS professional, but there was no permit or
inspections.
Any thoughts from those of you who "have gone before"?
|
308.26 | According to codes, no problem... | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Tue Dec 16 1986 09:29 | 13 |
| Evrything thing I have been told (including by my building inspector)
says that unless the additional wiring is ENORMOUS, it will
make NO DIFFERENCE who did it. As long as it is done in adherence
to the local codes, no problem. I infact did my whole first
floor, (Which I finished myself recently) and am very
confident I will have no problems.
(I do admit that my town is a little more lean on this type of
thing...)
M
|
308.27 | Only Smoke detectors needed in MA | KELVIN::RPALMER | Handyman in Training | Tue Dec 16 1986 09:41 | 18 |
|
I think in MA the only inspection required when you sell/buy
a house is a certificate from the fire dept stating that there is
a smoke detector on each floor and that it is in working order.
All other items are buyer beware. The plumbing for my kitchen sink
was a real botch job. It was a combination cast iron, lead, pvc
line with tape wrapped around the joints. When the plumbing inspector
came to look at my new gas line he asked me if I was responsible
for the mess. I just told him it came with the house and he left
it as that. His only comment was that I really should get it fixed.
I know that if you do wiring without an inspection and it causes
the house to burn down, the insurance company does not have to pay
IF they can prove it was related to the uninspected wiring. I wonder
what happens if someone does uninspected wiring, sells their house
and THEN it burns down? Isn't their a clause in most sales contracts
that state the the house is sold with no guarantees?
=Ralph=
|
308.28 | the bank sometimes requires | HARPO::B_HENRY | Bill Henry | Tue Dec 16 1986 13:03 | 22 |
| re: required inspections
When I bought my house a year ago the only required inspection
was for fire detectors. If I had any children under 5 then there
would have been lead paint. If I remember correctly, the bank
required a statement of my acceptance of the septic system. If
the house had a well they would have required the water tested.
They tried to make me get it tested anyway but I refused to pay
for a test of town water. They gave up. Any other inspections
are subject to the requirements of a particular bank and their
impression of their risk involved in you buying the house with their
money. I have heard of a case where the bank wanted to see the
inspection certificate on a gas hot water heater that was installed
10 years before the house went up for sale. Any other inspections
are usually spelled out in the purchase and sales agreement.
Bottom line, any work you do youself without getting inspected might
come back and get you when you go to sell the house IF the prospective
buyer and their bank for whatever reason feel it's necessary.
Bill
|
308.29 | Septic Inspection | PUNK::SUNG | Merry Xway | Tue Dec 16 1986 14:06 | 9 |
| Lately, some banks have been requesting septic system inspections
and certification. These are usually a real pain in the neck
since you have to locate the lid, dig up the seller's lawn, and
hold your breath. And of course the seller is not very happy
to end up with a ripped up lawn. The certification must be
made by a licensed septic company or home inspector for about
$45.
-al
|
308.30 | Another inspection | FDCV13::SANDSTROM | | Wed Dec 17 1986 08:54 | 15 |
|
Another inspection that may be required by the bank is one for
a wood or coal stove. Either the fire dept or building inspector,
whomever is designated in that town, comes out to make sure it's
properly installed, has the right amount of clearance on all sides,
is on the right kind hearth, etc.
We don't have any children, so when we bought our house last
year we didn't have to get a lead paint inspection, but we were
required to sign a lead paint waiver...no suing the previous owner
should we ever have little ones and they take to munching on the
wood.
Conni
|
308.31 | permits required??? | SVCRUS::KROLL | | Mon Dec 29 1986 22:07 | 10 |
| The state of Mass gave me a surprise. In California they require
every house sold to have building permits for each room, plumbing,
and electrical. does not matter who does it, only that it has a
permit for it. If you assume the loan this does not apply untill
the building inspector comes out for something else and then fines
you for it. I went to the local city hall and they had every plan
and permit in a file.
Lo and behold I go to the local city hall in Mass and they say
what file?? Now I know how I got a house that has no sill in places
and some things have no support.
|
308.32 | different strokes for different states | FSTVAX::FOSTER | Frank Foster -- Cincinnati Kid | Tue Dec 30 1986 08:05 | 8 |
| > The state of Mass gave me a surprise. In California they require
> every house sold to have building permits for each room, plumbing,
> and electrical.
Based on my (somewhat limited) experience, I would say that California
is the exception, not the rule.
Frank
|
308.33 | Not required-- But should be. | SCFAC::CHANG | | Mon Jan 05 1987 16:25 | 47 |
|
I Live in California, and am currently buying a house. The house
has a bathroom in the garage that we are not sure is original
construction. So we went to Sunnyvale City Hall to search out all
permits for this particular house. The only permit on record is
the original building construction permit. We then asked the City
Inspector what happens if we requested an Inspection of this house
we are about to buy. He said that first of all the owner has to
request the inspection and if everything passes (Electrical,
Mechanical, Plumbing) then an Occupancy Permit will be issued.
However one can not only request an Electrical Inspection unless
one is doing major Electrical work. Sunnyvale is very insistent
on Inspecting every house in Sunnyvale eventually.
So we asked our realator if we could get the sellers to request
a City Inspection -- at our expense. The seller said ABSOLUTELY
NOT! As it turns out if one gets the city involved it is a BIG
headache. If the city inspector finds anything NOT to code he can
not issue the permit, require that the owner to bring the fault
up to code, and charge a penalty fee. The key here is that the
owner HAS to fix the fault. So we could back out of the sell and
the owner is still required to fix it.
This has resulted in a lot of houses in Sunnyvale that have a lot
of work done (wiring, remodeling, plumbing, etc.) that do not have
permits. Once a change is made to a house without a permit it is
unlikely that any future owners will call in a city inspector to
inspect any new work done, because he will also inspect all work
that does not appear to be original. This could cost the owner
alot of bucks and headaches.
Fortuneately our bathroom seems to be to code (says a liscensed
property inspector) and the rest of the house is fairly virgin.
When we do some major electrical work on it we will call in the
city inspector and try to get the Occupancy Permit. Having this
piece of paper will help us to assure any future buyers and protect
us from law suits in case anything goes wrong.
Hope this was informative. That's how it is in California (Sunnyvale
anyway). I think that for safty's sake it is important that any
work done should meet current building codes, whether a permit is
issued on the work or not. Having the permit certainly helps when
one goes to re-sell the house in the furture. It would have made
us as buyers feel alot better about buying the house.
-Gina
|
308.34 | What to make sure the Home Inspector Does | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Fri Feb 06 1987 22:43 | 13 |
| Since I'm shortly to have one myself, I've been reading with interest
all the various notes on home inspections. I though it would be
useful to collect in one note: "What to make sure the home inspector
checks": Things like
Real # of amps of electrical service (not just the panel label)?
Defective humidifer rusting furnace?
etc - any thoughts on "what my home inspector checked and I wouldn't
have though of but I'm glad he did". My feeling is that even the
best inspector can have an off day, but if I can make sure he looks at
everything, I'm more likely to not have any surprises later.
|
308.35 | A couple suggestions | HOMBRE::DIGRAZIA | | Sun Feb 08 1987 23:33 | 15 |
|
When I sold a house a few years ago, the buyers' bank's inspector
operated the dishwasher, so you might ask whether yours will test
the appliances.
You might also have him note the ages of the house's machinery.
Second-hand appliances, furnaces, pumps, etc., can be installed
in new or newly renovated houses.
Also in your long checklist, see about including a note on who
did the wiring, plumbing, and significant improvements. Probe
for code violations.
Get a statement on how much water accumulates or passes through
the basement at various times of the year.
|
308.36 | check the permits | KELVIN::RPALMER | Half a bubble off plumb | Mon Feb 09 1987 08:40 | 8 |
|
Follow him around to keep him honest. It is also a good way
to learn about your house. Bring in a friend who knows about houses
and let him snoop around. The more people looking, the better.
Another good idea is to go to the town hall and research the
building permits. If you see new work with no permits taken out,
look very carefully at that area.
=Ralph=
|
308.37 | | 3363::MORGAN | Did Adam and Eve have navels? | Mon Feb 09 1987 16:35 | 18 |
| I learned a lot about my house at the time of the inspection, so
I agree that you should walk around with the inspector. He missed
only minor things during the inspection, but one that wasn't so
minor was this:
o Check all baseboard heaters (or other types) to make sure
that they are in working order.
He turned on the heat to make sure it went on, but didn't go
around and feel the baseboard heaters to make sure they work.
One of them didn't.
-- Jim
P.S. Do you need a "list of things to check"? I still have mine
and can make a copy for you ... What one person typically checks
might not be what everybody checks. Mine tested at least two
outlets in every room and all appliances, for example.
|
308.38 | a thorough septic-system check | KANE::PAHIGIAN | | Mon Feb 09 1987 17:20 | 18 |
| Make sure when the inspector checks the septic system (if applicable) that he
verifies not only that the water goes down the drains but also that the water
goes into the holding tank (he'll need to locate the cap and remove it to do
this).
My experience was that during some recent remodeling, my contractor found that
the pipe from the house to the tank was cracked, so he replaced it. A month
later I found my leach field was dead and probably had been for quite a
while. The waste was never making it to the tank in the first place, so it
looked as though everything was fine until that pipe was replaced.
Not only did I have to replace the leach bed, but I also had to relocate the
entire system to the other side of the house to comply with new regulations
that had not been in effect at the time the original system had been built.
- craig
|
308.39 | Oh yeah! Be sure inspector is licensed! | THE780::CHANG | TheFaceOfADragonFlyIsNothingButEyes! | Wed Feb 11 1987 14:14 | 42 |
|
.2 made a very good point! Do go do a search yourself on any permits
that may exist for your house. (Or may not exist!) The house we
are buying has a 1/2 bath in the garage. We thought what an odd
place to put a 1/2 bath! The seller told us that the bathroom was
part of the original building plan. We were skeptical. When we looked
for the permits for the bathroom there weren't any. The bank also had
a problem with this bathroom not having permits. We finally located
the original owner who confirmed that the bathroom was part of the
original house and we asked them to write a letter stating that
fact. The property inspector found nothing wrong with the bathroom
and felt that it would meet the building codes, but he was not sure
about whether it was original or not either.
We had a very competent building inspector. It helps if you are
able to go through the house yourself before he comes and point
out to him things that you may be concerned with. Then follow him
around the house and get into all those nooks and cracks with him
ask any questions you might have. It is one of the most educational
things you will ever do. We were alerted to a couple things by
our inspector such as aesbestos insulation wrapped around the heating
duct work, a crack combustion chamber in the gas furnace (the seller
has since replaced the furnace), some existing electrical code
violations.
The next thing to remember is to CAREFULLY read the report when
you get it. That report (at least in California) is used legally to
alert the seller to anything he may have to correct before the sell
can take place. There were some discrepancies between what the
inspector TOLD us and what was IN THE REPORT. We had the inspector
come to the house again and either clarify with us the discrepancy
or change the report. After all it is your $200!
If you send me mail I can send you a very good check list of things
to look for and at before you buy a house. We got it from a book
written by a professional building inspector. It is one of the
most complete check lists we have seen yet. But it is still only
a guideline.
Hope this helps....
-Gina
|
308.40 | Contact the owners | DSSDEV::REINIG | August G. Reinig | Wed Feb 11 1987 17:11 | 11 |
| Before having the house inspected, inform the owners so that they can
be sure that everything is accessable. When I bought my house, the
water heater was inaccessable (behind some panelling) so the inspector
couldn't see it. Guess what I had to replace a couple of months
later. You also want to be sure that it's easy to get to the
attic. Emptying a closet of other people's stuff isn't fun.
Be sure he inspects all windows and doors for possible water entry
and rot.
August G. Reinig
|
308.52 | Inspecting a brand new house | CLT::ZEHNGUT | | Wed Jun 03 1987 13:12 | 20 |
| We're buying a brand new home, and we are going to have the "final
walk-through" inspection in a few days. I have read several notes in
REAL_ESTATE and HOME_WORK on house inspections, but I haven't read
anything about inspecting a brand new house. Many of the problems I've
read about (asbestos, old appliances, insect damage, etc.) don't apply
to a new house. Some of them do apply. I'd like to get a list of
things to do when inspecting a new house. So far I have:
Test all electrical outlets
Turn on the heat and test all baseboards
Turn on all the water at the same time
Test all the appliances
Look for unfinished finish-work
Any other suggestions?
Marc
Posted to HOME_WORK and REAL_ESTATE.
|
308.53 | | PARITY::SZABO | | Wed Jun 03 1987 15:01 | 14 |
| Look a little harder because there is a note on this with several
good replies, and the author of the note compiled a list as one
of the last replies! Very good info.
I recently bought a new home I would strongly suggest to have your
walk-through a week before closing. Write everything down, type
it out, and give a copy to the builder the next morning, or else
write it all down twice and give him the copy immediately, but still
formally document it. Hopefully, he'll get it all done before you
move in. In my case, everything was rushed so we could close in
time and we moved in before some things were done. It's been 6
weeks, and most still aren't done. I've heard this from others
too, and not just my builder. It happens a lot. I swear that once
they get their money, you've become low priority. Good luck!
|
308.54 | HOLD SOME MONEY BACK | CSMADM::MAY | IT'S LIKE THE SAME, ONLY DIFFERENT! | Wed Jun 03 1987 16:06 | 8 |
| If its not too late, ask to have some of the money held aside in
a bank account which doesn't go to the builder untill you have all
of the items on you list completed.
signed
person-who-still-has-a-long-list-after-10-months-and-is-taking-builder
to-court!!
|
308.55 | | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I need an 'AUX' for my stereo | Thu Jun 04 1987 10:06 | 9 |
| re: .2
I agree 100%. I didn't buy a 'new' house but there were things
on the P&S that were agreed to but not done by closing. My lawyer
withheld some of the money to ensure that these things would get
taken care of and sure enough, they did. Quickly I might add.
-Jim
|
308.56 | Hold a lot of money back | AKOV04::CONNAUGHTON | GIA/FS Information Services | Fri Jun 05 1987 13:19 | 9 |
| Hold as much money back as possible!
(And specify that if the work is not done by dd-mmm-yy that you get
the money back...)
We only had 2K withheld, and it still took almost 10 months to get
work done. I would have rather taken the money and paid a contractor
to finish the work.
P.S. Even if you think you have identified all the unfinished work,
some more will pop-up later.
Good luck,
|
308.57 | Check EVERYTHING carefully! | QBUS::FINK | Time for a Dandelion Break!! | Mon Jun 08 1987 12:21 | 37 |
|
We bought a new home last July. You have a good list so far,
but I have a few suggestions on things to look for:
1) Besides checking all electrcal outlets to make sure they
work, also check to make sure they are secured to the walls
well. We have a few that are very loose.
2) Check that all electric lights/appliances work!
3) If your house has a washer/dryer with it, (ours did), make
sure they are connected and ready to go. I had to hook
up the hoses etc. myself.
4) Make sure all appliances include manuals.
5) Check the grounds thoroughly! We have found a LOT of trash
buried just beneath the surface. (i.e. hood from a pick-up
truck, an old tire/rim, barbed wire, etc.) We're currently
trying to get the builder to clean it all out of there.
6) Open and close/lock all doors to make sure they function
properly.
7) Any shrubs/plants on property should look healthy, not
brown.
8) After we moved in, we found cigarette butts in closets,
cupboards, etc. Check for these.
That's about all I can think of for now. Will post more later
as I recall them.
-Rich
p.s. - Just out of curiousity, who's your builder??
|
308.58 | | CLT::ZEHNGUT | | Mon Jun 08 1987 13:35 | 13 |
| re: .5
The builder is Roddy Palmer. He seems to have a very good
reputation from everyone we've spoken with. So far the house seems
to be well-constructed, and all of his sub-contracters (lighting,
flooring) know their business very well.
Thanks to all for your suggestions. The "walk-thru" is tonite,
and I'll have my check-list handy...
Marc
|
308.59 | another Happy Home Owner, eh? | QBUS::FINK | Time for a Dandelion Break!! | Mon Jun 08 1987 14:41 | 10 |
|
One other thing to look for: Make sure all the windows work
properly. We've got a few that won't stay open. (So who thought
of checking windows? It was 100� on the day we closed. It was
a/c all the way...) :-)
Good luck!
-Rich
|
308.60 | don't forget to keep cool | PSTJTT::TABER | Reliefe is just a NEXT UNSEEN away | Mon Jun 08 1987 16:23 | 35 |
| Remember to keep your head during a walk-through inspection. Usually
the walk-through is a time of "gentleman's agreement." It's a rare
purchase and sales agreement that gives you much muscle in a
walk-through.
You and the builder make agreements on items that you could take them to
small claims court on anyway. Your only bargaining chips at that point
are usually small claims court (of less value than you might think) and
refusing to close. Items like outlets, light fixtures or appliances
that don't work are big and they know they'll have to fix them for anyone,
so they might as well fix them for you and save finding a new buyer.
Items like cigarette butts, appliance manuals, general clutter, etc. are
not big items. Will you really refuse to close over cigarette butts in
the corners? That sort of thing will degenerate into a contest of wills,
and I've seen closings go down over things like that, but who is the
winner? You lose your deposits. The builder has a house on their hands
(it can probably be sold for more now that the amount agreed on before
it was built but the delay hurts.)
I'm not saying don't ask for the manuals, or don't ask if they'll clean up
if you think the place is dirty. Just don't get your back up or try to
make it more important to yourself than it really is. Remember, you're
(assumedly) going to live there for a long time. You're going to have
to sweep the floors or wash the windows at least once before you sell
the place anyway, and being easy going on small items generates the good
will that makes sure the big items (if there are any) get attended to
properly and promptly.
And don't be afraid to go through the place and admit the guy did a good
job. And if they did a good job, say so. It's amazing the amount of
good will such a thing generates. A builder who does good work is very
proud of it, and a little recognition makes them real happy, and costs
you nothing.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
308.61 | Stay ahead of the builder!!! | HPSVAX::MANDALINCI | | Tue Nov 03 1987 10:33 | 23 |
| We recently bought a newly built home and had pretty good luck with
everything. Since the builder is also building a home on the
neighborhood, he cannot afford to leave things unfinished. We did
our "walk-thrus" from about a month before closing and questioned
anything as soon as we saw it. This is the advantage of a newly
built home because chances are you will be at the site very often.
If your builder doesn't seem to have a good answer for you ask the
name of the appripriate person. We had a problem with the shelves
in some of our cabinets and called the cabinet crew directly and
had all our questions answered completely and ended up satisfied.
If there are a number of homes going up together, as ours was, you
will find things like a shipment of screens all come in together
because it is more cost effective for the builder to buy in bulk
rather than one house at a time. We waited for 2 months for the
screens on the living room but I wasn't about to postpone the closing
over one room. If you can keep on top of the builder as they are
actually building, you will be better off. Give him/her lists as
you see things. Our builder loved getting the lists because he
now had a check list of things to do and could hand it off to one
of his helpers. Stay on top of him from the beginning and you
shouldn't have to many problems, you will avoid costly mistakes
and the builder will know you are serious about the end result
of the house.
|
308.4 | Structural Inspections Guaranteed? | PARITY::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Mon Nov 30 1987 11:43 | 27 |
| Structural Inspection Guaranteed?
I purchased a 3 year old ranch in Kingston, NH last month.
Before purchasing I had a structural inspection done which
did not indicate any problems with plumbing or roof leaks.
My problem:
During the rain yesterday, in combination with my wife taking a
shower, I noticed a small puddle of water on my basement floor.
looking up I found water seeping from the sub-floor that was
exposed in the basement stair well. About three feet from this
leak is the plumbing from the bathroom. Using a flashlight I
traced all the water and drain pipes and did not find any
moisture. The drain roof vent is also above this area. Since my
wife had just finished her shower I am not sure whether the
problem is the bathroom or a leaking roof vent flange and will
check the outside of the roof after the rain stops. My last
resort is going into the attic since it has blown in insulation
piled well above the rafters and I could not see any moisture
from the small attic opening.
My real question is can I hold the inspection company, or
previous owner, or original builder (don't know who he is)
responsible for correcting the problem? If so how should I
proceed?
-JFK- (a very discouraged new homeowner)
|
308.5 | SSTRUCTURAL INSPECTION GUARNATEE. | MRMFG1::J_BORZUMATO | | Mon Nov 30 1987 12:51 | 14 |
| your gonna spend more money chasing these folks to hold them
accountable for this leak, than it will cost to have fixed.
why:: in the case of the original owner, you'll probalby have
to prove they knew of the leak and lied about it. in the case
of the builder, you'll probably to prove they used unacceptable
building practices during construction, and knew a leak could
occur. as for the inspector, if this is the only "real bad"
thing that happens consider yourself lucky.
to find the """responsible person"""" look in the mirror.
it ain't worth pursuing,,,, best spend the time on the phone
and get someone to fix it. it may well be doing some damage
you'll dearly regret.
P.S. DON'T BOTHER READING THIS GET ON THE PHONE.
JIM.
|
308.6 | They take the money and disappear | PARITY::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Mon Nov 30 1987 13:16 | 12 |
| re: -.1
I guess I expected that answer. It's just that it bothers me
that this is exactly why I hired the inspector in the first
place. As to "go to the phone" I thought this was primarily a
DIY notes file! I am a little new at this but it appears to be
a good type of do it yourself project. The hardest part will
be locating the source of the leak, yes? Anyway I guess I will
have to struggle through the attic insulation and find the source
of the leak. If I run into trouble expect to hear from me again
under the appropriate notes topic for a solution.
-JFK-
|
308.7 | My Inspector Missed It, Too | DECWET::MCWILLIAMS | Brian @ DECwest, 206.865.8837 | Mon Nov 30 1987 17:42 | 20 |
| re: -.1
Must be contagious, but the same damned thing happened at my house this
weekend! I noticed water on the floor of the basement and, after removing
some sheetrock from the ceiling to expose some of the plumbing from the
bathroom above, decided the shower must be leaking somehow.
But I'm stumped on _which_ aspect of the shower plumbing is leaking. My view
of the mess is limited--I'm looking up at the tub from underneath. The tub
drain is definitely not leaking. The cold and hot water supply lines do not
seem to be wet, which leads me to believe the leak is downline of the faucets.
The leak presents itself in the form of a steady drip over one of the corners
of the tub, as though water is pooling somewhere back there and dripping
down.
What sorts of plumbing connections are typically in place in a shower with
a bypass valve for the tub? Where can/do leaks usually take place?
-Brian
|
308.8 | Cut a hole | GLIVET::RECKARD | Jon Reckard 264-7710 | Tue Dec 01 1987 07:47 | 13 |
| Re .7 - tub/shower leak
You'll probably have to cut the wall in back of the tub/shower plumbing to
see any leak, let alone fix it. Cut it in such a way that you can replace it
with a handy-dandy-just-a-few-sheet-rock-screws panel that can be removed again
at a later time, if necessary. Future DIY owners of your house will love you!
'Course, if the plumbing can only be accessed through the middle of your
bedroom wall or living room wall :-( I just did a similar wall removal. Mine
was, conveniently, under a stairway, in a cubby-hole kind of thing.
If you cut a major hole like this: 1. you'll be able to see things better -
maybe the hole you have now just doesn't allow the right angle for your
flashlight view, and 2. you'll have plenty of room for your torch and solder -
a small hole just isn't enough for two hands, a head and probably shoulders.
|
308.9 | Legal Contract? , and a real life experience | 15934::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Tue Dec 01 1987 08:09 | 12 |
| What if any legal contract exists when a home inspector certifies
that a house is OK? I had a friend who had a house pass inspection
only to find out 6 months later that the sill plates were rotted
and that it would cost $1500 to repair. He took the inspector to
small claims court and the initial judgment was in his favor for
the tune of $1500. However on appeal the award was reduced to
$250, the amount he paid the inspector in the first place.
Home inspections are a good thing but you can't expect them
to find every wart in two hours. Some things like sills should
be obvious but others can be real hard to find.
=Ralph=
|
308.10 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Dec 01 1987 09:11 | 5 |
| Re: .7
If I had to guess, I'd guess the water is leaking through the joint
between the tub and the wall, and has nothing to do with the actual
plumbing. Do you have tile? Check the grout between the tiles,
and especially between the tub and tiles.
|
308.11 | Water Water everywhere | ENUF::LANOUE | | Tue Dec 01 1987 10:35 | 13 |
| I had a similar problem in my house. We have a shower stall in
the master bedroom not a tub, after taking a shower the ceiling
showed a wet spot. After looking into the obvious i.e. leaking
door, calking around the stall etc. I cut the ceiling in the stair
well and found the leak to be coming from the DRAIN. What was stuff
up around the drain pipe was something that looked like steel wool
pads that after years of use had corroded. I pulled the drain pipie
out went to my local hardware store and fro ~$5.00 bought a rubber
replacement installed it and no more leaks. The had part came
repairing the ceiling.
Don
|
308.12 | home inspections | MRMFG1::J_BORZUMATO | | Tue Dec 01 1987 11:16 | 6 |
| i'll be more than glad to help, if you diy. i may have over-
stated the point, but you can't cout on the weather here.
if the job requires opening the roof or whatever, you may
not be ableto open and close given nasty weather.
jim
|
308.13 | Cure Worse Than The Disease? | DECWET::MCWILLIAMS | Brian @ DECwest, 206.865.8837 | Wed Dec 02 1987 23:18 | 21 |
| RE. .8 (cutting a hole in the wall to expose leaky shower plumbing)
Sounds gruesome, but I guess I have to do it, using the sheetrock panel
deal you suggested.
Problem is, the wall is a fairly conspicuous one. What's the best way to
minimize the "repair damage" when I cut into the wall?
-What's the best tool to cut with (I have lath & plaster walls)?
-Will I need to cut from one stud to another to have something to screw
the sheetrock panel into?
-Can anyone offer a drawing of what the plumbing configuration might look like
behind a shower with separate hot and cold taps and a diverter knob on the
tub spout?
Thanks,
brian
|
308.14 | Tub/shower connections | GLIVET::RECKARD | Jon Reckard 264-7710 | Thu Dec 03 1987 08:55 | 23 |
| Here's what I just installed. Yours may or may not be like this.
| | ^ to shower head
________| |________
|__O_____ O ____O___| <--- this straight piece had four female-threaded
| | | | | | holes to match fittings soldered onto
| | | | | | 3/8" copper pipe. The hot/cold connections
hot in v cold in face standard house water pressure - more so
^ to tub ^ than the tub faucet connection (and probably
faucet the shower head connection too). I'd look
the "O"s are the handles for here for a good soldered joint (sweat) and
hot, shower/tub and cold tight threaded fittings (teflon tape).
For my hole-in-the-wall, I set my skil saw depth to just cut through the
wall (I had panelling on studs) as close to the middle of a stud as possible.
This left part of the stud for the good, remaining wallboard, and part for my
panel. With lath-and-plaster it might be harder to find studs. And even when
you do, you have to risk sawing through the nails holding the laths. :-(
Be prepared for lots of plaster dust.
An alternative might be to cut just inside the studs, and nail onto the
studs 3/4" strapping for your panel, or otherwise make a frame to nail your
panel to.
Have fun!
|
308.15 | access to shower valve | MRMFG1::J_BORZUMATO | | Thu Dec 03 1987 11:40 | 25 |
| in .14, i'd agree with the drawing. most of these look like this.
however, the sabre trick is fine, but awfully messy. i have an
old house with lathe and plaster, believe me don't use one.
most of these have blowers to keep the cut line clear so you can
see it, and you'll have the dust in the house for months.
you say the wall is in a conspicious place. do you mean a hallway,
a bedroom wall, need to know where ??????. a leak is only one
reason you need access, someday you may have to replce the
fixture and have to do this again. keep in mind that the plumbing
also goes up to the shower head. so you amy need access to it
as well. the shower head also has a sweated joint just behind
the wall where the shower head protrudes. not knowing who installed
this, they may not have secured the copper pipe (actually you use
a bracket) these joints degrade when the shower head is moved
around. depending on where in the house you need to gain access,
you might consider a shadow box, (send mail if you need an explanation)
or maybe a door to nowhere, maybe a louvered door. the point
here is a reaccessable entrance, without having to bust thru
the wall again. let us know what you decide and we can
help on how best do get in there, and how to make it reaccessable.
jim.
|
308.16 | Inspection Guaranteed | PARITY::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Fri Dec 04 1987 16:20 | 42 |
| Sorry Mr. Moderator for getting this discussion on bathroom leaks
started under a home inspection topic. Not really the right
place; perhaps we should move this discussion elsewhere?
Anyway ... back to my original question: Is the inspection
guaranteed? Well I called the inspection agency and their reply
was "if it is something we missed then we feel responsible for
repairing the damage ... we will have the original inspector call
you back shortly."
The bad (good) news is that I can't reproduce the leak. The day
after I saw the leak it rained much harder and there was no sign
of moisture. I also took a very long shower and still could not
locate any moisture. Murphy's law strikes again. Between the
inspector and I the only thing we could come up with is that
my wife leaned against the plastic? tub enclosure which allowed the
enclosure to separate from the faucet. He said if I can reproduce
the leak he will send someone to fix it. (he walked the roof and
is confident that it is not the source of the leak)
I must admit that after the puddle dried up there was no sign of
water marks or identifiable damage so I really don't fault them
for missing it. I am pleased with the way they treated me when I
called about guaranteeing their work. For those that are
interested the inspection was done by Phil Derosa at Realty
Inspections in Derry, NH. Cost $300.00 broken down as follows:
Structure inspection 150
water analysis 45
insect inspection 45
septic certification 60
Since I don't have anything to compare against don't take this as
a recommendation for Realty Inspections but they did find a
number of other faults that I was glad to know of before buying
the house. I think the 300.00 was worth it and I am happy to
know they standby their inspection guarantee (didn't see any
guarantee in writing thou). One note is that I was not present
during the inspection... I know - bad move, but, it couldn't be
helped.
-JFK-
|
308.41 | Make sure the heating system is ADEQUATE! | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Fri Jan 15 1988 16:25 | 38 |
|
My home inspector didn't check a few things that are going
to cost me MEGABUCKS:
1. The heating system:
Oh yes, he checked it! His comments were (exact quote):
"Boiler is old but operationg O.K. Clean and tune up yearly.
(Firebox liner has) minor cracking. (Heat exchanger) "needs
cleaning. Clean up rust (on flue and damper). Clean up rust
(n pipes). Some are still covered w/asbestous. A couple of
valves appear to be leaking on radiators. Clean up rust
(on oil tank)."
What he DIDN'T tell me is that the Boiler is way UNDER CAPACITY
for the size house. I have rooms that are below freezing!
I have found ice in my tub on many a morning (not cubes, frozen
droplets). Twice my water has frozen while I left it running.
My oil company technician looked at the boiler an all but laughed.
He says it looked like someone just went to Sears (not actually
the brand of the boiler), bought any old boiler, and stuck it in
the system.
Anyway, that is the biggest problem, but I also have to replace
a rotted bathroom floor, and there is some structural rot in the
attic from a previous leak. Again, the inspector did not find
these problems either.
Needless to say I would highly recommend NOT using ASTRA Home
Inspections in Fitchburg.
--Th�r�se
p.s. I am currently in the market for a good sanitarium (especially
one that is free to the impoverished), so if you know of any,
send mail to REGENT::MERSEREAU.
|
308.42 | Home inspection isn't a warranty | DR::BLINN | He's not a real Doctor.. | Fri Jan 15 1988 17:02 | 10 |
| .8> don't you have any type of recourse against the home inspector company?
Not if they correctly advised you of what their service entails.
Most do NOT warrant that the home you are purchasing is suitable
for any purpose. That's between you and the owners.
Some real estate companies offer a "guarantee". Most don't. It's
very much a "buyer beware" marketplace.
Tom
|
308.17 | Stay away from Astra | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Fri Jan 15 1988 17:21 | 13 |
|
My 1890's home was inspected by Astra, and they missed little details
(like the boiler's capacity is insufficient to heat the house,
structural damage in the roof/attic, and a rotted bathroom floor).
I went through the house with two people before purchasing it,
and the inspector did not find anything that we did not find.
I sure didn't pay a home inspector to find out that I should
"clean and tune" the boiler yearly!
-tm
|
308.43 | another opinion | TOOK::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Fri Jan 15 1988 17:22 | 7 |
| Hmmmmmm. I used Astra when I bought my home in Littleton nine
months ago. I thought at the time that the guy did a very good
job. I guess a lot of it depends on the particular inspector.
I forget the name of the guy, but he was the company president
(and maybe their only employee?).
Jim
|
308.18 | | 3D::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Mon Jan 18 1988 08:19 | 6 |
|
I didn't know home inspectors were experts in sizing heating
units ?
-Steve-
|
308.44 | Call 'em, then tell us what they do... | PSTJTT::TABER | Transfixed in Reality's headlights | Mon Jan 18 1988 09:15 | 15 |
| I've used ASTRA twice, and was very satisfied with them. They found a
couple of things that would have surprised me, and I've had no surprises
from things that they looked at.
If they screwed up, call them. They carry insurance against bad calls,
and if they agree that it is their fault, you might get some money out
of them.
If your pipes are freezing when the heat is on, there may be more wrong
than under-sized heating plant. (No insulation in the walls, for
example. Or air leaks.)
In any case, you have nothing to lose and the chance of something to
gain if you give them a call and complain.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
308.45 | I am not going to lie down and take it. | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Mon Jan 18 1988 09:22 | 19 |
|
Re: .8 and .9
There may be a recourse against the home inspection company,
and/or possibly some others (owners or R.E. agent). Not only
did the home inspection company do a lousy job, but the real
estate agent misled me into thinking that the owners never used
the wood stove in the living room (the owners contradicted him
at closing). I am trying to seek legal advice. If anyone knows
of any good lawyers who might be able to handle this king of case,
let me know.
RE: .10
Astra has many home inspectors. I'm sure some are good and some
are not. Nevertheless, they should not employ people to inspect
homes who are not qualified. The person who inspected my home
was Chris McNamara.
|
308.46 | A lawyer will first make the same call, and charge you $50. | PSTJTT::TABER | Transfixed in Reality's headlights | Mon Jan 18 1988 09:34 | 11 |
| > I am trying to seek legal advice. If anyone knows
> of any good lawyers who might be able to handle this king of case,
> let me know.
Save yourself a few bucks and call Astra first. If you talk to them,
they might offer to do something. If your lawyer just drops on them out
of the blue, then you've set an adversarial tone to the relationship that
will certainly hurt you over the long run. Any court will want evidence
that you first tried to settle in good faith, so give it a try.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
308.47 | | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Mon Jan 18 1988 13:33 | 25 |
| Re: .11
> If your pipes are freezing when the heat is on, there may be more wrong
> than under-sized heating plant. (No insulation in the walls, for
> example. Or air leaks.)
The house is 90 years old and never had insulation in the walls,
likewise it does have air leaks. However, that is not the cause
of the of problem. Any idiot ought to take those factors into
account when they put in a heating system. There are plenty of
older homes like mine which have no wall insulation and air leaks,
and still are adequately heated with steam systems.
Even with wall insulation and sealed air leaks, I doubt that the system
would be good enough. Even in 32 degree Farenheit weather, the system
does not have enough pressure for all the vents to operate correctly
(No, it is not the vents, as I have checked them all, and replaced
where necessary). I have had a heating company look at the system, and
they said "It looks like somebody went off to Sears and bougt a boiler,
without even figuring out what they needed". Incidently, I had said in
an earlier note that it wasn't actually a Sears (I thought he was
joking), but I was incorrect. It actually IS a Sears ("Sears Homart").
--Th�r�se
|
308.19 | They should be! | CHART::CBUSKY | | Mon Jan 18 1988 13:39 | 10 |
| Re: I didn't know home inspectors were experts in sizing heating units
WHY NOT? That's seems like a reasonable enough thing for them to do.
They check and recommend amounts of insulation, weather stripping,
types and quality of windows and doors, the condition of the heating
system, suggested maintenance schedules.... why not the capacity?
Aren't these all releated to how well and easily your new home will be
to heat?
Charly
|
308.20 | That's one of the reasons I hired'em | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Mon Jan 18 1988 14:46 | 13 |
|
Re: .18 and .19
I agree with .19, if home inspectors aren't able to thoroughly
check a heating system (and capacity seems pretty important),
than they should state that up front, and tell you that the heating
system should be inspected by someone else. What really gets me
is that they devoted a whole page to the heating system, and
I based my judgement on that. I would have hired someone else
if they had said "we are not qualified to evaluate heating systems".
-tm
|
308.48 | Save your money, lawyers won't help. | CGHUB::FLEURY | Dan Fleury OIS Performance Group | Tue Jan 19 1988 07:59 | 19 |
| Not to burst your bubble, but...
You probably won't get very far. I had a similar problem with Home
Inspections Inc. and got nowhere. The problem centered around the
chimney. The inspector claimed all was fine. Shortly after moving
in I was on the roof (for something?) and noticed a large crack
in the top of the chimney. "That can't be right!" said I. I had
the chimney checked and sure enough... cracked tiles all the way
down. I seems that hte previous owners had a fire in there and
didn't tell me.
I complained to no avail. It turns out that even though I had proof
that the previous owners had known about the fire (extinguisher
residue in the chimney), I would have had to prove that I wasn't
told about the fire for fear of the sale falling through. That
is a bit hard to prove. Basically it comes down to whether the
judge is having a good or bad day. It cost me $3200. for the repairs
which was an expensive lesson to learn.
Dan
|
308.49 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jan 19 1988 08:06 | 6 |
| I'd agree with those who are suggesting that you call the inspection
company yourself first. Talk to "the boss", whoever he is. If
he's running a responsible business he'll want to hear if one of
his people really screwed up. Whether you'll ever get anything out
of this, no matter what you do, is open to debate, but by all means
try the civilized discussion approach first.
|
308.21 | call in the experts | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Tue Jan 19 1988 08:26 | 11 |
| When I had my home inspected I called a local oil company
and asked if they would check out the heating system. I used
the same company that the previous owners were using and explained
that I was in the process of buying the house. They came out and
tested the efficiency, checked it over, and told me how much oil
they had delivered to the house for the past two years. There was
*no* charge for the service, but I told him if I did buy the house
I'd sign up. I can't imagine that a service could charge more than
$50 to look things over.
=Ralph=
|
308.50 | Bad luck with CHIS for Maynard inspection... | PILOU::REZUCHA | | Tue Jan 19 1988 08:32 | 11 |
| On Building Inspectors who 'check' the house before buying...
We used a company called CHIS for our Maynard home and and were completely
ignorant about home buying. We received a detailed report which described
insulation, electrical, etc, but this was of the 'check off' style. What they
didn't find was a hole in the furnace ($2400) and that the outside porch had
termites.
Kind regards,
-Tom Rezucha
|
308.51 | Cornell gets an A + | TOOK::ARN | | Tue Jan 19 1988 13:28 | 14 |
| I had my home inspected by Cornell. The guy that they sent out was
the best. He spent 4 1/2 hours going through the house checking
everything. It was snowing real bad but that didn't stop this guy.
We still spent over an hour on the outside of the house. He told
me though, most people don't bother to go around with him and ask
questions. He said he only spends a couple hours then because he
feels the people don't care they're just doing it because it has
to be done. At the end of the day I ended up with about 20 pages
of notes and have had no surprises since. He even ripped apart the
fuse box and examined every connection. I would recommend them highly
if all of their inspectors are the same.
Satisfied in Nashua
|
308.62 | Inspecting a house finished by owner | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Thu May 12 1988 17:40 | 48 |
| How about an "almost new" house?
We've looked at one house where the owner is a construction worker,
and has done much of the finishing himself. I'm not really sure
where he started - whether he did the any of the framing, or drywall
installation, or has merely done the subsequent finishing. The
house is three years old, but there are still some items unfinished.
The obvious things for us to do are to have a thorough inspection
(we'll probably use Cornell), and to speak to the town's building
inspectors, to see if they have any comments. (It's in Townsend.)
What are the points we might want to examine, to determine whether
either the workmanship was poor or corners were cut?
In about a 45 minute walk through, we've noticed: The windows are
double pane (those we looked at), and all the sliding windows have
storm windows as well; the crank-out kitchen window is double paned
with no storm. Some of the windows have paint on the outside, where no
masking was done; the owner claims he'll clean them up. The kitchen
cabinetry looked very nice, and were plentiful, but the shelves were
particle board with the edges not finished to my taste. One cabinet
door remains to be done. The wall behind the stove seemed to be painted
drywall, whereas I would prefer tile or something else, more durable
and fire retardant. A few electric face plates had yet to be
installed. The vents are in for a whole house attic fan, but the fan
is not yet installed. The owner plans to install an attic stair case,
but hasn't gotten to that yet, so there's no current access to the
attic. I can't tell whether there's any other attic ventilation. The
lally columns in the basement have metal plates at both top and bottom;
I've never seen the plates at the bottom before, so I don't know
whether that says anything about how well the columns were installed.
The best part is that there is a foundation for a garage already, but
the owner ran out of money to finish the garage.
Also, the house has electric heat. The is the second house I've
seen where the finishing was done by the owner and the heat was
electric. I'm starting to believe that carpenters and other
construction workers have a real dislike for plumbers.
Overall, I like the house, and the unfinshed items by themselves don't
bother me, since they're all negotiating points, and I know full well
what schedule delays are like. Also, only two of the unfinished items
are tasks I wouldn't want to do myself (the attic stairs and the
cabinet door). I just want to make sure I'm not missing any signs of
potential trouble.
Gary
|
308.63 | | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I lost my A$$ in the '87 CRASH! | Thu May 12 1988 17:49 | 14 |
| >> the owner ran out of money to finish the garage.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Also, the house has electric heat. The is the second house I've
>> seen where the finishing was done by the owner and the heat was
>> electric. I'm starting to believe that carpenters and other
>> construction workers have a real dislike for plumbers.
Electric heat is economical to install. It's the cost forever
afterward that can be expensive if the house isn't well insulated
and tight. I tend to think it would be more of a lack of funds than
a dislike of plumbers as the reason.
-Jim
|
308.64 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Thu May 19 1988 20:10 | 17 |
| The latest news: the building inspector found the building permits,
but no occupancy permits. Apparently, these people have been living in
the house illegally for the last three years. The building inspector
is firing off a letter, giving the owners seven days to respond. To
complicate matters, the Board of Health can't find the septic system
plans, although the inspector there seems to be quite sure it was
properly inspected. He recalls having been up there several times to
make sure the tank was at least 25 feet from the house (seems excessive
to me). Needless to say, if we do make an offer, it will be contingent
on getting the occupancy permits first.
Hmm. We're now faced with choosing between this newer, cheaper house,
in good condition, and another, slightly older, slightly more expensive
house, in obviously worse condition, but which was probably built more
professionally, and with all the paperwork intact.
Gary
|
308.65 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri May 20 1988 10:13 | 12 |
|
RE: .12
...properly inspected. He recalls having been up there several
times to make sure the tank was at least 25 feet from the house
(seems excessive to me). Needless to say, if we do make an offer,
it will be contingent...
NH Statutes require 35 feet from the house, so your tank at
25 feet is not really excessive.
|
308.66 | How close is close? | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Fri May 20 1988 13:11 | 8 |
| Re .13
35 feet from the house? The septic tanks at the two homes I've
owned in New Hampshire were 12 and 5 feet from the house. Is the
35-foot spec a recent regulation?
pbm
|
308.67 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri May 20 1988 13:39 | 5 |
|
I don't know when it took effect, but I built my house last
year and that was the requirement. I know that the state will
allow waivers to 25 feet, but I've never heard 12 and 5 feet.
What were the ages of the two houses you owned?
|
308.68 | | DSSI4::SHIRRON | Stephen F. Shirron, 223-3198 | Fri May 20 1988 14:16 | 5 |
| My house in Acton, MA is two years old, and the tank is less than
10 feet from the house. The leach field, however, is more than
25 feet away.
stephen
|
308.69 | Close, but no cigar | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Fri May 20 1988 15:39 | 9 |
| re .15
The 5-footer was built in 1972, the 12-footer in 1979. I'm sure
both were legitimate at their respective times, because other homes
in the area have similar distances. The leach fields on both, were,
of course, a considerable distance from the houses.
pbm
|
308.70 | Beyond inspection ... getting it right first | AKOV13::MATUS | Networks Prod Mktg Mgr for GIA | Thu Oct 13 1988 12:51 | 16 |
| We've discussed home inspection many times, but, are there people
who can help with the building process?
I am considering buying some land and building a house on it from
plans. I would probably NOT be the general contractor. But, I
still need help. I don't know how to read perc reports and to judge
the quality of land. I can look at a plan and visualize a house,
but, I can't tell if the heating is adequate or other such things.
Basically, I need the Paul Cornell of house building. (And, yes,
I did leave a message for him to call me.)
Do you know anyone in this business who can consult with me and
make sure that I know the trade-offs of my decisions?
Roger (ALSO POSTED IN REAL ESTATE)
|
308.72 | How to become an Inspector | RUTLND::FEID | Reality is an illusion. . . . . | Thu Oct 13 1988 13:50 | 8 |
| I was wondering how you would become an inspector in the state of
Mass. I heard that you have to be involved in real estate for so
many years. Is this true? If so, for how long?
Thanx
Laura
|
308.73 | It's easy | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Thu Oct 13 1988 15:15 | 2 |
| All you have to do is hang a shingle on your door that says:
Home Inspector.
|
308.71 | You want a "naive owner's agent" | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Thu Oct 13 1988 15:20 | 43 |
| A bunch of different people might do this sort of thing for you:
a general contractor
an architect
a structural engineer
a home inspector
a real estate agent
a real estate lawyer
Some of these people have a conflict of interest, advising you on work that
they hope to wind up performing themselves. Others are professionals that
traditionally charge by the hour and sometimes expend considerable effort on
minutae. And the practical expertise of the people in all of these roles
varies wildly.
It has occurred to me that somebody thoroughly familiar with construction
but not skilled in any particular construction trade could provide a
valuable service as a "naive owner's agent", watching out for the owner's
interests throughout the planning and construction stages of a project,
explaining choices and problems in everyday English, making sure schedules
and finances are realistic.
I don't think it would work, though. Good knowledge of specific architects,
contractors, suppliers, inspectors, unions, etc., and good working
relationships with all of these, would be an important asset of this "agent"
- but all of the above would HATE such a person for meddling in "their
business". The work would be very time-consuming, and probably quite
stressful; yet paying by the hour for detailed explanations and advice is
just the sort of thing the customer is trying to get away from. There would
probably also be liability insurance hassles, and possibly licensing problems.
So I suggest:
1. Read everything you can find about construction, including (but by no means
limited to) this conference. There's just no substitute for knowing what
you want done, how you want it done, and how to express it in the peculiar
language of construction.
2. Find (perhaps through this conference) and hire construction professionals
that you can trust. Part of that trust is trusting them to give you good
advice, to explain all of the assumptions and options, and not to take
advantage of your lack of knowledge. Another part of that trust is being
willing to pay for their time if all you want is information.
|
308.74 | Its that easy. . . | RUTLND::FEID | Reality is an illusion. . . . . | Thu Oct 13 1988 15:54 | 1 |
| Wow!!!!! I hope I picked the right one!!!
|
308.75 | Strictly amateur | AKOV11::GIDDENS | | Thu Oct 13 1988 17:57 | 6 |
| It may be true even in well-regulated(?) New Hampshire. My daughter
paid a home inspector who said he couldn't vouch for the roof since
it had a (light) snow cover, and was not responsible, when later
they discovered the hot water heater wasn't even connected and of
course was broken. The
oven plays on one temp only. No recourse whatsoever.
|
308.76 | | CRAIG::YANKES | | Thu Oct 13 1988 19:36 | 16 |
|
Yeah, the home inspector reports have these little clauses in
them that say basically:
"This is just what we think and might not actually reflect
reality in this or any other forseeable universe so you can't
really hold us to what we say."
Everyone keeps an "out", I guess.
But cynicism aside, I enjoyed walking through the house with
the house inspector before we closed. I learned a lot from him
since he obviousely saw that this was my first house and offered
plenty of suggestions and comments.
-c
|
308.77 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Thu Oct 13 1988 19:50 | 26 |
| By inspector do you mean someone who inspects structures on behalf
of private parties, to give advice on the condition of the structures?
Or do you mean someone who works for a municipality in an official
capacity, and has the authority to issue and sign off on building
permits? Or do you mean something entirely different?
Re: .3
Even very competant inspectors are cautious when it comes to roofs.
They might indicate the current general condition of the roof, and
whether there are any visible signs of leaks, but they won't guarantee
that the roof won't leak the next day. Apparently, roof leaks are
just too unpredictable.
On the other hand, if the inspector didn't point out that a water
heater was disconnected, I'd consider suing. My guess (as a
non-lawyer) would be that you'd have to bring in one or more expert
witnesses, or perhaps formal documentation from the American Society
of Building Inspectors, to show that checking the hot water supply
is an ordinary and routine part of every home inspection. I think
there only defense might be if it were patently obvious to any
non-expert observer that the hot water heater wasn't connected.
Even so, our inspector made it a point to write down some very obvious
points (like missing cabinet doors), and I don't blame him.
Gary
|
308.78 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Oct 14 1988 10:58 | 8 |
| Even after living in (and tearing apart and rebuilding) my house
for over six years, I'm still discovering things about it that I
didn't know. It's unrealistic to expect a house inspector to find
*everything* in a couple of hours. A good one will find most of
the obvious things, but they won't find *everything*, and it's
unrealistic to expect that they will. A house inspector can give
you more information than you might otherwise have about a house,
but don't expect miracles.
|
308.79 | Definition | RUTLND::FEID | Reality is an illusion. . . . . | Fri Oct 14 1988 11:28 | 11 |
| By inspector I mean an individual who we (the buyers) hire to give
information on the condition of a house.
I choose Paul Cornell. He was highly recommended in the Real_Estate
note. I have an appointment with him Monday to inspect a 1788
Colonial that i am thinking of buying. It needs alot of work but
it has LOTS of possibilities.
Wish me luck!
Laura
|
308.80 | Joe Blow, BA, MS, PhD, ASHI?? | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Fri Oct 14 1988 13:24 | 9 |
| Most home inspectors are part of some association whose name I forget.
But I'm sure that it has no official or legal status and the only
real function is to make it look like they're "official" in some
way.
Same as "master" X, where X is anything other than electrician or
plumber (the two remaining trades with a legally-recognized
apprenticeship system). (Hear that Norm?)
|
308.81 | Licensed Home Inspector only if | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Fri Oct 14 1988 14:10 | 3 |
| you have a license
(e.g. a driver's license or a marriage license)
|
308.82 | So, who DO you ask? | UCOUNT::BAILEY | Corporate Sleuth | Fri Oct 14 1988 14:35 | 16 |
| re:-2
My Dad's a Master Craftsman in sheet metal (I guess it's the sheet
metal worker's union, or something similar -- never paid any attention)
and they have an apprenticeship program, too. I'm not sure what
you mean by "legally recognized", but I know the union mandates
what rank you are in closed shops. Just as another example.
Back to the subject at hand, I have a question. If there is no
"certification", how do you find out (assuming we eliminate personal
recommendation, the obvious best source) whether to trust an inspector
or not? Or is it better to hire a general contractor or builder
with a known track record to advise the novice on the condition
of a house?
Sherry
|
308.83 | How to choose an inspector | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Oct 14 1988 17:15 | 18 |
| Short of a recommendation, I know of no way to pick an inspector!
In other cases (selecting an oil co., ect.) you can talk to the
people ahead of time and at least learn a little about how they
conduct their business. But with an inspector, it's a one-shot
deal, and they insist on being paid immediately, so you can't even
wait to figure out if they gave you good advice before paying.
There's definately one way *not* to pick an inspector - don't let
the seller or any seller's agent select or recommend the inspector.
I think you're better off setting your finger down in the phone
book than using someone who knows that he's got to please the
seller or a real estate agent, not you, to get repeat business.
Luck,
Larry
PS - In the case of obviously bad advice, at least you should be able
to get your inspection fee back. Was a complaint issued to the BBB?
|
308.84 | Who says you gotta get just one ? | CSC32::S_LEDOUX | Evolution here I come! | Fri Oct 14 1988 17:40 | 9 |
| Get a plumber to check the plumbing, and a
heating contractor to check the heating, and a
roofer to check the roofing, and a
structural engineer to check the structure, and a
...
I'm sure you get the idea...
Scott.
|
308.85 | State certification licneses are meaningless | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Mon Oct 17 1988 08:50 | 24 |
| The only way to be sure of getting a good inspector is to go
out and find a good inspector. This state certified stuff really
gets me going. When you go out to buy a car, do you need a state
certification saying the car is good? State certification is a
scam designed to limit entry into professions, and to give people
a false sense of security.
I'm a state certified waste water treatment engineer. Eight
years ago I took a two hour exam because I thought I wanted to work
in water pollution control. Every year I pay the state $15 and
they send me a little card saying that I'm state certified. I don't
remember much, but it doesn't matter because I'll never have to
be retested.
Massachusetts certifies lots of different profession: Hair
dressers, engineers, doctors, and there is talk of certifying
acupuncturest. Some certifications require tests, some just require
a license fee, but none that I no of requires periodic testing of
competence. State certification is just a bureaucratic game, assuring
the consumer nothing.
=Ralph=
(by the way in Canada you can't call yourself an engineer unless
you pass the government engineering certification test)
|
308.86 | not always | WMOIS::VAINE | | Mon Oct 17 1988 14:20 | 7 |
| This is not entirely true... My husband is a Master Electrician
in the state of MA and has his Journeyman's licence in NH and has
to show proof of 15 hours schooling on the National Electrical code
every 2(3?) years to renew his licence.
Lynn
|
308.87 | | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue Oct 18 1988 10:04 | 11 |
| I meant that an electrician/plumber is licensed by the state and
the master/journeyman (I'm not sure about apprentice) requirements
are directly called out by the state exam.
Carpenters and sheetmetal workers may have an apprenticeship system
within their unions but it isn't tied into any state-sponsored
licensing program.
However, as someone pointed out, the more things the state licenses
the less likely those licenses mean anything.
|
308.88 | Excellent Home Inspector | RUTLND::FEID | Reality is an illusion. . . . . | Tue Oct 18 1988 10:34 | 12 |
| In case any one is interested in a really good home inspector, Paul
Cornell Associates is an excellent one. It is a family business
They sent out John Cornell to inspect our future (I hope) house.
He was very friendly and professional. We walked around with John
and he showed us alot of things we could fix, what we couldnt fix
without outside help, how to fix things, ect. He spent 4 hours
with us, 2 hours just in the basement, and gave us an 8 page desciption
of what the house needed. I was very impressed with the whole
inspection. I highly recommend him.
Laura
|
308.89 | | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Tue Oct 18 1988 12:38 | 2 |
| Thanks for the recommendation. You might want to put it in 2012 so
people looking for home inspectors will find it.
|
308.90 | State Certification is corrupt | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Oct 18 1988 14:40 | 15 |
|
re .14
I'm not sure about MA or NH (haven't lived here long enough) but
in NY its a tightly closed club to be an Electrician. This guy I
knew tried for several years to get his electricians liscence in
NY and was turned down each year. Then he moves to MA and his first
year he gets his liscence. In the past 10 years in the Syracuse
NY area only 5 electricians liscences have been issued. The people
on the board are all electrical contractors, and they don't want
any new compitition. I'm not saying they don't their job, I'm sure
they do. But there are other people who know what their doing and
they can't because the contractors don't want the compitition.
Mike
|
308.91 | Buying house - inspections all at once, or separate? | MPGS::TOLLES | | Mon Aug 07 1989 15:18 | 16 |
| I'm so confused about all these different types of inspections, even
though I've read alot of them.
We (my husband and I) have made an offer on a house that has private
sewer and well. I know I need to get the house inspected, and I also
want the sewer and well done as well. Can/should I have all these
inspections done on the same day, or can I have the house done on
a Monday, and the well/sewer done a few days later (provided the house
inspection is ok with me?). I have two days from the home inspection
to cancel the deal. If this part flunks, why should I have the well
and sewer done, right? Should I have one company do all of these
tests, but cancel the well/sewer if the home has problems?
Sign me, confused
Thanks for your help!
debbie
|
308.92 | Do the inspections - may cancel if needed | FRAGIL::MCBRIDE | | Mon Aug 07 1989 16:27 | 18 |
| We had our house inspected in shifts. The house was done on a Friday
including a pest inspection at the same time arranged by the inspection
agency. We had the furnace inspected afterwards on a recommendation
by the home inspector. All we had to do was make a decision within
72 hours of all of the inspection work. I do not believe you need
one inspector to do all of the things you are looking for as there
are specialists for different things like pest, furnace, structure
etc. Your home inspector may offer a menu of services but do not
be surprised if several people take part. We had the option of
Radon, primary structure, plumbing, lead paint, asbestos, water
tests, etc. all at additional costs depending upon the test. You
should heave the well and sewer inspected, you do not have to have
it done at the same time, you should be able to cancel the latter
if you are not satisfied prior to that point.
Good Luck,
Brian
|
308.93 | Inspectors come in several flavors | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Mon Aug 07 1989 16:30 | 47 |
| Part of your confusion about inspectors, if you've tried to read about
them in HOME_WORK, is that there are two very different types of
inspectors.
One type is a paid local (typically town) official who inspects
construction projects in progress to ensure conformance with applicable
building codes. The inspectors that get involved with a typical
residential project include the building inspector, wiring inspector,
plumbing inspector, and gas inspector. The decisions these people make
carry the force of law, and a wrong decision either way can incur a
fair amount of liability for the town.
The other type of inspector - the type you're interested in - is a
private individual who makes his or her living by looking over houses
that are being sold. As discussed elsewhere in this conference, the
quality of the services they sell varies as much as the people do.
They're not licensed or regulated, they're occasionally in cahoots with
realtors or sellers, and they carefully disclaim all liability for the
accuracy of their reports. Some of them are excellent and well worth
the money they charge - the trick is to find one of those, probably via
word-of-mouth, possibly via HOME_WORK. Their decisions don't carry the
force of law, but your purchase-and-sale agreement probably gives some
contractural importance to them.
On to your main question: house inspection vs. well/sewer (did you
mean septic tank?) inspection. I don't know anything about specialized
septic/well inspections - the overall house inspector did mine (but I
had town water and a septic tank). Perhaps the town health inspector
in involved for some reason? The one specialty I know of is termite
inspection, which is performed by a licensed exterminator.
It's unlikely that the house will "flunk" the inspection, unless the
structure is in imminent danger of collapsing. Most likely, the
inspector won't find anything substantial. If the inspector does find
flaws in major mechanical systems, you're more likely to use that fact
to demand repairs, to adjust the price, or to organize escrow money for
repairs rather than to call the deal off. The condition of the water
systems is certainly part of this picture, so I would urge you to have
the second inspection done anyway even if the first one is unfavorable.
As to whether multiple inspectors should work on the same day or at the
same time: whatever suits your schedule (and theirs). You want to be
able to walk around with the inspectors and take notes - they'll say
they'll send you a report with everything in it, but take notes anyway
(you'll get more details that matter to you), so keep that in mind when
scheduling their visits. It might be fun to have their visits overlap,
especially if they disagree about something!
|
308.94 | Spend the money and be safe | PMROAD::CALDERA | | Mon Aug 07 1989 16:33 | 13 |
| I would have every thing inspected the same day. If you have the
house inspected and then have the sewer and well inspected a couple
days later and the well/sewer fails you may not be able to get out
of the deal (I don't know how the wording in the P&S goes), look
at the cost of the house, now look at the cost of having the well
and sewer inspected. So lets say the house fails how much have you
waisted by having the well and sewer inspected. I would say it
is a small price to pay just to be sure before you are forced into
a deal you don't want or at least, the loss of your deposit.
Good luck,
Paul
|
308.95 | Its up to you | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Mon Aug 07 1989 16:44 | 13 |
|
I did it all the same day, so it may cost you an extra
$200 in inspection costs if there's a major problem, but its
a lot easier to do it all at once.
I had one inspector check the house from top to bottom,
and also do the certified pest inspection, UFFI, lead paint, and radon test
(results in 72 hours), and I had a septic contractor pump
out the tank and check everything (found a broken inlet to
be fixed by owner prior to closing at his cost).
We have town water so that was not needed.
|
308.96 | | FRAGIL::MCBRIDE | | Mon Aug 07 1989 16:46 | 9 |
| One more note. A home inspector (the kind you pay not bribe ;^))
is liable for their work. A major structural flaw missed or major
system problem missed is a potential suit against the inspector.
If you incur major repairs that would have influenced you decision
to buy the house, the inspector is on the hook to pay for it. I
second the notion that you should choose an inspector wisely. Get
your own and do not let the realtors arrange this for you.
Brian
|
308.97 | Same day service | MED::D_SMITH | | Tue Aug 08 1989 09:11 | 40 |
| We had our inspections on the same day, all completed within approx
2.5 hours.
Building/pest. inspection was started at noon and took 1.5 hours.
He inspected wiring/fuse box, water pipes/heater, attic, FHA/AC, exterior
trims/molding, roof/chimney, pests and walked the perimeters of the property
for wet spots caused by septic, water runnoff, leaky water main.
Meanwhile making recommendation as he felt needed attention (paint,
shutter replace, trim back bushes, ect.).
Findings; Attic venting needed, new roof, leaky water main, reversed
polarity on pool pump (zzzzzzz), 20 amp fuses looking for 15's.
No wood boaring bugs...greate.
At 1:00, Lakeside sewer came to pump the system (at owners expence)
and performed an inspection of the system (at our cost). 1 hour
total.
Findings; System has been rescently updated with new tank and extended
fields and should last another 18 years provided a once a year pump.
Come to find out, the inspector and sewer guy knew each other and
where both very helpful and thorough (I feal I got a better than
average report between the paid for facts, and the friendly bull
between old friends).
All in all, I felt more reassured knowing all there was to know
about this house. No surprises (except water heater went 30 days
later-oh well).
Apon the offer, we stated "upon inspection and aproval of house and
septic within ??? days of offer".
Inspections from pros are worth it. Multiple inspections in one
day gets it over with. You can decide quicker, negotiate findings
with the owner, and get on with life, or start your second job,
whatever you decide to do with your results.
Good luck.. Dave'
|
308.98 | subtle wording | CASPRO::DUNN | | Thu Aug 10 1989 15:28 | 19 |
|
A point shared with us by a lawyer-friend.
Agreements often say 'upon inspection by...' and typically have a
dollar limit of repairs, above which the buyer can call off the deal
without retribution.
But, you should get it to say "buyers' approval of inspection by...."
the first way, there is a monetary cut off point which is somewhat
arbitrary (there are many ways to fix things). You may be really
unhappy about something, but if it's not above that dollar amount, you
can't get out with your deposit.
The second way, you have to approve of the results of the inspection.
If they found something that really bothered you, regardless of the
amount necessary to fix it, you can still back out.
|
308.99 | It depends which side of the deal you're on! | CSMET2::CHACE | I'm the NRA | Fri Aug 11 1989 11:42 | 8 |
|
Re .7
You're absolutely right -- EXCEPT that a smart seller shouldn't
agree to something so arbitrary. (I wouldn't - of course it depends
upon how desperate the seller is!) ;^)
Kenny
|
308.110 | Where to go for appraisal? | SMAUG::ZOLFONOON | | Mon Jun 24 1991 11:10 | 7 |
| I need to figure out the market value of our condo in Nashua.
Could anyone recommend a reasonable place that could do the appraisal?
The only place I've found so far is "Property Financial Services" in
Manchester. They charge $225.00. Is this considered to be a good price?
Riaz
|
308.111 | | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Mon Jun 24 1991 11:20 | 7 |
| Have you tried calling a few local realtors and getting them to do a
"Free Market Analysis"? This isn't a "real" appraisal but it can give
you a rough idea of the market value. When I checked into the price
of an actual appraisal about a year back I was given a figure of $300-
400. If you go the "paid" route, be sure the appraisal firm has been
certified by one of the real estate appraiser associations; anyone can
call themself an appraiser.
|
308.112 | | EVMS::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Jun 24 1991 15:59 | 11 |
| We've made a conscious decision here to stay away from as many aspects of real
estate sales as possible. The real_estate keyword has listings of a few notes,
but they are mostly about how to fix your house for best resale or things like
that. This file is big enough without pulling in all of the real estate issues.
Besides, there's a file devoted specifically to that - I believe it's currently
at TALLIS::REAL_ESTATE. I'm sure someone will correct me if that's wrong.
Sorry, I've locked this note.
Paul
[Moderator]
|
308.22 | Advise for a Rookie Home Buyer... | OAW::MILLER | James' & Joy's Daddy...� | Mon Apr 27 1992 19:28 | 16 |
| I need some advise. I am presently looking at a 3 bedroom, 1 bath
house that has been vacant for 10 years (+/- 1 year). What should I
look for in the first pass, and what are the glaring signs of major
repairs???
I am a rookie (read: first time home buyer with not much cash) in this
adventure and I want a fixer-upper, but don't want to get burned.
This file has been a wealth of advise for all kinds of home owners and
I hope to gain from this... *8�)...*8�)...*8�)...
Thanks in advance for this advise and you can post it here or send mail
to OAW::MILLER
Patrick Long_Live_`66_Mustangs!!!
|
308.23 | Water damage | LANDO::OBRIEN | Give it a TRI | Tue May 12 1992 09:27 | 10 |
| I'm sort of new to this too,.. but the first thing I'd look for is
water damage due to broken pipes. Since it was vacant for 10 years,
they may not have wanted to run heat in the winter and possibly
may not have drained the pipes and hence the pipes froze,
broke,...etc.
Good luck.
regds,
-John
|
308.24 | ymmv | VMSSG::NICHOLS | it ain't easy; being green | Thu Jun 25 1992 13:00 | 3 |
| the first thing i'd do is hire a professional home inspector.
herb
|
308.113 | Property Consultants | HARDY::OLIVEIRA | | Mon Aug 31 1992 11:16 | 5 |
| I have heard alot of positive feedback from a Company in Chelmsford
called Property Consultants.... I think their fee is reasonable and
have heard that they do work for DCU.
Nancy
|
308.100 | Home Inspection Service | STOWOA::FETTIG | | Tue Jan 17 1995 10:32 | 19 |
|
Maybe this note should be in 2016 but it looks like the good info is
buried and not being used.
My son and I are planning on starting an home inspection service. What we
would like to find out from recent home buyer (last 5 years). What was your
expectations? Where they meet? What you liked? What didn't you like?
How do you find your HI. Also if you could share with us a copy of the
inspection form used. Names and address can be crossed out. Mail it to me
at OGO1-B/A05.
If you were a seller feel free to add to the note.
thanks
walt
|
308.101 | | IMTDEV::BRUNO | | Tue Jan 17 1995 11:40 | 20 |
| RE: <<< Note 5494.0 by STOWOA::FETTIG >>>
The main thing I did not like was the inspector trying to sell his
services to the owner of the house I was buying WHILE he was there
working for me. It made me wonder if he was might be going easy on
some potential issues.
Fortunately, I have enoungh knowledge of most of the issues that I
felt confident about most of what the inspector said. I still think
it is a bad business practice. It is kind of like your lawyer flirting
with your soon-to-be-ex-spouse during a divorce trial.
I liked being able to follow the inspector with my tape recorder to
watch and record each point of inspection. I liked the way the
inspector explained each issue. I liked the fact that he had a pre-
written list of items to inspect (so that nothing was forgotten).
I liked the professional-looking report that the inspector presented
at the end.
Greg
|
308.102 | Convenience | NEMAIL::SCORZELLI | | Tue Jan 17 1995 12:50 | 13 |
|
What sold me was the the fact that when I placed the initial
call to the inspector that I ended up hiring...He answered the
telephone and was able to schedule the inspection right then.
He was on a roof, inspecting someone elses home when he answered
my call from his flip-phone.... no waiting around for call backs
and schedule checks.
Prices were good... and the realtor recommended him.
Good Luck,
Darlene
|
308.103 | Some don'ts and do's | JOKUR::FALKOF | | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:41 | 29 |
| I would not use a HI that the broker recommended. Since the broker
represents the seller, anyone the broker recommends, IMO, is also
representing the seller. I asked friends and the local building
inspector (who was hesitant about recommending anyone).
What I did not like about my last one was that he found faulty
items that he commented on verbally but did not include in the
written report. When I found items he overlooked or did not see,
he said, "So?" Those items, he obviously had seen them, also did
not show in the rport. And when the pest inspector arrived and found
a problem, the HI said, "Since you were not asking me to do a pest
inspection, I did not mention that when I saw it." Also, his written
report arrived 9 days later than he said it would, really pressing me
to the wall because of the terms of the Offer to Purchase that limited
the amount of time I had to negotiate based on the inspector's report.
The message I would bring to an aspiring HI is to work from your
checklist, record everything found right then and there (whether it is
in your specific performance contract), be prompt in following up with
any promises or obligations. Professional attitude (read that as
confident and knowing) would encourage me.
That inspector I used got a lot of bad press from me for several years.
There is a HI registry or licensing board (voluntary, I think) that is
headquartered in Massachusetts, so you may want to consider checking
out that professional affiliation or accreditation.
Good luck!
|
308.104 | my .02 | NETCAD::FLOWERS | Hub Engineering - Dan | Tue Jan 17 1995 23:40 | 8 |
| one of things I liked about my HI was that during the inspection he was
handing me photocopies that went into greater detail about the problems
he was pointing out. Some of the photocopies were do-it-yourself tips
on how to solve/fix the problem yourself. He also encuoraged me to call
him anytime if I had a question about trying to fix something (never took him
up on it though...)
Dan
|
308.105 | Home inspector recommendations | NPSS::GILES | | Fri Sep 01 1995 12:11 | 18 |
| I am in the process of buying a house, and I turned to
this conference to try to find a good home inspector -
unfortunately all the recommendations I could find were
old. I'd therefore like to start this note for new
up-to-date recommendations for home inspectors and
I'd like to start it off by making my own recommendation:
Maida Services Inc. seemed to give me a very good and
thorough inspection with a good detailed report. They
found several things that I wouldn't have thought to look
for and the inspector gave the impression of being very
knowledgeable. They're based in Plaistow NH but they
will inspect properties in MA too. Their number is
(603)382-3839.
If anything comes up that they didn't find then I'll be sure
to post it here...
Lezz Giles
|
308.106 | Check out the TALLIS::REAL_ESTATE notes conference | ROCK::MUELLER | | Fri Sep 01 1995 12:17 | 8 |
| There are tons of home inspector references in:
TALLIS::REAL_ESTATE
I used Paul Cornell. He comes very highly recommended from me and others. His
number is in the Real_estate conference. Just do a search on "inspect".
-Rob
|
308.107 | Already exists. | EVMS::MORONEY | DANGER Do Not Walk on Ceiling | Fri Sep 01 1995 12:43 | 4 |
| >I'd therefore like to start this note for new
>up-to-date recommendations for home inspectors
See note 2016.
|
308.108 | Paul Cornell is AWESOME inspector | STRATA::FISHER | | Mon Sep 18 1995 13:06 | 13 |
|
Hello,
I had the 3 family house inspected by Paul Cornell. What a dynamite he
is! He is very thorough and had saved alot of bucks on negotiating. I
am very grateful to have him. If you happen to have him, mention my
name to him. If he does not remember since he has thousands of clients
to deal with, tell him remember the Deaf guy. Bingo!
Regards,
Dave
|
308.109 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, Objectbroker | Mon Sep 18 1995 13:20 | 7 |
| Paul is good, but the inspection he did for me 3-4 years ago
he missed several things which I didn't find til much later
(ie. after I aleady purchased the house) like some dry-rot,
structural problems, and an electrical problem.
Bottom line is that one should not depend solely on the
home inspector to find problems.
|
308.114 | Maida Services, Plaistow, NH.. Great work.. | 3744::SUTER | and now for something you'll really like! | Mon Aug 05 1996 11:52 | 19 |
|
Two *BIG* thumbs up for Maida Services, Inc of
Plaistow, NH. 603-382-3839. Mike Wilhelm showed up early
on the appointed day and I must admit I wondered about this
at first as I expected the owner Paul Maida.
Any reservations on my part quickly disappeared as
Mike began his work. THIS GUY WAS THOROUGH!!!! He left no
stone unturned (in the dirt floor basement), no crannies
were left unseen. One example of his prowess was he spotted
the remains of some oil tank lines barely visible in the wall
downstairs, (behine the current oil tank, no less) Sure enough
there was a UST on the neighbor's property which used to be
plumbed to the house being inspected.
Fee was $190.00
Rick
|
308.115 | Are they affiliated with Andover? | NEMAIL::BRENNA | | Tue Aug 13 1996 14:58 | 2 |
| Are they affiliated with Maida in Andover? I was going to make an
appointment with Paul, the owner - same fee.
|
308.116 | More than likely... | 3744::SUTER | and now for something you'll really like! | Tue Aug 13 1996 15:08 | 10 |
| > <<< Note 308.115 by NEMAIL::BRENNA >>>
> -< Are they affiliated with Andover? >-
>
> Are they affiliated with Maida in Andover? I was going to make an
> appointment with Paul, the owner - same fee.
Not really sure as the only address I have for Maida is Plaistow, NH,
but since the name is the same (Paul Maida) I'd suspect it's the same company.
Rick
|